Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

A positive correlation between broad HI Ly$\alpha$ absorptions and local overdensities of galaxies

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Broad Lyα absorbers along one quasar sightline preferentially sit at redshifts with excess galaxies, and absorber column density rises with the strength of that excess—evidence that warm-hot gas occupies the deep potential wells of cosmic…

desk verdict A plausible but fragile new result: BLA column densities correlate with galaxy overdensities on one sightline, yet the quoted significance omits the dominant uncertainties in the overdensity axis. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15452 v2 pith:ZG5BTN4Y submitted 2025-04-21 astro-ph.GA

Ismael Pessa , Nicolas Tejos , Karen Martinez-Acosta , Sebastian Lopez , Jessica Werk , J. Xavier Prochaska This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords broadLyαabsorberswarm-hotintergalacticmediumcosmicfilamentsgalaxyoverdensitiesquasarabsorption-linespectroscopyWHIMbaryonslarge-scalestructuregalaxies:
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that broad hydrogen Lyman-$\alpha$ absorptions, wide UV absorption features tracing gas hotter than about $10^{5}$ kelvin, mark the dense filamentary parts of the cosmic web rather than being randomly distributed. Using 13 broad absorbers along a single quasar sightline and two galaxy surveys around that sightline, the authors find that four absorbers sit in strong galaxy overdensities, four in tentative ones, and one in an apparent galaxy void. The central quantitative claim is that the total hydrogen column density inferred from an absorber rises with the local galaxy overdensity at its redshift, with a Spearman coefficient of 0.88 for ionized hydrogen. The overdensities are local in the sense that they vanish beyond about 1000 km/s in velocity and roughly 1.5 Mpc in impact parameter. If correct, this would provide direct observational evidence tying the warm-hot intergalactic medium, a major suspected reservoir of low-redshift baryons, to the large-scale structure traced by galaxies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the broad Lyα absorber, an H I Lyman-$\alpha$ absorption line with Doppler parameter b>40 km/s, thermally broadened by gas at roughly $10^{5}$ K or hotter. The argument's mechanism is the comparison between gas properties derived from those absorbers and a completeness-corrected galaxy overdensity ratio, defined as the number of galaxies observed at the absorber redshift divided by the number expected from a halo mass function. Observed galaxy counts are corrected for two observational losses by dividing by a redshift-success factor of 0.84 and a target-recovery factor of 0.27, and the expected counts are set by integrating the halo mass function above a mass threshold fixed by the r≈22.5 magnitude limit through a stellar-to-halo mass relation. The correlation of column density with this overdensity ratio, and its decay toward larger velocity windows and impact parameters, is what carries the filament interpretation.

What would settle it

Recompute the found-to-expected galaxy ratio at each BLA redshift using a galaxy survey complete to r≈23–24 mag in the same field, so no recovery-factor correction is needed, and rerun the Spearman correlation against inferred hydrogen column density: if the correlation drops to zero or changes sign, the completeness correction is the cause; if it survives, the correction is validated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, broad Lyα absorbers—H I absorptions with Doppler parameter b>40 km/s, taken as tracers of warm-hot intergalactic gas—are preferentially found in locally overdense galaxy environments. The authors detect 13 reliable BLAs in the HST/COS spectrum of the quasar at z≈0.27, measure their neutral and ionized hydrogen column densities using Voigt-profile fitting and an assumed turbulent-to-thermal broadening ratio, and compare completeness-corrected galaxy counts in the VLT/VIMOS field with counts expected from a halo mass function. They find that 8 of 13 BLAs coincide with a measurable galaxy excess, that the excess peaks within ±1000 km/s and at impact parameters below about 1.5 Mpc, and that inferred hydrogen column density correlates positively with the found-to-expected galaxy ratio: ρ=0.88±0.14 for ionized hydrogen and ρ=0.70±0.08 for neutral hydrogen, while Doppler parameter shows no such correlation. The paper concludes that denser warm-hot gas resides deep within the gravitational potential wells of cosmic filaments, extending to the warm-hot phase what earlier work established for cooler Lyα absorbers.

