Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Cyclical accretion regime change in the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65 observed with Chandra

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The pulse-to-pulse luminosity swings of the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65 are explained by a cyclical accretion regime change, in which matter accumulates at the magnetosphere until Compton cooling becomes efficient.

desk verdict New Chandra constraints on 4U 0114+65 are solid, but the cyclical accretion-regime change rests on an inconsistent luminosity threshold and only three pulse trains. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08702 v2 pith:ZBM5RE6I submitted 2025-01-15 astro-ph.HE

Graciela Sanjurjo-Ferrín , Jose Miguel Torrejón , Konstantin Postnov , Michael Nowak , Jose Joaquín Rodes-Roca , Lida Oskinova , Jessica Planelles-Villalva , Norbert Schulz This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-raypulsarsaccretionquasi-sphericalsettlingComptoncooling4U0114+65ChandraRayleigh-Taylorinstabilityhigh-massbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes 200 kiloseconds of Chandra X-ray grating observations of the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65 and finds that its 2.6-hour pulses vary dramatically in brightness from one pulse to the next, with three pulses fading from bright to faint over the course of a single observation. The authors propose that these swings are not random but a cyclical accretion regime change: matter slowly settles onto the neutron star's magnetosphere at about half the free-fall speed until its density crosses a critical threshold, after which Compton cooling becomes more efficient, accretion quickens, and the source brightens. The bright phase then exhausts the accumulated matter and the system fades back until the next cycle. They also identify two families of X-ray spikes, short ones attributed to instabilities at the magnetospheric boundary and long ones to fluctuations in the wind-capture radius, and use the orbital variation of absorption to constrain the system's inclination to about 40 degrees and its wind mass-loss rate to about 8.6e-7 solar masses per year.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Compton-cooling-regulated accumulation cycle in the quasi-spherical settling accretion theory. In this model a hot convective shell sits above the magnetosphere, and plasma enters through Rayleigh-Taylor instability with a settling velocity about half the free-fall velocity; the entry rate is controlled by Compton and radiative cooling. When the accumulated density $\rho_1$ above the magnetosphere rises, the Atwood number $A \approx (\rho_1-\rho_2)/(\rho_1+\rho_2)$ approaches unity (the paper assumes $A\sim 1$, with interior density $\rho_2 \ll \rho_1$), and the RTI growth rate $\sigma = (Agk)^{1/2}$ increases, so the short-spike timescale $t_A \sim (R_A^3/GM)^{1/2} \sim 150$ s shortens. The long-spike timescale $t_B \sim (R_B^3/GM)^{1/2} \sim 2\times10^3$ s is set by the free-fall time from the Bondi radius. The cycle thus alternates between a matter-depleted, fainter state and a matter-rich, Compton-cooling-efficient brighter state.

What would settle it

A long continuous observation covering several complete 2.6-hour pulses should show a quasi-periodic bright-to-faint cycle whose recurrence time matches the magnetospheric accumulation timescale, with the absorption column building before each bright phase and short-spike durations shortening as brightness rises; observing bright pulses without the preceding NH increase, or finding no periodicity in pulse amplitudes, would falsify the regime-change scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the pulse-to-pulse variability of 4U 0114+65, including the observed bright-to-faint sequences, is the visible signature of an accumulation-discharge cycle in quasi-spherical settling accretion onto a slowly rotating magnetized neutron star. After a bright episode depletes the plasma above the magnetosphere, the inflow rate is set by a settling velocity roughly two times lower than free fall, so matter gradually builds up. When the density exceeds a critical value, Compton cooling becomes efficient, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability at the magnetospheric boundary grows faster, the mass accretion rate increases, and the source enters a brighter regime. The same cycle explains why the short spikes (timescale ~150 s) are shorter in brighter states: higher accumulated density lowers the magnetospheric radius and shortens the RTI timescale $t_A \sim R_A^{3/2}/(GM)^{1/2}$. Long spikes (~2e3 s) are attributed to density and velocity fluctuations in the captured stellar wind near the Bondi radius. Spectral support comes from the absorption column being about twice as high in the bright spectra than in the faint ones, and from the Comptonization index $\alpha$ changing from ~0.1 (bright) to ~4 (faint).

