Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 35 references

Local Well-Posedness for Vlasov--Poisson with $L^{d+}$ Initial Density and Fractional Velocity Regularity

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Vlasov–Poisson is locally well-posed when initial data has only L^{d+} spatial density control and an arbitrarily small positive Hölder modulus in velocity.

desk verdict Solid local well-posedness for VP in a genuinely anisotropic low-regularity class; the bootstrap closes and the argument is complete for what it claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24400 v1 pith:ZOYJOWL6 submitted 2026-07-27 math.AP

Quoc-Hung Nguyen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q4935Q8335Q8535A01
keywords Vlasov–Poissonequationlocalwell-posednessfractionalvelocityregularitykineticmixingSchauderfixedpointLagrangiansolutionscharacteristicreparametrization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the Vlasov–Poisson system on phase space admits a unique short-time Lagrangian solution under anisotropic assumptions far weaker than classical phase-space Sobolev regularity. The initial distribution needs finite mass, a weighted velocity envelope in L^p in space for some p greater than the dimension, and only a tiny positive Hölder regularity in the velocity variable, controlled in the same L^p space. Free-streaming already turns that velocity modulus into spatial Hölder regularity of the macroscopic density; the paper shows the same ballistic mixing survives a self-consistent electric field that is small in a time-integrated sense. The resulting density is integrable in time with values in a positive Hölder class, so the field is regular enough to close a characteristic construction. Existence comes from a Schauder fixed point on the density; uniqueness follows from a Loeper-type stability estimate that tolerates an integrable blow-up of the density as time approaches zero.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear mixing via characteristic reparametrization: for a field with small L^1_t C^{1,α} norm the map from terminal velocity to initial position is a global diffeomorphism, yielding an exact free-transport-like formula for the density in which a velocity Hölder increment becomes a spatial Hölder increment of size |ℓ|/t, producing the time-integrable bound on [ρ(t)]_{C^α}.

What would settle it

Exhibit two distinct Lagrangian solutions on a common short interval for a single nonnegative finite-mass datum whose weighted velocity envelope and weighted velocity Hölder envelope both belong to some L^p with p greater than dimension, or show that the density Hölder mixing bound fails for such data even under a field with arbitrarily small L^1_t C^{1,α} norm.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For dimension at least two, any p greater than d, and any positive velocity Hölder exponent however small, finite-mass nonnegative data whose weighted velocity supremum and weighted velocity Hölder envelope both lie in L^p in space generate a unique local Lagrangian solution of Vlasov–Poisson. The density obeys the nonlinear mixing bound that its spatial Hölder seminorm decays like a power of time strictly better than t^{-1}, hence is time-integrable in a positive Hölder class, and the electric field lies in L^1_t of C^{1,α}.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistent electric field must remain small enough, when integrated in time in the C^{1,α} norm, that particle trajectories stay a global diffeomorphism close to free streaming; that forces the existence time to be short.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Macroscopic density need not be uniformly bounded up to time zero; an integrable singularity of order t^{-d/p} is enough for uniqueness.
  • No positive-order spatial derivative of the initial distribution is required—only a weighted uniform velocity Hölder modulus controlled in L^p.
  • The electric field belongs to L^1 in time with values in C^{1,α}, closing the characteristic flow.
  • On sets of data with uniformly bounded mass and envelopes, the solution map is continuous into continuous-in-time L^1 ∩ L^p phase-space densities.
  • The same mechanism recovers the classical free-transport conversion of velocity regularity into spatial regularity of the density as a special case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The argument marks p = d and zero velocity Hölder as genuine endpoints of the Hölder-flow method, suggesting any extension there must replace pointwise Jacobian control by log-Lipschitz or regular-Lagrangian-flow tools.
  • The open nonuniqueness question posed at the end is the natural kinetic counterpart of known flexibility results for 2D Euler below Yudovich: either a rigidity principle protects Vlasov–Poisson far below bounded density, or a singular nonnegative finite-mass counter-example exists.
  • Because the assumptions are anisotropic, physically natural data that are rough in space but mildly regular in velocity fall inside the theorem while remaining outside isotropic Sobolev local theories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves local well-posedness for the Vlasov–Poisson system on R^d_x × R^d_v, d≥2, in an anisotropic low-regularity class: the initial datum f0≥0 has finite mass, its weighted velocity envelope G0(x)=ess sup_v⟨v⟩^m|f0(x,v)| belongs to L^p_x for some p>d (with m>d+1), and a uniform weighted C^θ modulus in velocity, G_θ, also belongs to L^p_x. No spatial derivative of f0 is assumed. The central estimate is a nonlinear mixing bound [ρ(t)]_{C^α_x} ≲ t^{−d/p−α}(‖G0‖_p+‖Gθ‖_p) for any α<min{θ,1−d/p}, obtained from a characteristic reparametrization (the terminal-velocity-to-initial-position map is a global C^1 diffeomorphism under a small L^1_t C^{1,α} field hypothesis, Lemma 3) and an exact density representation (37). Time integrability of the singularity (since d/p+α<1) yields E∈L^1_t C^{1,α}, which closes a Schauder fixed point on the density via Aubin–Lions–Simon compactness and tightness. Uniqueness follows from Loeper's H^{−1} field estimate applied pointwise in time with an integrable coefficient R(t)~t^{−d/p}, plus a truncation argument (Lemma 8) removing moment assumptions. Continuous dependence on the datum in L^1∩L^p is also shown. The endpoints p=d and θ=0 are identified as critical for the method, and a nonuniqueness open problem is formulated.