Load-bearing premise

The overdensity axis rests on correcting observed galaxy counts by factors of 0.84 and 0.27, with the 0.27 recovery fraction measured against a photometric catalog that may itself be incomplete near the r=22.5 limit, and on expected counts from a halo mass function and a stellar-to-halo mass relation that could be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Broad Lyα absorbers can serve as signposts of cosmic filaments even where no inter-cluster axis has been identified, since most of these BLAs avoid the preselected cluster-pair axes yet still cluster around galaxy overdensities.
  • The warm-hot intergalactic medium is not spread uniformly: its column density tracks galaxy density on Mpc scales, meaning UV absorption surveys along quasar sightlines can map where the missing baryons concentrate.
  • Doppler width does not track environment, so temperature or non-thermal broadening is not set by local galaxy density; column density is the gas property that responds to the filament environment.
  • The flattening of column density at the strongest overdensities matches the pattern seen for cooler H I absorbers, where absorption saturates in the densest filament cores.
  • Narrow Lyα absorbers show a similar but weaker trend, suggesting that both the cold and the warm-hot phases of the intergalactic medium respond to the same underlying galaxy overdensity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension follows from the paper's method: stacking many archival UV quasar sightlines against galaxy redshift surveys could map warm-hot gas density without requiring preselected filament axes, since the correlation with local galaxy excess is measurable even with a single sightline.
  • The BLA at z≈0.21316, found in an apparent galaxy void, offers a sharp discriminating test: deeper galaxy spectroscopy at that redshift should either reveal a faint excess, which would implicate survey incompleteness, or confirm genuinely isolated warm gas, which would mean some warm-hot baryons live outside filaments.
  • The fragility of the overdensity axis suggests a pointed follow-up: obtaining complete redshifts to r≈23–24 in one quadrant of the VIMOS field would directly test whether the 0.27 recovery factor is accurate and whether the reported correlation survives without that correction.
  • If the correlation holds across many sightlines, BLA column density could become a practical proxy for filament gas density in baryon-census work, complementing dispersion measures from fast radio bursts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports an observational study of 13 broad H I Lyα absorbers (BLAs) in the HST/COS spectrum of a single QSO, combined with VLT/MUSE and VLT/VIMOS galaxy surveys. The authors estimate completeness-corrected galaxy counts in ±1000 km s−1 windows around each BLA, compare these with expectations from a halo mass function, and identify four strong and four tentative galaxy overdensities. They then correlate the inferred ionized hydrogen column density of the BLAs with the local galaxy overdensity, reporting a positive Spearman correlation of ρ = 0.88 ± 0.14 for 12 BLAs (one BLA excluded because it may be associated with a galaxy), and argue that the warm-hot intergalactic medium resides preferentially in dense cosmic filaments.

