Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 175 references

Retrospective of the ARPA-E BETHE-GAMOW-Era Fusion Programs and Project Cohorts

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that ARPA-E's BETHE and GAMOW fusion programs, together with allied projects and external reports, helped shift U.S. fusion policy toward industry-led pilot plants in the 2030s.

desk verdict Useful primary-source retrospective of ARPA-E's fusion programs, but its central causal claim about the 2022 policy shift is asserted, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01784 v2 pith:ZFQTT5Q3 submitted 2025-05-03 physics.plasm-ph physics.soc-ph

S. C. Hsu , M. C. Handley , S. E. Wurzel , P. B. McGrath This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.soc-ph
keywords fusionenergycommercializationconceptdevelopmentARPA-EprogramsBETHEGAMOWpublic-privatepartnershipstechnology-to-market
open problems High-Temperature Superconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper, written by the former program leaders, argues that two ARPA-E fusion programs—BETHE (announced 2019) and GAMOW (announced 2020)—together with related fusion project cohorts and the agency's technology-to-market work, helped bring about a policy shift in U.S. fusion-energy development starting in 2022: from government-led big science toward industry-led fusion pilot plants targeted for the 2030s. BETHE pushed lower-cost fusion concepts toward defined scientific milestones, such as electron and ion temperatures at or above 1 keV and triple products at or above $10^{18}$ keV·s/m³, while also funding component technologies to reduce the capital cost of more mature concepts. GAMOW funded materials, fuel-cycle, and enabling technologies with quantitative performance targets. The paper documents roughly $108 million in obligated federal funding, more than 120 peer-reviewed publications to date, and over $500 million in follow-on private equity raised by project teams or their spinouts. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that this portfolio, alongside external reports, moved U.S. fusion policy toward public-private partnership.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the BETHE-GAMOW program architecture as a staged de-risking instrument. BETHE's Category A used a milestone ladder from theoretical analysis up to plasma triple products of $10^{20}$ keV·s/m³, with funding ceilings tied to each rung; Category B required quantitative arguments that a new component technology could bring a grid-ready demonstration under $2 billion overnight capital cost and $5 per watt; Category C supplied objective, third-party diagnostics and modeling capability. GAMOW set numeric performance targets for blankets, divertors, tritium fuel cycles, high-temperature superconducting magnets, electrical drivers, and materials. The accompanying technology-to-market effort engaged investors, open-sourced costing models, and explored early-market cost targets, together creating a pathway from federal R&D to private capital.

What would settle it

Compare follow-on private equity raised by BETHE/GAMOW awardees against a matched control group of fusion concepts of similar maturity that did not receive ARPA-E support between 2018 and 2022; if the control group raised comparable capital per unit of technical progress, the claim that these programs drove the policy shift would be falsified. A second check is to search agency and congressional records for whether the 2022 pilot-plant policy documents cite BETHE/GAMOW as a justification; if they do not, the attribution is weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a historical attribution: the BETHE-GAMOW-era programs and project cohorts, in concert with the emergence of the fusion industry association, the 2020 long-range plan, and the 2021 National Academies report on bringing fusion to the U.S. grid, together contributed to a policy shift in U.S. fusion-energy development starting in 2022, toward industry-led fusion pilot plants in the 2030s. Supporting evidence includes five BETHE projects or spinouts becoming awardees of the DOE Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program, nine of eleven BETHE Category-A and B projects still active as of late 2024, diagnostic teams providing third-party measurements that strengthened investor confidence, GAMOW progress on blankets, tritium fuel cycle, magnets, and materials, and technology-to-market engagement with roughly 100 investors. The paper explicitly leaves full outcome assessment to future years.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the BETHE-GAMOW programs materially contributed to the 2022 U.S. policy shift toward industry-led fusion pilot plants; the paper offers no counterfactual or control cohort to show that the shift would not have occurred anyway.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • More lower-cost fusion concepts will pass thresholds of verified performance, such as $T_e, T_i \ge 1$ keV, making them credible candidates for private investment.
  • Component-technology projects that reach prototype demonstration can lower the overnight capital cost of mature concepts toward the $2B and $5-per-watt metrics.
  • Third-party diagnostic capability teams provide a reusable public resource for validating performance claims, supporting investor due diligence beyond the program's lifetime.
  • If the causal claim is correct, the U.S. policy framework for fusion will continue toward industry-led pilot plants in the 2030s rather than reverting to big-science-only funding.
  • Open-source costing models and early-market analysis give fusion developers concrete cost targets, such as high-priced electricity markets and levelized costs below $50 per megawatt-hour, for market entry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the paper cannot rule out that the 2022 policy shift would have happened anyway, because private fusion investment had already reached roughly $1.5 billion before BETHE and because the late-2022 ignition milestone at a national laboratory independently reset expectations.
  • My inference: a testable extension would compare follow-on private funding for BETHE/GAMOW awardees against a matched set of fusion teams that did not receive ARPA-E support over 2018–2022; if the follow-on rates are statistically indistinguishable, the accelerator interpretation would be weakened.
  • My inference: the technology-to-market emphasis on social license suggests a non-obvious pathway—engagement with nongovernmental and public-advocacy groups may have lowered later political friction for pilot-plant programs, an effect not captured by scientific and technical metrics alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is an insider retrospective of ARPA-E's BETHE and GAMOW fusion programs and associated project cohorts (OPEN 2018, OPEN 2021, Fusion Diagnostic Teams) from 2018–2022, authored by the former program leaders. It documents program objectives, technical categories, milestone structures, awardees, funding amounts, and selected technology-to-market (T2M) activities including investor engagement, costing models, early-market analysis, and social-license discussions. The paper's central concluding claim is that these ARPA-E programs, together with the Fusion Industry Association, the 2020 FESAC long-range plan, and the 2021 National Academies report, 'contributed to a policy shift in U.S. fusion-energy development starting in 2022.' The body also reports aggregate outcome metrics, most notably that BETHE-GAMOW-era projects and spinouts have raised over $500M in equity investments (excluding CFS) as of May 2025.

Significance. If its conclusions were fully supported, the paper would provide a valuable documentary record of a formative period in U.S. fusion-energy policy, with a useful consolidated bibliography of over 120 peer-reviewed articles, detailed program-design information, and candid acknowledgements of pandemic delays and underutilized facilities. The paper also demonstrates genuine strengths: it is transparent about its insider perspective, it cites peer-reviewed outcomes for essentially every funded project, and it credits external co-evolving institutions rather than claiming sole credit. However, the central causal claim is not established: the paper offers no independent documentary evidence, no counterfactual analysis, and no attempt to isolate the marginal contribution of ARPA-E programs from concurrent developments. Its value is primarily archival and descriptive; the causal narrative in the Conclusions goes beyond what the evidence supports.