Load-bearing premise

The whole cycle rests on the assumption that this neutron star is in the quasi-spherical settling accretion regime, which requires its X-ray luminosity to sit below a Compton-cooling threshold; the paper quotes that threshold at $\simeq 4\times10^{36}$ erg/s in one section but ~$4\times10^{34}$ erg/s in another, while the source is measured at $0.1$–$1.3\times10^{36}$ erg/s.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the cycle is real, the bright-to-faint sequences in the 4U 0114+65 light curve are deterministic outcomes of the accumulation–depletion cycle, not stochastic flaring, and the relative durations of bright and faint phases should reflect the ratio of the settling and free-fall timescales.
  • The negative correlation between short-spike duration and source brightness follows directly from $t_A \propto R_A^{3/2}$ with $R_A$ decreasing at higher luminosity, so measuring spike durations in any additional luminosity state tests the RTI interpretation.
  • The factor about two higher absorption column in the Bright spectra is a direct signature of matter accumulated in the shell before the bright phase; continued spectral monitoring across a full cycle would show the column rising before each bright pulse.
  • Because 4U 0114+65 is near the boundary between settling and free-fall accretion regimes, the same cyclical behaviour should appear in other slow, wind-accreting X-ray pulsars whose luminosities approach the Compton-cooling threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable consequence the paper leaves implicit: the recurrence time of the bright phases should be quasi-periodic, equal to the time needed to re-fill the magnetospheric shell; a long continuous observation of this source should show a periodicity in pulse amplitudes at that accumulation timescale.
  • The paper's conflicting threshold values ($\simeq 4\times10^{36}$ erg/s in the Introduction versus ~$4\times10^{34}$ erg/s in the Discussion) leave the source's regime membership uncertain at its measured $0.1$–$1.3\times10^{36}$ erg/s; a systematic study of how spike properties change as the source's average luminosity crosses these values would determine the true regime boundary.
  • If the same Compton-cooling threshold controls flaring in supergiant fast X-ray transients, their short spikes should also anti-correlate with brightness; checking existing SFXT light curves for this pattern would tell whether a common mechanism is at work.
  • The phase-resolved pulse profiles could be used to see a spectral drift within a single bright pulse from an efficient-Comptonization (small $\alpha$) start to a less efficient (large $\alpha$) end, which would confirm that the bright phase depletes the accumulated matter on timescales of one to two hours.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 200 ks of Chandra HETG/ACIS observations of the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65, spread over nine uninterrupted exposures across four orbits. The authors measure a spin period of 9050±100 s, segment the light curves into peaks and valleys, classify the peaks into Bright, Intermediate, Faint, and Absorbed groups using k-means clustering, and detect short and long spikes using an autoencoder-based anomaly detector. From the orbital variation of the absorption column they infer an inclination of ~40° and a lower limit on the companion mass-loss rate of ~8.6e-7 solar masses per year. The central interpretive claim is that the pulse-to-pulse luminosity variations, in particular three decreasing bright-to-faint pulse trains, reflect a cyclical accretion regime change within the quasi-spherical settling accretion framework: matter accumulates at the magnetosphere until a critical density triggers more efficient Compton cooling, increasing the accretion rate and brightness until the reservoir is depleted.

