Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 58 references

KNOSOS: a fast orbit-averaging neoclassical code for stellarator geometry

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read KNOSOS computes stellarator neoclassical transport by orbit-averaging the drift-kinetic equation, reproducing benchmark fluxes orders of magnitude faster than standard local codes while retaining the tangential magnetic drift and…

desk verdict A solid, open-source code paper that delivers real speedups and honest benchmarks; the main caveat is that the radial-locality envelope of the method is not directly validated. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11615 v2 pith:ZD6ZRURD submitted 2019-08-30 physics.plasm-ph

J. L. Velasco , I. Calvo , F.I. Parra , J. M. García-Regaña This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords stellaratorneoclassicaltransportdrift-kineticequationorbitaveragingbounce-averagedcoefficientstangentialmagneticdriftflux-surfaceelectrostaticpotentialquasineutrality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces KNOSOS, an open-source solver for neoclassical transport in low-collisionality stellarator plasmas. The central idea is to orbit-average the radially local drift-kinetic equation, which collapses the problem from five dimensions to an equation in just two variables: the field-line label and the pitch angle. This reduction is what makes the code orders of magnitude faster than standard local codes. KNOSOS keeps effects that DKES-style monoenergetic calculations drop, namely the component of the magnetic drift tangent to flux surfaces and the flux-surface variation of the electrostatic potential, and it solves quasineutrality efficiently because the equation is linear in that potential variation. The paper demonstrates agreement with DKES and EUTERPE when the same equations are solved, in simulations that can be orders of magnitude faster.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is orbit-averaging of the drift-kinetic equation. Bounce-integrals along field lines—I_{vM,α}, I_{vE,α}, I_{vM,ψ}, I_{vE,ψ}, and I_ν—absorb all dependence on the arc-length coordinate, leaving a differential equation in only the field-line label α and the pitch-angle λ. The radial coordinate ψ and speed v become parameters. Divergences of these integrals near trapping bifurcations are removed and evaluated analytically, and fast Fourier-based evaluation of the magnetic field along straight field lines accelerates the coefficient calculation. The linearity in φ₁ allows a response-matrix solution of quasineutrality, in which the drift-kinetic equation is solved once for each Fourier basis element and the factorization is reused, giving a speed-up of roughly the number of basis elements.

What would settle it

Take a strongly non-omnigenous stellarator configuration, such as one with large effective ripple and small aspect ratio, and compute the two bounce-averaged drift terms in inequality (23); if the radial-drift term is not much smaller than the tangential-drift term, then run KNOSOS and a radially global code with identical collision operators and profiles and compare the radial fluxes, because a significant disagreement beyond the DKES/EUTERPE benchmark error bars would show the local-ordering premise does not hold for that device.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a rigorously orbit-averaged, radially local drift-kinetic equation can capture the neoclassical transport regimes relevant to stellarators—1/ν, √ν, and superbanana-plateau—while including physics that older local codes omit. Specifically, the tangential magnetic drift and the radial E×B drift caused by the flux-surface variation of the electrostatic potential φ₁ are retained, and quasineutrality is solved consistently because the equations are linear in φ₁. When the same simplifications as DKES are imposed, KNOSOS reproduces DKES monoenergetic transport coefficients across four very different stellarator configurations; when the full tangential-drift terms are kept, it matches EUTERPE calculations of φ₁ and shows that the tangential magnetic drift can change the radial energy flux by more than 50% in ion-root conditions and can qualitatively alter the amplitude and phase of φ₁.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the plasma is close enough to omnigeneity and large enough in aspect ratio that the bounce-averaged radial drift is much smaller than the tangential drift, so the radial-derivative term in the drift-kinetic equation can be dropped; if that inequality fails, KNOSOS solves a different equation that misses radially global effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Databases of monoenergetic transport coefficients for a stellarator configuration can be generated on the order of seconds to minutes rather than hours, enabling broad parameter scans.
  • The √ν and superbanana-plateau regimes, which the effective-ripple figure of merit ignores, can be computed fast enough to include them in stellarator optimization loops.
  • Consistent solutions of quasineutrality with the flux-surface potential φ₁ become practical for systematic impurity-transport studies that were previously computationally prohibitive.
  • KNOSOS can supply the radial electric field, the tangential electric field, and the full bulk-species distribution function as inputs to gyrokinetic turbulence calculations.
  • The retained tangential magnetic drift can change predicted energy fluxes by tens of percent in ion-root plasmas, so transport calculations that omit it may misestimate confinement even when thermal particles sit in the 1/ν regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This is an inference beyond the paper: because the speed gain comes from eliminating the arc-length and radial-derivative dependence, the same bounce-averaged response-matrix strategy could be extended to trace impurity species, yielding systematic impurity-flux scans across configurations and collisionalities.
  • The benchmarks cover devices that are relatively close to omnigeneity; a natural testable extension would be to quantify, in a strongly non-omnigenous configuration, how much the dropped ∂ψg term corrupts fluxes as inequality (23) breaks down.
  • The fast computation of √ν and superbanana-plateau transport suggests a geometry optimization target based on the variation of the second adiabatic invariant on the flux surface rather than the effective ripple alone; the paper points in this direction but does not develop such a figure of merit.
  • The response-matrix formulation of quasineutrality makes KNOSOS a natural building block for coupling neoclassical fluxes into time-dependent transport codes, since repeated evaluations of fluxes for changing profiles would reuse the same precomputed matrices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. KNOSOS is an open-source code that solves the radially local drift-kinetic equation for trapped particles together with the flux-surface quasineutrality equation in stellarator geometry, using bounce averages to reduce the equation to the variables (α, λ). The code retains the tangential magnetic drift and the flux-surface variation of the electrostatic potential φ1, solves the quasineutrality equation via a linear response-matrix method, and is benchmarked against DKES monoenergetic transport coefficients for W7-X, LHD, NCSX, and TJ-II, and against EUTERPE for φ1 in LHD and W7-X. The paper reports runtimes of seconds to minutes and claims that, when solving equivalent equations, KNOSOS reproduces DKES and EUTERPE calculations orders of magnitude faster.