major comments (4)
  1. [Conclusions] The central claim that BETHE-GAMOW-era programs 'contributed to a policy shift in U.S. fusion-energy development starting in 2022' is load-bearing but unsupported by process-tracing. The only citation for the policy shift is the first author's own 2023 article (ref. [184]), and no White House, DOE, or congressional document is cited that links ARPA-E programs to the 2022 pilot-plant turn. Moreover, nearly all outcome evidence cited in the paper—Zap's Te,Ti >= 1 keV results (refs. [28,30], published 2024), WHAM operations (2024), Realta's 2023–2025 raises, Thea's 2024 Series A, Acceleron's 2024 raise—postdates the April 2022 White House summit. The pre-2022 deliverables are essentially program launches, T2M investor briefings, and the 2021 early-markets paper, plus the CFS HTS coil test (ref. [45]). The claim should be softened to an association or hypothesis, or supported with independent policy documents or contemporaneous decision records.
  2. [T2M Activities / Appendix A] The paper's causal attributions from investor engagement to private funding are asserted rather than demonstrated. For example, Appendix A states that third-party diagnostics 'resulted in over $330M of equity investments into Zap Energy,' and the Conclusions state that BETHE-GAMOW-era projects have cumulatively raised over $500M, but no investor decision records, due-diligence documents, or counterfactual comparisons are provided. Given that the paper itself notes ~$1.5B of pre-existing private fusion investment and co-evolving institutions (FIA, FESAC, NAS), the marginal contribution of ARPA-E programs is not isolated. The authors should either add an explicit limitations paragraph acknowledging that the causal claims are hypotheses, or present independent evidence linking specific investor actions to specific ARPA-E activities.
  3. [Conclusions, $500M metric] The aggregate outcome metric 'more than $500M in equity investments to date (not including CFS)' is presented without a sourcing table or verification trail. The figure aggregates post-program raises and relies on insider knowledge, as do the 'approximately $108M' federal obligation figure and the project-level raises in Appendix A. Since the paper's T2M-impact narrative rests on these numbers, the authors should provide a per-company table with public sources (press releases, funding databases) or explicitly label the figures as unaudited insider estimates.
  4. [BETHE Awardees and Outcomes] The text states that '9 of the 11 Category-A and B projects are still actively advancing,' but Table 3 lists 6 Category-A projects and 4 Category-B projects, for a total of 10. This numerical inconsistency should be corrected, as it affects the reader's ability to assess the program-level outcome claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Page 6, BETHE Technical Categories] The phrase 'Applicants were are asked to self-identify' contains a duplicated verb; it should read 'Applicants were asked to self-identify.'
  2. [Page 16, OPEN 2021 cohort] The text describes 'spike trains of unaaaaeven duration and delay'; 'unaaaaeven' appears to be a typo for 'uneven.'
  3. [Page 23, Acknowledgements] 'The triumvrate of ARPA-E's first three fusion programs' should be 'triumvirate.'
  4. [Conclusions] The paper would benefit from a brief statement distinguishing its descriptive documentation from its interpretive causal claims, perhaps noting explicitly that the latter are the authors' professional judgment rather than a demonstrated result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the retrospective's causal claim is an interpretive historical assertion, not a derivation from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

This paper is a program retrospective, not a derivation, and no circular step is present. It contains no fitted parameters, no equations whose outputs are defined by their inputs, and no quantity that is both fit and then presented as a prediction. The central Conclusions claim that BETHE-GAMOW-era programs 'together contributed to a policy shift in U.S. fusion-energy development starting in 2022' is a historical-causal interpretation offered by the program directors who administered the programs. That claim may be contestable on causal-identification grounds (no counterfactual or process tracing is provided), but contestability of a causal claim is not circularity. The self-citations in the paper, including [184] (first author's 2023 article) for the 'new emphasis' of industry-led fusion pilot plants, are not load-bearing in the circularity sense: the same policy shift is independently documented in the paper by the DOE Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program FOA [80], and the program outcomes are supported by external peer-reviewed citations (e.g., [28,30,45]). No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to circularity, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes no mathematical derivations, so there are no fitted free parameters or invented entities. The central narrative rests on domain assumptions about what counts as fusion progress and program success.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The program's quantitative performance targets (e.g., OCC < $2B, <$5/W, Ti,Te >= 1 keV, nTtau >= 1e18) are appropriate proxies for commercial viability and scientific risk reduction.
    The paper's assessment of program outcomes (e.g., Zap Energy's 1 keV achievement as success) relies on these FOA-defined targets; the targets themselves are not independently justified.
  • domain assumption Private equity investment and spinout formation are valid measures of program success and commercial relevance.
    The retrospective repeatedly uses private funding raised and spinouts as evidence of success, assuming that market investment is a reliable indicator of program impact.
  • domain assumption The authors' insider accounts of program management and technology-to-market activities are accurate and sufficiently complete.
    The paper is a retrospective by former program directors; no independent audit or external evaluation is cited for these process descriptions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Retrospective of the ARPA-E BETHE-GAMOW-Era Fusion Programs and Project Cohorts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZFQTT5Q3

@misc{pith2026250501784,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Retrospective of the ARPA-E BETHE-GAMOW-Era Fusion Programs and Project Cohorts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZFQTT5Q3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01784}
}
read the original abstract

This paper provides a retrospective of the BETHE (Breakthroughs Enabling THermonuclear-fusion Energy) and GAMOW (Galvanizing Advances in Market-aligned fusion for an Overabundance of Watts) fusion programs of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), as well as fusion project cohorts (associated with OPEN 2018, OPEN 2021, and Exploratory Topics) initiated during the same time period (2018-2022). BETHE (announced in 2019) aimed to increase the number of higher-maturity, lower-cost fusion approaches. GAMOW (announced in 2020) aimed to expand and translate research-and-development efforts in materials, fuel-cycle, and enabling technologies needed for commercial fusion energy. Both programs had a vision of enabling timely commercial fusion energy while laying the foundation for greater public-private collaborations to accelerate fusion-energy development. Finally, this paper describes ARPA-E's fusion Technology-to-Market (T2M) activities during this era, which included supporting ARPA-E fusion performers' commercialization pathways, improving fusion costing models, exploring cost targets for potential early markets for fusion energy, engaging with the broader fusion ecosystem (especially investors and nongovernmental organizations), and highlighting the importance of social license for timely fusion commercialization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [184]

    Fusion Energy Development via Public-Private Partnerships

    Hsu, S.C.: U.S. Fusion Energy Development via Public-Private Partnerships. J. Fusion Energy 42, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-023-00357-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10894-023-00357-9 2023

  2. [45]

    Supercond

    Sanabria, C., Radovinsky, A., Craighill, C., Uppalapati, K., Warner, A., Colque, J., Allen, E., Evcimen, S., Heller, S., Chavarria, D., Metcalfe, K., Lenzen, S., Hubbard, A., Watterson, A., Chamberlain, S., Diaz-Pacheco, R., Weinreb, B., Brownell, E., Nealey, J., Hughes, A., Laamanen, E., Vasudeva, K., Nash, D., McCormack, C., Salazar, E., Duke, O., Hicks...

    2024

  3. [1]

    Nehl, C.L., Umstattd, R., Regan, W.R., Hsu, S.C., McGrath, P.B.: Retrospective of the ARPA-E ALPHA Fusion Program. J. Fusion Energy 38, 506 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-019-00226-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10894-019-00226-4 2019

  4. [2]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/alpha

  5. [3]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/bethe

  6. [4]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/gamow

  7. [5]

    House of Representatives (2016)

    Hsu, S.C., Prepared Statement for Hearing on An Overview of Fusion Energy Science, Energy Subcommittee, Committee on Science, Space, and Technol- ogy, U.S. House of Representatives (2016). https://science.house.gov/2016/4/ energy-subcommittee-hearing-overview-fusion-energy-science

    2016

  8. [6]

    Wurzel, S.E., Hsu, S.C.: Progress toward fusion energy breakeven and gain as measured against the Lawson criterion. Phys. Plasmas 29, 062103 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0083990

    doi:10.1063/5.0083990 2022

Show all 175 references
  1. [7]

    Burning Plasma Research

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Final Report of the Committee on a Strategic Plan for U.S. Burning Plasma Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2019). https://doi.org/10.17226/25331

    2019 doi

  2. [8]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 9baa45ea-2131-4552-ba65-02a8293bd8fb

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E OPEN 2018, DE- FOA-0001858 (2017). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 9baa45ea-2131-4552-ba65-02a8293bd8fb

    2017

  3. [9]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E Topics Informing New Pro- gram Areas, DE-FOA-0001953, Appendix D (2019). https://arpa-e-foa.energy. gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=2a90b153-50f4-4a8e-b7da-fb9b912dc7a7

