Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Limit operators techniques on general metric measure spaces of bounded geometry

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In bounded-geometry metric spaces, Fredholmness of a band-dominated operator is equivalent to invertibility of all its limit operators.

desk verdict A sound axiomatic unification of limit operator theory, but the title's 'general bounded geometry' scope outruns Assumption 4.3's transitive-isometry requirement. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01985 v2 pith:Z56FYXSV submitted 2019-08-06 math.FA

Raffael Hagger , Christian Seifert This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FA MSC 47A5347B0747B3547B3847L10
keywords metricmeasurespacesboundedgeometrylimitoperatorsband-dominatedFredholmessentialspectrumpropertyAmaximalcompactification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the limit-operator method—long used case-by-case for operators on $\mathbb{Z}^n$, Fock spaces, Bergman spaces, and discrete groups—is one general theorem about $L^p(X,\mu)$ over a metric measure space. The target statement is: a band-dominated operator on a closed subspace $M^p\subseteq L^p(X,\mu)$ is Fredholm exactly when every limit operator at the boundary $\Gamma X$ of the maximal compactification $\beta X$ is invertible, and compact exactly when every limit operator is zero. If this is right, the essential spectrum of such an operator is simply the union of the spectra of its boundary limit operators. The authors isolate the structural assumptions—bounded geometry together with a localization property they call property $A'$, a band-dominated projection onto the subspace, and isometric shifts compatible with the measure—under which all three statements hold uniformly across the known applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the limit operator $A_x=\operatorname*{w-lim}_{\iota} U_{x_\iota}^p AP(U_{x_\iota}^p)^{-1}$ restricted to $\operatorname{ran}(P_x)$, where $U_x^p$ is the isometric shift induced by a bijective isometry $\varphi_x$ and $x_\iota\to x\in\Gamma X=\beta X\setminus X$. The load-bearing mechanism is the family of localized lower norms $\nu_t(\hat A_x|F)$ together with the compactness argument of Proposition 4.37, which shows that the infimum of $\nu(\hat A_x)$ over the boundary is attained; this upgrades 'all limit operators invertible' to the uniform bound required for Fredholmness. Supporting this, property $A'$ supplies a partition of unity whose members have uniformly bounded supports and small variation, and commutator estimates with the corresponding multiplication operators characterize exactly which operators are band-dominated (Proposition 3.5).

What would settle it

Find a proper metric space of bounded geometry satisfying property $A'$ whose isometry group is not transitive—for example, a bounded-geometry graph made of two isometric rays joined by a single bridge vertex of different degree, or a manifold with a conical singularity. Construct a band-dominated operator on $L^p$ of that space, with shifts taken along the rays, whose boundary limit operators are all invertible while the operator itself is not Fredholm. Such an example would show Assumption 4.3 is genuinely load-bearing; proving the theorem for the non-homogeneous space would show it can be dropped.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is Theorem 4.38: for $A\in\mathcal{A}_p$, the algebra of band-dominated operators on $M^p$, the conditions (a) $A$ is Fredholm, (b) every limit operator $A_x$ is invertible with $\sup_{x\in\Gamma X}\|A_x^{-1}\|<\infty$, (c) every $A_x$ is invertible, and (d) every extended limit operator $\hat A_x=A_xP_x+Q_x$ is invertible, are equivalent. The proof first shows that compact operators have trivial limit operators, then uses localized lower norms to prove that the boundary infimum of $\nu(\hat A_x)$ is attained; attainment converts pointwise invertibility into the uniform invertibility needed to construct Fredholm regularizers. Two direct corollaries follow: compactness is equivalent to triviality of all limit operators (Corollary 4.24), and the essential spectrum is $\sigma_{\mathrm{ess}}(A)=\bigcup_{x\in\Gamma X}\sigma(A_x)$ (Corollary 4.39).