Significance. If the benchmarks are taken at face value, KNOSOS is a significant practical tool for stellarator neoclassical transport: it makes low-collisionality calculations fast enough for parameter scans and optimization, includes two effects that DKES-style monoenergetic approaches drop (the tangential magnetic drift and the flux-surface electrostatic potential variation), and is released as open source. The response-matrix solution of quasineutrality is a clean and efficient idea, and the agreement with the independently developed DKES and EUTERPE codes in the simplified comparisons is strong evidence that the discretization and bounce-average implementation are sound. The paper is also careful to qualify its central claim with "when solving equivalent equations" and to acknowledge the radially local approximation, which is a genuine strength.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (23)] The radially local ordering that justifies dropping the ∂ψgb term is never quantified for any of the devices benchmarked in Section 4. Because DKES also solves a radially local equation, agreement with DKES cannot validate inequality (23); both codes would fail together if the ordering broke down. The paper should either compute the relative size of the omitted bounce-averaged radial-drift term versus the retained tangential term for the benchmarked cases, or explicitly state that the benchmarks validate only the numerical solution of the local equation and not the applicability of the local approximation itself. This matters because inequality (23) defines the code's domain of validity.
  2. [Sections 4.2-4.3, Figs. 8-11] The main physical novelty of KNOSOS, the tangential magnetic drift in Eq. (24), is not benchmarked against any independent code. In Section 4.2 the comparison is internal (Q versus \hat Q, both computed by KNOSOS), and in Section 4.3 the EUTERPE comparisons use Eq. (52), which sets the tangential magnetic drift to zero; the right-hand columns of Figs. 10 and 11, which include this drift, have no independent reference. Please add a comparison with SFINCS or FORTEC-3D for at least one case where the tangential drift changes the result, or clearly label these predictions as not independently validated.
  3. [Section 4.3, Fig. 11] The W7-X edge case shows a clear underestimation of φ1 by KNOSOS relative to EUTERPE. The attribution to EUTERPE's plateau-regime contribution is plausible, but it is not demonstrated, and if correct it indicates that the local trapped-particle equation (9) is not adequate at that radial position. The paper should quantify the plateau contribution, for example by varying the cutoff v0 in Eq. (58) or by comparing with a non-local model, and should state explicitly over what radial range the φ1 validation is reliable.
  4. [Sections 3.4 and 4.1] No grid-convergence study is reported. The benchmarks use fixed grids (Nα=32 and Nλ=64 or 128), and the text acknowledges that the lowest-collisionality TJ-II points in Fig. 6 (bottom right) are under-resolved and would have required a finer grid. Since the paper's speed claims (seconds per case) are only meaningful if the chosen grids are adequate, please add a convergence study over Nα, Nλ, and the Fourier truncation N for at least one representative configuration, and report the corresponding accuracy of the computed fluxes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, near Fig. 6] The sentence "This regime, which cannot be not described by a bounce-averaged drift-kinetic equation" contains a typo and should read "cannot be described".
  2. [Section 3.3, Fig. 2] The example in the text says that field lines are followed for "6" toroidal periods and refers to N/ι, but the rotational transform used in the example is not stated; please give the value of ι so the reader can verify the construction.
  3. [Section 3.5, Eq. (45)] The stated number of Fourier coefficients, N = 2(2Nn+1)(Nm+1), appears inconsistent with the summation limits in Eq. (45), where -Nn<n<Nn and 0<m<Nm; please check the counting or define the limits to match the expression.
  4. [Section 4] A summary table listing the benchmark configurations, grid sizes, and runtimes would improve reproducibility; these values are currently scattered through the text and figure captions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: KNOSOS benchmarks an independent code implementation against DKES and EUTERPE, with no fitted inputs; the radially-local ordering is a scope assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

