Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The Interstellar Medium in IZw18 seen with JWST/MIRI: I. Highly Ionized Gas

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST/MIRI shows that the extreme ionization of IZw18 is powered by X-ray binaries and ULXs, not shocks or an AGN.

desk verdict Solid JWST/MIRI dataset with a new [NeV] detection, but the 'not shocks' claim depends on a 0.2 dex metallicity extrapolation that the authors admit is shaky. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09251 v1 pith:ZIGX3RNZ submitted 2025-08-12 astro-ph.GA

L. K. Hunt , A. Aloisi , M. G. Navarro , R. J. Rickards Vaught , B. T. Draine , A. Adamo , F. Annibali , D. Calzetti
show 14 more authors
S. Hernandez B. L. James M. Mingozzi R. Schneider M. Tosi B. Brandl M. G. del Valle-Espinosa F. Donnan A. S. Hirschauer M. Meixner D. Rigopoulou C. T. Richardson J. M. Levanti A. R. Basu-Zych
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords IZw18JWSTMIRIspectroscopyhighlyionizedgasultra-luminousX-raysourcesphotoionizationmodelsfine-structurelinesmetal-poordwarfgalaxiesyoungstarclusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports JWST/MIRI spectroscopy of I Zw 18, the closest extremely metal-poor dwarf galaxy, and shows that its gas is ionized by a far harder radiation field than ordinary star formation produces: fine-structure lines requiring 55 eV and 97 eV photons are detected. The authors argue that this extreme ionization is not caused by radiative shocks, the usual explanation for such lines in blue compact dwarfs, but by low-metallicity stellar populations that include a substantial population of X-ray binaries or ultraluminous X-ray sources. They show that the measured line ratios sit at the extreme upper end of galaxy-wide trends while remaining off the AGN locus, and that a small (a few percent) contribution from an intermediate-mass black hole cannot be excluded. A sympathetic reader would care because [Ne v] is widely used as a black-hole indicator, and I Zw 18 is the local analogue of the metal-poor dwarf galaxies now being discovered at high redshift, so the result warns against reading such lines as AGN signatures without considering ULXs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is a set of mid-infrared fine-structure line ratios—[Ne iii]/[Ne ii], [S iv]/[S iii], [O iv]/[S iii], and [Ne v]/[Ne ii]—whose ionization potentials span 21.6 to 97.1 eV. These ratios are measured in eleven ~120 pc apertures and compared with photoionization models that include a self-consistent, metallicity- and age-dependent ULX population, and with radiative shock models spanning a range of magnetic field strengths and preshock densities. The high-ionization lines [O iv] and [Ne v] are what discriminate between the mechanisms, because only the ULX-bearing stellar models supply enough photons above 50 eV to match the observed ratios.

What would settle it

Measure the [Ne v] 24.32/14.32 flux ratio in the four NW apertures with deeper MIRI exposures. The photoionized-ULX interpretation requires low-density gas (ratio ≳ 1), whereas fast radiative shocks would predict a ratio closer to the high-density limit (~0.1); a ratio near 0.1 would break the ULX-only picture and reopen the shock case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the interstellar medium of I Zw 18, a dwarf galaxy at roughly 3% solar metallicity, is in an extremely high ionization state that does not come from an active galactic nucleus. JWST/MIRI detects ten fine-structure lines, including [O iv] 25.9 µm (ionization potential 54.9 eV) and [Ne v] 14.3 µm (97.1 eV), and the measured line ratios place I Zw 18 at the extreme upper end of galaxy trends while remaining off the AGN locus. Comparing these ratios with photoionization models that include a self-consistent population of X-ray binaries and ULXs, and with radiative shock models, the authors conclude that shocks cannot reproduce the observations, whereas a roughly 25