Significance. If the regime-cycle interpretation holds, the paper would provide an observational diagnostic of the quasi-spherical settling accretion theory in a slow X-ray pulsar, connecting three independent datasets: pulse-to-pulse flux evolution, short-spike durations, and spectral parameters (NH and the bmc index alpha). The analysis is based on standard Chandra data reduction and spectral fitting, and the orbital NH modeling with a PSO fit is a reasonable approach that yields a plausible inclination and a lower limit on the wind mass-loss rate. The classification of long and short spikes into distinct clusters is a useful empirical result, and the short-spike timescale comparison with Eq. (6) is presented as an explicit, falsifiable check rather than a fitted parameter. However, the central regime-change claim currently rests on a small number of pulse trains and on a theoretical regime boundary that is stated inconsistently in the manuscript, so the significance of the paper as a test of settling-accretion theory remains conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1 and §5, 'NS pulse to pulse variability'] The manuscript gives two mutually inconsistent luminosity boundaries for the quasi-spherical settling accretion regime: the Introduction states that this mode is present in sources with moderate X-ray luminosity 'below ≃ 4×10^36 erg s−1', while Section 5 states that 'in sources with moderate X-ray luminosity (below ∼ 4×10^34 erg s−1), a hot convective quasi-spherical shell forms above the NS's magnetosphere.' With the source luminosity in Table 1 of 0.1–1.3×10^36 erg s−1, the source lies inside the regime under the first boundary but 2.5–33 times above the second boundary. Because the entire cyclical Compton-cooling explanation presupposes that the source is in the settling regime with a hot shell above the magnetosphere, the lower threshold would invalidate the central mechanism. The authors must resolve this contradiction: if 4×10^34 is a typo, it must be corrected and the sentence reworded; if it is not, the proposed cycle cannot operate at this luminosity and a different theoretical framework is needed. This point is load-bearing, not stylistic.
  2. [§5, 'NS pulse to pulse variability'] The central claim of a cyclical regime change is not backed by a quantitative model. The text asserts that matter accumulates at the magnetospheric boundary until 'the density exceeds a critical threshold' and that this triggers more efficient Compton cooling, but no expression is given for this threshold, for the accumulation timescale, for the depletion phase, or for the resulting cycle period. The observational evidence consists of three decreasing pulse trains (Orb 1-1, Orb 14-3, Orb 31-1; Fig. 14), without a statistical test of whether such sequences are expected or unlikely under a null model of stochastic wind accretion. As written, the cycle scenario is a plausible narrative rather than a tested explanation, and competing mechanisms (e.g., wind clumps, temporary gating by the magnetosphere, or variable absorption) are not quantitatively excluded. A quantitative derivation, even order-of-magnitude, of the cycle threshold and timescale is required to support the regime-change claim.
  3. [§3.3 and §5, Eqs. (5)–(6)] The short-spike timescale estimate tA ∼ R_A^{3/2}/(GM)^{1/2} ∼ 150 s depends on two assumptions that are stated rather than derived: the Atwood number A is taken to be close to 1 without justification, and the magnetospheric radius R_A is taken from Table 1 without an uncertainty or a consistency check against the luminosity-dependent accretion rate. Since R_A depends on the mass accretion rate and the magnetic field of the neutron star, and since the paper itself notes that R_A is inversely proportional to luminosity, the agreement between tA and the observed spike durations should be verified across the full range of luminosities in Table 1, not just at a single representative value. This is not necessarily fatal—the comparison is an independent check—but it needs to be presented with the relevant ranges and caveats.
  4. [§5, spectral support, Table 6] The spectral support for the accumulation scenario is suggestive but not decisive. The paper notes that NH is about two times larger in the Bright spectrum than in the Faint spectrum (2.1±0.1 versus 1.1±0.2 ×10^22 cm−2) and that the bmc index alpha differs (∼0.01 versus ∼4), but these are four-point correlations within a single source, and the Absorbed spectrum has NH = 19×10^22 cm−2, which is dominated by the orbital phase around ϕ ∼ 0 rather than by the accumulation cycle. The claim that NH traces local matter accumulation above the magnetosphere would be strengthened by showing that the NH difference between Bright and Faint is not simply a phase effect, and by quantifying the expected column density contributed by the accumulating shell.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] The phrase 'To characterize the spin period is not straightforward thought' appears to contain a typo; 'thought' should be 'though'.
  2. [§1 and Table 1] The companion spectral type is printed as 'BI1a' in the Introduction but as 'B1Ia' in Table 1; the standard notation should be used consistently.
  3. [Appendix references] Several cross-references to tables and figures are ambiguous or inconsistent, for example 'Table Fig. C.1.', 'Table Fig. D.1.', and 'Table Fig. E.1.'; these should be cleaned up.
  4. [§2] The observation log lists nine exposures, but the prose says 'nine different uninterrupted light curves spread across four different orbits'; this is consistent, but the table would benefit from a column identifying the orbit number more explicitly to avoid confusion between observation ID and orbit number.
  5. [§3.2] The pulse fraction is quoted with very asymmetric or large uncertainties (e.g., 0.6 ± 0.6 for Orb 1-1), and the text states a correlation of r = 0.9 between pulse fraction and orbital evolution without giving a significance level or showing the correlation on the relevant figure; a quantitative statement of the correlation's uncertainty would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spike-timescale checks use independent radii, the accretion-regime framework is external theory, and no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

