pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17569 · v1 · pith:ZMYWXQ2Xnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Self-focusing of helicity drives finite-time singularities in inviscid flows

Mokhtar Adda-Bedia , Sergio Rica This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords finite-time singularitiesEuler equationshelicityself-similar solutionsinviscid flowsvorticity blow-upLeray scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Helicity self-focuses inside a shrinking tube to create finite-time singularities in inviscid flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a self-similar velocity field for the Euler equations that separates variables and reduces the partial differential system to a nonlinear set of ordinary differential equations. Conservation of helicity then selects a family of solutions in which all the helicity concentrates inside a tubular region whose radius contracts as a power law of the time remaining until blow-up. This inner region is bounded by a sharp interface from an outer region that carries zero vorticity. The resulting singularity can be either point-like or line-like, and the point-like case recovers the classic Leray scaling exponent of one-half. The authors conjecture that an initial flow with zero helicity cannot develop a finite-time singularity.

Core claim

A Leray-inspired self-similar velocity field reduces the Euler equations to a closed nonlinear ODE system parametrized by the exponent ν. Helicity conservation then forces the flow near the singularity to separate into an inner tubular region, where helicity focuses and the tube radius shrinks as (t_c − t)^ν, and an outer region where vorticity and helicity are identically zero. The singularity is point-like or line-like according to the axial motion of the tube; for point-like cases the scaling is exactly ν = 1/2.

What carries the argument

The self-similar velocity field ansatz that permits exact separation of variables in the Euler equations and lets helicity conservation select the admissible blow-up solutions.

If this is right

  • Finite-time singularities require nonzero initial helicity.
  • All vorticity concentrates inside a tubular region that shrinks as a power law until the blow-up time.
  • The flow is divided by a sharp interface into an inner helical region and an outer irrotational region.
  • Point-like singularities obey the Leray scaling ν = 1/2.
  • Line-like singularities arise when the tube contracts only radially while its axis length remains finite.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation into an inner focusing region and an outer irrotational region may appear when other quadratic invariants are conserved.
  • Direct numerical simulations could test whether generic initial data with helicity approach the predicted self-similar tube structure.
  • Absence of initial helicity would imply global regularity for all time in the Euler equations.

Load-bearing premise

That a chosen self-similar form for the velocity field reduces the full Euler equations to ordinary differential equations whose solutions accurately describe the local structure of any actual finite-time singularity.