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the shock models being applicable to IZw18, but those models only go down to log(Z/Zsun) = -1.3 while IZw18 is at about -1.5; the authors note the comparison may not be strictly appropriate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In I Zw 18, [O iv] and [Ne v] detections are reproduced by the ULX-bearing photoionization models but not by the shock grids, so shocks are not the driver of the extreme ionization.
  • Because the [Ne v]/[Ne ii] ratio places I Zw 18 outside the AGN region of the diagnostic diagrams, [Ne v] emission alone cannot be treated as proof of an accreting massive black hole in low-metallicity dwarfs.
  • A 25 Myr, 1% solar-metallicity stellar population with maximal ULX output nearly coincides with the observed ratios; a ~4% IMBH contribution is nearly degenerate with it, so the data cannot decisively separate the two.
  • The four 14 µm continuum sources have sizes ~30-100 pc and SEDs matching ~3-5 Myr star-cluster templates; the authors conclude they are H ii regions ionized by young, only slightly embedded clusters.
  • The near-zero internal extinction means the MIR lines are unabsorbed tracers of the ionized gas, strengthening their use as benchmarks for high-redshift metal-poor dwarfs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ULX interpretation holds, JWST's [Ne v] detections in high-redshift dwarf galaxies should not be read as AGN signatures without modelling a ULX population; the same hard-photon mechanism could mimic black-hole accretion at z>7.
  • The apparent youth (3-5 Myr) of the MIRI continuum sources implies that cluster formation proceeds efficiently at ~3% solar metallicity; this is testable with NIRSpec IFU spectroscopy targeting the embedded stellar continua.
  • The ULX-1 photoionization model makes a quantitative prediction of a ~200 pc He iii region; narrowband He ii 4686 imaging across the NW complex would directly test whether ULX-1 alone can sustain the ionization.
  • The resemblance of IZw18's line ratios to the SMC WR nebula N76 suggests that a single WR binary, rather than a distributed population, could power the SE [O iv] emission far from ULX-1; optical IFU spectroscopy can search for the WR signature in those apertures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents JWST/MIRI MRS aperture spectra of eleven 120-pc regions in the extremely metal-poor dwarf galaxy I Zw 18. The authors measure ten fine-structure lines, including [O IV] 25.9 μm and [Ne V] 14.3 μm, derive very low extinction from MIRI H I recombination lines combined with optical KCWI data, and compare aperture line ratios to published photoionization grids (Richardson et al. 2022, 2025) and shock grids (Flury et al. 2024). They conclude that the high-ionization state is not due to fast radiative shocks and is best reproduced by low-metallicity stellar populations with a self-consistent ULX contribution, with possible additional contributions from WR stars and a few-percent intermediate-mass black hole. The paper also identifies four compact 14 μm continuum sources, three of which are new, and interprets them as young H II regions around star clusters.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this is a valuable local benchmark for JWST studies of high-redshift metal-poor dwarfs. The paper provides the first clear MIRI detection of [Ne V] in an extremely metal-poor BCD and a useful caution against equating [Ne V] emission with an AGN in low-metallicity systems. The observational analysis is careful: S/N >= 3 detections with Gaussian fits, PSF-matched extraction, foreground-corrected extinction, and comparison against independent published model grids. The interpretation is model-dependent, but the paper does not overfit: f_AGN = 0.04 is explicitly presented as an illustrative choice. These strengths make the paper a credible addition to the dwarf-galaxy ISM literature, provided the shock-exclusion claim can be supported at I Zw 18's metallicity.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.3, Fig. 6 and §5.1] The exclusion of shocks rests on the F24 MAPPINGS V grid, whose metallicity floor is log(Z/Zsun) = -1.3, while I Zw 18 has log(Z/Zsun) approximately -1.5. The authors acknowledge the grid may not be strictly appropriate, yet Sect. 5.1 asserts shocks are unable to reproduce the MIRI line ratios. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim. At lower Z, shock cooling is less efficient and the precursor is harder, which pushes [O IV]/[S III] and [Ne V]/[Ne II] toward the observed extreme high-ionization locus. The alternate shock models are only cited via Mingozzi et al. (2025), not run at this metallicity. Please either run or obtain shock grids at Z ~ 0.03 Zsun, or soften the conclusion to 'not reproduced by current grids'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.5, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The ULX plausibility estimate assumes an rms electron density of ~1 cm^-3, while Sect. 1 quotes 10–100 cm^-3 for the ionized gas. Please clarify whether this is a volume-averaged filling-factor-weighted value and discuss sensitivity to the adopted density.
  2. [§4, Fig. 10] The age estimates for the 14 μm continuum sources use Solar-metallicity templates with PAH and silicate features not seen in I Zw 18. The systematic uncertainty due to template metallicity could be emphasized more strongly.
  3. [§3.3] The f_AGN = 0.04 model is described as 'relatively arbitrary' later; please state earlier that it is illustrative, not a fitted parameter.
  4. [Throughout] Typos: 'identifed' in the intro; 'the extraction ... was performed' should be 'were performed'; Table 5 lists [P III] as a detection while text calls it a possible weak detection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: model comparisons are external grids, not fitted predictions; the F24 metallicity limitation is a robustness caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is observational and comparative: MIRI line fluxes are measured, extinction-corrected using H recombination lines and PyNeb emissivities, converted to line ratios, and then located on published model grids (R25, R22, F24) plus an empirical WR nebula (N76). No parameter is fitted to the IZw18 data in this paper; the fAGN=0.04 model is explicitly called a 'relatively arbitrary choice' made to 'illustrate the trends', not a fitted prediction. The R25/R22 grids are independent model calculations with stated assumptions (BPASS, metallicity, log U, ULX prescription) that do not take the IZw18 line ratios as input, so citing them is real evidence rather than circular. The main 'not due to shocks' claim rests on the F24 MAPPINGS V shock grids, which are external to this team; the paper itself flags that the F24 metallicities stop at log(Z/Zsun)=-1.3 and 'may not be strictly appropriate' for IZw18 at ~3% Zsun. That is a model-applicability limitation affecting robustness, not a self-referential reduction: the exclusion of shocks could be too strong if lower-metallicity shocks reach the observed locus, but the argument is still an external comparison rather than an identity between inputs and outputs. The self-citation overlap with Richardson et al. (2022, 2025) exists but is not load-bearing in a way that forces the conclusion: alternatives (shocks, WR stars, IMBHs, ULXs) are explicitly considered and the authors stress the ambiguity. No circular step can be exhibited by quoting an equation or a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. It uses standard assumptions about recombination physics, extinction curves, and the distance to IZw18. The main free parameters are the illustrative fAGN=0.04 and an assumed rms electron density in the ULX nebula. The central interpretation depends on external model grids (R25, R22, F24) that may not perfectly cover the extreme low metallicity of IZw18.