    2019

  4. [10]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 89fa48ab-ef90-45e2-aa04-c75ce55f7b61

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E BETHE, DE-FOA- 0002212 (2019). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 89fa48ab-ef90-45e2-aa04-c75ce55f7b61

    2019

  5. [11]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 25 9c638d41-6cb9-466a-bfe3-16905d482bf3

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E GAMOW, DE-FOA- 0002288 (2020). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 25 9c638d41-6cb9-466a-bfe3-16905d482bf3

    2020

  6. [12]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 3878df1f-27b8-4869-ae13-c9852f2a2818

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E OPEN 2021, DE- FOA-0002459 (2021). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID= 3878df1f-27b8-4869-ae13-c9852f2a2818

    2021

  7. [13]

    Sheffield, J., Milora, S.L.: Generic Magnetic Fusion Reactor Revisited. Fus. Sci. Tech. 70, 14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST15-157

    2016 doi

  8. [14]

    Lindemuth, I.R., Siemon, R.E.: The fundamental parameter space of controlled thermonuclear fusion. Amer. J. Phys. 77, 407 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1119/ 1.3096646

    2009

  9. [15]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx? FileID=50d48a6a-22a4-411b-9a78-c92de1bef5b9

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for ARPA-E Exploratory Topics, DE- FOA-0002784, Topic A (2022). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx? FileID=50d48a6a-22a4-411b-9a78-c92de1bef5b9

    2022

  10. [16]

    Egedal, J., Endrizzi, D., Forest, C.B., Fowler, T.K.: Fusion by beam ions in a low collisionality, high mirror ratio magnetic mirror. Nucl. Fusion 62, 126053 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac99ec

    2022 doi

  11. [17]

    Ruegsegger, J., Moreno, C., Nyberg, M., Bohm, T., Wilson, P.P.H., Lindley, B.: Scoping Studies for a Lead-Lithium-Cooled, Minor-Actinide-Burning, Fission- Fusion Hybrid Reactor Design. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 197, 1911 (2023). https://doi. org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2154118

    2023

  12. [18]

    IEEE Trans

    Radovinsky, A., Zhukovsky, A., Kelton, N., Kristofek, G., Kuznetsov, S., Nash, D., Sanabria, C., LaBombard, B., Brunner, D.: Design of High Field HTS Coils for Magnetic Mirror. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 33, 4200305 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3240377

    2023

  13. [19]

    Endrizzi, D., Anderson, J.K., Brown, M., Egedal, J., Geiger, B., Harvey, R.W., Ialovega, M., Kirch, J., Peterson, E., Petrov, Y.V., Pizzo, J., Qian, T., Sanwalka, K., Schmitz, O., Wallace, J., Yakovlev, D., Yu, M., Forest, C.B.: Physics basis for the Wisconsin HTS Axisymmetric...

    2023 doi

  14. [20]

    Ialovega, M., Dabney, T., Gonzalez, M.N., Yeom, H., Velez, D., Willing, E., Anderson, J.K., Angot, T., Bisson, R., Forest, C., Kreter, A., Schmitz, O., Sridharan, K.: Initial study on thermal stability of cold spray tantalum coat- ing irradiated with deuterium for fusion appli...

    2023 doi

  15. [21]

    Forest, C.B., Anderson, J.K., Endrizzi, D., Egedal, J., Frank, S., Furlong, K., Ialovega, M., Kirch, J., Harvey, R.W., Lindley, B., Petrov, Y.V., Pizzo, J., Qian, T., Sanwalka, K., Schmitz, O., Wallace, J., Yakovlev, D., Yu, M.: Prospects for a high-field, compact break-even a...

    2024

  16. [22]

    IEEE Trans

    Kristofek, G., Radovinsky, A., Zhukovsky, A., Kelton, N., Kuznetsov, S., Mum- gaard, R., Hollman, J., Ames, N., Carroll, P.B., Howell, J., Nottingham, B., Sullivan, D.: Manufacturing and Testing HTS Coils for Magnetic Mirror. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 35, 4605605 (2025). ht...

    2025

  17. [23]

    Tran, A., Frank, S.J., Le, A.Y., Stanier, A.J., Wetherton, B.A., Egedal, J., Endrizzi, D.A., Harvey, R.W., Petrov, Y.V., Qian, T.M., Sunwalka, K., Viola, J., Forest, C.B., Zweibel, E.G.: Drift-cyclotron loss-cone instability in 3-D sim- ulations of a sloshing-ion simple mirror...

    2025 doi

  18. [24]

    Frank, S.J., Viola, J., Petrov, Y.V., Anderson, J.K., Bindl, D., Biswas, B., Cane- ses, J., Endrizzi, D., Furlong, K., Harvey, R.W., Jacobson, C.M., Lindley, B., Marriott, E., Schmitz, O., Shih, K., Sutherland, D.A., Forest, C.B.: Confinement performance predictions for a high...

    2025

  19. [26]

    Banasek, J.T., Goyon, C., Bott-Suzuki, S.C., Swadling, G.F., Quinley, M., Levitt, B., Nelson, B.A., Shumlak, U., McLean, H.S.: Probing local elec- tron temperature and density inside a sheared flow stabilized Z-pinch using portable optical Thomson scattering. Rev. Sci. Instrum...

    2023 doi

  20. [27]

    Levitt, B., Meier, E.T., Umstattd, R., Barhydt, J.R., Datta, I.A.M., Liekhus- Schmaltz, C., Sutherland, D.A., Nelson, B.A.: The Zap Energy approach to commercial fusion. Phys. Plasmas 30, 090603 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0163361

    2023

  21. [28]

    Levitt, B., Goyon, C., Banasek, J.T., Bott-Suzuki, S.C., Liekhus-Schmaltz, C., Meier, E.T., Morton, L.A., Taylor, A., Young, W.C., Nelson, B.A., Suther- land, D.A., Quinley, M., Stepanov, A.D., Barhydt, J.R., Tsai, P., Morgan, K.D., Rossum, N., Hossack, A.C., Weber, T.R., McGe...

    2024

  22. [29]

    Datta, I.A.M., Meier, E.T., Shumlak, U.: Whole device modeling of the fuze sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch. Nucl. Fusion 64, 066016 (2024). https://doi. 27 org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3fcb

    2024 doi

  23. [30]

    Goyon, C., Bott-Suzuki, S.C., Youmans, A.E., Banasek, J.T., Morton, L.A., Levitt, B., Barhydt, J.R., Morgan, K.D., Liekhus-Schmaltz, C., Young, W.C., Higginson, D.P., Hossack, A.C., Meier, E.T., Nelson, B.A., Quinley, M., Taylor, A., Tsai, P., Rossum, N., Shah, A., Stepanov, A...

    2024

  24. [31]

    IEEE Trans

    Crews, D.W., Datta, I.A.M., Meier, E.T., Shumlak, U.: The Kadomtsev Pinch Revisited for Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z-Pinch Modeling. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 52, 4804 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2024.3383312

    2024

  25. [32]

    Schwartz, N.R., Abel, I.G., Hassam, A.B., Kelly, M., Romero-Talam´ as, C.A.: MCTrans++: a 0-d model for centrifugal mirrors. J. Plasma Phys.90, 905900217 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022377824000424

    2024 doi

  26. [33]

    Morgan, K.D., Hansen, C.J., Hossack, A.C., Sutherland, D.A.: Effect of injected flux and current temporal phasing on self-organization in the HIT-SI3 experi- ment. Phys. Plasmas 29, 052305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090665

    2022 doi

  27. [34]

    Hossack, A.C., Morgan, K.D., Hansen, C.J., Sutherland, D.A.: A multi-chord, two-color interferometer using hilbert transform phase detection for measuring electron density in spheromak plasmas. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 093501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0097459

    2022 doi

  28. [35]

    Chu, F., LaJoie, A.L., Keenan, B.D., Webster, L., Langendorf, S.J., Gilmore, M.A.: Experimental measurements of ion diffusion coefficients and heating in a multi-ion-species plasma shock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 145101 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.145101

    2023 doi

  29. [36]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS), p

    LaJoie, A., Chu, F., Langendorf, S., Case, A., Witherspoon, F., Gilmore, M.: Measurements of Plasma Liner Characteristics at the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS), p. 1 (2023). https://doi.org10.1109/ICOPS45740.2023...