Significance. If the correlation is robust, the paper provides one of the few direct observational links between the physical conditions of the warm-hot intergalactic medium and the local galaxy environment, complementing earlier work on narrower Lyα absorbers and filament impact parameters. The paper is careful on the absorption-line side: it uses BIC to test blended decompositions, checks saturated systems with additional Lyman lines and associated metals, and transparently quantifies the α (turbulent-to-thermal broadening) systematic range in Table 4. It also makes a genuine effort to characterize the VIMOS completeness function, and the analysis is largely reproducible given the public tools and detailed tables. The main weakness is that the headline correlation does not yet propagate the substantial uncertainties in the galaxy-overdensity axis, which is the load-bearing quantity of the central claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec 4.3, Fig 14 (top)] The quoted Spearman uncertainty is obtained by perturbing only the column densities, while the x-axis values Nfound/Nexpected are treated as exact. Each x-value is, however, a ratio of a completeness-corrected galaxy count (divided by 0.84 and 0.27 in Sec 2.6.4) to an expected count from the Reed et al. halo mass function with a constant M/L and the Moster et al. (2010) stellar-to-halo mass relation (Sec 3.1). The two lowest-redshift points (z≈0.04021 and 0.04866), which have raw counts of 2 and 3 and anchor the high-NHII end, are especially sensitive to these corrections. I request a Monte Carlo or jackknife that also perturbs the found counts with Poisson statistics, the completeness corrections with priors reflecting the SDSS DR16 comparison, and the expected counts (for example by varying the halo-mass threshold by the ~0.1-0.2 dex scatter in the stellar-to-halo relation), and that reports the resulting Spearman coefficient and its full uncertainty.
  2. [Sec 4.3, Table 4] The systematic range in log NHII from the α = 0 to α = 1.5 bracket (column 6 of Table 4) is comparable to the statistical errors, and the paper itself states this in Sec 2.7. Yet the reported ρ = 0.88 ± 0.14 is computed only for the fiducial α = 0.7. Because the correlation is the central claim, the authors should recompute the Spearman coefficient for α = 0 and α = 1.5, and ideally incorporate the α range into the quoted uncertainty; if the correlation disappears or changes rank order under this bracket, the claim needs to be substantially softened.
  3. [Sec 4.3 and Sec 4.2] The headline correlation uses 12 BLAs after excluding the z≈0.18919 system as likely associated with a galaxy, and the paper acknowledges in Sec 4.2 that the four 'strong' overdensities are only about 1σ above the 2.5× threshold. This makes the result sensitive to individual points. I request a leave-one-out analysis for both the full 13-BLA sample and the 12-BLA sample, and an explicit statement of how ρ changes when the two low-redshift anchors (z≈0.04021 and 0.04866) or the void BLA at z≈0.21316 are removed. Without such a robustness test, the significance of a rank correlation on 12 points with a post hoc exclusion is difficult to assess.
  4. [Sec 3.1 and Sec 2.6.4] The completeness correction relies on the recovery fraction of 0.27 measured against SDSS DR16 near r = 22.5, which is close to the SDSS median 5σ depth of r = 22.70. If SDSS itself is incomplete at this limit, the recovery fraction is biased and the corrected found counts inherit a systematic error that is not propagated into the overdensity ratios. In addition, the expected galaxy counts are obtained by converting the r-band luminosity limit to a halo-mass threshold using a constant mass-to-light ratio and the Moster et al. (2010) relation, an extrapolation at the low stellar masses probed at z≈0.04-0.05. The paper should state the direction and plausible magnitude of these biases and include them in the uncertainty budget of the overdensity axis.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig 4 caption] The third panel description in the caption begins with 'Left:' but should be 'Right:' to match the redshift distribution panel.
  2. [Sec 4.2] The text writes 'Although 8000 km−1' where the unit should be 'km s−1'; the same typo appears in a few other places.
  3. [Sec 2.6.4] The phrase 'the real number of sources with apparent r magnitude < 22.5 mag in the VIMOS field of view that satisfies the imposed color criteria' should read 'that satisfy', and the photometric system used for the R−I criterion should be stated explicitly (SDSS versus Johnson-Cousins) for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported BLA-to-overdensity correlation is built from independent column-density and galaxy-count measurements.

full rationale

The central claim (Sec 4.3, Fig 14 top) compares ionized hydrogen column densities inferred from Voigt-profile fits to the HST/COS spectrum with a completeness-corrected found-to-expected galaxy count ratio from VLT/VIMOS and SDSS DR16. These two axes are constructed from fully independent data: NHII comes from b and NHI plus the Richter et al. (2006a) temperature-ionization relation, with the turbulent-to-thermal ratio alpha adopted from the external Savage et al. (2014) and Stocke et al. (2014) samples and explicitly bracketed with alpha = 0 and 1.5; the overdensity axis comes from VIMOS galaxy counts corrected by the 0.84 redshift-success fraction and the 0.27 recovery fraction measured against SDSS DR16, divided by an expectation from the Reed et al. (2007) halo mass function with a Moster et al. (2010) stellar-to-halo mass conversion. No BLA property enters the galaxy-count or expectation calculation, and no galaxy-overdensity property enters the NHII calculation. The self-citations (Tejos et al. 2016; Pessa et al. 2018) are methodological, covering line-identification criteria, MUSE survey construction, and the ionization-inference recipe; they do not contain or assert the target correlation. The removal of the z about 0.18919 BLA from the Spearman calculation is a stated sample choice motivated by a nearby MUSE galaxy, not a fit to the correlation. The paper's caveats about completeness, the alpha systematic, and small-number statistics concern robustness and uncertainty propagation, which are correctness risks rather than circularity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and no prediction reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two model-dependent chains: (1) converting observed BLA Doppler parameters into NHII via α and the Richter ionization relation, and (2) converting galaxy counts into overdensities via completeness corrections and HMF expectations. No new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameter is α; the velocity window is a modeling choice that is varied in robustness tests.