free parameters (2)
  • fAGN (IMBH photon fraction) = 0.04
    Chosen arbitrarily to illustrate that a small IMBH contribution can mimic ULX models; explicitly described as "relatively arbitrary" in Section 3.3.
  • rms electron density for ULX nebula = ~1 cm^-3
    Assumed in Eq. (1)-(2) to estimate the ULX luminosity required to sustain the He III region; the authors state this as a plausible value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Case B recombination emissivities with Te=20,000 K and ne=100 cm^-3
    Used in Section 3.1 to derive intrinsic H line ratios for extinction estimates.
  • domain assumption The R25 BPASS+ULX photoionization models and F24 MAPPINGS shock models accurately describe the relevant physics at IZw18's metallicity
    The interpretation of the ionization source rests on these models; F24 models have metallicity floor log(Z/Zsun)=-1.3, higher than IZw18.
  • domain assumption The MIRI PSF convolution to 27 um and 0.65 arcsec aperture extraction preserve the line flux ratios
    Section 2.2; ensures line ratios are mutually consistent, but mixes emission over ~120 pc scales.
  • standard math The Garcia-Gordon (G23) and Weingartner-Draine (WD01) extinction curves are applicable to IZw18
    Used to infer extinction; the two curves give negligible differences.
  • domain assumption Distance to IZw18 is 18.2 Mpc
    Used to convert angular sizes to parsecs for the continuum sources and ULX nebula radius.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Interstellar Medium in IZw18 seen with JWST/MIRI: I. Highly Ionized Gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZIGX3RNZ

@misc{pith2026250809251,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Interstellar Medium in IZw18 seen with JWST/MIRI: I. Highly Ionized Gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZIGX3RNZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09251}
}
abstract

