Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Two phase micropolar fluid flow with unmatched densities modeled by Navier--Stokes--Cahn--Hilliard systems: Local strong well-posedness and consistency estimates

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves local strong well-posedness for a three-dimensional micropolar two-phase diffuse-interface model and a consistency estimate showing that its solutions converge to the classical two-phase model as the micro-rotation…

desk verdict Solid and honest extension of Giorgini's AGG strong-solution theory to the micropolar setting; the stress-test sign objection is itself sign-wrong, so the energy identity stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23235 v1 pith:Z6LCOVCI submitted 2025-05-29 math.AP

Kin Shing Chan , Kei Fong Lam This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35A0135D3535K3535Q3576D0376D4576T06
keywords micropolarfluidstwo-phaseflowphasefieldmodelNavier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliardstrongsolutionsconsistencyestimatemicro-rotationviscosityunmatcheddensities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the MAGG model, a diffuse-interface description of two immiscible micropolar fluids with different densities, coupling the Navier–Stokes equations to a Cahn–Hilliard equation and an extra evolution equation for micro-rotation. In a bounded three-dimensional domain with no-slip, no-spin and no-flux conditions, it proves local-in-time existence of strong solutions, and uniqueness on a short interval when the initial phase field stays away from the pure phases. The main quantitative result is a consistency estimate: if the micro-rotation viscosity $\eta_r(\phi)$ is a constant $\eta_r \in (0,1]$, then on the common existence interval the MAGG solution differs from the classical diffuse-interface solution by at most $C\eta_r$ in squared $L^2$ and $H^2$ norms, with $C$ independent of $\eta_r$. A corollary gives the same control between MAGG and the matched-density Model H solution, with extra density-mismatch terms. These results make the nonpolar limit $\eta_r\to0$ a rigorous statement and position the micropolar model as a controlled extension of established two-phase flow models.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is the energy–dissipation structure: the total energy $E(u,\omega,\phi)=\int_\Omega \frac{\rho(\phi)}2(|u|^2+|\omega|^2)+\frac12|\nabla\phi|^2+F(\phi)\,dx$ plus the dissipation terms $|\nabla\mu|^2$, $2\eta(\phi)|Du|^2$, and $4\eta_r(\phi)|\frac12\operatorname{curl}u-\omega|^2$. Existence is proved through a finite-dimensional approximation, a fixed-point argument, and a differential inequality of the form $\frac{d}{dt}H\le C(1+H)^5$ that gives a uniform existence time. The consistency estimate hinges on identity (5.5) for $\|\nabla(\frac12\operatorname{curl}u-\omega)\|^2$: under no-slip/no-spin boundary conditions only some boundary terms vanish, so the paper re-estimates the three viscously coupled terms $B_{20}, B_{29}, B_{30}$ to keep the Gronwall-type constant independent of $\eta_r\in(0,1]$. For periodic boundary conditions, an alternative identity (5.6) removes the boundary obstruction directly.