free parameters (2)
  • α (turbulent-to-thermal Doppler broadening ratio) = 0.7 (fiducial; range 0 to 1.5 evaluated)
    Adopted from median of Savage et al. (2014) and Stocke et al. (2014) samples; used in Eq. 4 to split observed b into thermal and non-thermal components, then to derive T, fion, and NHII. The central correlation uses NHII, so α is load-bearing; the paper shows systematic ranges but does not recompute the Spearman coefficient for α=0 or 1.5.
  • Velocity window for galaxy overdensity = ±1000 km s^-1
    Chosen to match typical filament velocity dispersion (Sec 2.2); the overdensity ratios and the correlation in Fig 14 use this window. The paper explores other windows in Sec 4.2, but the headline correlation and the 4-strong/4-tentative classification are tied to this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ΛCDM cosmology with Planck 2016 parameters for HMF and distance calculations.
    Used in Sec 2.2 and 3.1 to compute expected galaxy counts from the halo mass function.
  • domain assumption The Reed et al. (2007) HMF model and the Moster et al. (2010) stellar-to-halo mass relation correctly predict the number of galaxies above the r=22.5 mass threshold in the VIMOS field.
    Underlies the 'expected number of galaxies' line in Fig 8 and the overdensity ratios; if wrong, the overdensity classifications shift.
  • domain assumption The Richter et al. (2006a) relation log(fion) = -0.75 + 1.25 log(T) applies to the BLA sample.
    Used in Eq. 6 to convert temperature to ionization fraction for NHII; an extrapolation for one NLA is noted.
  • domain assumption BLAs with b>40 km/s trace gas at T>10^5 K (WHIM).
    The paper acknowledges non-thermal broadening can mimic BLAs; this is the link between the observed lines and warm-hot gas.
  • domain assumption Inter-cluster axes from the GMBCG catalog are proxies for cosmic filaments.
    Used to select the sightline and interpret overdensities; the paper itself notes most BLAs do not coincide with these axes (Sec 4.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A positive correlation between broad HI Ly$\alpha$ absorptions and local overdensities of galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZG5BTN4Y

@misc{pith2026250415452,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A positive correlation between broad HI Ly$\alpha$ absorptions and local overdensities of galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZG5BTN4Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15452}
}
abstract