    2023

  30. [37]

    LaJoie, A.L., Chu, F., Langendorf, S., Cassibry, J., Vyas, A., Gilmore, M.: Multi- camera imaging to characterize jet and liner uniformity on the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 063503 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0101674

    2023

  31. [38]

    In: 2023 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference (PPC), pp

    Vyas, A.C., Cassibry, J.T., Xu, G., Langendorf, S.: Computational Scaling Laws for Fusion Yield in Reactor Relevant Plasma Liner Magneto-Inertial Fusion. In: 2023 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference (PPC), pp. 1–5 (2023). https://doi.org/ 10.1109/PPC47928.2023.10310697 28

    2023

  32. [39]

    Chu, F., Langendorf, S.J., Olson, J., Byvank, T., Endrizzi, D.A., LaJoie, A.L., McCollam, K.J., Forest, C.B.: Characterization of fast magnetosonic waves driven by compact toroid plasma injection along a magnetic field. Phys. Plasmas 30, 122110 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/...

    2023 doi

  33. [40]

    LaJoie, A.L., Chu, F., Brown, A.E., Langendorf, S.J., Dunn, J.P., Wurden, G.A., Witherspoon, F.D., Case, A., Luna, M., Cassibry, J., Vyas, A., Gilmore, M.: For- mation of a spherical plasma liner for plasma-jet-driven magneto-inertial fusion. Phys. Plasmas 31, 102701 (2024). h...

    2024 doi

  34. [41]

    IEEE Sensors J

    Lee, G.S., Marchevsky, M., Sanabria, C., Prestemon, S.: Time-Frequency-Based Quench Detection for HTS VIPER Cable Using Torsional Acoustic Wave. IEEE Sensors J. 22, 21846 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2022.3209143

    2022

  35. [42]

    Measurement 214, 15 (2023)

    Huang, X., Gonzales, J.T., Badcock, R.A.: A novel algorithm for highly sensitive and rapid hotspot detection in HTS magnets using quasi-continuous fiber Bragg gratings. Measurement 214, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement. 2023.112796

    2023

  36. [43]

    Huang, X., Davies, M., Moseley, D.A., Ludbrook, B.M., Salazar, E.E., Badcock, R.A.: Localized Hotspot Detection for Quench Prevention in HTS Magnets Using Distributed Fiber Bragg Gratings. J. Lightwave Tech. 41, 7045 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2023.3294468

    2023

  37. [44]

    Huang, X., Haneef, S.M., Davies, M., Moseley, D.A., Ludbrook, B.M., Salazar, E.E., Chalmers, A.N., Badcock, R.A.: Optimization of surface bonding methods for fiber Bragg grating sensors at cryogenic temperatures. Opt. Fiber Tech 80, 103419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yof...

    2023

  38. [46]

    IEEE 29 Trans

    Watterson, A., Hubbard, A., Diaz-Pacheco, R., Francis, A., Granetz, R., Logan, J., Golfinopoulos, T., Kaplan, A., Michael, P., Murray, R., Sanabria, C., Schweiger, S., Toland, T., Vieira, R.: Performance Assessment of PIT VIPER Cables Following Long-Duration Solder Exposure Du...

    2025

  39. [47]

    Schmitt, A.J., Obenschain, S.P.: The importance of laser wavelength for driving inertial confinement fusion targets. I. Basic physics. Phys. Plasmas 30, 012701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118080

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Schmitt, A.J., Obenschain, S.P.: The importance of laser wavelength for driving inertial confinement fusion targets. II. Target design. Phys. Plasmas 30, 012702 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118093

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Bates, J.W., Follett, R.K., Shaw, J.G., Obenschain, S.P., Myatt, J.F., Weaver, J.L., Wolford, M.F., Kehne, D.M., Myers, M.C., Kessler, T.J.: Suppressing parametric instabilities in direct-drive inertial-confinement-fusion plasmas using broadband laser light. Phys. Plasmas 30, ...

    2023

  42. [50]

    IEEE Trans

    Petrova, T.B., Wolford, M.F., Myers, M.C., Obenschain, S.P.: Modeling of the NRL Electra Electron-Beam Pumped Argon Fluoride Laser. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 51, 1392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2023.3271581

    2023

  43. [51]

    Lawrence, Y., Goncharov, V., Woo, K.M., Trickey, W., Igumenshchev, I.: Mitigation of deceleration-phase Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth in iner- tial confinement fusion implosions. Phys. Plasmas 30, 092704 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0164835

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Myers, M.C., Giuliani, J.L., Wolford, M.F., Hegeler, F., Robson, A.E., Sethian, J.D.: Rapid detection of incipient foil failure and remediation for longevity in repetitively pulsed, electron-beam-pumped excimer lasers for fusion research. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95, 073523 (2024). ...

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Wolford, M.F., Myers, M.C.: Lessons learned and ongoing research at Electra: a rep-rate excimer laser facility. Proc. SPIE 13358, Optical Technologies for Inertial Fusion Energy, 133580 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3041918

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    Supercond

    Riva, N., Granetz, R.S., Vieira, R., Hubbard, A., Pfeiffer, A.T., Harris, P., Chamberlain, C., Hartwig, Z.S., Watterson, A., Anderson, D., Volberg, R.: Development of the first non-planar REBCO stellarator coil using VIPER cable. Supercond. Sci. Tech. (2023). https://doi.org/1...

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    reservoir problem

    Cagas, P., Hakim, A.H., Srinivasan, B.: A boundary value “reservoir problem” and boundary conditions for multi-moment multifluid simulations of sheaths. Phys. Plasmas 28, 014501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024510

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Mathews, A., Mandell, N., Francisquez, M., Hughes, J.W., Hakim, A.: Turbulent field fluctuations in gyrokinetic and fluid plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 28, 112301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0066064 30

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    Cagas, P., Juno, J., Hakim, A., LaJoie, A., Chu, F., Langendorf, S., Srinivasan, B.: An investigation of shock formation vs shock mitigation of colliding plasma jets. Phys. Plasmas 30, 053903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135389

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    Francisquez, M., Rosen, M.H., Mandell, N.R., Hakim, A., Forest, C.B., Ham- mett, G.W.: Toward continuum gyrokinetic study of high-field mirrors. Phys. Plasmas 30, 102504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152440

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    Plasma Sources Sci

    Bradshaw, K., Srinivasan, B.: Energy-dependent implementation of secondary electron emission models in continuum kinetic sheath simulations. Plasma Sources Sci. Tech. 33, 035008 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ ad331c

    2024 doi

  52. [61]

    Bradshaw, K., Hakim, A., Srinivasan, B.: Effects of oxidation and impurities in lithium surfaces on the emitting wall plasma sheath. Phys. Plasmas 32, (2025). accepted for publication, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17686

    2025 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Davies, J.R., Wen, H., Ji, J.Y., Held, E.D.: Transport coefficients for magnetic- field evolution in inviscid magnetohydrodynamics. Phys. Plasmas 28, 012305 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023445

    2021 doi

  54. [64]

