Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Investigating the emergent invariant properties of Hungarian electric distribution networks

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Five Hungarian medium-voltage distribution networks, despite different geographies, show statistically consistent patterns across degree, betweenness centrality, and powerline length, with powerline lengths collapsing onto a single…

desk verdict A genuinely useful dataset and descriptive analysis, but the universality claim rests on a hand-picked rescaling exponent with no statistical validation; the paper needs revision before the strong conclusions are supportable. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04009 v1 pith:Z7JTPBOX submitted 2025-06-04 physics.soc-ph math.GN

Michelle T. Cirunay , Bálint Hartmann , Tímea Erdei , Tamás Soha This is my paper
classification physics.soc-phmath.GN
keywords medium-voltagedistributionnetworksuniversalscalingpowerlinelengthbetweennesscentralitydegreedatacollapsespatialHungarianpowergrid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether medium-voltage electric distribution networks, designed under different local conditions, nonetheless share a common structural fingerprint. Examining five Hungarian distribution networks (DEDASZ, DEMASZ, EDASZ, EMASZ, TITASZ) after repairing their vector GIS data, the authors find statistically consistent patterns in degree distribution, betweenness centrality, and powerline length. The strongest evidence is a data collapse: when powerline lengths are rescaled as $L^\gamma P(L)$ versus $L/\langle L\rangle^\alpha$ with $\alpha=1.4$ and $\gamma=1/(2-\alpha)\approx 1.67$, all five networks fall on the same curve. If the result holds, it suggests that distribution grids are shaped by common optimization principles that transcend regional geography, so insights from one network could transfer to others.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the universal scaling function $F(\cdot)$ from Strano et al.'s global road network study, applied here to powerline lengths. The collapse is shown by plotting $L^\gamma P(L)$ against $L/\langle L\rangle^\alpha$, with $\gamma=1/(2-\alpha)$ chosen to enforce normalization; the paper finds $\alpha=1.4$. This rescaling test is what turns five separate empirical distributions into evidence for a single universality class. Supporting machinery includes the GIS repair of the vector network data, primal-graph construction, Spearman rank correlations linking demography and topology, and spatial mapping of betweenness-centrality peaks.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to fit the five networks' powerline-length data without imposing the constraint $\gamma=1/(2-\alpha)$: if the exponents that best describe each network differ substantially, the single-curve collapse is an artifact of the rescaling choice rather than a genuine invariant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the five Hungarian MV networks, despite differences in population density, settlement structure, and terrain, exhibit invariant statistical properties. Powerline length distributions are unimodal and fat-tailed, and they collapse under the universal scaling function introduced for road networks, with nontrivial exponents $\alpha=1.4$ and $\gamma\approx 1.67$. Degree centrality follows a lognormal distribution, closeness centrality is approximately normal, and betweenness centrality follows a truncated power law consistent with random planar graphs. The paper interprets the collapse as evidence that universal principles\u2014hierarchical structure, shared design goals, and common scalability\u2014govern the structural organization of MV distribution networks.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the assumption that the scaling collapse formula developed for road-network lengths also applies to medium-voltage powerline lengths because roads and power lines are built along shared corridors under similar optimization pressures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the universality holds, one Hungarian MV network can serve as a modeling proxy for others with similar radial design, reducing data needs.
  • Planning standards could be standardized across regions because common structural patterns imply common design constraints.
  • Vulnerability and expansion behavior could be estimated in data-poor regions by transferring statistical laws measured elsewhere.
  • Shared structural features may correspond to shared failure modes, allowing utilities to anticipate where faults are likely.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is whether the same $\alpha\approx 1.4$, $\gamma\approx 1.67$ exponents appear in MV networks outside Hungary; if they do, the universality claim moves from national to international scale.
  • The reliance on the road-network scaling ansatz implies that if powerline planning economics differ from road building (for example, due to voltage-drop constraints), the collapse might be a property of the rescaling rather than a genuine invariant\u2014a risk the paper does not resolve.
  • One could use the collapsed distribution as a generative prior to synthesize realistic MV network topologies for resilience simulation, a step the paper does not take.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper characterizes five Hungarian medium-voltage (MV) distribution networks (DEDASZ, DEMASZ, EDASZ, EMASZ, TITASZ) using GIS-repaired vector data, complex network metrics, and demographic/land-cover information. It reports metrical and topological properties (Tables 1–3), a Spearman correlation analysis between demographics and network structure (Figure 2), and probability distributions for population, land area, powerline length, degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality (Figures 3–5). The central claim is that, despite regional differences, the five networks exhibit statistically consistent structural patterns, and that the powerline length distributions collapse under a universal scaling function with exponents α = 1.4 and γ ≈ 1.67, suggesting common design principles and potentially universal behavior in MV network architecture.