A large fraction of the baryon budget at $z<1$ resides in large-scale filaments in the form of diffuse intergalactic gas, and numerous studies have reported a significant correlation between the strength of the absorptions produced by this gas in the spectra of bright background sources, and impact parameter to cosmic filaments intersected by these sightlines. However, a similar relation is harder to determine for the warm-hot phase of the intergalactic gas, since its higher Doppler parameter and significantly lower neutral gas fraction makes this gas difficult to detect in absorption. We use a sample of 13 broad Ly$\alpha$ absorbers (BLAs) detected in the HST/COS spectrum of a single QSO ($z\sim0.27$), whose sightline intersects several inter-cluster axes, to study the relation between BLAs and the large-scale structure of the Universe. Given their Doppler parameters of $b>40$ km s$^{-1}$, BLAs are good tracers of warm-hot intergalactic gas. We use VLT/MUSE and VLT/VIMOS data to infer local overdensities of galaxies at the redshifts of the BLAs, and to assess the potential association of the BLAs with nearby galaxies. We find that out of the 13 BLAs in our sample, four are associated with a strong overdensity of galaxies, and four with tentative overdensities. The remaining five are located at redshifts where we do not identify any excess of galaxies. We find that these overdensities of galaxies at the redshift of BLAs are local, and they vanish when larger cosmic volumes are considered, in terms of a larger velocity offset to the BLA or larger impact parameter to the QSO sightline. Finally, we find a positive correlation between the total hydrogen column densities inferred from the BLAs, and the relative excess of galaxies at the same redshifts, consistent with the picture where warm-hot gas resides deep within the gravitational potential well of cosmic filaments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15452 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observed HST/COS FUV spectrum of QSO SDSSJ161940.56+254323.0 in black. The green line shows the 1 − σ uncertainty of the spectrum. The red line corresponds to the modeled pseudo-continuum. The grey line shows the HST spectrum convolved with a Gaussian kernel with a FWHM of 1Å [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Combined FoV of our VLT/MUSE observations. The magenta square shows approximately the size of the combined FoV. The back￾ground image corresponds to an r-image from The Dark Energy Spec￾troscopic Instrument (DESI; Dey et al. 2019) Legacy Surveys. The green and grey circles show the sources identified in the field, with and without a redshift measurement, respectively (see Sec. 2.6.1). The cen￾tral yellow circle corr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Survey histogram colored in green for our VLT/MUSE sample with measured redshifts. The black line shows the distribution for the whole sample detected by SExtractor. The distribution suggest a detection threshold of around r ∼ 24 mag, indicated with the vertical dashed line. Center: completeness fraction of the redshift survey. The star forming galaxies and non-star forming galaxies are shown in blue and red, … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: r magnitude distribution of the sources in our VIMOS survey. The sources characterized with a redshift are represented in green, and the complete sample is represented by the black solid line. Center: Fraction of sources characterized with a redshift per magnitud…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Total number of sources in the SDSS DR16 data that satisfies the imposed color criteria of R − I < 0.7 (blue) and number of sources in our VIMOS survey (black) per magnitude bin. Right: Ratio between the total number of sources in the SDSS DR16 data and our VIMOS…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Identified BLAs in the HST/COS spectrum of SDSSJ161940.56+254323.0. The panels show the best-fitting Voigt profile for each BLA in blue and the full model of the QSO spectrum in red. The dotted line shows the continuum level. Additional modeled transitions in the same …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Impact parameter to the QSO sightline as a function of the redshift of each source in our survey. Top: Sources up to a projected distance of 4 Mpc from the QSO sightline. Objects in our VLT/MUSE and VLT/VIMOS surveys are represented with blue squares and red pentagons,…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between the number of galaxies randomly expected at the redshift of the BLAs reported in Section 2.7, within a velocity window of ±1000 km s−1 , inside the physical area enclosed by the total VLT/VIMOS FoV at a given redshfit, with the number of galaxies act…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatial distribution of galaxies with a redshift within zsys ± 1000 km s−1 , for the BLA at z = 0.04021. Left: Full VLT/VIMOS FoV around SDSSJ161940.56+254323.0 at z ≈ 0.04021. The dashed cross represents the separation between the four VLT/VIMOS quadrants, indicated i…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spatial distribution of galaxies with a redshift within zsys ± 1000 km s−1 , for the BLA at z = 0.04866. Left: Full VLT/VIMOS FoV around SDSSJ161940.56+254323.0 at z ≈ 0.04866. The dashed cross represents the separation between the four VLT/VIMOS quadrants, indicated …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Ratio of completeness-corrected found and expected number of galaxies in our VLT/VIMOS survey (considering the full FoV) at the redshift of the BLAs, as a function of the size of the velocity win￾dow used to define the depth of the cosmic volume subtended by the VLT/V…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Ratio of completeness-corrected found and expected number of galaxies in our VLT/VIMOS survey within 1000 km s−1 from the red￾shift of the BLAs, as a function of the maximum impact parameter used to define the area of the cosmic volume subtended by VLT/VIMOS, from 100…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Correlation between the total ionized hydrogen column density (top), neutral hydrogen column density (middle), and Doppler parame￾ter (bottom) measured for each absorption feature and the completeness￾corrected number of galaxies found in our VLT/VIMOS survey at the s…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measurement of the Dispersion$\unicode{x2013}$Galaxy Cross-Power Spectrum with the Second CHIME/FRB Catalog

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FRB dispersion and foreground galaxy density are spatially correlated at 5.1 sigma, with a fitted plasma clustering cutoff near 0.9 Mpc, measured from 2,873 CHIME FRBs and about 6 million DESI galaxies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A., van de Weygaert, R., & Jones, B

    Aragón-Calvo, M. A., van de Weygaert, R., & Jones, B. J. T. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 2163 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ram- say, & H. Takami, 773508

    2010

  3. [3]

    2016, MPDAF: MUSE Python Data Analysis Framework, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1611.003

    Bacon, R., Piqueras, L., Conseil, S., Richard, J., & Shepherd, M. 2016, MPDAF: MUSE Python Data Analysis Framework, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1611.003

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    X., Mannings, A

    Baptista, J., Prochaska, J. X., Mannings, A. G., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.07022

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Bell, E. F. & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212

    2001

  6. [6]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    1996

  7. [7]

    R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D

    Bond, J. R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D. 1996, Nature, 380, 603

    1996

  8. [8]

    Bouma, S. J. D., Richter, P., & Wendt, M. 2021, A&A, 647, A166

    work page 2021

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    C., Gnat, O., & Brinboim, Y

    Bromberg, I., Sarkar, K. C., Gnat, O., & Brinboim, Y . 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.18071

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    N., Elek, O., Tejos, N., et al

    Burchett, J. N., Elek, O., Tejos, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 891, L35