KNOSOS is a numerical implementation of a previously derived radially-local drift-kinetic and quasineutrality system (Eqs. 9 and 18; derivation credited to Refs. [5,25]). The paper does not fit any parameter to the benchmark outputs and then rename that fit a prediction. Section 4.1 solves the deliberately simplified DKES-like equation (52) and compares the resulting monoenergetic coefficients with DKES; this is an implementation benchmark against an independently developed code, not a self-defined prediction. Section 4.2 compares the full equation (24) with the simplified one, and the hybrid DKES+KNOSOS curve in Eq. (58) uses a cut-off v0 chosen in the 1/nu regime; the conclusion drawn from that curve is a consistency check about the plateau contribution, not a fitted central claim. Section 4.3 validates the quasineutrality response-matrix solution against EUTERPE by solving the same reduced equation (52) with the same assumptions, and the tangential-drift variant is an additional physics result rather than a fitted or circular assertion. The cited derivations in Ref. [25] are parameter-free, state their ordering assumptions, and do not assume the numerical results of this paper; although they are prior work by the same group, they are not empirical inputs to the benchmarks and therefore do not make the outputs equivalent to the inputs by construction. The radial-locality ordering expressed by inequality (23) is an approximation whose quantitative validity is not established by the benchmark suite, and the W7-X edge discrepancy may indicate its boundary; however, an unvalidated scope assumption is a correctness risk, not circularity, because it does not reduce the paper's claimed results to its inputs. Thus no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or fitted physical constants are introduced. The code depends on numerical choices (grid sizes, harmonic truncation, well truncation, and a hybrid cutoff for one diagnostic curve) and on the radially-local, near-omnigeneous, low-beta framework from the authors' earlier theory. Benchmarks are against independently developed DKES and EUTERPE, so the central validation is external.

free parameters (4)
  • Grid sizes Nα and Nλ = 32x64 to 32x128 in benchmarks
    Hand-chosen resolutions; no convergence study is reported, and the TJ-II mismatch is attributed to insufficient Nλ at low collisionality.
  • Maximum trapped-well traversal = 6 toroidal periods in the W7-X example
    Orbits trapped in more than this are treated as passing, effectively setting the trapped/passing boundary and excluding deeply trapped orbits.
  • Fourier truncation for phi1 = not specified
    The number of harmonics Nn and Nm in eq. (45) determines the accuracy of the response-matrix quasineutrality solution.
  • Cut-off velocity v0 in hybrid DKES+KNOSOS flux = not specified
    Hand-chosen in eq. (58) for the black-line hybrid curves; not used in the standalone KNOSOS solution.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Low collisionality: parallel motion is much faster than collisions, so the distribution function is independent of arc length and orbit averaging is valid.
    Invoked throughout Section 2; stated before eq. (23).
  • domain assumption Closeness to omnigeneity and large aspect ratio make the radial drift term proportional to ∂ψg negligible via inequality (23).
    Section 2, eq. (23); without this the radially local eq. (9) is not valid.
  • domain assumption Low-beta magnetic geometry with Bψ=0 and incompressible E×B drift is used in eqs. (15) and (25).
    Section 2, eq. (15); excludes finite-beta effects.
  • domain assumption Only pitch-angle scattering, with effective collision frequencies, is retained; quasineutrality assumes a pure plasma with one ion species.
    Section 2 and Appendix A; electron-ion collisions are approximated by an effective νλ.
  • domain assumption Tangential drift does not alter the bounce points because drifts are much slower than parallel motion.
    Section 2 discussion after eq. (23); essential to treating l as a parameter in the orbit-averaged equation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of KNOSOS: a fast orbit-averaging neoclassical code for stellarator geometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZD6ZRURD