Significance. If the universal scaling and invariant distribution claims were rigorously established, the work would be a valuable contribution to spatial network theory and infrastructure planning, offering quantitative support for cross-network modeling and transferability of insights among distribution grids. The paper's strengths are its newly repaired and previously unstudied dataset of five real DSO networks, its careful compilation of metrical and reliability metrics, and its explicit scaling ansatz with quantitative exponents, which constitutes a falsifiable prediction that could be tested on MV networks in other countries. However, at present the main evidence is visual curve inspection and a correlation matrix based on only five data points, with no statistical validation. The significance is therefore more hypothesis-generating than demonstrative.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1, Figure 4(c)] The universal scaling collapse is produced by manually fixing α = 1.4 and γ = 1/(2−α) ≈ 1.67, with no search over α, no collapse-quality metric, no null model, and no goodness-of-fit test. The figure caption itself concedes 'a noticeable deviation of the DEMASZ network in the short-to-mid length region.' Because the central claim of universal behavior rests on this collapse, the evidence as presented could arise from the freedom to tune α and γ rather than from a true invariant. In addition, the normalization condition γ = 1/(2−α) is stated without derivation, and the transfer of the Strano et al. ansatz from road networks to powerline networks is asserted on the basis of similarity rather than validated.
  2. [Section 3.1, Figure 3(a)-(b)] The population distribution is claimed to follow a power law with exponent '~ −2.0(0)', but no fitting procedure, uncertainty interval, or goodness-of-fit test is reported, and the notation is ambiguous. Similarly, the claims that land area and powerline length distributions are lognormal (Figures 3(c)-(d) and 4) are not supported by any distribution-fitting diagnostic or comparison against alternative models. These assertions underlie the 'statistically consistent patterns' claim in the abstract and conclusion, so they need quantitative backing.
  3. [Section 3.1, Figure 5] The cross-network comparisons of degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality distributions are made by visual inspection. No statistical tests (e.g., two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for distributional equality, or goodness-of-fit tests for the claimed lognormal and truncated power-law forms) are reported. The conclusion that these networks share 'statistically consistent patterns' in centrality metrics is therefore not established.
  4. [Section 3, Figure 2] The Spearman correlation matrix is computed from only five networks (five data points), which yields very uncertain correlation estimates. The paper does not report significance levels, confidence intervals, or a permutation-based null; several statements in the text (e.g., that the number of microvillages is more influential than total population on network structure) are drawn from this matrix. With n = 5, these correlations are not robust and should be treated as exploratory only.
  5. [Introduction and Abstract] The five networks are all within Hungary, share the same national regulatory and planning context, and serve regions of 'similar size and population density.' The abstract's 'hypothesis of universal behavior' and the introduction's claim that such universality 'enables simplified modeling and generalization, allowing insights from one network to be applied to others' go beyond what a five-network, single-country sample can support. Either the claims should be reframed as specific to Hungarian MV networks, or the paper should provide a basis for expecting universality across different regulatory regimes (e.g., comparison with networks from other countries).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The text contains several typos, e.g., 'three-folds' should be 'threefold' (Section 1) and 'shortes' should be 'shortest' (Section 3, EMASZ paragraph).
  2. [Abstract] The acronym BC is used in the Abstract without definition; it is defined only in Section 2.2.3. Please define it at first use.
  3. [Figure 2] The correlation values and significance indicators are not legible in the preprint; adding the numerical values and p-values (or an explicit note on their absence) would help the reader assess the claims.
  4. [Equations (1) and Section 3.1] The symbol α is used for the adjacency matrix in Equation (1) and for the scaling exponent in Section 3.1; this reuse of the same symbol for different quantities is confusing and should be resolved.
  5. [Section 2.2.1] The definition of powerline length L = Σ_l L_l uses ℓ both as an index and as a length symbol; please clarify the notation.
  6. [References] Reference [13] is an unreviewed preprint; if a published version exists, it should be cited in its place.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The universal-scaling claim rests on a manually chosen collapse exponent α=1.4, so the reported universal exponents are fitted parameters presented as predicted invariants.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1 (Invariant Statistical Properties), Figure 4(c) and the paragraph following it]
    "we employ the universal scaling function F (·) which can be obtained by plotting Lγ · P (L) with L/ ⟨L⟩α, where γ = 1/(2 − α) ensures normalization ... In Figure 4(c), we utilized the case of α = 1.4 (and, thus, γ ∼ 1.67), which resulted in all the distributions collapsing under a single curve. This time, we can still observe a scaling law but with non-trivial exponents."