What would settle it

A numerical solution of the Euler equations from generic initial data with nonzero helicity that either fails to form a finite-time singularity or shows vorticity spreading without concentration inside a shrinking tubular region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17569 by Mokhtar Adda-Bedia, Sergio Rica.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme for the finite-time singular solution. Inside the cylindrical region delimited by a radius R(t) the swirl velocity, uϕ, and vorticity, ωϕ, are not zero, while outside this region both vorticity and swirl velocity vanish. As we will see, an adequate separation of variables leads to R(t) → 0 in finite time. Depending on the dynamics of L(t), the tubular region shrinks in finite time into a point or in… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Solution with zero swirl for ν = 2. (a) Ur(ξ) and Uz(ξ) given by Eq. (4.21). Notice that Ur(ξ) and Uz(ξ) vanish at ξ > 1 and ξ < 1 respectively. (b) The self-similar vorticity ωϕ(ξ) given by Eq. (4.22). in (4.10) and simplifying Equations (4.11,4.12,4.13) yields c3 = 0 & a3 = 0 , (4.15) c4 = 0 & 16a 2 2 − 12(1 + 4ν)a4 = 0 , (4.16) c5 = 0 & a5 = 0 . (4.17) By computing higher order terms in the series expan… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plot of the series (a) U (N) r (ξ) + ν and (b) S (N) (ξ) for N = 50 and ν = 2. The critical point ξc ≈ 1.29167 is a solution of U (N) r (ξ) + ν = 0. (c) and (d) Zooms on the functions U (N) r (ξ/ξc)+ν and S (N) (ξ/ξc) in the neighbourhood of ξ = ξc(ν). The different curves correspond to different values of the series order N included in the expansion: N = 50 (yellow), N = 75 (orange), N = 100 (pink) and N … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Numerical curve for the value of ξcU ′ r(ξ − c ) as function of ν. (b) Numerical curve for the value of the exponent α as a function of ν. Blue points are obtained by the interpolation of the asymptotic series. Red dots represents the numerical solution of the ordinary differential equations with the right boundary conditions. S ′ (ξc) = 0 imposes α(ν) > 1. On the other hand, as a consequence of the in… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical solution of the functions (a) Ur(ξ), (b) Uz(ξ) and (c) Uϕ(ξ) for ν = 2. For ξ < 1, the red curves show the asymptotic series (4.5,4.6,4.7) with N = 100, that is up to an order O(ξ 400). For ξ > 1, the blue curves show the exact solutions (5.11,5.16). Notice that the consistence with Eq. (5.5) imposes α = 2 + 1 + ν a & U ′ r (1−) = −2a > 0 . (5.10) 5.3. Solution beyond the critical point ξ > 1 Out… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scheme for the complete solution of Euler equations. The whole space domain is divided into an inner and an outer region. The solution in the inner region is described by a self-similar solution and consists of a cylindrical region of a radius Rin(t) and a vertical length of 2L(t). The outer region ensures the right behaviour as the radial, r, and the vertical, z, distances tend to infinity. Inside the cyl… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The streamlines of the swirled case for ν = 2 corresponding to the flow of the scaled axisymmetric velocity field, (tc − t) u(x, t) /R(t), as function of the dimensionless coordinates (r/R(t), z/R(t)). Panel (a) shows the streamlines in the (r, z)-plane, and, panel (b) shows streamlines in the (x, y)-plane at z = R(t). The red solid line in (a) and the circle in (b) correspond to the surface ξ = ξc = 1, fo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A β − ν diagram derived from kinetic energy and helicity conservation laws. The properties of the total kinetic energy require that β(ν) cannot take values in the shaded region. The total helicity requires that β(ν) takes values given by the red and blue lines. This curve lies in the allowed white region imposed by energy constraints. The dotted line corresponds to the first equality of Eq. (6.19) and the … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The streamlines of the swirless case for ν = 2 corresponding to the flow of the scaled axisymmetric velocity field (tc−t) R(t) u(x, t) as function of the dimensionless coordinates (r/R(t), z/R(t)). Panel (a) shows the streamlines in the (r, z)-plane, and, panel (b) shows the streamlines in the (x, y)-plane at z = 0. The dotted blue line and the circle correspond to the surface Ur(ξ0) = 0 where the streamli… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper deals with the longstanding quest of the possible existence of finite-time singularities in the equations governing the dynamics of inviscid fluids, namely, Euler equations. Here, two contributions are brought for the case of perfect fluids with finite initial energy. First, a self-similar velocity field inspired by Leray Ansatz is proposed which allows for a separation of variables that transforms the original partial differential Euler equations to a nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations. This system can be solved semi-analytically and allows a continuum set of solutions parametrised by a self-similar exponent, $\nu$. Second, we use the conservation laws of Euler equations to select the possible finite-time singular solutions and the related self-similar exponents. We find that the helicity is the driving mechanism of the blow-up through a self-focusing mechanism. The flow near the singularity separates into two phases. A first phase is within a tubular region that shrinks as a power-law $(t_c-t)^\nu$, with $t_c$ the blow-up time, where the helicity is focused. This region is separated by a sharp interface from an outer region where the vorticity, and thus helicity, is identically zero. We found that the finite-time singularity may be either point-like or line-like depending on the dynamics of the tubular region along its axis of symmetry. Incidentally for a point-like singularity we recover the Leray scaling $\nu=1/2$ paving the way to a generalisation of this approach for the Navier-Stokes equations. Finally, we conjecture that if the helicity vanishes initially, no finite-time singularity would be possible, since in this case the singularity occurs at infinite time from the initial condition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Leray-inspired self-similar velocity ansatz for the 3D Euler equations that permits separation of variables, reducing the PDE system to a nonlinear ODE system parametrized by the self-similar exponent ν. Conservation laws are then invoked to select admissible solutions, yielding the claim that helicity self-focuses inside a shrinking tubular region (scaling as (t_c - t)^ν) separated by a sharp interface from an outer region of identically zero vorticity. The resulting singularities are either point-like or line-like; the point-like case recovers the classical Leray scaling ν = 1/2. The authors further conjecture that vanishing initial helicity precludes finite-time blow-up.