    Walsh, C.A., Sadler, J.D., Davies, J.R.: Updated magnetized transport coeffi- cients: impact on laser-plasmas with self-generated or applied magnetic fields. Nucl. Fusion 61, 116025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac25c1

    2021 doi

  55. [65]

    Wen, H., Ren, C., Hansen, E.C., Michta, D., Zhang, Y., Langendorf, S., Tzeferacos, P.: Particle-in-cell modeling of plasma jet merging in the large-Hall- parameter regime. Phys. Plasmas 29, 062706 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0087035

    2022

  56. [66]

    Diaw, A., Coleman, S.J., Cook, N.M., Edelen, J.P., Hansen, E.C., Tzeferacos, P.: Impact of electron transport models on capillary discharge plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 29, 063101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0091809

    2022 doi

  57. [67]

    Garc´ ıa-Rubio, F., Betti, R., Sanz, J., Aluie, H.: Theory of the magnetothermal instability in coronal plasma flows. Phys. Plasmas 29, 092106 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0109877 31

    2022 doi

  58. [68]

    Calvo-Rivera, A., Huete, C., Garc´ ıa-Rubio, F., Velikovich, A.L., Betti, R., Tze- feracos, P.: Stability of perpendicular magnetohydrodynamic shocks in materials with ideal and nonideal equations of state. Phys. Rev. E 108, 035203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.108.035203

    2023 doi

  59. [69]

    Davies, J.R.: Nonlocal suppression of Biermann battery magnetic-field genera- tion for arbitrary atomic numbers and magnetization. Phys. Plasmas 30, 072701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152530

    2023 doi

  60. [70]

    Davies, J.R.: Weibel-like instability in magnetohydrodynamics. Phys. Plasmas 30, 122705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0181342

    2023 doi

  61. [71]

    Hansen, E.C., Garcia-Rubio, F., Adams, M.B.P., Fatenejad, M., Moczulski, K., Ney, P., Rahman, H.U., Reyes, A.C., Ruskov, E., Tranchant, V., Tzeferacos, P.: Feasibility and performance of the staged Z-pinch: A one-dimensional study with FLASH and MACH2. Phys. Plasmas 31, 042712...

    2024 doi

  62. [72]

    Lavell, M.J., Kish, A.J., Sexton, A.T., Masti, R.L., Mohammad, I., Kim, M.J., Srinivasan, A., Jarvis, K., Scullin, W., Shaw, J.G., Sefkow, A.B.: Verification of a Monte Carlo binary collision model for simulating elastic and inelastic collisions in particle-in-cell simulations...

    2024 doi

  63. [73]

    Sefkow, A.B., Logan, B.G., Tabak, M.: Directly driven magnetized fast-ignition targets with steep density gradients for inertial fusion energy. Phys. Plasmas31, 050704 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0197817

    2024 doi

  64. [74]

    Garcia-Rubio, F., Tranchant, V., Hansen, E.C., Reyes, A., Tabassum, R., Rah- man, H.U., Ney, P., Ruskov, E., Tzeferacos, P.: Shock wave formation in radiative plasmas. Phys. Rev. E 109, 065206 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve. 109.065206

    2024 doi

  65. [75]

    Lavell, M.J., Kish, A.J., Sexton, A.T., Evans, E.S., Mohammad, I., Gomez- Ramirez, S., Scullin, W., Borscz, M., Pikuz, S., Mehlhorn, T.A., Tabak, M., Ainsworth, G., Sefkow, A.B.: A kinetic study of fusion burn waves in compressed deuterium–tritium and proton–boron plasmas. Fro...

    2024

  66. [76]

    Lawrence, Y., Davies, J.R., McBride, R.D., Sefkow, A.B.: Transport coefficient sensitivities in a semi-analytic model for magnetized liner inertial fusion. Phys. Plasmas 31, 112703 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0221649

    2024 doi

  67. [77]

    Michta, D., Tranchant, V., Narkis, J., Hansen, E.C., Adams, M.B.P., Moczulski, K., Reyes, A., Conti, F., Beg, F.N., Tzeferacos, P.: Code-to-code comparison between FLASH and HYDRA in gas-puff Z-pinch modeling. Phys. Plasmas 31, 122703 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0231394 32

    2024 doi

  68. [79]

    IEEE Trans

    Klemmer, A.W., Fuelling, S., Bauer, B.S., Wurden, G.A., Taylor, A.S., Suther- land, D.A., Hossack, A., Shumlak, U., Levitt, B.J., Nelson, B.A., Quinley, M., Weber, T.R., Smythe, J., Diamond, B., Parry, M., Parga, C.: Progress on Multielement Spectroscopic Temperature and Impur...

    2024

  69. [80]

    https://science.osti

    Funding Opportunity Announcement for the DOE SC/FES Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program, DE-FOA-0002809 (2022). https://science.osti. gov/fes/-/media/grants/pdf/foas/2022/SC FOA 0002809.pdf

    2022

  70. [81]

    https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=0002131# FoaId7b738f65-fe91-44d2-b8b7-f4506a1c758e

    Request for Information (RFI) on Enabling Technologies for a Commercially Viable Fusion Power Plant, DE-FOA-0002131 (2019). https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=0002131# FoaId7b738f65-fe91-44d2-b8b7-f4506a1c758e

    2019

  71. [82]

    Martinez-Loran, E., Izadi, A., Jain, A., Spencer, B.W., Boedo, J., Hollmann, E.: Development of pebble-based extruded carbon rods for extreme plasma heat flux environments. J. Appl. Phys. 133, 245001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0139921

    2023

  72. [84]

    Li, C., Job, A.J., Fuerst, T.F., Shimada, M., Way, J.D., Wolden, C.A.: Low temperature hydrogen plasma permeation in palladium and its alloys for fuel recycling in fusion systems. J. Nucl. Mat. 582, 154484 (2023). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154484

    2023

  73. [85]

    Job, A.L., Li, C., Burst, C.M., Way, J.D., Wolden, C.A.: Zirconium nitride intermetallic diffusion barriers enable stable hydrogen permeation in palladium- vanadium composite membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 685, 121930 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121930

    2023

  74. [86]

    Li, C., Way, J.D., Fuerst, T.F., Wolden, C.A.: Low temperature hydrogen super- permeation in vanadium composite metal foil pumps. Nucl. Mat. Energy 37, 101529 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2023.101529

    2023

  75. [87]

    Job, A.L., Li, C., Fuerst, T.F., Way, J.D., Wolden, C.A.: Acceleration of Pd-V intermetallic diffusion by hydrogen. J. Alloys Comp. 972, 172825 (2024). https: 33 //doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172825

    2024

  76. [88]

    Lundin, S.T.B., Movick, W.J., Ikeda, A., Hasegawa, Y., Wolden, C.A., Way, J.D.: Modeling of an ammonia decomposition membrane reactor including purity with complex geometry and non-isothermal behavior. J. Membrane Sci. 693, 122345 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122345

    2024

  77. [89]

    Li, C., Fuerst, T.F., Way, J.D., Wolden, C.A.: High Compression in Palladium Alloy Metal Foil Pumps. Fus. Sci. Tech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15361055.2024.2415794

    2024

  78. [90]

    Li, C., Way, J.D., Fuerst, T.F., Wolden, C.A.: Direct internal recycling fractions approaching unity. Fus. Eng. Des. 209, 114705 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.fusengdes.2024.114705

    2024

  79. [91]

    Li, C., Way, J.D., Fuerst, T.F., Wolden, C.A.: The Impact of Helium on Plasma- Driven Hydrogen Permeation and Implications for Direct Internal Recycling in the Fusion Fuel Cycle. Nucl. Fusion65, 016039 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1741-4326/ad97ce

    2025

  80. [92]

    Membranes 15, 68 (2025)