    α is not derived from theory or measured independently; it is selected as the value that makes the five powerline-length distributions overlap, and γ is fixed by the stated normalization condition γ = 1/(2 − α). The collapse in Figure 4(c) is therefore produced by the chosen α, not independently confirmed. The paper then reports α = 1.4 and γ ≈ 1.67 as 'non-trivial exponents' and as evidence that universal principles govern the structural properties of these networks. With no search over α, no collapse-quality metric, and no uncertainty on the exponents, the claimed universal scaling law reduces to a fitted parameter presented as a discovered invariant.

full rationale

The only load-bearing step that reduces to its own input is the universal-scaling collapse in Section 3.1 / Figure 4(c). The paper selects α = 1.4 to make the five powerline-length distributions collapse and fixes γ through the normalization condition, then presents the resulting collapse and exponents as evidence of 'universal principles.' Since the collapse is produced by the chosen α, without an independent derivation, a systematic search, a collapse-quality metric, or uncertainty estimates, the claimed universal exponents are fitted values rather than predicted invariants. This is the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern and it affects the central claim of universal behavior. The other analyses—degree, closeness, and betweenness distributions, Spearman correlations, and the comparison to random planar graphs—are descriptive and not circular by themselves. The self-citation [13] is used only as background motivation for the bimodal BC pattern and is not load-bearing for the universality claim, so it does not raise the score further. The absence of statistical tests for the collapse and for distributional equality across the five networks is a validation gap, not circularity per se.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central universality claim rests on one fitted rescaling exponent (alpha=1.4), the transfer of a road-network scaling ansatz to powerlines, the unvalidated fidelity of repaired GIS data, and the assumption that five same-country networks can support a universal claim. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (powerline length rescaling exponent) = 1.4
    Chosen by hand in Section 3.1 and Figure 4(c) to collapse the five length distributions; gamma=1/(2-alpha) ~ 1.67 is then derived. The claimed universal collapse depends on this fitted value, not an out-of-sample prediction.
  • population distribution power-law exponent = ~ -2.0
    Reported as P_o^{-2.0(0)} in Section 3.1 without a fitting procedure, error bars, or cutoff details; fitted to settlement population data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The repaired GIS vector data faithfully represents the real MV network topology; the automated repair and manual back-check introduced no systematic distortion.
    All downstream metrics (degree, BC, line length) are computed on this repaired data. Section 2.1.1 describes the repair but provides no validation against utility as-built records.
  • domain assumption Strano et al.'s universal scaling function for road length distributions applies to MV powerline length distributions because roads and powerlines are co-located and share design principles.
    Section 3.1: "We believe that the same scaling ansatz can be applied for powerline lengths since road networks and power distribution networks are closely related..." This is load-bearing for the collapse claim.
  • ad hoc to paper A data collapse obtained by manually choosing alpha=1.4 identifies a true universality class rather than an artifact of rescaling.
    The collapse is assessed visually; no collapse quality metric, null model, or cross-validation is provided. Section 3.1 and Figure 4(c).
  • domain assumption Five DSO networks in one country are enough to infer universal structural tendencies in MV network design.
    All five networks operate under Hungarian planning norms; the abstract and conclusion generalize beyond this sample without additional evidence.
  • domain assumption Spearman correlations on n=5 networks meaningfully rank the influence of population, density, and microvillages on network structure.
    Figure 2 correlations have no significance tests or confidence intervals; with n=5 any monotonic relation can appear strong by chance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating the emergent invariant properties of Hungarian electric distribution networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z7JTPBOX