We present JWST/MIRI spectra from the Medium-Resolution Spectrometer of IZw18, a nearby dwarf galaxy with a metallicity of $\sim$3% Solar. Its proximity enables a detailed study of highly ionized gas that can be interpreted in the context of newly discovered high-redshift dwarf galaxies. We derive aperture spectra centered on eleven regions of interest; the spectra show very low extinction, A_V $\lesssim 0.1$, consistent with optical determinations. The gas is highly ionized; we have detected 10 fine-structure lines, including [OIV] 25.9 micron with an ionization potential (IP) of $\sim$ 55 eV, and [NeV] 14.3 micron with an IP of $\sim$ 97 eV. The ionization state of IZw18 falls at the extreme upper end of all of the line ratios we analyzed, but not coincident with galaxies containing an accreting massive black hole (active galactic nucleus). Comparison of the line ratios with state-of-the-art photoionization and shock models suggests that the high ionization state in IZw18 is not due to shocks. Rather it can be attributed to metal-poor stellar populations with a self-consistent contribution of X-ray binaries or ultra-luminous X-ray sources. It could also be partially due to a small number of hot low-metallicity Wolf-Rayet stars ionizing the gas; a small fraction (a few percent) of the ionization could come from an intermediate-mass black hole. Our spectroscopy also revealed four 14 micron continuum sources, $\gtrsim 30-100$ pc in diameter, three of which were not previously identified. Their properties are consistent with HII regions ionized by young star clusters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09251 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 16′′×16′′ overlays of MIRI images of I Zw 18 on the HST F606W image astrometrically corrected to Gaia. The MIRI F560W filter is shown in the top left panel, and F1130W in the top right. The F2550W filter appears in the bottom panels, with the MIRI FoVs from both pointings in the four overlapping channels overlaid in the right panel, together with the circles giving the apertures (0. ′′65 radius, ∼ 120 pc diameter) f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spectra extracted the 27 µm convolved cubes in the 0. ′′65-radius apertures shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Inferred extinction relative to Hβ using Hδ from KCWI, and the detected MIRI Hi recombination lines with a S/N ≥ 10; G23 is assumed for the extinction curve, and no foreground extinction has been applied. The extinction values for each aperture are plotted against the wavelength of the MIRI Hi lines to illustrate the power of the MIRI wavelengths to probe deeper into embedded regions. The horizontal shaded light-gra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of various RF diagnostic line flux ratios plotted versus [Ne iii]/[Ne ii]. Top panel: [S iv]/[S iii]; middle: [O iv]/[S iii]; bottom: [Ne v]/[Ne ii]. Our MIRI points for I Zw 18 are given as stars, shown in the legend in the upper right panel. Other samples …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SEDs of selected R22 and R25 SSP+ULXs plot￾ted against photon energy in eV. These R25 populations have ages of 10 to 25 Myr, and two values of metallici￾ties: log(Z/Z⊙) = −2 and log(Z/Z⊙) = 0. The addition of fAGN = 0.04 to the R25 10 Myr SSP+ULX at the same two metall…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Line ratios as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The observed line ratios considered to be the strongest diagnostics by R25. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 4 ′′×4 ′′ cutouts of the MIRI 14 µm continuum sources: from left to right JWST-SE-1, JWST-SE-2, JWST-SE-3, and VLA-NW-A, and from top to bottom F560W, F1130W, F2550W, and HST/F606W. The images are centered on the respective 14 µm emission peaks ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial profiles centered on the four continuum sources in the three MIRI imaging filters. The source profiles are shown as red curves, and the PSF is with blue curves, as shown in the legend in the lower right panel. The source profiles have been resampled to the same …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of MIRI imaging aperture photom￾etry of the four continuum sources with photometric tem￾plates of star clusters as a function of age from Whitmore et al. (2025). All SEDs are normalized to 5.6 µm. The con￾tinuum sources are shown as filled stars, and the di…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Gaussian line fits to the detected [O iv]; the vertical flux density scale is in units of 10−18 W m −2 µm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Gaussian line fits to the detected [Ne v]; the vertical flux density scale is in units of 10−18 W m −2 µm. REFERENCES Alarie, A., & Morisset, C. 2019, RMxAA, 55, 377, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21 Aloisi, A., Clementini, G., Tosi, M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 667…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Resolving Emission from Small Dust Grains in the Blue Compact Dwarf II Zw 40 with JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the low-metallicity dwarf II Zw 40, JWST resolves 3.3 um PAH emission, finds it concentrated at the northern star cluster, and shows the 3.3/11.3 PAH ratio correlates with radiation hardness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2019, RMxAA, 55, 377, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    Alarie, A., & Morisset, C. 2019, RMxAA, 55, 377, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21 2019

  2. [2]

    2007, ApJL, 667, L151, doi: 10.1086/522368

    Aloisi, A., Clementini, G., Tosi, M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 667, L151, doi: 10.1086/522368

    work page doi:10.1086/522368 2007

  3. [3]

    2013, AJ, 146, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/6/144

    Annibali, F., Cignoni, M., Tosi, M., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/6/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/6/144 2013

  4. [4]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  5. [5]

    J., Oesch, P., et al

    Atek, H., Furtak, L. J., Oesch, P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4464, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac360

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac360 2022

  6. [6]

    J., et al

    Atek, H., Labb´ e, I., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 975, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6 2024

  7. [7]

    Babul, A., & Ferguson, H. C. 1996, ApJ, 458, 100, doi: 10.1086/176795

    work page doi:10.1086/176795 1996

  8. [8]

    H., Hearin, A

    Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 2019

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    H., et al

    Behroozi, P., Conroy, C., Wechsler, R. H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5702, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3164 24 T able 5.Integrated line fluxes in the NW-region apertures with S/N ≥ 3 Line Rest λ NW VLA-NW-A VLA-NW-B VLA-NW-C CO2-1 ULX-1 (µm) (10 −21 W m−2) Hi recombination lines HI(...