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on Assumption 4.3: the metric space must admit, from a fixed base point $x_0$, a bijective isometry $\varphi_x$ sending $x_0$ to each point $x$, together with a compatible Radon-measure weight $h_x$ and continuous dependence of $\varphi_x$ and $h_x$ on $x$, so that the localized conjugated projections extend continuously to the boundary $\Gamma X=\beta X\setminus X$. Without this homogeneity, the shifted operators $U_x^p$ that define limit operators are not available.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compactness is characterized by triviality at infinity: $K\in\mathcal{A}_p$ is compact if and only if $K_x=0$ for every boundary point $x\in\Gamma X$ (Corollary 4.24).
  • Fredholmness needs no separate uniform invertibility condition: as soon as every limit operator $A_x$ is invertible, the norms of $A_x^{-1}$ are automatically bounded (Theorem 4.38).
  • The essential spectrum of any band-dominated operator is the union of the spectra of its limit operators, $\sigma_{\mathrm{ess}}(A)=\bigcup_{x\in\Gamma X}\sigma(A_x)$ (Corollary 4.39).
  • The characterization passes automatically to any compactification of $X$ on which the boundary limits exist, because the resulting limit operators coincide with those from the maximal compactification (Proposition 5.1).
  • The classical Fredholm criteria for $\ell^p(\mathbb{Z}^n)$, Fock-space and Bergman-space Toeplitz operators, and operators on discrete groups all appear as special cases; the framework also covers Fock–Sobolev and pluriharmonic Bergman spaces (Section 6).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could try replacing the exact isometries $\varphi_x$ in Assumption 4.3 by coarse equivalences or almost-isometries; the localized-norm machinery would likely survive, which would extend the theorem to bounded-geometry spaces with local defects or non-transitive isometry groups.
  • For $p=2$, the same Fredholm criterion is usually approached through $C^*$-algebras; this paper's template suggests the criterion should hold for any homogeneous bounded-geometry space once the projection is band-dominated, including weighted Fock-type spaces with non-Gaussian weights.
  • Because the boundary $\Gamma X$ is compact, the essential-spectrum formula suggests a practical discretization: sample finitely many boundary points and compute spectra of the corresponding limit operators to approximate $\sigma_{\mathrm{ess}}$; the attained-infimum argument indicates where the sampling error concentrates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an abstract limit-operator framework for band-dominated operators on closed subspaces of L_p(X,µ), where X is a proper metric space of bounded geometry satisfying an additional property A'. The central machinery is introduced in Section 4: Assumption 4.3 postulates a family of bijective isometries φ_x with φ_x(x0)=x, compatible Radon–Nikodym derivatives h_x, and continuity of the localized conjugates; limit operators are then defined over the Stone–Čech boundary ΓX. The main results are the compactness characterization (Corollary 4.24), the Fredholm characterization (Theorem 4.38), and the essential-spectrum formula (Corollary 4.39). Section 5 extends the results to other compactifications, and Section 6 applies the framework to ℓ_p(Z^n), ℓ_p(N^n), discrete groups, Fock spaces, Fock-Sobolev spaces, Bergman spaces, pluriharmonic Bergman spaces, and vector-valued spaces.

Significance. If the main results hold, they unify a substantial body of limit-operator theory ranging from classical ℓ_p(Z^n) results to recent Fock and Bergman space applications, and they add new applications (Fock-Sobolev and pluriharmonic Bergman spaces). The proofs in Sections 3–5 are detailed and I did not detect circularity or parameter-fitting in the central derivation. The lower-norm minimization argument in Proposition 4.37 and the equivalence of pointwise invertibility with Fredholmness in Theorem 4.38 are nontrivial and are the paper's main technical contribution. The paper also contains several useful algebraic results for band-dominated operators on metric measure spaces, such as inverse closedness and compactness criteria.