@misc{pith2026250604009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating the emergent invariant properties of Hungarian electric distribution networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z7JTPBOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04009}
}
read the original abstract

Electric power distribution networks serve as the final and essential stage in power delivery, bridging transmission infrastructure and end users. The structural configuration of these networks plays a critical role in determining system reliability, fault tolerance, and operational efficiency. Although the design of distribution systems is influenced by various regional factors, such as geography, customer density, and planning standards, the extent to which consistent structural characteristics emerge across different networks remains an open question. In this study, we perform a detailed spatial and topological analysis of five MV distribution networks in Hungary. Despite notable differences in geographic layout and consumer distribution, we identify statistically consistent patterns across several key metrics, including degree, BC, and powerline length. These findings suggest the influence of common underlying design principles or optimization constraints, potentially indicating universal structural tendencies in MV network design. The results provide insight into the organization of real-world distribution systems and offer a basis for improved planning, risk mitigation, and system optimization in future grid developments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04009 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of the electric distribution networks that comprise the Hungarian power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spearman Correlation Matrix of the DSO metrical and topological properties. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Population and area distributions of the regions being catered by the DSO net￾works. The population distributions [top panels] Po follow a PL behavior that scales ac￾cording to ∼ P −2.0(0) o . On the other hand, the landareas [bottom panels] are unimodally distributed, indicative that there is a characteristic size in how space is divided in each region. When the population distribution follows a power-law and the a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Powerline length distributions of the DSO networks.(a) The length distributions P(L) of the electric distribution networks mostly follow unimodal trends, suggesting sim￾ilar mechanisms of creation. (b) Rescaling the distributions by their respective mean did not cause …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Statistical distributions of centrality measures: (a) degree centrality (DC) (b) closeness centrality (CC) (c) betweenness centrality (BC). with a few nodes having either very few or many connections. This results in a network where connectivity is generally moderate, …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial distribution of nodes found in the dip (green), peak (blue), and tails (red) of the BC distributions of the electric distribution networks found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Landcover information of regions catered by the DSO networks and the location of the most central nodes. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations Characterizing MV electric distribution networks is critical for power sys￾tem planning, reliability, optimization, and resilience…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Barthelemy, Spatial networks, 2022nd Edition, Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2022

    M. Barthelemy, Spatial networks, 2022nd Edition, Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Guillier, V

    S. Guillier, V. Muñoz, J. Rogan, R. Zarama, J. Valdivia, Optimization of spatial complex networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 467 (2017) 465–473.doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.011. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.011 2017

  3. [3]

    Bolukbasi, A

    G. Bolukbasi, A. S. Kocaman, A prize collecting steiner tree approach to least cost evaluation of grid and off-grid electrification systems, Energy 160 (2018) 536–543. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.029. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.029 2018