    Burst, C.M., Li, C., Way, D., Wolden, C.A.: Titanium Nitride as an Intermetallic Diffusion Barrier for Hydrogen Permeation in Palladium–Vanadium Composite Membranes. Membranes 15, 68 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15030068

    2025 doi

  81. [93]

    Lubricants 11, 287 (2023)

    Bliznyuk, V.N., Smith, J., Guin, T., Verst, C., Folkert, J., McDonald, K., Larsen, G., DeVol, T.A.: Photoluminescence Induced in Mineral Oil by Ionizing Radiation. Lubricants 11, 287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ lubricants11070287

    2023

  82. [95]

    IEEE Trans

    Castaneda, N., Majkic, G., Robles, F., Selvamanickam, V.: Correlation Between Critical Current Density and Raman Spectra of Tetragonal REBCO. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 33, 6600906 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC. 2023.3246002

    2023

  83. [96]

    Supercond

    Xue, S., Li, Y., Zhu, L., Sarangi, B., Sandra, J.S., Rong, J., Mai, N., Chen, S., Chavda, A., Sambangi, U., Peram, J., Parthiban, P., Selvamanickam, V.: Current sharing in double-sided REBCO tapes. Supercond. Sci. Tech. 37, 075006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad4e76

    2024 doi

  84. [97]

    34 Supercond

    Paidpilli, M., Sandra, J.S., Sarangi, B., Goel, C., Galstyan, E., Majkic, G., Selva- manickam, V.: High-current, double-sided REBCO tapes by advanced MOCVD. 34 Supercond. Sci. Tech. 36, 095016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ ace8c8

    2023 doi

  85. [98]

    IEEE Trans

    Pullanikkat, V., Paulose, M.T., Rajamohan, S., Schmidt, R., Diwan, S., Majkic, G., Selvamanickam, V.: Next-Generation Advanced MOCVD for Long REBCO Tapes. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 35, 6602005 (2025). https://doi.org/10. 1109/TASC.2024.3514600

    2025

  86. [99]

    IEEE Trans

    Sandra, J.s., Are, V.M., Sherin, S., Yerraguravagari, V., Sarangi, B., Prab- hakaran, A., Selvamanickam, V.: A Double-Sided Oxide Buffer Architecture to Facilitate REBCO Growth for High Performance. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct. (2025). https://doi.org10.1109/TASC.2025.3526857

    2025

  87. [100]

    In: 2024 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Confer- ence and Exposition (APEC), pp

    Sen, T., Liao, M., Elasser, Y., Chen, M.: Power Amplifiers with Reactance Steering Network for Efficient Driving of Variable Impedance Inductively Coupled Plasma Coils. In: 2024 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Confer- ence and Exposition (APEC), pp. 2136–2143 (2024). https://do...

    2024

  88. [101]

    IEEE Trans

    Sen, T., Elasser, Y., Chen, M.: Origami Inductor: Foldable 3-D Polyhedron Multiphase Air-Coupled Inductors With Flux Cancellation and Faster Transient. IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 39, 7312 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1109/TPEL.2024.3374572

    2024

  89. [102]

    In: 2024 40th Semiconductor Thermal Measure- ment, Modeling & Management Symposium (SEMI-THERM), pp

    Vinoth, S.P., Feng, X., Galea, C., Moreno, G., Paluszek, M., Narumanchi, S.: Thermal Management of Wide-Bandgap Semiconductor Amplifiers used for Plasma Heating and Control. In: 2024 40th Semiconductor Thermal Measure- ment, Modeling & Management Symposium (SEMI-THERM), pp. 1–...

    2024

  90. [104]

    AIP Conf

    Ridzon, J., Channel, A., Seltzman, A.H., Sirigiri, J.R., Wukitch, S.J.: Thermal mechanical analysis of novel electron collector for megawatt class gyrotrons. AIP Conf. Proc. 2984, 120001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162410

    2023 doi

  91. [105]

    IEEE Trans

    Ridzon, J.T., Seltzman, A.H., Patel, S., Beck, W., Leccacorvi, R., Viera, R., Wukitch, S.J.: Manufacturing Process Development for Joining GRCop-84 and -42 Alloys for DIII-D LHCD. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.1109/tps.2024.3402330

    2024

  92. [108]

    Bae, J.W., Kos, B., Biondo, E.: Shutdown dose rate analysis with the Shift Monte Carlo radiation transport code and modular verification workflow. Fus. Eng. Design 194, 113895 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113895

    2023

  93. [109]

    Bae, J.W., Borowiec, K., Sircar, A., Badalassi, V.: Impact of fusion reactor neutronics modeling for transmutation and thermal feedback. Nucl. Fusion 63, 126037 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acfd9e

    2023 doi

  94. [110]

    In: Crespi, N., Drobot, A.T., Minerva, R

    Kropaczek, D.J., Badalassi, V., Jain, P.K., Ramuhalli, P., Pointer, W.D.: Digital Twins for Nuclear Power Plants and Facilities. In: Crespi, N., Drobot, A.T., Minerva, R. (eds.) The Digital Twin, pp. 971–1022. Springer, Cham (2023)

    2023

  95. [111]

    Borowiec, K., Bae, J.W., Badalassi, V.: 3D high-fidelity automated neutronics guided optimization of fusion blanket designs. Fus. Eng. Design 200, 114159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114159

    2024

  96. [112]

    Bae, J.W., Young, D., Borowiec, K., Badalassi, V.: Integral analysis of the effect of material dimension and composition on tokamak neutronics. Nucl. Fusion 64, 056013 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad33ee

    2024 doi

  97. [113]

    Ottaviano, A., Wirz, R.E.: Secondary electron emission of reticulated foam mate- rials. J. Appl. Phys. 133, 103302 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133253

    2023 doi

  98. [114]

    Sabiston, G., Wirz, R.E.: Ion-surface interactions in plasma-facing material design. J. Appl. Phys. 135, 183301 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201758

    2024 doi

  99. [117]

    Snead, L.L., Sprouster, D., Cheng, B., Brown, N., Ang, C., Duchnowski, E.M., Hu, X., Trelewicz, J.: Development and potential of composite moderators for elevated temperature nuclear applications. J. Asian Ceramic Soc. 10, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2021.1993592

    2022

  100. [118]

    Frontiers Nucl

    Bhardwaj, D., Cheng, B., Sprouster, D.J., Cunningham, W.S., Rani, N., Trelewicz, J.R., Snead, L.L.: Fabrication of neutron absorbing metal hydride 36 entrained ceramic matrix shield composites. Frontiers Nucl. Eng. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnuen.2024.1352667

    2024

  101. [119]

    Dunkin, M.R., Shawon, M.A., Ouyang, M., Gentile, J.M., Pattammattel, A., Trelewicz, J.R., Snead, L.L., Sprouster, D.J.: Interface instabilities in hafnium hydride entrained iron metal matrix composites. J. Appl. Phys. 137, 015105 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234481

    2025 doi

  102. [120]

    Zhang, D., Darsell, J.T., Wang, J., Ma, X., Grant, G.J., Anderson, I.E., Rieken, J.R., Edwards, D.J., Setyawan, W., Horn, T.J., Odette, G.R.: No ball milling needed: Alternative ODS steel manufacturing with gas atomization reaction syn- thesis (GARS) and friction-based process...