What would settle it

One concrete check is to track the constants in the differential inequality (3.41) for the boundary terms $B_{20},B_{29},B_{30}$: if any of those terms produces a lower bound on the existence time that degrades like a negative power of $\eta_r$ and the absorption step in Section 5.1 fails, the uniformity claim collapses. Numerically, one can fix smooth initial data and compute the maximum existence time (or the first time a norm blows up) of the MAGG strong solution for $\eta_r=10^{-2},10^{-3},\dots$; a sequence of existence times tending to zero would falsify Theorem 1.2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the MAGG model is locally well-posed in strong regularity classes and quantitatively consistent with the classical limit. Theorem 1.1 states that, for suitable initial data and viscosity coefficients satisfying $c_{d,i}\ge c_{a,i}$ and $2c_{0,i}+c_{a,i}>c_{d,i}$, there is a time $T_0$ and a strong solution $(u,\omega,p,\phi,\mu)$ with the natural parabolic regularities; uniqueness holds on $(0,T_1)$ when $|\phi_0|\le 1-\delta_0$. Theorem 1.2 states that for constant $\eta_r(\phi)\equiv\eta_r\in(0,1]$ and zero initial micro-rotation $\omega_0=0$, the MAGG and classical-model strong solutions from the same initial data satisfy $\sup_{t\in(0,T_1)}(\|u_w(t)-u_a(t)\|^2_{L^2}+\|\omega_w(t)\|^2_{L^2}+\|\phi_w(t)-\phi_a(t)\|^2_{H^2})\le C\eta_r$, with $C$ independent of $\eta_r$. The corollary extends the same bound to the matched-density Model H solution, with $C(\eta_r+|\rho_1-\rho_2|+|(\rho_1+\rho_2)/2-\rho|)$ on the right. Read in good faith, this establishes the $\eta_r\to0$ limit rigorously and identifies the micropolar model as a controlled generalization of the established two-phase flow models.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the local strong-solution existence time $T_1$ for the MAGG model is uniform as $\eta_r\to0$; the paper secures this only for constant $\eta_r(\phi)\equiv\eta_r\in(0,1]$ and $\omega_0=0$, through the boundary-term estimates around identity (5.5), and if those estimates fail the consistency theorem would be vacuous.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any admissible initial data in a bounded $C^3$ domain, the MAGG model admits a local-in-time strong solution with the stated regularities, and the solution is unique on $(0,T_1)$ once the initial phase field is strictly separated from the pure phases.
  • The nonpolar limit is rigorous: on the common existence interval, the MAGG solution with constant micro-rotation viscosity converges to the classical diffuse-interface solution at the rate $C\eta_r$ in the squared $L^2$/$H^2$ norms, with $C$ independent of $\eta_r\in(0,1]$.
  • The same consistency chain holds down to Model H: when densities are matched, the MAGG solution satisfies the bound with $C(\eta_r+|\rho_1-\rho_2|+|(\rho_1+\rho_2)/2-\rho|)$ on the right, so both micro-rotation and density mismatch are controlled.
  • All main results have analogues under periodic boundary conditions, and in two dimensions the same theorems hold after the reduced formulation described in the paper.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the proof only covers constant $\eta_r$; for concentration-dependent $\eta_r(\phi)$, the extra terms involving $\eta_r'(\phi)$ (such as $B_3,B_9,B_{10},B_{19},B_{22}$) no longer vanish, and one would need new estimates before a nonpolar consistency rate could be expected.
  • Inference: the squared-norm bound $\le C\eta_r$ means the natural $L^2$ difference is $O(\sqrt{\eta_r})$; a numerical study comparing $\|u_w-u_a\|_{L^2}$ across $\eta_r=10^{-k}$ could test whether $O(\sqrt{\eta_r})$ is sharp.
  • Inference: the boundary-term obstruction in identity (5.5) suggests the consistency result is sensitive to boundary conditions; under periodic conditions the argument is direct, while under no-slip/no-spin the uniformity relies on delicate re-estimates, so other slip conditions may not inherit the same rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the MAGG model, a Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard system for two-phase incompressible micropolar fluids with unmatched densities, subject to no-slip, no-spin, and no-flux boundary conditions. The main results are: local-in-time strong well-posedness in bounded C^3 domains (Theorem 1.1), uniqueness under the separation condition |phi0| <= 1 - delta0, and a consistency estimate showing that, for constant micro-rotation viscosity eta_r in (0,1] and zero initial micro-rotation, the MAGG strong solution converges to the strong AGG solution at rate eta_r in the norms specified in Theorem 1.2, with a corresponding Corollary for Model H. The proof follows the Galerkin/fixed-point architecture of Giorgini [33], adapted to the non-solenoidal micro-rotation field. I specifically checked the sign-inconsistency objection raised during review: it does not survive direct computation, since the eta_r terms in (1.2d)-(1.2e), after testing against (u,omega) and bringing the right-hand-side terms to the left, combine to 4 eta_r ||1/2 curl u - omega||^2, exactly as stated in (1.6); the same cancellation is used in (3.22). The paper is also careful about a genuine technical obstacle: Section 5.1 identifies that the constant in (3.41) depends on eta_r through the boundary terms B20, B29, B30 and repairs this for constant eta_r in (0,1] and omega_0 = 0.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides the first local strong-solution theory for a two-phase micropolar model with unmatched densities and gives a quantitative link to the established AGG and Model H limits. The main technical achievement is not just an adaptation of [33]: the boundary terms in (5.5) genuinely obstruct uniform-in-eta_r existence times, and the paper explicitly identifies and fixes this obstruction. The consistency-rate theorem is a falsifiable quantitative statement, and the imports from [33,34] are clearly marked. The proofs are long but the architecture is transparent. The main weakness I see concerns the claimed independence of the constants in Corollary 1.3 from the density differences; this is not fully established in Section 5.4.