full rationale

The short- and long-spike timescale checks are genuine, non-circular comparisons. t_A is computed from the tabulated Alfvén radius R_A ≃ 1.7×10^10 cm and t_B from the Bondi radius R_B ≃ 10^11 cm using standard scalings (Eqs. 4–6); neither radius was fitted to the observed spike durations, and the predicted t_A ≃ 150 s is compared with independently measured spike durations. The anti-correlation between short-spike duration and brightness follows from the scaling R_A ∝ L^{-2/7} and is tested against the data, making it a prediction rather than a restatement of inputs. The quasi-spherical settling accretion framework is cited from Shakura et al. (2012, 2014, 2015) and Shakura & Postnov (2017); although one author is a coauthor, that framework is an external published theory with independent applications and is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem. The RTI mechanism is also anchored to Arons & Lea (1976) and Elsner & Lamb (1977). The spectral parameters (N_H, alpha) used to support the scenario are fitted from the same Chandra data, so that support is post-hoc rather than a predictive test, but the paper does not claim these parameters are derived from the cycle model, so this is not circularity by construction. The luminosity-regime inconsistency (4×10^36 vs 4×10^34 erg/s) is a correctness/consistency concern about whether the settling regime applies to 4U 0114+65, not a circularity in the derivation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the quasi-spherical settling accretion theory (which one of the authors helped develop), on assumed wind geometry, and on several fitted spectral and geometric parameters. No new particles or fields are introduced; the 'accumulation cycle' is a proposed process, not an entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Orbital inclination = 40 ± 3 degrees
    Fitted with PSO to the variation of absorption column NH across three orbital phases; used to infer the mass-loss rate and the density profile.
  • Companion mass-loss rate = 8.6 ± 1.7 x 10^-7 M_sun/yr (lower limit)
    Fitted together with inclination from NH orbital variation, assuming a unionized, spherically symmetric CAK wind with beta = 0.8.
  • BMC spectral parameters for Bright/Intermediate/Faint/Absorbed spectra = NH ranges from about 1.1 to 23 x 10^22 cm^-2; alpha ranges from about 0.1 to 4
    Free parameters in the spectral fits; the bright/faint contrasts in NH and alpha are used as supporting evidence for the accretion regime cycle.
  • Soft blackbody temperature and absorption = kT = 0.06 keV, NH = 0.8 x 10^22 cm^-2
    Chosen by hand from the most frequent fitted values and fixed; the soft excess luminosity depends on this choice.
  • Atwood number A = ~1 (assumed)
    Used in the RTI timescale tA ~ 150 s; not measured.
  • Magnetospheric (Alfven) radius RA = 1.7 x 10^10 cm
    Taken from Table 1, computed from standard magnetospheric radius formula with assumed NS mass, magnetic field, and accretion rate; the short-spike prediction is sensitive to RA^1.5.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CAK stellar wind model with beta = 0.8 and the wind is unionized and spherically symmetric.
    Used to convert NH variations into inclination and mass-loss rate; the paper states this is an oversimplification.
  • domain assumption Quasi-spherical settling accretion theory (Shakura et al. 2012, 2014) with settling velocity about 2 times smaller than free-fall and a Compton-cooling threshold.
    The central regime-change model is built on this framework; the paper gives inconsistent luminosity thresholds for its applicability.
  • domain assumption Neutron star mass of 1.4 M_sun.
    Used to compute Bondi radius, corotation radius, Alfven radius, and the RTI timescale; not measured in this work.
  • standard math Rayleigh-Taylor instability dispersion relation sigma = sqrt(A g k) with A ~ 1.
    Used to derive the short-spike timescale tA.
  • domain assumption Blackbody seed-photon radius formula R_W = 0.6 sqrt(L_34)(kT)^-2 km.
    Used to estimate emission radii from fitted bmc luminosity and temperature; from Torrejon et al. 2004.
  • ad hoc to paper The pulse-phase shift in Orb 32-1 is caused by pole switching.
    Proposed to explain the observed 0.5 phase shift without independent evidence; not essential to the central accretion cycle claim but part of the narrative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cyclical accretion regime change in the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65 observed with Chandra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZBM5RE6I