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    T., Johnson, M

    Berghea, C. T., Johnson, M. C., Secrest, N. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9108

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 230, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/230

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    K., Blecha, L., Torrey, P., et al

    Bhowmick, A. K., Blecha, L., Torrey, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4311, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1386

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    A., & Tuohy, I

    Binette, L., Dopita, M. A., & Tuohy, I. R. 1985, ApJ, 297, 476, doi: 10.1086/163544

    1985 doi

  6. [14]

    D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, A&A, 689, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450632

    Bortolini, G., ¨Ostlin, G., Habel, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450632

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    2011, ARA&A, 49, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102608

    Bromm, V., & Yoshida, N. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102608

    2011 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Heap, S

    Brown, T. M., Heap, S. R., Hubeny, I., Lanz, T., & Lindler, D. 2002, ApJL, 579, L75, doi: 10.1086/345336

    2002 doi

  11. [19]

    S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12556702

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12556702

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582, doi: 10.1086/174346

    1994 doi

  14. [22]

    1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    Campbell, A., Terlevich, R., & Melnick, J. 1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    1986 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Skillman, E

    Cannon, J. M., Skillman, E. D., Garnett, D. R., & Dufour, R. J. 2002, ApJ, 565, 931, doi: 10.1086/324691

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Walter, F., Skillman, E

    Cannon, J. M., Walter, F., Skillman, E. D., & van Zee, L. 2005, ApJL, 621, L21, doi: 10.1086/428943 25 T able 6.Integrated line fluxes in the SE-region apertures with S/N ≥ 3 Line Rest λ JWST-SE-1 JWST-SE-2 JWST-SE-3 SE VLA-SE (µm) (10 −21 W m−2) Hi recombination lines HI(10-6...

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    C., Begley, R., McLeod, D

    Carnall, A. C., Begley, R., McLeod, D. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, L45, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac136 Cervi˜ no, M., Mas-Hesse, J. M., & Kunth, D. 2002, A&A, 392, 19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020785

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    A., & Clegg, A

    Chevalier, R. A., & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44, doi: 10.1038/317044a0

    1985 doi

  19. [27]

    A., Endsley, R., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Endsley, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 2633, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2199

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    S., Allen, D., et al

    Churchwell, E., Povich, M. S., Allen, D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 759, doi: 10.1086/507015

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Adams, N., Harvey, T., et al

    Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., Harvey, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada608

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    C., Lebouteiller, V., et al

    Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., Lebouteiller, V., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425207

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    A., Smith, J

    Dale, D. A., Smith, J. D. T., Schlawin, E. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1821, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1821

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    Davidzon, I., Ilbert, O., Laigle, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    D., Andrews, J

    Decleir, M., Gordon, K. D., Andrews, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe Della Bruna, L., Adamo, A., McLeod, A. F., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243395

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    T., Calzetti, D., et al

    Deshmukh, S., Linden, S. T., Calzetti, D., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba9

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  30. [38]

    T., & Bertoldi, F

    Draine, B. T., & Bertoldi, F. 1996, ApJ, 468, 269, doi: 10.1086/177689 26

    1996 doi

  31. [39]

    T., & McKee, C

    Draine, B. T., & McKee, C. F. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002105

    1993

  32. [40]

    2020, astropy/specutils: v1.0, v1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3718589

    Earl, N., Tollerud, E., Jones, C., et al. 2020, astropy/specutils: v1.0, v1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3718589

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    J., Stanway, E

    Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1857

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    W., Gordon, K

    Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJL, 628, L29, doi: 10.1086/432613

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    B., Bolatto, A

    Fisher, D. B., Bolatto, A. D., Herrera-Camus, R., et al. 2014, Nature, 505, 186, doi: 10.1038/nature12765

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Clayton, G. C. 2019, ApJ, 886, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06763

    Einsig, A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06763

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 212, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    Franeck, A., W¨ unsch, R., Mart ´ ınez-Gonz´ alez, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 212, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    R., & Hunt, L

