REVIEW 1 cited by
Linear Map of $D$-Algebra
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Module is effective representation of ring in Abelian group. Linear map of module over commutative ring is morphism of corresponding representation. This definition is the main subject of the book. To consider this definition from more general point of view I started the book from consideration of Cartesian product of representations. Polymorphism of representations is a map of Cartesian product of representations which is a morphism of representations with respect to each separate independent variable. Reduced morphism of representations allows us to simplify the study of morphisms of representations. However a representation has to satisfy specific requirements for existence of reduced polymomorphism of representations. It is possible that Abelian group is only $\Omega$-algebra, such that representation in this algebra admits polymorphism of representations. However, today, this statement has not been proved. Multiplicative $\Omega$-group is $\Omega$-algebra in which product is defined. The definition of tensor product of representations of Abelian multiplicative $\Omega$-group is based on properties of reduced polymorphism of representations of Abelian multiplicative $\Omega$-group. Since an algebra is a module in which the product is defined, then we can use this theory to study linear map of algebra. For instance, we can study the set of linear transformations of $D$-algebra $A$ as representation of algebra $A\otimes A$ in algebra $A$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Diagram of Representations of Universal Algebras
The paper builds a general framework for representations of universal algebras with morphisms, bases, tensor products, and towers of representations, but key theorems contain unjustified steps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.