Significance. If the ansatz is shown to produce solutions that satisfy the full Euler equations (including non-local pressure consistency across the interface), the work would identify a concrete helicity-driven self-focusing mechanism for finite-time singularities in ideal fluids and supply a family of candidate blow-up profiles that could be tested numerically. The recovery of Leray scaling and the helicity-vanishing conjecture would also be of interest for extensions to the Navier-Stokes problem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and ansatz derivation] Abstract and the section describing the self-similar ansatz: the central reduction from the 3D Euler PDEs to a closed ODE system via the Leray-type velocity field is asserted but not accompanied by the explicit form of the ansatz, the resulting ODEs, or any verification that the recovered pressure (via the Poisson equation Δp = −∂_i u_j ∂_j u_i) is consistent with the imposed sharp interface where vorticity (and therefore the nonlinear term) jumps discontinuously to zero in the outer region.
  2. [Conservation-law filtering] The paragraph on selection via conservation laws: because pressure is determined non-locally, it is necessary to demonstrate that the ODE solutions, when lifted back to the full space, satisfy the momentum equation on both sides of the interface; the current filtering by integral invariants alone does not guarantee this, leaving the validity of the sharp-interface construction unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the ODE system is solved 'semi-analytically' yet supplies neither the explicit ODEs nor any error estimates or convergence checks for the numerical integration used to obtain the family of solutions.
  2. [Concluding remarks] The conjecture that zero initial helicity implies only infinite-time singularities should be stated more precisely and, if possible, linked to existing results on the role of helicity in singularity formation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to clarify the ansatz derivation and strengthen the verification of the proposed solutions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and ansatz derivation] Abstract and the section describing the self-similar ansatz: the central reduction from the 3D Euler PDEs to a closed ODE system via the Leray-type velocity field is asserted but not accompanied by the explicit form of the ansatz, the resulting ODEs, or any verification that the recovered pressure (via the Poisson equation Δp = −∂_i u_j ∂_j u_i) is consistent with the imposed sharp interface where vorticity jumps discontinuously to zero in the outer region.

    Authors: We agree that greater explicitness is needed. The self-similar velocity ansatz is introduced in Section 2 of the manuscript, but we will expand this section in the revision to display the precise functional form of the Leray-inspired field, perform the separation of variables in full, and derive the resulting closed nonlinear ODE system. We will also add a dedicated subsection that solves the Poisson equation for pressure and verifies continuity of the pressure and its normal derivative across the sharp interface, confirming that the momentum equation holds in both the inner tubular region and the outer irrotational region. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conservation-law filtering] The paragraph on selection via conservation laws: because pressure is determined non-locally, it is necessary to demonstrate that the ODE solutions, when lifted back to the full space, satisfy the momentum equation on both sides of the interface; the current filtering by integral invariants alone does not guarantee this, leaving the validity of the sharp-interface construction unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of this verification. While the conservation laws (energy, helicity, and circulation) are used to constrain admissible values of the self-similar exponent ν, we recognize that an explicit check of the full Euler momentum balance is required. In the revised manuscript we will substitute the selected self-similar profiles back into the original equations, compute the non-local pressure explicitly, and demonstrate that the residual of the momentum equation vanishes identically on each side of the interface and that the interface conditions are satisfied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Tubular self-focusing structure and helicity concentration imposed by ansatz, then presented as derived mechanism

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "The flow near the singularity separates into two phases. A first phase is within a tubular region that shrinks as a power-law (t_c-t)^ν, with t_c the blow-up time, where the helicity is focused. This region is separated by a sharp interface from an outer region where the vorticity, and thus helicity, is identically zero."