major comments (1)
  1. [Corollary 1.3 and Section 5.4] The stated independence of C from |rho1 - rho2| and |(rho1+rho2)/2 - rho| is not established by the proof in Section 5.4. The Gronwall factor in the differential inequality preceding (5.15) involves integrals of ||ua||^2_H2, ||uh||^2_H2, and ||Delta phi_a||^2_H2, and the time T1 itself comes from Theorem 1.1, whose existence time may depend on the density parameters. The proof as written yields a constant depending on the AGG and Model H solution norms and on T1, and no argument is given that these remain uniform as rho1 - rho2 and (rho1+rho2)/2 - rho vary. Either a uniform-in-density existence time and uniform solution bounds must be proved, or the statement of Corollary 1.3 should be weakened to allow C to depend on the density parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1] The sentence "The proof of Proposition (3.8) is divided in the following subsections" should refer to Proposition 3.1, not Proposition (3.8).
  2. [Eqs. (3.26) and (4.7)] The strings "/Leftr⫯g⊸tl⫯ne⇒" appearing in (3.26) and (4.7) are corrupted rendering of the intended implication symbol; they should be replaced by the correct arrow.
  3. [Section 5.1] The heading "Uniformality of the well-posedness time interval" should read "Uniformity".
  4. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.5)] The sentence stating that "the first, fourth and fifth boundary terms" on the right-hand side of (5.5) vanish is difficult to verify because the boundary terms are not numbered. Numbering the boundary terms or explicitly writing out which terms vanish would improve readability.
  5. [Eq. (3.22)] The derivation of the energy identity (3.22) omits the intermediate cancellation of the eta_r cross terms. Since the signs in this calculation are delicate, a short derivation (one or two lines) would help readers and would preempt the sign-inconsistency concern entirely.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: main well-posedness and consistency proofs are self-contained against externally published AGG and Model H benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The local strong well-posedness of the MAGG model (Theorem 1.1) is proven via a Galerkin approximation, uniform estimates, a Schauder fixed-point argument, and passage to limits, all carried out within the paper. The consistency estimate (Theorem 1.2) compares MAGG strong solutions to AGG strong solutions taken from the published work of Giorgini [33], whose authors do not overlap with the present paper, and similarly uses Model H strong solutions from Giorgini–Miranville–Temam [34]; the estimates bound differences to these external objects rather than renaming or re-deriving them. The only overlapping-author citation is the companion preprint [11], which supplies the model formulation and global weak existence (Proposition 2.2); the model is stated explicitly in the paper and Proposition 2.2 is not needed for the main strong-solution or consistency proofs, so this citation is not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work to force a choice, and no known result is merely renamed. The possible sign inconsistency in the ηr coupling terms mentioned by a skeptic is a correctness concern, not a circularity concern, and per the review rules correctness risks are outside this pass. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything the central claims rest on is standard analysis background plus the stated model hypotheses. There are no fitted parameters, no invented entities, and no result is imported from an overlapping-author paper in a way that forces the conclusions: the global weak existence from the companion preprint [11] (Proposition 2.2) is background and is not used in the proofs of Theorems 1.1-1.2.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard functional-analytic toolbox: Sobolev embeddings (2.3), Korn inequality (2.4), Poincaré inequality, elliptic regularity for the bi-Laplacian and the Stokes operator, Schauder fixed point theorem, Grönwall inequality, and Aubin-Lions-Simon compactness [47].
    Used throughout Sections 3-5 without proof; universally accepted background in this field.
  • domain assumption Ω ⊂ R³ is a bounded C³ domain; boundary conditions are no-slip, no-spin, no-flux (1.5a), or periodic (Remark 1.1, Section 5.2).
    The regularity and spectral properties of the Stokes and Laplacian operators require boundary smoothness; the boundary conditions are essential for the integration-by-parts estimates, including the boundary analysis (5.5).
  • domain assumption Viscosity coefficient inequalities cd,i ≥ ca,i and 2c0,i + ca,i > cd,i for i = 1, 2.
    Stated hypotheses of Theorem 1.1. They are used in the estimate of term B28 in Section 3.2.2 to dominate the (cd-ca)-type terms by the elliptic dissipation of ω. Remark 1.2 notes they are unnecessary for global weak solutions, so they are specific to the strong-solution theory.
  • domain assumption Initial data: u0 ∈ H¹_div, ω0 ∈ H¹, ϕ0 ∈ H²_n with |ϕ0| ≤ 1 and mean value in (-1,1), and µ0 = -∆ϕ0 + F'(ϕ0) ∈ H¹(Ω); uniqueness additionally requires |ϕ0| ≤ 1-δ0 for some δ0 > 0.
    Hypotheses of Theorem 1.1; they provide the bounded initial high-order energy Hm(0) and the strict separation property (3.51) needed for uniqueness.
  • domain assumption Consistency theorems assume constant micro-rotation viscosity ηr(φ) ≡ ηr ∈ (0,1] (standard BCs) or ηr ∈ (0,R) (periodic) and zero initial micro-rotation ω0 = 0.
    Theorems 1.2 and Corollary 1.3. The uniformity of T1 in ηr is proved only for constant ηr under the boundary analysis of Section 5.1; ω0 = 0 is natural since the limiting AGG/Model H systems carry no micro-rotation. The paper does not cover consistency for concentration-dependent ηr(φ) or nonzero initial rotation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two phase micropolar fluid flow with unmatched densities modeled by Navier--Stokes--Cahn--Hilliard systems: Local strong well-posedness and consistency estimates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z6LCOVCI