Significance. If correct — and the argument appears sound — this is a solid contribution to the low-regularity theory of Vlasov–Poisson. It is, to my knowledge, the first well-posedness result in an anisotropic class with no spatial derivative of f0, going below the phase-space Sobolev theories of Jeong–Tae and Tae and adding uniqueness and C^{1,α} field regularity where the finite-energy Lagrangian theory of Ambrosio–Colombo–Figalli gives only existence. Particular strengths worth recording: the argument is complete and self-contained with all constants tracked; the mechanism (ballistic mixing converting fractional velocity regularity into spatial Hölder regularity) is identified transparently and shown to be sharp for the method, with the endpoints p=d and θ=0 openly flagged rather than hidden; the uniqueness proof is genuinely pointwise-in-time, using only an integrable L∞ singularity of the density; and §7 formulates precise, well-motivated open problems (the θ=0 endpoint, nonuniqueness below the density-stability threshold) that are likely to stimulate further work. The result is incremental in technique over the author's characteristic-reparametrization program [20, 21] but the data class,

major comments (1)
  1. [§5, Lemma 8] Lemma 8 (p. 15) is the analytical input on which the uniqueness theorem rests, since (64)–(65) are applied with R=R(t)~t^{-d/p} unbounded as t↓0, so any hidden mass- or support-dependence of the constant would be load-bearing. The truncation/normalization step is currently compressed into two sentences ('applied after normalization by their common mass, gives... The normalization introduces no additional mass factor'). Please expand this: (i) state the scaling argument showing the constant in (64) depends only on d and R=max\|ρ_i\|_∞ and not on the common mass (the estimate for probability densities rescales cleanly, but this should be shown); (ii) justify ρ_{i,n}→ρ_i in L¹ (one line: ρ_{i,n}≤ρ_i with masses converging to M); (iii) justify the passage from distributional convergence of the truncated fields plus the uniform L² bound to (64) via weak lower semicontinuity, including why the
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract / Eq. (11)] Abstract vs. Theorem 1: the abstract states the mixing bound as [ρ(t)]_{C^α} ≲ t^{-d/p-ε} 'ε>0 small', whereas (11) gives t^{-d/p-α} with the explicit admissible range α<min{θ,1−d/p} (which need not be small when θ and 1−d/p are large). Please harmonize the notation so the abstract reflects the actual statement.
  2. [Remark 2 / Lemma 4, Eq. (39)] The restriction m>d+1 is slightly stronger than what the proof needs: the current kernel K̃_t(z)=t^{-d}⟨z/t⟩^{-m+1} belongs to L^{p'} precisely when (m−1)p'>d, i.e. m>1+d−d/p, which is weaker than m>d+1 for finite p. Consider either noting the sharp condition or stating that m>d+1 is chosen for uniformity in p.
  3. [References] Reference [6] is listed as 'unpublished survey notes'. Please provide a stable citation (preprint number, journal status, or URL) if available, since §7 leans on it for the 2D Euler context.
  4. [§1.3, Eq. (3)] The passage from an a.e.-defined section v↦f0(x,v) to a C^θ_loc representative is asserted; one sentence on measurability of the resulting selection (e.g., via the essential-supremum definition of G_θ) would make expressions like f0(y,W_t(x,y)) fully rigorous.
  5. [§5, proof of uniqueness] In the uniqueness proof it would help the reader to note explicitly that R(t)=max_i‖ρ_i(t)‖_∞ is finite for every t>0 by (10) even though ρ_0 need only lie in L^p, so that Lemma 8 applies at each positive time and only the time-integrability of R(t) is needed for Gronwall.
  6. [§4.2, Lemma 7] The derivation ∥E_ϱ∥_{L^1_tC^{1,α}} ≤ CA_0T + CA_0T^{1−q} absorbs (M+R_p) into A_0; since R_p is chosen 'comparable to' the data norms rather than equal to them, a brief remark that the final T depends only on the stated parameters would close the bookkeeping.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: standard local well-posedness proof with self-contained estimates and external classical tools