    2022

  103. [121]

    JOM 76, 2899 (2024)

    Wang, X., Darsell, J.T., Ma, X., Liu, J., Liu, T., Prabhakaran, R., Anderson, I.E., Zhang, D.: Manufacturing ODS Steels from GARS Powders by Friction Consolidation and Extrusion. JOM 76, 2899 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11837-024-06584-5

    2024

  104. [122]

    Graning, T., Tan, L., Robin, I., Katoh, Y., Yang, Y.: A novel design of tran- sitional layer structure between reduced activation ferritic martensitic steels and tungsten for plasma facing materials. J. Mat. Res. Tech. 24, 4285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.019

    2023 doi

  105. [123]

    Metals 13, 1438 (2023)

    Robin, I.K., Graning, T., Yang, Y., Haider, S.B., Lass, E.A., Katoh, Y., Zinkle, S.J.: Evaluation of Tungsten-Steel Solid-State Bonding: Options and the Role of CALPHAD to Screen Diffusion Bonding Interlayers. Metals 13, 1438 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081438

    2023 doi

  106. [124]

    Robin, I.K., Graning, T., Yang, Y., Katoh, Y., Zinkle, S.J.: Microstructure and thermal stability of a structurally graded tungsten and reduced activa- tion ferritic/martensitic steel joint. J. Mat. Res. Tech. 30, 3663 (2024). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.087

    2024 doi

  107. [125]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/view-all-programs/ vision-open-2024

    2024

  108. [126]

    https://kyotofusioneering.com/en/news/2024/07/23/2533

    2024

  109. [127]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/ advanced-metal-foil-pumps-and-integrated-test-environment-fusion-fuel-cycle

  110. [128]

    Shumlak, E.T.M., Levitt, B.J.: Fusion Gain and Triple Product for the Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z Pinch

    U. Shumlak, E.T.M., Levitt, B.J.: Fusion Gain and Triple Product for the Sheared-Flow-Stabilized Z Pinch. Fus. Sci. Tech. 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 1080/15361055.2023.2198049

    2023

  111. [129]

    Sutherland, D.A., Hansen, C.J.: Driven resonant current amplification in 37 self-organized plasma configurations with uniform λ and plasma pressure con- finement. Phys. Plasmas 28, 022507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025959

    2021 doi

  112. [130]

    Swanson, C.P.S., Cohen, S.A.: The effect of rigid electron rotation on the Grad–Shafranov equilibria of a class of FRC devices. Nucl. Fusion 61, 086023 (2021). https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac0f96

    2021 doi

  113. [131]

    Glasser, A.H., Cohen, S.A.: Interpreting ion-energy distributions using charge exchange emitted from deeply kinetic field-reversed-configuration plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 29, 052508 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089430

    2022 doi

  114. [132]

    Ahsan, T., Cohen, S.A.: An analytical approach to evaluating magnetic-field closure and topological changes in frc devices. Phys. Plasmas 29, 072507 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090163

    2022 doi

  115. [133]

    Swanson, C.P.S., Galea, C.A., Cohen, S.A.: Electron heating in 2D: Combining Fermi–Ulam acceleration and magnetic-moment non-adiabaticity in a mirror- configuration plasma. Phys. Plasmas 29, 082106 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0097299

    2022

  116. [134]

    Glasser, A.H., Cohen, S.A.: Simulating single-particle dynamics in magnetized plasmas: The RMF code. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 083506 (2022). https://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0101665

    2022 doi

  117. [135]

    Vinoth, S.P., Evans, E.S., Swanson, C.P.S., Palmerduca, E., Cohen, S.A.: Eval- uation of a collisional radiative model for electron temperature determination in hydrogen plasma. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 093503 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0101676

    2022

  118. [136]

    Dogariu, A., Cohen, S.A., Jandovitz, P., Vinoth, S., Evans, E.S., Swanson, C.P.S.: A diagnostic to measure neutral-atom density in fusion-research plasmas. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 093519 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0101683

    2022 doi

  119. [137]

    Galea, C.A., Swanson, C.P.S., Cohen, S.A., Thomas, S.J.: Use of a mylar filter to eliminate vacuum ultraviolet pulse pileup in low-energy x-ray measurements. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 093531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0101712

    2022 doi

  120. [138]

    Palmerduca, E., Qin, H., Cohen, S.A.: Energizing charged particles by an orbit instability in a slowly rotating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 106, 045209 (2022). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.045209

    2022 doi

  121. [139]

    AIAA 2023-0555

    Thomas, S.J., Paluszek, M.A.: A Fusion-Propelled Transportation System to Produce Terrestrial Power using Helium-3 from Uranus. AIAA 2023-0555. AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum (2023). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0555

    2023 doi

  122. [140]

    Galea, C., Thomas, S., Paluszek, M., Cohen, S.: The Princeton Field-Reversed Configuration for Compact Nuclear Fusion Power Plants. J. Fusion Energy 42, 38 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-023-00342-2

    2023 doi

  123. [141]

    Plasma 6, 58 (2023)

    Ahsan, T., Swanson, C.P.S., Galea, C., Vinoth, S.P., Qian, T., Rubin, T., Cohen, S.A.: Analysis and Mitigation of Pulse-Pile-Up Artifacts in Plasma Pulse-Height X-ray Spectra. Plasma 6, 58 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma6010006

    2023 doi

  124. [142]

    Acta Astronautica 210, 82 (2023)

    Paluszek, M., Price, A., Koniaris, Z., Galea, C., Thomas, S., Cohen, S., Stutz, R.: Nuclear fusion powered Titan aircraft. Acta Astronautica 210, 82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.04.029

    2023 doi

  125. [144]

    Nature Astron

    Zhang, Y., Pree, S., Bellan, P.M.: Generation of laboratory nanoflares from multiple braided plasma loops. Nature Astron. 7, 655 (2023). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41550-023-01941-x

    2023 doi

  126. [145]

    Mitrani, J.M., Brown, J.A., Goldblum, B.L., Laplace, T.A., Claveau, E.L., Draper, Z.T., Forbes, E.G., Golingo, R.P., McLean, H.S., Nelson, B.A., Shumlak, U., Stepanov, A., Weber, T.R., Zhang, Y., Higginson, D.P.: Thermonuclear neu- tron emission from a sheared-flow stabilized ...

    2021 doi

  127. [146]

    IEEE Trans

    Youmans, A.E., Mitrani, J.M., McMahon, M., Jibodu, A.T., Goyon, C.S., Cooper, C.M., Goldblum, B.L., Laplace, T.A., Brown, J.A., Conti, F., Williams, A., Beg, F.N., Ruskov, E., Levitt, B.J., Johanssen, A.R., Shumlak, U., Tsai, P.E., Higginson, D.P.: PANDA-FES: Portable and Adap...

    2024

  128. [147]

    Conti, F., Williams, A., Rahman, H.U., Fadeev, V., Higginson, D.P., Youmans, A., Aybar, N., Ruskov, E., Beg, F.N.: Neutron-producing gas puff Z-pinch exper- iments on a fast, low-impedance, 0.5 MA linear transformer driver. J. Appl. Phys. 136, 095901 (2024). https://doi.org/10...

    2024 doi

  129. [148]

    Ryan, R.A., Tsai, P.E., Johansen, A.R., Youmans, A., Higginson, D.P., Mitrani, J.M., Adams, C.S., Sutherland, D.A., Levitt, B., Shumlak, U.: Time-resolved measurement of neutron energy isotropy in a sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch. Nucl. Fusion 65, (2025). https://arxiv.org/ab...

    2025 arXiv

  130. [149]

    Klemmer, A.W., Fuelling, S., Bauer, B.S., Wurden, G.A., Taylor, A.S., Suther- land, D.A., Shah, A.P., Stepanov, A.D., Levitt, B.J., Nelson, B.A., Weber, T.R., Quinley, M., Shumlak, U.: Implementation of extreme ultraviolet spectroscopy on a sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch. Rev...

    2023 doi

  131. [150]

    Kafle, N., Elliott, D., Garren, E.W., He, Z., Gebhart, T.E., Zhang, Z., Biewer, T.M.: Design and implementation of a portable diagnostic system for Thomson scattering and optical emission spectroscopy measurements. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 063002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/...