    Fumagalli, M., Krumholz, M. R., & Hunt, L. K. 2010, ApJ, 722, 919, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/919

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    J., Shuntov, M., Atek, H., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Shuntov, M., Atek, H., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3064, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3717 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    2021, A&A, 649, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039701

    Galliano, F., Nersesian, A., Bianchi, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039701

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    R., Johnson, B

    Garofali, K., Basu-Zych, A. R., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 960, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0a6a Gil de Paz, A., Madore, B. F., & Pevunova, O. 2003, ApJS, 147, 29, doi: 10.1086/374737

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    Gordon, K. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G. C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1320, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    D., Misselt, K

    Gordon, K. D., Misselt, K. A., Bouwman, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, doi: 10.21105/joss.00695 G´ urpide, A., Parra, M., Godet, O., Contini, T., & Olive, J

    Green, G. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, doi: 10.21105/joss.00695 G´ urpide, A., Parra, M., Godet, O., Contini, T., & Olive, J. F. 2022, A&A, 666, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142229

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    2009, ApJ, 704, 1159, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1159

    Hao, L., Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1159, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1159

    2009 doi

  51. [59]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    K., et al

    Hassani, H., Rosolowsky, E., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca8ab

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    E., Gim´ enez-Arteaga, C., Fujimoto, S., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Gim´ enez-Arteaga, C., Fujimoto, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2cf

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    J., Jones, L

    Hernandez, S., Smith, L. J., Jones, L. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.17621, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17621

    2025 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    S., Crouzet, N., Habel, N., et al

    Hirschauer, A. S., Crouzet, N., Habel, N., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4967

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    E., Barth, A

    Hood, C. E., Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., & Greene, J. E. 2017, ApJ, 838, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa60c9

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    K., Dyer, K

    Hunt, L. K., Dyer, K. K., & Thuan, T. X. 2005, A&A, 436, 837, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052915

    2005 doi

  58. [66]

    K., Thuan, T

    Hunt, L. K., Thuan, T. X., Izotov, Y. I., & Sauvage, M. 2010, ApJ, 712, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/164

    2010 doi

  59. [67]

    K., Vanzi, L., & Thuan, T

    Hunt, L. K., Vanzi, L., & Thuan, T. X. 2001, A&A, 377, 66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011088

    2001 doi

  60. [68]

    K., Testi, L., Casasola, V., et al

    Hunt, L. K., Testi, L., Casasola, V., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322739

    2014 doi

  61. [69]

    A., & Thronson, Jr., H

    Hunter, D. A., & Thronson, Jr., H. A. 1995, ApJ, 452, 238, doi: 10.1086/176295

    1995 doi

  62. [70]

    2013, ApJ, 777, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/156

    Inami, H., Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/156

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    I., Chaffee, F

    Izotov, Y. I., Chaffee, F. H., Foltz, C. B., et al. 1999, ApJ, 527, 757, doi: 10.1086/308119

    1999 doi

  64. [72]

    Thuan, T. X. 1997, ApJL, 487, L37, doi: 10.1086/310872

    1997 doi

  65. [73]

    I., & Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 64, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2957

    2016 doi

  66. [74]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2556, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2798

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Privon, G. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1229, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22051.x

    2012

  68. [76]

    J., van Zee, L., Rosenberg, J

    Janowiecki, S., Salzer, J. J., van Zee, L., Rosenberg, J. L., & Skillman, E. 2017, ApJ, 836, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/128

    2017 doi

  69. [77]

    2013, ApJ, 770, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/20

    Kaaret, P., & Feng, H. 2013, ApJ, 770, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/20

    2013 doi

  70. [78]

    Kaaret, P., Feng, H., & Roberts, T. P. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 303, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259

    2017 doi

  71. [79]

    2021, ApJL, 908, L54, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abe41b

    Ramos-Larios, G. 2021, ApJL, 908, L54, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abe41b

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    M., P´ erez-Montero, E., et al

    Kehrig, C., V ´ ılchez, J. M., P´ erez-Montero, E., et al. 2015, ApJL, 801, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L28 —. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2992, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw806

    2015 doi

  73. [81]

    S., & Glover, S

    Klessen, R. S., & Glover, S. C. O. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 65, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453 27

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    R., McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 227, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430

    2019 doi

  75. [83]

    Law, D. R., E. Morrison, J., Argyriou, I., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acdddc

    2023 doi

  76. [84]