major comments (2)
  1. [Assumption 4.3, Definition 4.10, Theorem 4.38] The framework requires, for every x∈X, a bijective isometry φ_x with φ_x(x0)=x, together with compatible measure weights and continuity conditions. This forces the isometry group of X to act transitively on X. Many proper metric spaces of bounded geometry satisfying property A' are not homogeneous; for example, the infinite biregular tree T_{2,3} has vertices of two different degrees, so no isometry can map a degree-2 vertex to a degree-3 vertex, and no family φ_x exists. Consequently, Definition 4.10 and Theorem 4.38 do not apply to such spaces. The title and the abstract's phrase 'general metric measure spaces of bounded geometry' therefore overstate the scope: the results are proved only for spaces admitting a transitive, measure-compatible, continuous shift family. This is a genuine limitation of the central claim, not an internal inconsistency in the proof. Please revise the title/abstract and explicitly state this restriction, or extend the theory to non-homogeneous spaces.
  2. [Section 6, Fock-Sobolev and pluriharmonic Bergman subsections] The verification of Assumption 4.3 in the new applications is incomplete at load-bearing points. For Fock-Sobolev spaces, the compactness of M1K P and P M1K is asserted with 'one can easily show' and a Hille–Tamarkin reference, and the continuity of x↦M1K U_x^p P (U_x^p)^{-1} M1K' is established only through compressed kernel estimates. For pluriharmonic Bergman spaces, the corresponding claims are deferred to '[14]' and 'as above'. Since these applications are advertised as new contributions, please provide complete arguments or precise statements of cited results that cover the present setting.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 4.5] The displayed statement repeats f in both distance terms; the second occurrence should be g.
  2. [Proposition 2.5] The proof is a single sentence citing a construction in [18]. Given the role of property A' in Lemma 3.3 and Proposition 3.5, please expand the argument or give a precise reference to the construction.
  3. [Definition 4.10 and Theorem 4.38] It would help to state explicitly that each limit operator A_x acts on ran(P_x), which may depend on x, when discussing invertibility and spectra.
  4. [General] There are minor typographical issues, for example 'space s' on the title line of the manuscript; please proofread the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No substantive circularity: the main limit-operator theorem is derived from explicit assumptions; self-citations occur only in applications and supplementary facts.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained relative to Assumptions 4.1-4.3. Limit operators are defined via the shift family U_x^p, and Theorem 4.38 is obtained from Theorem 4.28 (sufficiency of invertibility), Theorem 4.29 (necessity), and Proposition 4.37 (uniform boundedness of inverses), none of which assumes the conclusion. Compactness is characterized in Corollary 4.24 via Theorem 4.23, and the spectral corollary follows algebraically. The only self-citations appear in applications (e.g., recovering [14, Theorem 28] and [19, Theorem B]) and in Proposition 2.5, where the authors cite their own [18] for a partition-of-unity construction; this is not load-bearing for Theorem 4.38 because finite asymptotic dimension implies property A by external references ([4,39]) and Theorem 2.4 gives equivalence with property A'. The paper's actual weakness is one of scope, not circularity: Assumption 4.3 postulates bijective isometries φ_x mapping a fixed base point to every x, which forces a transitive isometry action and excludes many bounded-geometry spaces (e.g., a biregular tree with vertices of different degrees). That limits the claimed generality but does not make any derivation reduce to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the three explicit assumptions (4.1, 4.2, 4.3) and on standard background results in metric geometry and operator theory. No free parameters or fitted values are present. The most fragile ingredient is Assumption 4.3, which imposes a high degree of symmetry on the space.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption X is a proper metric space of bounded geometry satisfying property A'
    Assumption 4.1; provides the partition of unity and local finiteness used throughout Sections 3 to 5.
  • domain assumption M_p is a closed subspace with bounded projection P ∈ BDO_p and M_1K P, P M_1K compact for all compact K
    Assumption 4.2; ensures limit operators are well-behaved and compact operators vanish at infinity.
  • domain assumption For every x ∈ X there is a bijective isometry φ_x with φ_x(x0)=x, with compatible measure transformation h_x and continuity
    Assumption 4.3; defines the shifts U_x^p and is the most restrictive geometric condition, implying a transitive isometry group.
  • standard math Property A and property A' are equivalent for proper metric spaces of bounded geometry
    Theorem 2.4, proven using [39, Theorem 1.2.4] and [39, Lemma 5.2.4].
  • standard math Stone-Čech compactification βX exists and has the universal property
    Used throughout Section 4 to define the boundary ΓX and to take limits of shifted operators over nets.
invented entities (1)
  • Property A'
    purpose: A sufficient geometric condition (a partition of unity with controlled supports and variation) for the commutator estimates that drive the limit operator theory
    Introduced in Definition 2.3 as a named hypothesis. It is not a physical entity, and it is equivalent to property A in this setting, so it has independent support from prior literature, but as a named assumption it is specific to this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Limit operators techniques on general metric measure spaces of bounded geometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z56FYXSV

@misc{pith2026190801985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Limit operators techniques on general metric measure spaces of bounded geometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z56FYXSV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01985}
}
abstract

We study band-dominated operators on (subspaces of) $L_p$-spaces over metric measure spaces of bounded geometry satisfying an additional property. We single out core assumptions to obtain, in an abstract setting, definitions of limit operators, characterizations of compactness and Fredholmness using limit operators; and thus also spectral consequences. In this way, we recover and unify the classical and recent results on limit operator techniques, but also gain new insights and are able to treat further applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Fulsche, R

    R. Fulsche, R. Hagger, Fredholmness of Toeplitz operators on the Fock space. Complex Anal. Op. Theory 13(2), 375–403 (2019). 32

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Arcozzi, R

    N. Arcozzi, R. Rochberg, E. Sawyer, Carleson measures and interpolating sequences for Besov sp aces on complex balls . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 182 (859), vi + 163 pp. (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Beckus, D