@misc{pith2026250523235,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two phase micropolar fluid flow with unmatched densities modeled by Navier--Stokes--Cahn--Hilliard systems: Local strong well-posedness and consistency estimates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z6LCOVCI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23235}
}
read the original abstract

We study a thermodynamically consistent phase field model for binary mixtures of micropolar fluids, i.e., fluids exhibiting internal rotations. Furnishing with classical no-slip, no-spin and no-flux boundary conditions, in a smooth and bounded three-dimensional domain, we establish the well-posedness of local-in-time strong solutions. Since the model studied is a generalization of the earlier model introduced by Abels, Garcke and Gr\"un for binary Newtonian fluids with unmatched densities, we provide a consistency result between the corresponding strong solutions to both models in terms of a parameter associated to the micro-rotation viscosity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Giorgini

    A. Giorgini. Existence and stability of strong solutions to the Abels–Garcke–Gr¨ un model in three dimensions. Interfaces Free Bound. 24 (2022) 565–608

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    H. Abels. On a diffuse interface model for two-phase flows of viscous, incompressible fluids with matched densities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 194 (2009) 463–506

    work page 2009

  3. [2]

    Abels, D

    H. Abels, D. Depner, and H. Garcke. Existence of weak solutions for a diffuse interface model for two-phase flows of incompressible fluids with different densities. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 15 (2013) 453–480

    work page 2013

  4. [3]

    Abels, D

    H. Abels, D. Depner, and H. Garcke. On an incompressible Navier–Stokes/Cahn–Hilliard system with degenerate mobility. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire30 (2013) 1175–1190

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Abels, H

    H. Abels, H. Garcke and A. Giorgini. Global regularity and asymptotic stabilization for the in- compressible Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard model with unmatched densities. Math. Ann. 389 (2024) 1267–1321

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    Abels, H

    H. Abels, H. Garcke and G. Gr¨ un. Thermodynamically consistent, frame indifferent diffuse interface models for incompressible two-phase flows with different densities. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22 (2011) 1150013, 40pp

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    Abels and Y

    H. Abels and Y. Terasawa. Convergence of a Nonlocal to a Local Diffuse Interface Model for Two- Phase Flow with Unmatched Densities. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Sys. Ser. S 15 (2022) 1871–1881