    2021 doi

  132. [151]

    Kafle, N., Elliott, D., Berlinger, B., He, Z., Cohen, S., Zhang, Z., Biewer, T.M.: Portable diagnostic package for Thomson scattering and optical emission spectroscopy on Princeton field-reversed configuration 2 (PFRC 2). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 113506 (2022). https://doi.org/1...

    2022 doi

  133. [152]

    He, Z., Kafle, N., Gebhart, T.E., Biewer, T.M., Zhang, Z.: Implementation of a portable diagnostic system for Thomson scattering measurements on an elec- trothermal arc source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 113526 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0101835

    2022

  134. [153]

    Domier, C.W., Zhu, Y., Dannenberg, J., Luhmann, N.C.: A next generation ultra short pulse reflectometry (USPR) diagnostic. Rev. Sci. Instrum.92, 034714 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040724

    2021 doi

  135. [154]

    Hatler, C., Robin, I., Kim, H., Curtis, N., Sun, B., Aydogan, E., Fensin, S., Couet, A., Martinez, E., Thoma, D.J., El Atwani, O.: The path towards plasma facing components: A review of state-of-the-art in W-based refractory high- entropy alloys. Curr. Opin. Sol. State Mat. Sc...

    2025

  136. [155]

    Ferry, S.E., Woller, K.B., Peterson, E.E., Sorensen, C., Whyte, D.G.: The LIBRA Experiment: Investigating Robust Tritium Accountancy in Molten FLiBe Exposed to a D-T Fusion Neutron Spectrum. Fus. Sci. Tech. 79, 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2022.2078136

    2023

  137. [156]

    Meschini, S., Ferry, S.E., Delaporte-Mathurin, R., Whyte, D.G.: Modeling and analysis of the tritium fuel cycle for ARC- and STEP-class D-T fusion power plants. Nucl. Fusion 63, 126005 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ acf3fc

    2023 doi

  138. [157]

    Delaporte-Mathurin, R., Goles, N., Ball, J., Dunn, C., Edwards, E., Ferry, S., Lamere, E., Lanzrath, A., Leccacorvi, R., Meschini, S., Peterson, E., Segantin, S., Vieira, R., Whyte, D., Zhou, W., Woller, K.: Advancing tritium self-sufficiency in fusion power plants: insights f...

    2025 doi

  139. [158]

    Ochs, I.E., Kolmes, E.J., Mlodik, M.E., Rubin, T., Fisch, N.J.: Improving the feasibility of economical proton-boron-11 fusion via alpha channeling with a hybrid fast and thermal proton scheme. Phys. Rev. E 106, 055215 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1103/physreve.106.055215

    2022 doi

  140. [159]

    Kolmes, E.J., Ochs, I.E., Fisch, N.J.: Wave-supported hybrid fast-thermal p-11B 40 fusion. Phys. Plasmas 29, 110701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119434

    2022 doi

  141. [160]

    Mlodik, M.E., Munirov, V.R., Rubin, T., Fisch, N.J.: Sensitivity of synchrotron radiation to the superthermal electron population in mildly relativistic plasma. Phys. Plasmas 30, 043301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0140508

    2023 doi

  142. [161]

    Ochs, I.E., Munirov, V.R., Fisch, N.J.: Confinement time and ambipolar poten- tial in a relativistic mirror-confined plasma. Phys. Plasmas 30, 052508 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147466

    2023 doi

  143. [162]

    Munirov, V.R., Fisch, N.J.: Suppression of bremsstrahlung losses from rela- tivistic plasma with energy cutoff. Phys. Rev. E 107, 065205 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/physreve.107.065205

    2023 doi

  144. [163]

    Kolmes, E.J., Mlodik, M.E., Fisch, N.J.: Extending the single-fluid solvability conditions for more general plasma systems. Phys. Lett. A 477, 128882 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2023.128882

    2023

  145. [164]

    Ochs, I.E., Fisch, N.J.: Critical role of isopotential surfaces for magnetostatic ponderomotive forces. Phys. Rev. E 108, 065210 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 1103/physreve.108.065210

    2023

  146. [165]

    Rax, J.M., Gueroult, R., Fisch, N.J.: Rotating Alfv´ en waves in rotating plasmas. J. Plasma Phys. 89, 905890613 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0022377823001368

    2023

  147. [167]

    Kolmes, E.J., Ochs, I.E., Fisch, N.J.: Loss-cone stabilization in rotating mirrors: thresholds and thermodynamics. J. Plasma Phys. 90, 905900203 (2024). https: //doi.org/10.1017/s0022377824000205

    2024 doi

  148. [168]

    Kolmes, E.J., Fisch, N.J.: Upper and lower bounds on phase-space rearrange- ments. Phys. Plasmas 31, 042109 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0202456

    2024 doi

  149. [169]

    Plasmas31, 042116 (2024)

    Ochs, I.E.: When do waves drive plasma flows? Phys. Plasmas31, 042116 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201780

    2024 doi

  150. [170]

    Nature Comm

    Kolmes, E.J., Ochs, I.E., Rax, J.M., Fisch, N.J.: Massive, long-lived electrostatic potentials in a rotating mirror plasma. Nature Comm. 15, 4302 (2024). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47386-2

    2024 doi

  151. [171]

    Rubin, T., Ochs, I.E., Fisch, N.J.: Flowing plasma rearrangement in the presence of static perturbing fields. Phys. Plasmas 31, 082109 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0222129 41

    2024

  152. [172]

    Ochs, I.E., Mlodik, M.E., Fisch, N.J.: Electron tail suppression and effective collisionality due to synchrotron emission and absorption in mildly relativistic plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 31, 083303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228464

    2024 doi

  153. [173]

    Kolmes, E.J., Fisch, N.J.: Coriolis forces modify magnetostatic ponderomo- tive potentials. Phys. Plasmas 31, 112107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0233613

    2024 doi

  154. [174]

    Gueroult, R., Tripathi, S.K.P., Gaboriau, F., Look, T.R., Fisch, N.J.: Plasma potential shaping using end-electrodes in the Large Plasma Device. J. Plasma Phys. 90, 905900603 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377824000552

    2024 doi

  155. [175]

    https://infuse.ornl.gov

  156. [176]

    https://cfs.energy/news-and-media/close-series-a-round

  157. [177]

    Revisit of the 2017 Costing for Four ARPA-E ALPHA Concepts, Woodruff Scientific, Inc. (2020). https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/publications/ updated-cost-study-and-final-report-four-alpha-fusion-concepts

    2020

  158. [178]

    https://woodruffscientific.com

  159. [179]

    Handley, M.C., Slesinski, D., Hsu, S.C.: Potential Early Markets for Fusion Energy. J. Fusion Energy 40, 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10894-021-00306-4

    2021

  160. [180]

    Hoedl, S.A.: Achieving a social license for fusion energy. Phys. Plasmas 29, 092506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0091054

    2022 doi

  161. [181]

    https://www.fusionindustryassociation.org/fusion-industry-association-announces-launch

  162. [182]

    https://science.osti.gov/-/media/fes/fesac/pdf/2020/202012/FESAC Report 2020 Powering the Future.pdf

    2020

  163. [183]

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Bringing Fusion to the U.S. Grid. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2021). https://doi. org/10.17226/25991

    2021 doi

  164. [185]

    https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/chadwick

  165. [186]

    Bethe, H.A.: Energy Production in Stars. Phys. Rev. 55, 434 (1939). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.55.434

    1939 doi

  166. [187]

    Gamow, G.: Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes. Z. Physik 51, 204 (1928). 42 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01343196

    1928 doi

  167. [188]

    Alpher, R.A., Bethe, H., Gamow, G.: The Origin of Chemical Elements. Phys. Rev. 73, 803 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803 43

    1948 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.