    S. Beckus, D. Lenz, M. Lindner, C. Seifert, On the spectrum of operator families on discrete groups over minimal dynamical systems . Math. Z. 287, 993–1007 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Beckus, D

    S. Beckus, D. Lenz, M. Lindner, C. Seifert, Note on spectra of non-selfadjoint operators over dynamica l systems. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 61(2), 371–386 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    G. Bell, A. Dranishnikov, Asymptotic Dimension . Topology and its Applications 155 (12), 1265–1296 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Buck, Bounded Continuous Functions on a Locally Compact Space

    R.C. Buck, Bounded Continuous Functions on a Locally Compact Space . Michigan Math. J. 5, 95–104 (1958)

    work page 1958

  7. [6]

    Carvalho, V

    C. Carvalho, V. Nistor, Y. Qiao, Fredholm criteria for pseudodifferential operators and ind uced repre- sentations of groupoid algebras . Electronic Research Announcements 24, 68–77 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [7]

    Carvalho, V

    C. Carvalho, V. Nistor, Y. Qiao, Fredholm Conditions on Non-Compact Manifolds: Theory and E x- amples. In: C. Andr´ e, M. Bastos, A. Karlovich, B. Silbermann, I. Zaballa ( eds.), Operator Theory, Operator Algebras, and Matrix Theory. Operator Theory: Advan ces and Applications 267, Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Chandler-Wilde, M

    S.N. Chandler-Wilde, M. Lindner, Limit Operators, Collective Compactness, and the Spectral Theory of Infinite Matrices . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc 210(989), 2011

    2011

  2. [9]

    H.R. Cho, K. Zhu, Fock-Sobolev spaces and their Carleson measures . J. Funct. Anal. 263, 2483–2506 (2012)

    2012

  3. [10]

    Cohn, Measure Theory: Second Edition

    D.L. Cohn, Measure Theory: Second Edition . Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    Engliˇ s, Compact Toeplitz Operators via the Berezin Transform on Bou nded Symmetric Domains

    M. Engliˇ s, Compact Toeplitz Operators via the Berezin Transform on Bou nded Symmetric Domains . Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 33(4), 426–455 (1999)

    1999

  5. [12]

    Faraut, A

    J. Faraut, A. Koranyi, Function spaces and reproducing kernels on bounded symmetr ic domains . J. Funct. Anal 88, 64-89 (1990)

    1990

  6. [13]

    Favard, Sur les ´ equations dif´ erentielles ` a coeffcients presque p´ eriodiques

    J.A. Favard, Sur les ´ equations dif´ erentielles ` a coeffcients presque p´ eriodiques. Acta Math. 51, 31–81 (1927)

    1927

  7. [15]

    Georgescu, On the structure of the essential spectrum of elliptic opera tors on metric spaces

    V. Georgescu, On the structure of the essential spectrum of elliptic opera tors on metric spaces . J. Funct. Anal. 260, 1734–1765 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Georgescu, On the essential spectrum of elliptic differential operator s

    V. Georgescu, On the essential spectrum of elliptic differential operator s. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 468(2), 839–864 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Hagger, M

    R. Hagger, M. Lindner, M. Seidel, Essential pseudospectra and essential norms of band-domin ated operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 437(1), 255–291 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Hagger, The essential spectrum of Toeplitz operators on the unit bal l

    R. Hagger, The essential spectrum of Toeplitz operators on the unit bal l. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 89(4), 519–556 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Hagger, Limit operators, compactness and essential spectra on boun ded symmetric domains

    R. Hagger, Limit operators, compactness and essential spectra on boun ded symmetric domains . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 470(1), 470–499 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Janson, J

    S. Janson, J. Peetre, R. Rochberg, Hankel forms and the Fock space . Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 3(1), 61–138 (1987)

    1987

  13. [21]

    Lange and V.S

    B.V. Lange and V.S. Rabinovich, On the Noether property of multidimensional discrete convo lutions. Mat. Zametki 37(3), 407–421 (1985). (Russian, English transl. Math. Notes 37, 228–237 (1985).)

    1985

  14. [22]

    Lange and V.S

    B.V. Lange and V.S. Rabinovich, On Noetherian multidimensional convolution operators wit h bounded measurable coeffcients. Izv. VUZ Matemat. 29(6), 22–30 (1985)

    1985

  15. [23]

    Lange and V.S

    B.V. Lange and V.S. Rabinovich, Pseudo-differential operators on Rn and limit operators . Mat. Sbornik 129(2), 175–185 (1986). (Russian, English transl. Math. USSR Sborn ik 577(1), 183–194 (1987).)