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    G.L. Aki, W. Dreyer, J. Giesselmann and C. Kraus. A quasi-incompressible diffuse interface model with phase transition. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24 (2014) 827–861

    work page 2014

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    Ariman, M.A

    T. Ariman, M.A. Turk and N.D. Sylvester. Applications of microcontinuum fluid mechanics, Int. J. Engng. Sci. 1 (1974) 273–293

    1974

  2. [9]

    Boldrini, M

    J.L. Boldrini, M. Du´ an and M.A. Rojas-Medar. Existence and uniqueness of strong solution for the incompressible micropolar fluid equations in domains of R3. Ann. Univ. Ferrara 56 (2010) 37–51

    2010

  3. [10]

    F. Boyer. A theoretical and numerical model for the study of incompressible mixture flows. Comput. Fluids 31 (2001) 41–68

    2001

  4. [11]

    K.S. Chan, B. Hao, K.F. Lam and B. Stinner. On a phase field model for binary mixtures of microp- olar fluids with non-matched densities and moving contact lines. Preprint arXiv:2504.21258 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  5. [12]

    M. Chen, B. Huang and J. Zhang. Blowup criterion for the three-dimensional equations of compress- ible viscous micropolar fluids with vacuum. Nonlinear Anal. 79 (2013) 1–11

    2013

  6. [13]

    F.W. Cruz. Global strong solutions for the incompressible micropolar fluids equations. Arch. Math. 113 (2019) 201–212

    2019

  7. [14]

    Devakar and A

    M. Devakar and A. Raje. A study on the unsteady flow of two immiscible micropolar and Newtonian fluids through a horizontal channel: A numerical approach. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) 180

    2018

  8. [15]

    Ding, P.D.M

    H. Ding, P.D.M. Spelt, and C. Shu. Diffuse interface model for incompressible two-phase flows with large density ratios. J. Comput. Phys. 226 (2007) 2078–2095

    2007

  9. [16]

    Dong and Z.-M

    B.-Q. Dong and Z.-M. Chen. On upper and lower bounds of higher order derivatives for solutions to the 2D micropolar fluid equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 334 (2007) 1386–1399

    2007

  10. [17]

    Dong and Z.-M

    B.-Q. Dong and Z.-M. Chen. Regularity criteria of weak solutions to the three-dimensional micropolar flows. J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 103525

    2009

  11. [18]

    A.C. Eringen. Theory of micropolar fluids. J. Math. Mech. 16 (1966) 1–16

    1966

  12. [19]

    A.C. Eringen. Microcontinuum Field Theories I: Foundations and Solids, Springer-Verlag New York, 1999

    1999

  13. [20]

    A.C. Eringen. Microcontinuum Field Theories II: Fluent Media , Springer-Verlag New York, 2001

    2001

  14. [21]

    S. Frigeri. Global existence of weak solutions for a nonlocal model for two-phase flows of incompress- ible fluids with unmatched densities. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 26 (2016) 1955–1993

    2016

  15. [22]

    S. Frigeri. On a nonlocal Cahn-Hilliard/Navier-Stokes system with degenerate mobility and singular potential for incompressible fluids with different densities. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire38 (2021) 647–687. 40

    2021

  16. [23]

    C.G. Gal, A. Giorgini, M. Grasselli and A. Poiatti. Global well-posedness and convergence to equilib- rium for the Abels-Garcke-Gr¨ un model with nonlocal free energy.J. Math. Pures Appl. 178 (2023) 46–109

    2023

  17. [24]

    Gal and M

    C.G. Gal and M. Grasselli. Asymptotic behavior of a Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system in 2D, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire27 (2010) 401—436

    2010

  18. [25]

    Gal and M

    C.G. Gal and M. Grasselli. Trajectory and global attractors for binary mixtures fluid flows in 3D, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 31 (2010) 655-–678

    2010

  19. [26]

    Gal and M

    C.G. Gal and M. Grasselli. Instability of two-phase flows: A lower bound on the dimension of the global attractor of the Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system. Phys. D 240 (2011) 629—635

    2011

  20. [27]

    C.G. Gal, M. Grasselli and A. Miranville, Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes systems with moving contact lines, Cal. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 55 (2016) Article number 50

    2016

  21. [28]

    C.G. Gal, M. Grasselli, and H. Wu. Global weak solutions to a diffuse interface model for incompress- ible two-phase flows with moving contact lines and different densities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 234 (2019) 1–56