@misc{pith2026190811615,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: KNOSOS: a fast orbit-averaging neoclassical code for stellarator geometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZD6ZRURD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11615}
}
read the original abstract

KNOSOS (KiNetic Orbit-averaging SOlver for Stellarators) is a freely available, open-source code (\href{https://github.com/joseluisvelasco/KNOSOS}{https://github.com/joseluisvelasco/KNOSOS}) that calculates neoclassical transport in low-collisionality plasmas of three-dimensional magnetic confinement devices by solving the radially local drift-kinetic and quasineutrality equations. The main feature of KNOSOS is that it relies on orbit-averaging to solve the drift-kinetic equation very fast. KNOSOS treats rigorously the effect of the component of the magnetic drift that is tangent to magnetic surfaces, and of the component of the electrostatic potential that varies on the flux surface, {\varphi}_1. Furthermore, the equation solved is linear in {\varphi}_1, which permits an efficient solution of the quasineutrality equation. As long as the radially local approach is valid, KNOSOS can be applied to the calculation of neoclassical transport in stellarators (helias, heliotrons, heliacs, etc.) and tokamaks with broken axisymmetry. In this paper, we show several calculations for the stellarators W7-X, LHD, NCSX and TJ-II that provide benchmark with standard local codes and demonstrate the advantages of this approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11615 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of a particle trajectory at fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Construction of the angular grid (see text) for a flux surface of W7-X (top); zoom (bottom). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sketch of grid in λ space at fixed α. The collision operator is discretized as in equation (29) except at the top (λ1) or bottom (λNλ+1) of the well and at bifurcations (e.g. λj0 ); there, equations (32), (31) and (30), respectively are used instead. larger value of α, the wells merge into a single region labelled again I. The last point of the grid, αNα , is close to α1 + 2π. Non-centered finite differences with se… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: sketch of grid in α space at fixed λ. The tangential derivatives are discretized as in equations (34) and (35) except close to the limits of the grid (α1 and αNα ) and to bifurcations (e.g. αi0 ); there, equations (36), (37), (38), (39) and (40) are used instead. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Magnetic field strength for surface ψ/ψLCFS = 0.5 of the W7-X high-mirror configuration (top left), the LHD Rax = 3.75 m configu￾ration (top right), an NCSX equilibrium (bottom left) and the TJ-II standard configuration (bottom right). 4. Results In this section, we sh…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Monoenergetic transport coefficients calculated with DKES (full squares) and KNOSOS (small open circles with lines) as a function of the collisionality at ψ/ψLCFS = 0.5 surface of W7-X (top left), LHD (top right), NCSX (bottom left) and TJ-II (bottom right). The colour…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial profile of normalized monoenergetic transport coe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radial energy flux as a function of the radial electric field for a W7-X high-performance plasma: logarithmic (top) and linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial energy flux as a function of the radial electric field for a W7-X high density plasma (top) and an LHD plasma (bottom). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Electrostatic potential variation on the flux surface calculated fort the LHD plasma with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Electrostatic potential variation on the flux surface calculated fort the W7X plasma with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dinklage, M

    A. Dinklage, M. Yokoyama, K. Tanaka, J. L. Velasco, D. L ´opez-Bruna, C. D. Beidler, S. Satake, E. Ascas ´ıbar, J. Ar´evalo, J. Baldzuhn, Y . Feng, D. Gates, J. Geiger, K. Ida, M. Jakubowski, A. L´opez-Fraguas, H. Maassberg, J. Miyazawa, T. Morisaki, S. Murakami, N. Pablant, S. Kobayashi, R. Seki, C. Suzuki, Y . Suzuki, Y . Turkin, A. Wakasa, R. Wolf, H. ...