@misc{pith2026250108702,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cyclical accretion regime change in the slow X-ray pulsar 4U 0114+65 observed with Chandra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZBM5RE6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08702}
}
abstract

4U 0114+65 is a high-mass X-ray binary system formed by the luminous supergiant B1Ia, known as V{*} V662 Cas, and one of the slowest rotating neutron stars (NS) with a spin period of about 2.6 hours. This fact provides a rare opportunity to study interesting details of the accretion within each individual pulse of the compact object. In this paper, we analyze 200 ks of Chandra grating data, divided into 9 uninterrupted observations around the orbit. The changes in the circumstellar absorption column through the orbit suggest an orbital inclination of $\sim$ $40^{\circ}$ with respect to the observer and a companion mass-loss rate of $\sim$ 8.6 10$^{-7}$ solar masses yr$^{-1}$. The peaks of the NS pulse show a large pulse-to-pulse variability. Three of them show an evolution from a brighter regime to a weaker one. We propose that the efficiency of Compton cooling in this source fluctuates throughout an accumulation cycle. After significant depletion of matter within the magnetosphere, since the settling velocity is $\sim \times$ 2 times lower than the free-fall velocity, the source gradually accumulates matter until the density exceeds a critical threshold. This increase in density triggers a transition to a more efficient Compton cooling regime, leading to a higher mass accretion rate and consequently to an increased brightness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08702 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pole-on sketch of the system showing the relative sizes of the companion star and the NS orbit (NS size not to scale, the observer would be situated in a perpendicular plane with respect to the orbit). The light curves are displayed parallel to the orbit. Green represents the 9 uninterrupted Chandra light curves from the dataset analyzed in this paper scaled to the count rate. Red represents a former XMM-Newton ligh… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of peaks and valleys division on Orb 1-1. Upper panel: High-energy (3–10 keV, red) and low-energy (0.2–3 keV, blue) light curves. The vertical lines indicate the division between peaks and val￾leys. Lower panel: Color ratio (CR), defined as the high-energy light curve divided by the low-energy light curve. 3. Timing analysis Within this dataset there are nine different uninterrupted light curves spread acros… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Normalized NS spin pulse shapes. The averaged pulses of the four distinct orbits included in this dataset are shown in the top panels, while the averaged pulses for the k-means classifications are displayed in the bottom panels. To compute the average pulse shape, all pulses were normalized beforehand to ensure that each contributed equally to the final result. There are two main challenges in the spike detection. O… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Orb 32-1 light curve. Green vertical lines divide peaks from valleys. NS phase 0.9 − 0.1 is shadowed in blue. (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Detected spikes at their respective orbital phases. The radial axis represents the prominence. The size of the bubbles is proportional to their duration. The color gradient is used to support visually the promi￾nence gradient. for elliptical cluster shapes and differen…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Prominence vs duration of spikes detected in this dataset. Blue squares and red triangles represent the two separated clusters obtained by a gaussian mixture algorithm. The leftmost panel provides the results obtained for all the observations combined, while the three …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: To fit this section of the spectra, we thawed the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The plots show the average spike duration for each of the two clusters (with the upper panel displaying the short spikes and the lower panel displaying the long spikes) as predicted by the Gaussian Mixture algorithm for each observation. The x axis represents the brigh…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper row (left to right): Spectra, model, and χ 2 values for Bright, Intermediate and Faint. Lower row (left to right): Spectra, model, and χ 2 values for Absorbed and all spectra displayed for comparison [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Emission lines observed in the low energy range within the spectra Orb 32 and the absorbed spectra. ing that 4U 0114+65 have the typical thick wind of a supergiant star but with a much lower degree of clumping. In order to have a strong Fe Kα line, the ionization param…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Representation of the system. The dotted circle represents the NS orbit and the white circle the companion star. Red arrows represent the path that the emitting radiation transverses in its path to the observer. This path is different in length and wind density depend…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Density variation encountered by the NS as it travels around the eccentric orbit (red continuous line). The measured pulse fraction ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Ionization map in the plane of the orbit. From left to right of the Bright, Intermediate, Faint and Absorbed spectra respectively. The delimited regions represent the Fe Kα region, i.e. with an ionization parameter lower than 100 and higher than 25. Please note that t…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Fe Kα formation region (ionization parameter in the range 50− 100) vs the Fe Kα line area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Light curves showing the decreasing pulse intensity trend (Orb 1-1, Orb 14-3, and Orb 31-1). Compton cooling and a faster RTI, leading to increased accreted matter flow and thus, the source brightness. As the settling veloc￾ity is approximately two times smaller than …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H., Samir, R