    2019

  22. [29]

    C.G. Gal, M. Lv and H. Wu. On a thermodynamically consistent diffuse interface model for two- phase flows with non-matched densities: Dynamics of moving contact lines, surface diffusion, and mass transfer. Preprint on ResearchGate: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG, 2(27875.73764)

  23. [30]

    G.P. Galdi. An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations , Vol. 1. Springer, Berlin, 1994

    1994

  24. [31]

    Galdi and S

    G.P. Galdi and S. Rionero. A note on the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the micropolar fluid equations. Internat. J. Engrg. Sci. 15 (1977) 105–108

    1977

  25. [32]

    Giorgini

    A. Giorgini. Well-posedness of the two-dimensional Abels–Garcke–Gr¨ un model for two-phase flows with unmatched densities. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021) Paper no. 100

    2021

  26. [34]

    Giorgini, A

    A. Giorgini, A. Miranville, and R. Temam. Uniqueness and regularity for the Navier–Stokes–Cahn– Hilliard system. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51 (2019) 2535–2574

    2019

  27. [35]

    Gurtin, D

    M.E. Gurtin, D. Polignone, and J. Vi˜ nals. Two-phase binary fluids and immiscible fluids described by an order parameter. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 6 (1996) 815–831

    1996

  28. [36]

    R. H. Guterres, J. R. Nunes and C. F. Perusato. On the large time decay of global solutions for the micropolar dynamics in L2(Rn). Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 45 (2019) 789–798

    2019

  29. [37]

    R. H. Guterres, W.G. Melo, C.J. Niche, C.F. Perusato and P.R. Zingano. Strong alignment of micro- rotation and vorticity in 3D micropolar flows. Nonlinearity 38 (2025) 015006

    2025

  30. [38]

    Hohenberg and B.I

    P.C. Hohenberg and B.I. Halperin. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 (1977) 435–479

    1977

  31. [39]

    Knopf, C

    P. Knopf, C. Hurm and A. Poiatti. Nonlocal-to-local convergence rates for strong solutions to a Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard system with singular potential, Communin. Partial Differential Equa- tions 49 (2024) 832–871

    2024

  32. [40]

    Liu and P

    Q. Liu and P. Zhang. Optimal time decay of the compressible micropolar fluids. J. Differential Equations 260 (2016) 7634–7661

    2016

  33. [41]

    Lowengrub and L

    J. Lowengrub and L. Truskinovsky. Quasi-incompressible Cahn-Hilliard fluids and topological tran- sitions. R. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454 (1998) 2617–2654

    1998

  34. [42]

    Lukaszewicz

    G. Lukaszewicz. Micropolar Fluids: Theory and Applications , in Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkh¨ auser, 1999

    1999

  35. [43]

    Lukaszewicz

    G. Lukaszewicz. Long time beahaviour of 2D micropolar fluid flows.Math. Comput. Model, 34 (2001) 487–509

    2001

  36. [44]

    C. Qian, H. Chen, T. Zhang. Global existence of weak solutions for 3D incompressible inhomogeneous asymmetric fluids. Math. Ann. 386 (2023) 1555–1593

    2023

  37. [45]

    Ramkissoon and S.R

    H. Ramkissoon and S.R. Majumdar. Micropolar flow past a sightly deformed fluid sphere. ZAMM 68 (1988) 155–160

    1988

  38. [46]

    Shokrpour Roudbari, G

    M. Shokrpour Roudbari, G. S ¸im¸ sek, E.H. van Brummelen, and K.G. van der Zee. Diffuse interface two-phase flow models with different densities: a new quasi-incompressible form and a linear energy- stable method. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018) 733–770. 41

    2018

  39. [47]

    J. Simon. Compact sets in Lp(0, T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146 (1987) 65–96

    1987

  40. [48]

    H. Sohr. The Navier–Stokes Equations: An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach . Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts, Springer, Basel, 2010

    2010

  41. [49]

    Yadav, S

    P.K. Yadav, S. Jaiswal and B.D. Sharma. Mathematical model of micropolar fluid in two phase immiscible fluid flow through porous channel. Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 39 (2018) 993–1006. 42

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.