  4. [4]

    Morer, A

    I. Morer, A. Cardillo, A. Díaz-Guilera, L. Prignano, S. Lozano, Com- paring spatial networks: A one-size-fits-all efficiency-driven approach, Physical Review E 101 (4) (Apr. 2020).doi:10.1103/physreve.101. 042301. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.042301

    doi:10.1103/physreve.101 2020

  5. [5]

    J. R. Banavar, F. Colaiori, A. Flammini, A. Maritan, A. Rinaldo, Topology of the fittest transportation network, Physical Review Let- ters 84 (20) (2000) 4745–4748.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4745. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4745

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4745 2000

  6. [6]

    Chekuri, A

    C. Chekuri, A. Gupta, A. Kumar, J. Naor, D. Raz, Building edge-failure resilient networks, Algorithmica 43 (1–2) (2005) 17–41.doi:10.1007/ s00453-005-1156-z. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-005-1156-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00453-005-1156-z 2005

  7. [7]

    Katifori, G

    E. Katifori, G. J. Szöllősi, M. O. Magnasco, Damage and fluctuations induce loops in optimal transport networks, Physical Review Letters 104 (4) (Jan. 2010).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.048704. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.048704

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.048704 2010

  8. [8]

    M. E. Baran, F. F. Wu, Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing, IEEE Transactions on Power de- livery 4 (2) (1989) 1401–1407. 25

    work page 1989

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Abeysinghe, J

    S. Abeysinghe, J. Wu, M. Sooriyabandara, M. Abeysekera, T. Xu, C. Wang, Topological properties of medium voltage electricity distri- bution networks, Applied energy 210 (2018) 1101–1112

    2018

  2. [10]

    Hines, S

    P. Hines, S. Blumsack, E. C. Sanchez, C. Barrows, The topological and electrical structure of power grids, in: 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–10

    2010

  3. [11]

    Kaiser, H

    F. Kaiser, H. Ronellenfitsch, D. Witthaut, Discontinuous transition to loop formation in optimal supply networks, Nature Communications 11 (1) (Nov. 2020).doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19567-2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19567-2

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    R. Louf, P. Jensen, M. Barthelemy, Emergence of hierarchy in cost- driven growth of spatial networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(22) (2013) 8824–8829.doi:10.1073/pnas.1222441110. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222441110

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    Hartmann, T

    B. Hartmann, T. Soha, M. T. Cirunay, T. Erdei, Uncovering the in- herited vulnerability of electric distribution networks (2024). doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2409.06194. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06194

    2024 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kirkley, H

    A. Kirkley, H. Barbosa, M. Barthelemy, G. Ghoshal, From the between- ness centrality in street networks to structural invariants in random planar graphs, Nature communications 9 (1) (2018) 2501

    2018

  7. [15]

    Nayeripour, N

    M. Nayeripour, N. Rezaee, A. Roosta, T. Niknam, Role of gis in dis- tribution power systems, World Applied Sciences Journal 8 (5) (2010) 614–621

    2010

  8. [16]

    Abdulrahman, G

    I. Abdulrahman, G. Radman, Power system spatial analysis and visual- ization using geographic information system (gis), Spatial Information Research 28 (1) (2020) 101–112

    2020

  9. [17]

    Y. Xu, T. Yu, B. Yang, Reliability assessment of distribution networks through graph theory, topology similarity and statistical analysis, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 13 (1) (2019) 37–45. 26

    2019

  10. [18]

    Z. Wang, A. Scaglione, R. J. Thomas, Electrical centrality measures for electric power grid vulnerability analysis, in: 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), IEEE, 2010, pp. 5792–5797

    2010

  11. [19]