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Dinklage, the W7-X Team, Magnetic configuration e ffects on the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator, Nature Physics 14 (8) (2018) 855–860

    A. Dinklage, the W7-X Team, Magnetic configuration e ffects on the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator, Nature Physics 14 (8) (2018) 855–860. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0141-9 . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0141-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0141-9 2018

  3. [3]

    D. D. Ho, R. M. Kulsrud, Neoclassical transport in stellarators, The Physics of Fluids 30 (2) (1987) 442–461. doi:10.1063/1.866395. URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.866395

    doi:10.1063/1.866395 1987

  4. [4]

    C. D. Beidler, K. Allmaier, M. Y . Isaev, S. V . Kasilov, W. Kernbichler, G. O. Leitold, H. Maaßberg, D. R. Mikkelsen, S. Murakami, M. Schmidt, D. A. Spong, V . Tribaldos, A. Wakasa, Benchmarking of the mono-energetic transport coe fficients. Results from the Inter- national Collaboration on Neoclassical Transport in Stellarators (ICNTS), Nuclear Fusion 51 ...

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J. L. Velasco, A. Alonso, The e ffect of tangential drifts on neoclassical transport in stellarators close to omnigeneity, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 59 (5) (2017) 055014. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/59/i=5/a=055014

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    J. R. Cary, S. G. Shasharina, Helical plasma confinement devices with good confinement properties, Physical Review Letters 78 (1997) 674–677. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.674

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.674 1997

  7. [7]

    F. I. Parra, I. Calvo, P. Helander, M. Landreman, Less constrained omnigenous stellarators, Nuclear Fusion 55 (2015) 033005

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    A. H. Boozer, Transport and isomorphic equilibria, The Physics of Fluids 26 (2) (1983) 496–499. arXiv:https://aip.scitation.org/ doi/pdf/10.1063/1.864166, doi:10.1063/1.864166. URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.864166

    doi:10.1063/1.864166 1983

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Landreman, P

    M. Landreman, P. J. Catto, Omnigenity as generalized quasisymmetry, Physics of Plasmas 19 (2012) 056103

    2012

  2. [10]

    Klinger, A

    T. Klinger, A. Alonso, S. Bozhenkov, R. Burhenn, A. Dinklage, G. Fuchert, J. Geiger, O. Grulke, A. Langenberg, M. Hirsch, G. Kocsis, J. Knauer, A. Kr¨amer-Flecken, H. Laqua, S. Lazerson, M. Landreman, H. Maaßberg, S. Marsen, M. Otte, N. Pablant, E. Pasch, K. Rahbarnia, T. Stan...

    2017

  3. [11]

    R. C. Wolf, et al., Major results from the first plasma campaign of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator, Nuclear Fusion 57 (10) (2017) 102020. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/57/i=10/a=102020

    2017

  4. [12]

    Takeiri, the LHD team, Extension of the operational regime of the LHD towards a deuterium experiment, Nuclear Fusion 57 (10) (2017) 102023

    Y . Takeiri, the LHD team, Extension of the operational regime of the LHD towards a deuterium experiment, Nuclear Fusion 57 (10) (2017) 102023. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/57/i=10/a=102023

    2017

  5. [13]

    Sunn-Pedersen, M

    T. Sunn-Pedersen, M. Otte, S. Lazerson, P. Helander, S. Bozhenkov, C. Biedermann, T. Klinger, R. Wolf, H. S. Bosch, the Wendelstein 7-X Team, Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X magnetic field to better than 1:100,000, Nature Communications 7 (13493)

  6. [14]

    H. E. Mynick, T. K. Chu, A. H. Boozer, Class of model stellarator fields with enhanced confinement, Phyics Review Letters 48 (1982) 322–326. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.322

    1982 doi

  7. [15]

    Yamada, J

    H. Yamada, J. Harris, A. Dinklage, E. Ascasibar, F. Sano, S. Okamura, J. Talmadge, U. Stroth, A. Kus, S. Murakami, M. Yokoyama, C. Beidler, V . Tribaldos, K. Watanabe, Y . Suzuki, Characterization of energy confinement in net-current free plasmas using the extended Internationa...

    2005

  8. [16]

    M. C. Zarnstor ff, L. A. Berry, A. Brooks, E. Fredrickson, G.-Y . Fu, S. Hirshman, S. Hudson, L.-P. Ku, E. Lazarus, D. Mikkelsen, D. Mon- ticello, G. H. Neilson, N. Pomphrey, A. Reiman, D. Spong, D. Strickler, A. Boozer, W. A. Cooper, R. Goldston, R. Hatcher, M. Isaev, C. Kesse...