    2013, A&A, 553, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220948

    Lebouteiller, V., Heap, S., Hubeny, I., & Kunth, D. 2013, A&A, 553, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220948

    2013 doi

  77. [85]

    2017, A&A, 602, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629675

    Lebouteiller, V., P´ equignot, D., Cormier, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629675

    2017 doi

  78. [86]

    Walsh, J. R. 1997, A&A, 326, L17, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9707279

    1997 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    2014, ApJS, 212, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    Leitherer, C., Ekstr¨ om, S., Meynet, G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    2014 doi

  80. [88]

    2012, A&A, 537, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117867

    Lelli, F., Verheijen, M., Fraternali, F., & Sancisi, R. 2012, A&A, 537, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117867

    2012 doi

  81. [89]

    K., Bolatto, A

    Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaecd1

    2018 doi

  82. [90]

    K., Schinnerer, E., Liu, D., et al

    Leslie, S. K., Schinnerer, E., Liu, D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba044

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Mayya, D., et al. 2024, ApJL, 973, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7af3

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    T., Lai, T., Evans, A

    Linden, S. T., Lai, T., Evans, A. S., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eae

    2024 doi

  85. [93]

    J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347102

    2025 doi

  86. [94]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  87. [95]

    C., Galliano, F., Jones, A

    Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., Jones, A. P., & Sauvage, M. 2006, A&A, 446, 877, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053890

    2006 doi

  88. [96]

    C., R´ emy-Ruyer, A., Galametz, M., et al

    Madden, S. C., R´ emy-Ruyer, A., Galametz, M., et al. 2014, An Overview of the Dwarf Galaxy Survey (PASP, 125, 600, [2013])—Corrigendum, IOP, doi: 10.1086/679312

    2014 doi

  89. [97]

    Martin, C. L. 1996, ApJ, 465, 680, doi: 10.1086/177453

    1996 doi

  90. [98]

    T., et al

    McQuaid, T., Calzetti, D., Linden, S. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e64

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    L., et al

    Mingozzi, M., Garcia del Valle-Espinosa, M., James, B. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 253, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc996

    2025 doi

  92. [100]

    A., Cenko, S

    Moon, D.-S., Harrison, F. A., Cenko, S. B., & Shariff, J. A. 2011, ApJL, 731, L32, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/731/2/L32

    2011 doi

  93. [101]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Grillo, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290

    2024 doi

  94. [102]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  95. [103]

    2020, A&A, 641, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037833 Naz´ e, Y., Rauw, G., Manfroid, J., Chu, Y

    Hirashita, H. 2020, A&A, 641, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037833 Naz´ e, Y., Rauw, G., Manfroid, J., Chu, Y. H., & Vreux, J. M. 2003, A&A, 408, 171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030847

    2020 doi

  96. [104]

    G., Weiner, B

    Noeske, K. G., Weiner, B. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L43, doi: 10.1086/517926

    2007 doi

  97. [105]

    M., & Schaerer, D

    Oskinova, L. M., & Schaerer, D. 2022, A&A, 661, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142520

    2022 doi

  98. [106]

    2005, MNRAS, 358, 1423, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08862.x

    Ott, J., Walter, F., & Brinks, E. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1423, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08862.x

    2005

  99. [107]

    R., et al

    Patapis, P., Argyriou, I., Law, D. R., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347339 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Ashdown, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629022 R´ emy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 56...

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    E., Wold, I

    Rhoads, J. E., Wold, I. G. B., Harish, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 942, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaaf

    2023 doi

  101. [109]

    T., Simpson, C., Polimera, M

    Richardson, C. T., Simpson, C., Polimera, M. S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac510c

    2022 doi

  102. [110]

    T., Wels, J., Garofali, K., et al

    Richardson, C. T., Wels, J., Garofali, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.07749, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.07749 Rickards Vaught, R. J., Sandstrom, K. M., & Hunt, L. K. 2021, ApJL, 911, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf09b Rickards Vaught, R. J., Hunt, L. K., Aloisi, A.,...