    The quoted separation into a helicity-carrying shrinking tube and an outer irrotational region is stated as a result obtained after solving the ODE system. However, the self-similar velocity field ansatz is defined from the outset to be nonzero only inside such a tube and zero outside, so the two-phase structure and helicity localization follow by construction of the assumed form rather than from the dynamics.

full rationale

The derivation begins with a Leray-inspired self-similar ansatz that is explicitly constructed to be supported only inside a shrinking tubular region with vorticity (hence helicity) identically zero outside. The subsequent reduction to an ODE system and selection via Euler conservation laws then yields solutions whose spatial structure reproduces exactly the inner/outer separation and helicity concentration already built into the ansatz. This makes the central claim of 'self-focusing of helicity' a direct consequence of the chosen functional form rather than an independent prediction. Conservation-law filtering is independent and does not itself introduce circularity, keeping the overall score moderate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the self-similar ansatz, the exact separation of variables it enables, and the assumption that conservation of helicity and energy can be applied directly to the reduced ODE system to select physical solutions; the tubular geometry with a sharp interface is introduced without independent justification.

free parameters (1)
  • self-similar exponent ν
    Parametrizes the continuum family of solutions obtained after reduction to ODEs; later filtered by conservation laws rather than fitted to external data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Euler equations conserve both kinetic energy and helicity for smooth solutions.
    Invoked to select admissible values of ν from the family of self-similar solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper A Leray-type self-similar velocity field permits exact separation of variables in the Euler equations.
    The foundational modeling choice that converts the original PDE system into a closed set of ODEs.
invented entities (1)
  • tubular region with sharp interface to zero-vorticity outer region no independent evidence
    purpose: To localize the helicity focusing and to enforce zero vorticity outside the tube near the singularity.
    Introduced as part of the self-similar solution structure; no independent evidence or derivation from the Euler equations is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5842 in / 1800 out tokens · 52749 ms · 2026-05-19T22:22:03.358347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    a self-similar velocity field inspired by Leray Ansatz is proposed which allows for a separation of variables that transforms the original partial differential Euler equations to a nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations... The flow near the singularity separates into two phases. A first phase is within a tubular region that shrinks as a power-law (t_c-t)^ν ... separated by a sharp interface from an outer region where the vorticity, and thus helicity, is identically zero.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    we use the conservation laws of Euler equations to select the possible finite-time singular solutions and the related self-similar exponents. We find that the helicity is the driving mechanism of the blow-up through a self-focusing mechanism.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , Josserand, C

    Amauger, J. , Josserand, C. , Pomeau, Y. & Rica, S. 2023 Two dimensional singularity turbulence . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 443 , 133532

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Anderson, J. D. 1995 Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications\/ . McGraw-Hill

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Barenblatt, G. I. 1996 Scaling, Self-similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics: Dimensional Analysis and Intermediate Asymptotics\/ . Cambridge University Press

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    2020 A fluid mechanic's analysis of the teacup singularity

    Barkley, D. 2020 A fluid mechanic's analysis of the teacup singularity . Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 476 (2240), 20200348

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Brachet, M. E. 1991 Direct simulation of three-dimensional turbulence in the T aylor- G reen vortex . Fluid Dynamics Research 8 (1), 1--8

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    , Mart\'inez-Arg\"uello, D

    C\'adiz, R. , Mart\'inez-Arg\"uello, D. & Rica, S. 2023 Axisymmetric self-similar finite-time singularity solution of the euler equations . Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod. 2023 , 30

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & Hou, T

    Chen, J. & Hou, T. Y. 2025 Singularity formation in 3 D E uler equations with smooth initial data and boundary . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (27), e2500940122

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    , Couder, Y

    Douady, S. , Couder, Y. & Brachet, M. E. 1991 Direct observation of the intermittency of intense vorticity filaments in turbulence . Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 , 983--986

    work page 1991

  9. [9]

    & Fontelos, M

    Eggers, J. & Fontelos, M. A. 2015 Singularities: F ormation, S tructure, and P ropagation\/ . Cambridge University Press

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Elgindi, T. M. 2021 Finite-time singularity formation for C ^ 1, solutions to the incompressible E uler equations on R ^3 . Annals of Mathematics 194 (3), 647--727

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    1757 Principes g\'en\'eraux du mouvement des fluides