    2020

  3. [11]

    Cautun, M., van de Weygaert, R., Jones, B. J. T., & Frenk, C. S. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2923

    2014

  4. [12]

    & Ostriker, J

    Cen, R. & Ostriker, J. P. 1999, ApJ, 514, 1

    1999

  5. [13]

    M., Pomarède, D., Tully, R

    Courtois, H. M., Pomarède, D., Tully, R. B., Hoffman, Y ., & Courtois, D. 2013, AJ, 146, 69

    2013

  6. [14]

    W., Keeney, B

    Danforth, C. W., Keeney, B. A., Tilton, E. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 111

    2016

  7. [15]

    W., Stocke, J

    Danforth, C. W., Stocke, J. T., & Shull, J. M. 2010, ApJ, 710, 613 Davé, R., Cen, R., Ostriker, J. P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 473

    2010

  8. [16]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  9. [17]

    M., & Diaferio, A

    Dolag, K., Bykov, A. M., & Diaferio, A. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 134, 311

    2008

  10. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 450, 1465

    Garzilli, A., Theuns, T., & Schaye, J. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1465

    2015

  11. [19]

    1986, ApJ, 303, 336 González, R

    Gehrels, N. 1986, ApJ, 303, 336 González, R. E. & Padilla, N. D. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1449

    1986

  12. [20]

    A., Koester, B

    Hao, J., McKay, T. A., Koester, B. P., et al. 2010, ApJS, 191, 254

    2010

  13. [21]

    A., Bolton, A

    Hutchinson, T. A., Bolton, A. S., Dawson, K. S., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 205

    2016

  14. [22]

    L., Berg, D

    James, B. L., Berg, D. A., King, T., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 37

    2022

  15. [23]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33

    2003

  16. [24]

    S., Sorini, D., Lee, K.-G., & Davé, R

    Khrykin, I. S., Sorini, D., Lee, K.-G., & Davé, R. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 537

    2024

  17. [25]

    & Böhringer, H

    Kull, A. & Böhringer, H. 1999, A&A, 341, 23 Le Fèvre, O., Saisse, M., Mancini, D., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical /Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. I...

    1999

  18. [26]

    S., et al

    Lee, K.-G., Ata, M., Khrykin, I. S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 9

    2022

  19. [27]

    D., Richter, P., et al

    Lehner, N., Savage, B. D., Richter, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 680

    2007

  20. [28]

    P., Prochaska, J

    Macquart, J. P., Prochaska, J. X., McQuinn, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 581, 391

    2020

  21. [29]

    W., Kacprzak, G

    Marra, R., Churchill, C. W., Kacprzak, G. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10522

    2024

  22. [30]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L1

    2005

  23. [31]

    C., et al

    Martizzi, D., V ogelsberger, M., Artale, M. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 3766

    2019

  24. [32]

    A., et al

    Matthee, J., Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 2381

    2017

  25. [33]

    2014, ApJ, 780, L33

    McQuinn, M. 2014, ApJ, 780, L33

    2014

  26. [34]

    P., Somerville, R

    Moster, B. P., Somerville, R. S., Maulbetsch, C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 903

    2010

  27. [35]

    2018, Nature, 558, 406

    Nicastro, F., Kaastra, J., Krongold, Y ., et al. 2018, Nature, 558, 406

    2018

  28. [36]

    D., Davé, R., Kereš, D., et al

    Oppenheimer, B. D., Davé, R., Kereš, D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2325

    2010

  29. [37]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 733

    Pachat, S., Narayanan, A., Muzahid, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 733

    2016

  30. [38]

    F., et al

    Pessa, I., Tejos, N., Barrientos, L. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2991

    2018

  31. [39]

    2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Pessa, I., Tejos, N., & Moya1, C. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 522, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Sys- tems XXVII, ed. P. Ballester, J. Ibsen, M. Solar, & K. Shortridge, 61 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et ...