    Abdallah, M. H., Samir, R. M., Leahy, D. A., & Shaker, A. A. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3271

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    & Lea, S

    Arons, J. & Lea, S. M. 1976, ApJ, 207, 914

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, The Astronomical Journal, 161, 147

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2003.05991

    Bank, D., Koenigstein, N., & Giryes, R. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2003.05991

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Bonning, E. W. & Falanga, M. 2005, A&A, 436, L31

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Bonyadi, M. R. & Michalewicz, Z. 2017, Evolutionary Computation, 25, 1

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    2008, ApJ, 683, 1031

    Bozzo, E., Falanga, M., & Stella, L. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1031

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    2003, A&A, 404, 1023

    Bulik, T., Gondek-Rosi´nska, D., Santangelo, A., et al. 2003, A&A, 404, 1023

    work page 2003

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    I., Abbott, D

    Castor, J. I., Abbott, D. C., & Klein, R. I. 1975, ApJ, 195, 157

    1975

  2. [10]

    B., & Cowley, A

    Crampton, D., Hutchings, J. B., & Cowley, A. P. 1985, ApJ, 299, 839 D’Aì, A., Evans, P. A., Burrows, D. N., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1607.04264]

    1985 arXiv

  3. [11]

    1977, IAU Circ., 3144

    Dower, R., Kelley, R., Margon, B., & Bradt, H. 1977, IAU Circ., 3144

    1977

  4. [12]

    Duncan, R. C. & Thompson, C. 1992, ApJ, 392, L9

    1992

  5. [13]

    Elsner, R. F. & Lamb, F. K. 1977, ApJ, 215, 897

    1977

  6. [14]

    A., Sood, R

    Farrell, S. A., Sood, R. K., & O’Neill, P. M. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1457

    2006

  7. [15]

    P., Belloni, T., & Cassinelli, J

    Finley, J. P., Belloni, T., & Cassinelli, J. P. 1992, A&A, 262, L25

    1992

  8. [16]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 6270, Ob- servatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V

    2006

  9. [17]

    D., Blair, J

    Grundstrom, E. D., Blair, J. L., Gies, D. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 431

    2007

  10. [18]

    A., Finley, J

    Hall, T. A., Finley, J. P., Corbet, R. H. D., & Thomas, R. C. 2000, ApJ, 536, 450

    2000

  11. [19]

    J., Kahn, S

    Hess, C. J., Kahn, S. M., & Paerels, F. B. 1993, in American Astronomical So- ciety Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 183, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 65.02

    1993

  12. [20]

    C., Narayan, R., & Kallman, T

    Hickox, R. C., Narayan, R., & Kallman, T. R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 881

    2004

  13. [21]

    Y ., Lin, L

    Hu, C.-P., Chou, Y ., Ng, C. Y ., Lin, L. C.-C., & Yen, D. C.-C. 2017, ApJ, 844, 16

    2017

  14. [22]

    C.-C., & Yen, D

    Hu, C.-P., Chou, Y ., Ng, C.-Y ., Lin, L. C.-C., & Yen, D. C.-C. 2017, The Astro- physical Journal, 844, 16

    2017

  15. [23]

    Ikhsanov, N. R. & Beskrovnaya, N. G. 2013, Astronomy Reports, 57, 287

    2013

  16. [24]

    2006, A&A, 458, 513 Krtiˇcka, J., Kubát, J., & Krtiˇcková, I

    Koenigsberger, G., Georgiev, L., Moreno, E., et al. 2006, A&A, 458, 513 Krtiˇcka, J., Kubát, J., & Krtiˇcková, I. 2015, A&A, 579, A111

