Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Think2Drive: Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Thinking in Latent World Model for Quasi-Realistic Autonomous Driving (in CARLA-v2)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.16720 v2 pith:ZBM23VIW submitted 2024-02-26 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords drivingcarlacasesmodelthink2drivetrainingworldautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world autonomous driving (AD) especially urban driving involves many corner cases. The lately released AD simulator CARLA v2 adds 39 common events in the driving scene, and provide more quasi-realistic testbed compared to CARLA v1. It poses new challenge to the community and so far no literature has reported any success on the new scenarios in V2 as existing works mostly have to rely on specific rules for planning yet they cannot cover the more complex cases in CARLA v2. In this work, we take the initiative of directly training a planner and the hope is to handle the corner cases flexibly and effectively, which we believe is also the future of AD. To our best knowledge, we develop the first model-based RL method named Think2Drive for AD, with a world model to learn the transitions of the environment, and then it acts as a neural simulator to train the planner. This paradigm significantly boosts the training efficiency due to the low dimensional state space and parallel computing of tensors in the world model. As a result, Think2Drive is able to run in an expert-level proficiency in CARLA v2 within 3 days of training on a single A6000 GPU, and to our best knowledge, so far there is no reported success (100\% route completion)on CARLA v2. We also propose CornerCase-Repository, a benchmark that supports the evaluation of driving models by scenarios. Additionally, we propose a new and balanced metric to evaluate the performance by route completion, infraction number, and scenario density, so that the driving score could give more information about the actual driving performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. iPad: Iterative Proposal-centric End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    iPad achieves top NAVSIM and Bench2Drive driving scores by iteratively refining sparse candidate trajectories with proposal-anchored attention over camera images.

  2. Ego-centric Learning of Communicative World Models for Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sharing compressed latent states and planned waypoints between agents, triggered by prediction errors, improves multi-agent driving performance in CARLA while cutting communication bandwidth by roughly 50x.

  3. A Comprehensive Review of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving in the CARLA Simulator

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of roughly 100 CARLA reinforcement learning papers, mapping algorithm families, representations, rewards, evaluation metrics, towns, and open challenges.

  4. Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: A Review

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of generative models (VAEs, GANs, diffusion, transformers, LLMs) applied to map generation, scenario generation, trajectory prediction, and motion planning for autonomous driving.

Pith tools