REVIEW 6 cited by
Towards LLM-Powered Verilog RTL Assistant: Self-Verification and Self-Correction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate high-quality Register-Transfer Level (RTL) code with minimal human interference. The traditional RTL design workflow requires human experts to manually write high-quality RTL code, which is time-consuming and error-prone. With the help of emerging LLMs, developers can describe their requirements to LLMs which then generate corresponding code in Python, C, Java, and more. Adopting LLMs to generate RTL design in hardware description languages is not trivial, given the complex nature of hardware design and the generated design has to meet the timing and physical constraints. We propose VeriAssist, an LLM-powered programming assistant for Verilog RTL design workflow. VeriAssist takes RTL design descriptions as input and generates high-quality RTL code with corresponding test benches. VeriAssist enables the LLM to self-correct and self-verify the generated code by adopting an automatic prompting system and integrating RTL simulator in the code generation loop. To generate an RTL design, VeriAssist first generates the initial RTL code and corresponding test benches, followed by a self-verification step that walks through the code with test cases to reason the code behavior at different time steps, and finally it self-corrects the code by reading the compilation and simulation results and generating final RTL code that fixes errors in compilation and simulation. This design fully leverages the LLMs' capabilities on multi-turn interaction and chain-of-thought reasoning to improve the quality of the generated code. We evaluate VeriAssist with various benchmark suites and find it significantly improves both syntax and functionality correctness over existing LLM implementations, thus minimizing human intervention and making RTL design more accessible to novice designers.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Interpretable and Verifiable Hardware Generation with LLM-Driven Stepwise Refinement
Framework uses LLM-driven stepwise application of transformation rules to generate verifiable RTL hardware designs from specifications.
-
FVRuleLearner: Operator-Level Reasoning Tree (Op-Tree)-Based Rules Learning for Formal Verification
FVRuleLearner retrieves learned operator-level reasoning rules to boost the functional correctness of LLM-generated SystemVerilog assertions by roughly 30 percentage points over simple prompting baselines.
-
Spec2RTL-Agent: Automated Hardware Code Generation from Complex Specifications Using LLM Agent Systems
On three NIST crypto standards (AES, DSS, HMAC), Spec2RTL-Agent generates RTL via a multi-agent pipeline from pseudocode to Python to synthesizable C++, reporting 3/3 correct designs with about 4.3 human interventions...
-
ProtocolLLM: RTL Benchmark for SystemVerilog Generation of Communication Protocols
A new benchmark, ProtocolLLM, evaluates LLM-generated SystemVerilog for SPI, I2C, UART, and AXI and finds most models fail timing-accurate functional checks.
-
DecoRTL: A Run-time Decoding Framework for RTL Code Generation with LLMs
DecoRTL combines token-class-aware temperature adjustment with contrastive top-K reranking to improve synthesizability and functional correctness of LLM-generated Verilog.
-
SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models
SV-LLM automates SoC security verification with six cooperating LLM agents, reaching 84.8% vulnerability detection accuracy and 82% to 89% bug validation rates on benchmarks the paper does not disclose.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.