    Dwivedi, S

    D. Dwivedi, S. B. Mitikiri, K. V. S. M. Babu, P. K. Yemula, V. L. Srinivas, P. Chakraborty, M. Pal, Technological advancements and in- novations in enhancing resilience of electrical distribution systems, In- ternational Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (2024) 100696

    2024

  12. [20]

    B. Fan, N. Shu, Z. Li, F. Li, Critical nodes identification for power grid based on electrical topology and power flow distribution, IEEE Systems Journal 17 (3) (2022) 4874–4884

    2022

  13. [21]

    L. Chen, D. Yue, C. Dou, J. Chen, Z. Cheng, Evaluation of cyber- physical power systems in cascading failure: node vulnerability and sys- tems connectivity, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (7) (2020) 1197–1206

    2020

  14. [22]

    G. Wu, B. Chen, X. Li, H. Zheng, X. Pan, Reliability calculation method for power distribution networks based on topological similarity, in: 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Information Systems and Com- puter Aided Education (ICISCAE), IEEE, 2024, pp. 571–575

    2024

  15. [23]

    Corine Land Cover 2018 (Vector), Europe, 6-yearly - Version 2020_20u1, May 2020 (2019)

    European Environment Agency. Corine Land Cover 2018 (Vector), Europe, 6-yearly - Version 2020_20u1, May 2020 (2019). doi:10.2909/71C95A07-E296-44FC-B22B-415F42ACFDF0. https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/copernicus/api/records/ 71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0?language=all

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    MTA FKI, Magyarország földrajzi kistájbeosztása (MTA FKI) – GIS | MÉTA Program,https://novenyzetiterkep.hu/node/407, [Accessed 17-05-2025] (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Ksh statinfo v40 | theme selection, https://statinfo.ksh.hu/Statinfo/themeSelector.jsp? &lang=en, [Accessed 17-05-2025] (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Jordan, Kocsis, k., kovács, z., nemerkényi, zs., gercsák, g., kincses, á

    P. Jordan, Kocsis, k., kovács, z., nemerkényi, zs., gercsák, g., kincses, á. and tóth, g.(eds.): National atlas of hungary vol. 3: Society, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 70 (4) (2021) 381–383. 27

    2021

  19. [27]

    Prakash, A

    K. Prakash, A. Lallu, F. Islam, K. A. Mamun, Review of power sys- tem distribution network architecture, in: 2016 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE), IEEE, 2016, pp. 124–130

    2016

  20. [28]

    Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Authority, Eval- uation of the Reliability of Distribution Supply 2023, https:// mekh.hu/download/1/12/81000/Elosztoi-ellatas-megbizhatosag_ ertekeles_2023_vegleges.pdf, accessed: 2025-05-12 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    T. Xu, T. Wang, C. Ye, J. Zhang, P. Xi, Y. Chen, G. Zhang, Research of electric cable path planning based on heuristic optimization algorithm in mixed-land scenario, Energy Engineering 120 (11) (2023) 2629–2650. doi:10.32604/ee.2023.027537. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/ee.20...

    2023

  22. [30]

    L. Rüde, M. Wussow, M. Heleno, G. Gust, D. Neumann, Estimating electrical distribution network length and capital investment needs from real-world topologies and land cover data, Energy Policy 195 (2024) 114368. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114368. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j....

    2024

  23. [31]

    Mehrtash, A

    M. Mehrtash, A. Kargarian, A. J. Conejo, Graph-based second-order coneprogrammingmodelforresilientfeederroutingusinggisdata, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 35 (4) (2020) 1999–2010.doi:10.1109/ tpwrd.2019.2959229. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2019.2959229

    2020

  24. [32]

    L. B. Techane, A. O. Salau, Y. W. Gebru, E. A. Hailu, Geographical information system based optimal path routing of distribution networks, Heliyon 8 (5) (2022) e09397.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09397. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09397

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Ameling, G

    J. Ameling, G. Gust, Automated feeder routing for underground elec- tricity distribution networks based on aerial images, European Journal of Operational Research 318 (2) (2024) 629–641.doi:10.1016/j.ejor. 2024.05.035. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.035 28