    2020

  32. [40]

    X., Tejos, N., Crighton, N., et al

    Prochaska, J. X., Tejos, N., Crighton, N., et al. 2016, Linetools/Linetools: Second Major Release, Zenodo

    2016

  33. [41]

    X., Weiner, B., Chen, H

    Prochaska, J. X., Weiner, B., Chen, H. W., Mulchaey, J., & Cooksey, K. 2011, ApJ, 740, 91

    2011

  34. [42]

    S., Bower, R., Frenk, C

    Reed, D. S., Bower, R., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., & Theuns, T. 2007, in Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 379, Cosmic Frontiers, ed. N. Metcalfe & T. Shanks, 12

    2007

  35. [43]

    H., Veronica, A., Pacaud, F., et al

    Reiprich, T. H., Veronica, A., Pacaud, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A2

    2021

  36. [44]

    D., Tripp, T

    Richter, P., Savage, B. D., Tripp, T. M., & Sembach, K. R. 2004, ApJS, 153, 165

    2004

  37. [45]

    C., Wakker, B

    Sameer, Charlton, J. C., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3827

    2024

  38. [46]

    D., Kim, T

    Savage, B. D., Kim, T. S., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 8

    2014

  39. [47]

    D., Lehner, N., & Narayanan, A

    Savage, B. D., Lehner, N., & Narayanan, A. 2011, ApJ, 743, 180

    2011

  40. [48]

    P., Richards, G

    Schneider, D. P., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2360

    2010

  41. [49]

    2022, AJ, 163, 154

    Schombert, J., McGaugh, S., & Lelli, F. 2022, AJ, 163, 154

    2022

  42. [50]

    F., Zabl, J., et al

    Schroetter, I., Bouché, N. F., Zabl, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4368

    2019

  43. [51]

    1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461

    Schwarz, G. 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461

    1978

  44. [52]

    A., Lemaux, B

    Shen, L., Miller, N. A., Lemaux, B. C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 998

    2017

  45. [53]

    M., Smith, B

    Shull, J. M., Smith, B. D., & Danforth, C. W. 2012, ApJ, 759, 23

    2012

  46. [54]

    N., Prochaska, J

    Simha, S., Burchett, J. N., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 134

    2020

  47. [55]

    X., et al

    Simha, S., Lee, K.-G., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 71

    2023

  48. [56]

    X., et al

    Simha, S., Tejos, N., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 134

    2021

  49. [57]

    T., Lilly, S

    Soto, K. T., Lilly, S. J., Bacon, R., Richard, J., & Conseil, S. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3210

    2016

  50. [58]

    T., Keeney, B

    Stocke, J. T., Keeney, B. A., Danforth, C. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 128

    2014

  51. [59]

    Struble, M. F. & Rood, H. J. 1999, ApJS, 125, 35

    1999

  52. [60]

    N., Hopkins, A

    Taylor, E. N., Hopkins, A. M., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1587

    2011

  53. [61]

    L., Crighton, N

    Tejos, N., Morris, S. L., Crighton, N. H. M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 245

    2012

  54. [62]

    L., Finn, C

    Tejos, N., Morris, S. L., Finn, C. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2017

    2014

  55. [63]

    X., Crighton, N

    Tejos, N., Prochaska, J. X., Crighton, N. H. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2662

    2016

  56. [64]

    M., Bowen, D

    Tripp, T. M., Bowen, D. V ., Sembach, K. R., et al. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 348, Astrophysics in the Far Ultraviolet: Five Years of Discovery with FUSE, ed. G. Sonneborn, H. W. Moos, & B. G. Andersson, 341

    2006

  57. [65]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389

    2017

  58. [66]

    2021, A&A, 646, A156

    Tuominen, T., Nevalainen, J., Tempel, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A156

    2021

  59. [67]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 4178

    Vernstrom, T., Heald, G., Vazza, F., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 4178

    2021

  60. [68]

    P., Hernandez, A

    Wakker, B. P., Hernandez, A. K., French, D. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 40

    2015

  61. [69]

    & Wei, J.-J

    Wang, B. & Wei, J.-J. 2023, ApJ, 944, 50

    2023

  62. [70]

    Watson, W. E. & V ogeley, M. S. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.06708

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    S., et al

    Werner, N., Finoguenov, A., Kaastra, J. S., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L29

    2008

  64. [72]

    C., Tchernyshyov, K., Werk, J

    Wilde, M. C., Tchernyshyov, K., Werk, J. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 114

    2023

  65. [73]

    J., Mulchaey, J

    Williams, R. J., Mulchaey, J. S., & Kollmeier, J. A. 2013, ApJ, 762, L10 Article number, page 22 of 36 Ismael Pessa et al.: A positive correlation between broad H i Lyα absorptions and local overdensities of galaxies Appendix A: Galaxies in our VLT/MUSE galaxy survey Table A.1...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.