    2001

  9. [17]

    Sagara, Y

    A. Sagara, Y . Igitkhanov, F. Najmabadi, Review of stellarator /heliotron design issues towards mfe demo, Fusion Engineering and Design 85 (7) (2010) 1336 – 1341, proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.fuse...

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    Fuchert, S

    G. Fuchert, S. Bozhenkov, N. Pablant, K. Rahbarnia, Y . Turkin, A. Alonso, T. Andreeva, C. Beidler, M. Beurskens, A. Dinklage, J. Geiger, M. Hirsch, U. H ¨ofel, J. Knauer, A. Langenberg, H. Laqua, H. Niemann, E. Pasch, T. S. Pedersen, T. Stange, J. Svensson, H. T. Mora, G. Wur...

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Geiger, C

    J. Geiger, C. D. Beidler, Y . Feng, H. Maaßberg, N. B. Marushchenko, Y . Turkin, Physics in the magnetic configuration space of W7-X, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57 (1) (2015) 014004. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/57/i=1/a=014004

    2015

  12. [20]

    J. A. Alonso, C. D. Beidler, I. Calvo, A. Dinklage, Y . Feng, G. Fuchert, M. Hirsch, M. Landreman, A. Langenberg, H. Maaßberg, N. Pablant, 30 J. L. Velasco et al. / Accepted for publication in Journal of Computational Physics (2020) H. Smith, J. L. Velasco, G. Weir, D. Zhang, ...

    2020

  13. [21]

    V . V . Nemov, S. V . Kasilov, W. Kernbichler, M. F. Heyn, Evaluation of 1/ν neoclassical transport in stellarators, Physics of Plasmas 6 (1999) 4622

    1999

  14. [22]

    S. P. Hirshman, K. C. Shaing, W. I. van Rij, C. O. Beasley, E. C. Crume, Plasma transport coefficients for nonsymmetric toroidal confinement systems, Physics of Fluids 29 (9) (1986) 2951–2959. URL http://link.aip.org/link/?PFL/29/2951/1

    1986

  15. [23]

    Turkin, C

    Y . Turkin, C. D. Beidler, H. Maaßberg, S. Murakami, V . Tribaldos, A. Wakasa, Neoclassical transport simulations for stellarators, Physics of Plasmas 18 (2) (2011) 022505. URL http://link.aip.org/link/?PHP/18/022505/1

    2011

  16. [24]

    C. D. Beidler, M. Y . Isaev, S. V . Kasilov, W. Kernbichler, H. M. S. Murakami, V . V . Nemov, D. Spong, V . Tribaldos, ICNTS-Impact of Incompressible E× B Flow in Estimating Mono-Energetic Transport Coe fficients, in: Proceedings of the 16th Int. Stellarator /Heliotron Workshop...

    2007

  17. [25]

    Calvo, J

    I. Calvo, J. L. Velasco, F. I. Parra, J. A. Alonso, J. M. Garc´ıa-Regana, Electrostatic potential variations on stellarator magnetic surfaces in low collisionality regimes, Journal of Plasma Physics 84 (4) (2018) 905840407

    2018

  18. [26]

    Landreman, H

    M. Landreman, H. Smith, A. Moll ´en, P. Helander, Comparison of particle trajectories and collision operators for collisional transport in nonaxisymmetric plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 21 (4) (2014) 042503. URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/pop/21/4/10.1063/1.4870077

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, R. Kleiber, C. D. Beidler, Y . Turkin, H. Maassberg, P. Helander, On neoclassical impurity transport in stellarator geometry, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 55 (7) (2013) 074008. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/55/i=7/a=074008

    2013

  20. [28]

    Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, C

    J. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, C. Beidler, R. Kleiber, P. Helander, A. Moll´en, J. Alonso, M. Landreman, H. Maaßberg, H. Smith, Y . Turkin, J. Velasco, Electrostatic potential variation on the flux surface and its impact on impurity transport, Nuclear Fusion 57 (5) (2017) 056004. URL htt...