full rationale

Theorem 1 is a pure existence/uniqueness statement proved by (i) short-time characteristic reparametrization (Lemma 3, proved in full), (ii) dispersive L^p/L^∞/C^α bounds from the anisotropic G0,Gθ assumptions (Lemma 4), (iii) a Schauder fixed point on a closed convex set of densities in L^r_t C^β_x (Section 4, using Aubin–Lions–Simon), and (iv) uniqueness via Loeper’s field stability plus an integrable t^{-d/p} density bound (Section 5). The smallness bootstrap ∫∥E∥_{C^{1,α}}≤δ0 closes explicitly in Lemma 7 by choosing T small in terms of A0 and the fixed exponents; it is not assumed of the solution. Self-citations [20,21] supply related characteristic technique but the needed estimates are re-derived here; [28] is only a pointer to the compact-map form of Schauder. Loeper [26], Schauder, and Aubin–Lions are external. No fitted parameters, no definitional tautology, and no load-bearing uniqueness imported from the author’s prior theorems. Endpoints p=d and θ=0 are openly left open. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The argument rests on classical PDE and functional-analysis tools plus the paper’s anisotropic envelope assumptions. No empirical fits. The only ‘parameters’ are the admissible ranges for p,θ,α,r,m and the small time T forced by the twist-lemma threshold δ0.

free parameters (1)
  • Existence time T and twist threshold δ0 = T ≤ T*(d,p,m,θ,α,r,A0); δ0=δ0(d) small
    T∈(0,1] is chosen small enough that ∥E∥_{L^1_t C^{1,α}}≤δ0(d); δ0 is an absolute small constant from the characteristic estimates. Not fitted to data, but hand-chosen to close the bootstrap.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Schauder fixed-point theorem on a closed convex set in a Banach space with relatively compact continuous self-map
    Invoked in §4 (Theorem 5) to obtain a density fixed point without contraction.
  • standard math Loeper’s L^2 field-stability estimate for bounded equal-mass densities (and the paper’s minor compact-support approximation)
    Lemma 8 / §5; uniqueness Gronwall rests on this external estimate applied at each positive time.
  • standard math Global Schauder estimates for the Poisson equation mapping C^α density to C^{1,α} fields
    Used to pass from ρ∈L^r_t C^α to E∈L^r_t C^{1,α} (e.g. (61), (9)).
  • standard math Aubin–Lions–Simon compactness for time-integrable Hölder densities with W^{-1,p} time derivative bound
    Lemma 6; supplies relative compactness of the admissible set K in X=L^r_t C^β.
  • domain assumption Initial envelopes G0,Gθ∈L^p_x with p>d, m>d+1, and 0<θ≤1 (anisotropic Hölder in velocity only)
    Hypothesis (5) of Theorem 1; without p>d the L^∞ density singularity is non-integrable, without θ>0 the spatial Hölder mixing bound fails.
  • domain assumption Lagrangian solution concept: E∈L^1_t C^1 and f transported by the unique backward characteristic flow
    Solution notion fixed in §1.3 before Theorem 1; uniqueness and continuity are proved in this class.
invented entities (1)
  • Weighted velocity envelopes G0 and Gθ
    purpose: Encode the anisotropic assumption (essential velocity supremum and uniform C^θ_v modulus controlled in L^p_x) without phase-space Sobolev regularity.
    Definitions (3); standard function-space packaging rather than a new physical object. No independent empirical handle required.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local Well-Posedness for Vlasov--Poisson with $L^{d+}$ Initial Density and Fractional Velocity Regularity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZOYJOWL6

@misc{pith2026260724400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local Well-Posedness for Vlasov--Poisson with $L^d+$ Initial Density and Fractional Velocity Regularity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZOYJOWL6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24400}
}
abstract