    2006

  17. [25]

    Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. & Cassinelli, J. P. 1999, Introduction to Stellar Winds, 452

    1999

  18. [26]

    & van den Heuvel, E

    Li, X.-D. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1999, ApJ, 513, L45

    1999

  19. [27]

    & Blomme, R

    Lobel, A. & Blomme, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 408

    2008

  20. [28]

    1967, in Some methods for classification and analysis of multi- variate observations Martínez-Núñez, S., Kretschmar, P., Bozzo, E., et al

    MacQueen, J. 1967, in Some methods for classification and analysis of multi- variate observations Martínez-Núñez, S., Kretschmar, P., Bozzo, E., et al. 2017, Space Sci. Rev.[arXiv:1701.08618]

    1967 arXiv

  21. [29]

    W., et al

    Massa, D., Oskinova, L., Fullerton, A. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2173

    2014

  22. [30]

    M., Clarke, D., & Pollock, A

    Oskinova, L. M., Clarke, D., & Pollock, A. M. T. 2001, A&A, 378, L21

    2001

  23. [31]

    C., Bozzo, E., & Belloni, T

    Pradhan, P., Paul, B., Paul, B. C., Bozzo, E., & Belloni, T. M. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4467

    2015

  24. [32]

    2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1607.04107]

    Rea, N., Borghese, A., Esposito, P., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1607.04107]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J., et al

    Reig, P., Chakrabarty, D., Coe, M. J., et al. 1996, A&A, 311, 879

    1996

  26. [34]

    Reig, P., Nersesian, A., Zezas, A., Gkouvelis, L., & Coe, M. J. 2016, A&A, 590, A122

    2016

  27. [35]

    2009, Gaussian Mixture Models, ed

    Reynolds, D. 2009, Gaussian Mixture Models, ed. S. Z. Li & A. Jain (Boston, MA: Springer US), 659–663

    2009

  28. [36]

    Rousseeuw, P. J. 1987, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53 Sanjurjo-Ferrín, G., Torrejón, J. M., Postnov, K., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A145 Sanjurjo-Ferrín, G., Villalva, J. P., Torrejón, J. M., & Rodes-Roca, J. J. 2024, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7220

    1987

  29. [37]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

    1982

  30. [38]

    & Postnov, K

    Shakura, N. & Postnov, K. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1702.03393]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    2012, MNRAS, 420, 216

    Shakura, N., Postnov, K., Kochetkova, A., & Hjalmarsdotter, L. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 216

    2012

  32. [40]

    I., Postnov, K

    Shakura, N. I., Postnov, K. A., Kochetkova, A. Y ., & Hjalmarsdotter, L. 2014, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, V ol. 64, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 02001

    2014

  33. [41]

    I., Postnov, K

    Shakura, N. I., Postnov, K. A., Kochetkova, A. Y ., et al. 2015, Astronomy Re- ports, 59, 645

    2015

  34. [42]

    A., Belfiore, A., et al

    Sidoli, L., Postnov, K. A., Belfiore, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 420

    2019

  35. [43]

    Sood, R., Farrell, S., O’Neill, P., Manchanda, R., & Ashok, N. M. 2006, Ad- vances in Space Research, 38, 2779

    2006

  36. [44]

    Titarchuk, L., Mastichiadis, A., & Kylafis, N. D. 1997, ApJ, 487, 834 Torrejón, J. M., Kreykenbohm, I., Orr, A., Titarchuk, L., & Negueruela, I. 2004, A&A, 423, 301

    1997

  37. [45]

    S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H

    Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 1999, A&A, 350, 181

    1999

  38. [46]

    2011, MNRAS, 413, 1083

    Wang, W. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1083

    2011

  39. [47]

    C., Tananbaum, H

    Weisskopf, M. C., Tananbaum, H. D., Van Speybroeck, L. P., & O’Dell, S. L. 2000, in X-Ray Optics, Instruments, and Missions III, ed. J. E. Truemper & B. Aschenbach (SPIE)

    2000

  40. [48]

    2000, ApJ, 542, 914 Article number, page 11 of 11

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914 Article number, page 11 of 11

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.