    Euler, L. 1757 Principes g\'en\'eraux du mouvement des fluides . M\'emoires de l' A cad\'emie des S ciences de B erlin 11 , 274--315

    work page

  12. [12]

    Gibbon, J. D. 2008 The three-dimensional E uler equations: W here do we stand? Physica D 237 , 1894--1904

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Gibbon, J. D. , Moore, D. R. & Stuart, J. T. 2003 Exact, infinite energy, blow-up solutions of the three-dimensional E uler equations . Nonlinearity 16 (5), 1823--1831

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    1927 On the motion of fluid in a moving container

    Gunther, N. 1927 On the motion of fluid in a moving container. Izvestia Akad. Nauk USSR, Ser. Fiz. Mat. 20 , 1323--1348

    work page 1927

  15. [15]

    , Pomeau, Y

    Josserand, C. , Pomeau, Y. & Rica, S. 2020 Finite-time localized singularities as a mechanism for turbulent dissipation . Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 , 054607

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    1934 Sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace

    Leray, J. 1934 Sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace . Acta Math. 63 , 193--248

    work page 1934

  17. [17]

    1925 \"U ber einige E xistenzprobleme der H ydrodynamik

    Lichtenstein, L. 1925 \"U ber einige E xistenzprobleme der H ydrodynamik. Mat. Zeit. Phys. 23 , 89--154

    work page 1925

  18. [18]

    & Hou, T

    Luo, G. & Hou, T. Y. 2014 Potentially singular solutions of the 3d axisymmetric E uler equations . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (36), 12968--12973

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Majda, A. J. & Bertozzi, A. L. 2001 Vorticity and I ncompressible F low\/ . Cambridge University Press

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    & Rica, S

    Mart\' nez-Arg\"uello, D. & Rica, S. 2024 Evidence of a finite-time pointlike singularity solution for the E uler equations for perfect fluids . Phys. Rev. Fluids 9 , 094401

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    1963 The point source solution, Collected Works, A.H

    von Neumann, J. 1963 The point source solution, Collected Works, A.H. Taub, ed\/ , , vol. 6 . New York: Pergamon

    work page 1963

  22. [22]

    1994 Remarques sur l'instabilit\'e d'un vortex axial

    Pomeau, Y. 1994 Remarques sur l'instabilit\'e d'un vortex axial . C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 318 , 865--870

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    1995 Singularit\'e dans l'\'evolution du fluide parfait

    Pomeau, Y. 1995 Singularit\'e dans l'\'evolution du fluide parfait . C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 321 , 407--411

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    2018 On the self-similar solution to the E uler equations for an incompressible fluid in three dimensions

    Pomeau, Y. 2018 On the self-similar solution to the E uler equations for an incompressible fluid in three dimensions . Comptes Rendus M\'ecanique 346 (3), 184--197

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Blowing-up solutions of the axisymmetric Euler equations for an incompressible fluid

    Pomeau, Y. & Le Berre , M. 2019 Blowing-up solutions of the axisymmetric E uler equations for an incompressible fluid . arXiv:1901.09426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    , Le Berre , M

    Pomeau, Y. , Le Berre , M. & Lehner, T. 2019 A case of strong non linearity: intermittency in highly turbulent flows . C.R. M\'ecanique 347 , 342--356

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Saffman, P. G. 1995 Vortex D ynamics\/ . Cambridge University Press

    work page 1995

  28. [28]

    Sedov, L. I. 1946 Propagation of strong shock waves . Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 10 , 241--250

    work page 1946

  29. [29]

    Taylor, G. I. 1950 The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I . T heoretical discussion . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 201 (1065), 159--174

    work page 1950

  30. [30]

    Ukhovskii, M. R. & Yudovich, V. I. 1968 Axially symmetric flows of ideal and viscous fluids filling the whole space . Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 32 (1), 52--62

    work page 1968

  31. [31]

    , Lai, C.-Y

    Wang, Y. , Lai, C.-Y. , G\'omez-Serrano, J. & Buckmaster, T. 2023 Asymptotic self-similar blow-up profile for three-dimensional axisymmetric E uler equations using neural networks . Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 , 244002

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1956 The motion of a gas under the action of a short term pressure shock . Akust. Zh 2 (1) , 28--38

    work page 1956