    2025 doi arXiv

  103. [111]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293 Rodr ´ ıguez, M

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293 Rodr ´ ıguez, M. J., Lee, J. C., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbb69

    2023 doi

  104. [112]

    2008, ApJ, 677, 926, doi: 10.1086/529014

    Heckman, T. 2008, ApJ, 677, 926, doi: 10.1086/529014

    2008 doi

  105. [113]

    1999, A&AS, 136, 35, doi: 10.1051/aas:1999197

    Schaerer, D., Contini, T., & Pindao, M. 1999, A&AS, 136, 35, doi: 10.1051/aas:1999197

    1999 doi

  106. [114]

    Schaerer, D., Fragos, T., & Izotov, Y. I. 2019, A&A, 622, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935005

    2019 doi

  107. [115]

    1999, A&A, 345, L17, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9903430

    Schaerer, D., & Stasi´ nska, G. 1999, A&A, 345, L17, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9903430

    1999 doi arXiv

  108. [116]

    Schaerer, D., & Vacca, W. D. 1998, ApJ, 497, 618, doi: 10.1086/305487

    1998 doi

  109. [117]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  110. [118]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  111. [119]

    2011, A&A, 534, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117812

    Palla, F. 2011, A&A, 534, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117812

    2011 doi

  112. [120]

    2016, A&A, 591, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527916

    Shenar, T., Hainich, R., Todt, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527916

    2016 doi

  113. [121]

    J., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J., & Sabbi, E

    Smith, L. J., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J., & Sabbi, E. 2020, ApJ, 896, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8f94 28

    2020 doi

  114. [122]

    W., Motch, C., et al

    Soria, R., Pakull, M. W., Motch, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1644, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3784

    2021 doi

  115. [123]

    Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    2014 doi

  116. [124]

    R., Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., & Becker, G. D. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 485, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2661

    2016 doi

  117. [125]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Stefanon, M., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb6

    2021 doi

  118. [126]

    2002, A&A, 393, 821, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021043

    Sturm, E., Lutz, D., Verma, A., et al. 2002, A&A, 393, 821, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021043

    2002 doi

  119. [127]

    2024, ApJ, 967, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de6

    Sun, J., He, H., Batschkun, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de6

    2024 doi

  120. [128]

    2018, MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1807.005

    Sutherland, R., Dopita, M., Binette, L., & Groves, B. 2018, MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1807.005

    2018

  121. [129]

    S., & Dopita, M

    Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. 2017, ApJS, 229, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541

    2017 doi

  122. [130]

    D., Indebetouw, R., et al

    Tarantino, E., Bolatto, A. D., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3def

    2024 doi

  123. [131]

    D., F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Thornley, M. D., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Lutz, D., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 641, doi: 10.1086/309261

    2000 doi

  124. [132]

    X., Bauer, F

    Thuan, T. X., Bauer, F. E., Papaderos, P., & Izotov, Y. I. 2004, ApJ, 606, 213, doi: 10.1086/382949

    2004 doi

  125. [133]

    X., & Izotov, Y

    Thuan, T. X., & Izotov, Y. I. 2005, ApJS, 161, 240, doi: 10.1086/491657

    2005 doi

  126. [134]

    R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R

    Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 1988, ApJ, 334, 771, doi: 10.1086/166877 van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420, doi: 10.1086/323894 van Hoof, P. A. M. 2018, Galaxies, ...

    2023 doi

  127. [135]

    2003, A&A, 403, 829, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030408

    Verma, A., Lutz, D., Sturm, E., et al. 2003, A&A, 403, 829, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030408

    2003 doi

  128. [136]

    M., & Pagel, B

    Vilchez, J. M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/231.2.257

    1988 doi

  129. [137]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  130. [138]

    W., Hao, L., Higdon, S

    Weedman, D. W., Hao, L., Higdon, S. J. U., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 706, doi: 10.1086/466520

    2005 doi

  131. [139]

    C., & Draine, B

    Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296, doi: 10.1086/318651

    2001 doi

  132. [140]

    E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/104

    2014 doi

  133. [141]

    White, S. D. M., & Frenk, C. S. 1991, ApJ, 379, 52, doi: 10.1086/170483

    1991 doi

  134. [142]

    C., Chandar, R., Lee, J

    Whitmore, B. C., Chandar, R., Lee, J. C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a2

    2025 doi

  135. [143]

    H., & Cen, R

    Wise, J. H., & Cen, R. 2009, ApJ, 693, 984, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/984

    2009 doi

  136. [144]

    K., et al

    Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Hunt, L. K., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, 952, doi: 10.1086/517988

    2007 doi

  137. [145]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4e34

    Matsumoto, H. 2024, ApJ, 970, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4e34

    2024 doi

  138. [146]

    2021, A&A, 653, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039033

    Zhou, L., Shi, Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., & Wang, J. 2021, A&A, 653, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039033

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.