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Gebhard, A

    T. Gebhard, A. Tundis, F. Steinke, Automated generation of urban medium-voltage grids using openstreetmap data, in: 2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE), 2024, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863461

    2024

  27. [35]

    Hartmann, T

    B. Hartmann, T. Soha, Topological and topographical network data of the South Transdanubian medium-voltage distribution network in Hun- gary between 1950–1965, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15109/ARP/ JXPLE8, [Accessed 17-05-2025] (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    M. T. Cirunay, R. Batac, Spatial signatures of road network growth for different levels of global planning, Complex Systems 30 (3) (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    M. T. Cirunay, R. C. Batac, Statistical signatures of the spatial imprints of road network growth, International Journal of Modern Physics C 29 (10) (2018) 1850099

    2018

  30. [38]

    Lämmer, B

    S. Lämmer, B. Gehlsen, D. Helbing, Scaling laws in the spatial struc- ture of urban road networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 363 (1) (2006) 89–95

    2006

  31. [39]

    Barthélemy, A

    M. Barthélemy, A. Flammini, Modeling urban street patterns, Physical review letters 100 (13) (2008) 138702

    2008

  32. [40]

    Strano, A

    E. Strano, A. Giometto, S. Shai, E. Bertuzzo, P. J. Mucha, A. Rinaldo, The scaling structure of the global road network, Royal Society open science 4 (10) (2017) 170590

    2017

  33. [41]

    S. M. Bhattacharjee, F. Seno, A measure of datacollapse for scaling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34 (33) (2001) 6375

    2001

  34. [42]

    Arderne, C

    C. Arderne, C. Zorn, C. Nicolas, E. Koks, Predictive mapping of the global power system using open data, Scientific data 7 (1) (2020) 19

    2020

  35. [43]

    Sadhu, K

    K. Sadhu, K. Haghshenas, M. Rouhani, M. Aiello, Optimal joint oper- ation of coupled transportation and power distribution urban networks, Energy Informatics 5 (1) (2022) 35

    2022

  36. [44]

    Crawford, S

    D. Crawford, S. Holt, A mathematical optimization technique for locat- ing and sizing distribution substations, and deriving their optimal ser- vice areas, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 94 (2) (1975) 230–235. doi:10.1109/T-PAS.1975.31846. 29

    1975

  37. [45]

    D. Sun, D. Farris, P. Cote, R. Shoults, M. Chen, Optimal distribution substation and primary feeder planning via the fixed charge network formulation, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS- 101 (3) (1982) 602–609.doi:10.1109/tpas.1982.317273. URL http://dx.doi.o...

    1982

  38. [46]

    Diaz-Dorado, J

    E. Diaz-Dorado, J. Cidras, E. Miguez, Application of evolutionary al- gorithms for the planning of urban distribution networks of medium voltage, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 17 (3) (2002) 879–884. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2002.800975

    2002

  39. [47]

    Gomez, H

    J. Gomez, H. Khodr, P. De Oliveira, L. Ocque, J. Yusta, R. Villasana, A. Urdaneta, Ant colony system algorithm for the planning of primary distribution circuits, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 19 (2) (2004) 996–1004. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825867

    2004

  40. [48]

    Ramirez-Rosado, J

    I. Ramirez-Rosado, J. A. Dominguez-Navarro, New multiobjective tabu search algorithm for fuzzy optimal planning of power distribution sys- tems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 21 (1) (2006) 224–233. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2005.860946

    2006

  41. [49]

    Mendoza, J

    F. Mendoza, J. Bernal-Agustin, J. Dominguez-Navarro, Nsga and spea applied to multiobjective design of power distribution systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 21 (4) (2006) 1938–1945.doi:10.1109/ TPWRS.2006.882469. Acknowledgements Bálint Hartmann acknowledges the suppo...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.