    2017

  21. [29]

    Satake, M

    S. Satake, M. O. an N Nakajima, H. Sugama, M. Yokoyama, Non-local simulation of the formation of neoclassical ambipolar electric field in non-axisymmetric configurations, Plasma and Fusion Research 1 (2006) 002. URL https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/pfr/1/0/1_0_002/_article

    2006

  22. [30]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J L Velasco, J. A. Alonso, Stellarators close to quasisymmetry, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 55 (12) (2013) 125014. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/55/i=12/a=125014

    2013

  23. [31]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J. A. Alonso, J L Velasco, Optimizing stellarators for large flows, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 56 (9) (2014) 094003. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/56/i=9/a=094003

    2014

  24. [32]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J L Velasco, J. A. Alonso, Flow damping in stellarators close to quasisymmetry, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57 (1) (2015) 014014. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/57/i=1/a=014014

    2015

  25. [33]

    J. L. Velasco, I. Calvo, J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, F. I. Parra, S. Satake, J. A. Alonso, the LHD team, Large tangential electric fields in plasmas close to temperature screening, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 60 (7) (2018) 074004. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/60/i=7...

    2018

  26. [34]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: the Art of Scientific Computing. Second Edition, V ol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1996

    1996

  27. [35]

    Kernbichler, S

    W. Kernbichler, S. Kasilov, G. Kapper, A. Martitsch, V . Nemov, C. Albert, M. Heyn, Solution of drift kinetic equation in stellarators and tokamaks with broken symmetry using the code NEO-2, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58 (2016) 104001

    2016

  28. [36]

    J. L. Velasco, K. Allmaier, A. L. Fraguas, C. D. Beidler, H. Maaßberg, W. Kernbichler, F. Castej´on, J. A. Jim´enez, Calculation of the bootstrap current profile for the TJ-II stellarator, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 53 (11) (2011) 115014. URL http://stacks.iop.org/074...

    2011

  29. [37]

    Barnes, F

    M. Barnes, F. Parra, M. Landreman, stella: An operator-split, implicit–explicit delta-f-gyrokinetic code for general magnetic field configura- tions, Journal of Computational Physics 391 (2019) 365 – 380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.025. URL http://www.sciencedirec...

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Landreman, D

    M. Landreman, D. R. Ernst, New velocity-space discretization for continuum kinetic calculations and Fokker–Planck collisions, Journal of Computational Physics 243 (2013) 130 – 150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.02.041. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    Moll ´en, M

    A. Moll ´en, M. Landreman, H. M. Smith, J. M. Garc´ıa-Rega˜na, M. Nunami, Flux-surface variations of the electrostatic potential in stellarators: impact on the radial electric field and neoclassical impurity transport, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 60 (8) (2018) 084001. ...

    2018

  32. [40]

    E. J. Paul, M. Landreman, F. M. Poli, D. A. Spong, H. M. Smith, W. Dorland, Rotation and neoclassical ripple transport in ITER, Nuclear Fusion 57 (11) (2017) 116044. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa7fa4. URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F1741-4326%2Faa7fa4

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Matsuoka, S

    S. Matsuoka, S. Satake, R. Kanno, H. Sugama, E ffects of magnetic drift tangential to magnetic surfaces on neoclassical transport in non- axisymmetric plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 22 (7) (2015) 072511. doi:10.1063/1.4923434. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4923434

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    d´ Herbemont, F

    V . d´ Herbemont, F. I. Parra, I. Calvo, J. L. Velasco, Finite orbit width effects in large aspect ratio stellarators, in preparation

  35. [43]

    Balay, W

    S. Balay, W. D. Gropp, L. C. McInnes, B. F. Smith, E fficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries, in: E. Arge, A. M. Bruaset, H. P. Langtangen (Eds.), Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, Birkh¨auser Press, 1997, pp. 163–202

    1997

  36. [44]

    Balay, S

    S. Balay, S. Abhyankar, M. F. Adams, J. Brown, P. Brune, K. Buschelman, L. Dalcin, A. Dener, V . Eijkhout, W. D. Gropp, D. Karpeyev, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, D. A. May, L. C. McInnes, R. T. Mills, T. Munson, K. Rupp, P. Sanan, B. F. Smith, S. Zampini, H. Zhang, J. L. Velasco...

    2020

  37. [45]

    Balay, S

    S. Balay, S. Abhyankar, M. F. Adams, J. Brown, P. Brune, K. Buschelman, L. Dalcin, A. Dener, V . Eijkhout, W. D. Gropp, D. Karpeyev, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, D. A. May, L. C. McInnes, R. T. Mills, T. Munson, K. Rupp, P. Sanan, B. F. Smith, S. Zampini, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, PET...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Kotschenreuther, G

    M. Kotschenreuther, G. Rewoldt, W. Tang, Comparison of initial value and eigenvalue codes for kinetic toroidal plasma instabilities, Com- puter Physics Communications 88 (2) (1995) 128 – 140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00035-E . URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/s...