    1986

  16. [24]

    Lindner, Limit Operators and Applications on the Space of essentiall y bounded Functions

    M. Lindner, Limit Operators and Applications on the Space of essentiall y bounded Functions . Disserta- tion, TU Chemnitz, 2003

    2003

  17. [25]

    Lindner, Infinite Matrices and their Finite Sections

    M. Lindner, Infinite Matrices and their Finite Sections . Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2006

    2006

  18. [26]

    Lindner, M

    M. Lindner, M. Seidel, An affirmative answer to a core issue on limit operators . J. Funct. Anal. 267(3), 901–917 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Muhamadiev, On invertibility of differential operators in the space of co ntinuous functions bounded on the real axis

    E.M. Muhamadiev, On invertibility of differential operators in the space of co ntinuous functions bounded on the real axis . Soviet Math Dokl. 12, 49–52 (1971)

    1971

  20. [28]

    Muhamadiev, On the invertibility of elliptic partial differential opera tors

    E.M. Muhamadiev, On the invertibility of elliptic partial differential opera tors. Soviet Math Dokl. 13, 1122–1126 (1972)

    1972

  21. [29]

    Muhamadiev, On normal solvability and Noether property of elliptic oper ators in spaces of func- tions on Rn, Part I

    E.M. Muhamadiev, On normal solvability and Noether property of elliptic oper ators in spaces of func- tions on Rn, Part I . Zapiski nauchnih sem. LOMI 110, 120–140 (1981). (Russian, English transl. J. Soviet Math. 25(1), 884–901 (1984).)

    1981

  22. [30]

    Muhamadiev, On normal solvability and Noether property of elliptic oper ators in spacesof functions on Rn, Part II

    E.M. Muhamadiev, On normal solvability and Noether property of elliptic oper ators in spacesof functions on Rn, Part II . Zapiski nauchnih sem. LOMI 138, 108–126 (1984). (Russian, English transl. J. Soviet Math. 32(5), 499–512 (1986).)

    1984

  23. [31]

    Ostrand, Covering dimension in general spaces

    P.A. Ostrand, Covering dimension in general spaces . General Topology and its Applications 1(3), 209– 221 (1971)

    1971

  24. [32]

    Rabinovich, S

    V.S. Rabinovich, S. Roch and B. Silbermann, Fredholm Theory and Finite Section Method for Band- dominated operators. Integral Equations Operator Theory 30(4), 452–495 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Rabinovich, S

    V.S. Rabinovich, S. Roch and B. Silbermann, Band-dominated operators with operatorvalued coeffcients, their Fredholm properties and finite sections. Integral Equations Operator Theory 40(3), 342–381 (2001). 33

    2001

  26. [34]

    Rabinovich, S

    V.S. Rabinovich, S. Roch, B. Silbermann, Limit Operators and their Applications in Operator Theory . Operator Theory Advances and Applications 150, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2004

    2004

  27. [35]

    Roe, Band-dominated Fredholm operators on discrete groups

    J. Roe, Band-dominated Fredholm operators on discrete groups . Integral Equations Operator Theory 51, 411–416 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Seidel, Fredholm theory for band-dominated and related operators: A survey

    M. Seidel, Fredholm theory for band-dominated and related operators: A survey . Linear Algebra Appl. 445, 373–394 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    I. B. Simonenko, Multidimensional discrete convolutions . Mat. Issled. 3(1), 108–122 (1968)

    1968

  30. [38]

    ˇSpakula, R

    J. ˇSpakula, R. Willett, A metric approach to limit operators . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369, 263–308 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Willett, Some notes on Property A

    R. Willett, Some notes on Property A . Limits of Graphs in Group Theory and Computer Science, 191–281, EPFL press, Lausanne 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Yu, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a u niform embedding into Hilbert space

    G. Yu, The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a u niform embedding into Hilbert space. Invent. Math. 139(1), 201–240 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Zaanen, Introduction to Operator Theory in Riesz Spaces

    A. Zaanen, Introduction to Operator Theory in Riesz Spaces . Springer-Verlag, New York and Heidelberg, 1997

    1997

  34. [42]

    Zhang, Extreme Cases of Limit Operator Theory on Metric Spaces

    J. Zhang, Extreme Cases of Limit Operator Theory on Metric Spaces . Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 90: 73 (2018). Raffael Hagger Leibniz-Universit¨ at Hannover Fakult¨ at f¨ ur Mathematik und Physik Fachgebiet Mathematik Welfengarten 1 30167 Hannover, Germany raffael.hagger@math.uni...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.