    1995

  39. [47]

    T. S. Pedersen, T. Andreeva, H.-S. Bosch, S. Bozhenkov, F. E ffenberg, M. Endler, Y . Feng, D. A. Gates, J. Geiger, D. Hartmann, H. H¨olbe, M. Jakubowski, R. K¨onig, H. Laqua, S. Lazerson, M. Otte, M. Preynas, O. Schmitz, T. Stange, Y . Turkin, the W7-X Team, Plans for the first...

    2015

  40. [48]

    Ascas ´ıbar, D

    E. Ascas ´ıbar, D. Alba, D. Alegre, A. Alonso, J. Alonso, F. de Arag ´on, A. Baciero, J. Barcala, E. Blanco, J. Botija, L. Bueno, S. Cabrera, E. de la Cal, I. Calvo, A. Cappa, D. Carralero, R. Carrasco, B. Carreras, F. Castej ´on, R. Castro, A. de Castro, G. Catal ´an, A. Chmy...

    2019

  41. [49]

    Klinger, the W7-X Team, Overview of first Wendelstein 7-X high-performance operation, Nuclear Fusion 59 (11) (2019) 112004

    T. Klinger, the W7-X Team, Overview of first Wendelstein 7-X high-performance operation, Nuclear Fusion 59 (11) (2019) 112004. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab03a7. URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F1741-4326%2Fab03a7

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    N. A. Pablant, et al, Investigations of the role of neoclassical transport in ion-root plasmas on W7-X, Nuclear Fusion submitted

  43. [51]

    Carralero, T

    D. Carralero, T. Estrada, T. Windisch, J. L. Velasco, J. A. Alonso, M. Beurskens, S. Bozhenkov, H. Damm, G. Fuchert, E. Pasch, G. Weir, the W7-X Team, First V-band Doppler reflectometer results from the OP1.2b campaign in Wendelstein 7-X, in: 14th International Reflectometry Wor...

    2019

  44. [52]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J. L. Velasco, J. A. Alonso, J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, Stellarator impurity flux driven by electric fields tangent to magnetic surfaces, Nuclear Fusion 58 (12) (2018) 124005. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/58/i=12/a=124005

    2018

  45. [53]

    Buller, H

    S. Buller, H. M. Smith, P. Helander, A. Moll ´en, S. L. Newton, I. Pusztai, E ffects of flux-surface impurity density variation on collisional transport in stellarators, Journal of Plasma Physics 84 (4) (2018) 905840409

    2018

  46. [54]

    J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, T. Estrada, I. Calvo, J. L. Velasco, J. A. Alonso, D. Carralero, R. Kleiber, M. Landreman, A. Moll ´en, E. S ´anchez, C. Slaby, T.-I. Team, W.-X. Team, On-surface potential and radial electric field variations in electron root stellarator plasmas, Plasma...

    2018

  47. [55]

    Fujita, S

    K. Fujita, S. Satake, R. Kanno, M. Nunami, M. Nakata, J. M. G.-R. na, Global effects on the variation of ion density and electrostatic potential on the flux surface in helical plasmas, Plasma and Fusion Research 14 (2019) 3403102

    2019

  48. [56]

    M. A. Pedrosa, J. A. Alonso, J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, C. Hidalgo, J. L. Velasco, I. Calvo, C. Silva, P. Helander, Electrostatic potential variations along flux surfaces in stellarators, Nuclear Fusion 55 (5) (2015) 052001. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/55/i=5/a=052001

    2015

  49. [57]

    Estrada, E

    T. Estrada, E. S ´anchez, J. M. G.-R. na, J. A. Alonso, E. Ascas ´ıbar, I. Calvo, A. Cappa, D. Carralero, C. Hidalgo, M. Liniers, I. Pastor, J. L. Velasco, Turbulence and perpendicular plasma flow asymmetries measured at TJ-II plasmas, Nuclear Fusion 59 (2019) 076021. doi: 10.1...

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    Calvo, F

    I. Calvo, F. I. Parra, J. L. Velasco, J. M. Garc ´ıa-Rega˜na, Impact of main ion pressure anisotropy on stellarator impurity transport, Nuclear Fusion https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08482. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08482

    1907 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.