We prove a local well-posedness criterion for the Vlasov--Poisson system on $\R^d_x\times\R^d_v$, $d\geq2$, under an anisotropic assumption on the initial distribution. The datum has finite mass, its weighted velocity supremum belongs to $L^p_x$ for some $p>d$, and it has an arbitrarily small positive H\"older regularity in the velocity variable, uniformly with respect to velocity and with the same spatial $L^p$ control. The main estimate is a nonlinear mixing bound \[ [\rho(t)]_{C^\alpha_x}\lesssim t^{-d/p-\epsilon}C(f_0), \qquad \epsilon>0~~\text{small}. \] Thus the density is integrable in time with values in a positive spatial H\"older class, and the corresponding electric field belongs to $L^1_tC^{1,\alpha}_x$. We construct a solution by a Schauder fixed point on the density and prove uniqueness by a Loeper-type stability estimate.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ambrosio, M

    L. Ambrosio, M. Colombo, and A. Figalli,Existence and uniqueness of maximal regular flows for non-smooth vector fields, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 218 (2015), no. 2, 1043–1081, doi:10.1007/s00205-015-0875-9

    doi:10.1007/s00205-015-0875-9 2015

  2. [2]

    Ambrosio, M

    L. Ambrosio, M. Colombo, and A. Figalli,On the Lagrangian structure of transport equations: the Vlasov–Poisson system, Duke Math. J. 166 (2017) , no. 18, 3505–3568, doi:10.1215/00127094-2017-0032

    work page doi:10.1215/00127094-2017-0032 2017

  3. [3]

    A. A. Arsen’ev,Existence in the large of a weak solution of Vlasov’s system of equations, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 15 (1975), no. 1, 131–143, doi:10.1016/0041-5553(75)90141-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0041-5553(75)90141-x 1975

  4. [4]

    Binshati and A

    I. Binshati and A. Tudorascu,Heteroclinic orbits for the nonlinear Vlasov and the one-dimensional Vlasov–Poisson systems, Nonlinear Anal. 187 (2019), 180–204, doi:10.1016/j.na.2019.04.009. 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.na.2019.04.009 2019

  5. [5]

    Bouchut, F

    F. Bouchut, F. Golse, and M. Pulvirenti,Kinetic Equations and Asymptotic Theory, vol. 4 of Series in Applied Mathematics, Gauthier-Villars, Éditions Scientifiques et Médicales Elsevier, Paris, 2000

    2000

  6. [6]

    Bruè,2D Euler beyond the Yudovich class: nonuniqueness, instability, and flexibility, unpublished survey notes

    E. Bruè,2D Euler beyond the Yudovich class: nonuniqueness, instability, and flexibility, unpublished survey notes

  7. [7]

    Bruè and M

    E. Bruè and M. Colombo,Nonuniqueness of solutions to the Euler equations with vorticity in a Lorentz space, Comm. Math. Phys. 403 (2023), 1171–1192, doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04816-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04816-4 2023

  8. [8]

    E. Bruè, M. Colombo, and A. Kumar,Flexibility of two-dimensional Euler flows with integrable vorticity, Duke Math. J., to appear, arXiv:2408.07934

    arXiv

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Chen and C

    J. Chen and C. He,Vlasov–Poisson equation inHs,p(w)space, Michigan Math. J. 73 (2023), no. 3, 557–569, doi:10.1307/mmj/20205973

    2023

  2. [10]

    Crippa, M

    G. Crippa, M. Inversi, C. Saffirio, and G. Stefani,Existence and stability of weak solutions of the Vlasov–Poisson system in localised Yudovich spaces, Nonlinearity 37 (2024) , no. 9, 095015, doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ad5bb3

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    R. J. DiPerna and P.-L. Lions,Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), 511–547

    1989

  4. [12]

    Gilbarg and N

    D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger,Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1983

    1983

  5. [13]

    R. T. Glassey,The Cauchy Problem in Kinetic Theory, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1996

    1996

  6. [14]

    Golse, P.-L

    F. Golse, P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, and R. Sentis,Regularity of the moments of the solution of a transport equation, J. Funct. Anal. 76 (1988), 110–125

    1988

  7. [15]

    He and J

    C. He and J. Chen,Vlasov–Poisson equation in Besov space, Taiwanese J. Math. 26 (2022), no. 5, 1003–1028

    2022

  8. [16]

    He and J

    C. He and J. Chen,Vlasov–Poisson equation in weighted Sobolev spaceWm,p(w), CUBO 24 (2022), no. 2, 211–226, doi:10.56754/0719-0646.2402.0211

    2022

  9. [17]

    Holding and E

    T. Holding and E. Miot,Uniqueness and stability for the Vlasov–Poisson system with spatial density in Orlicz spaces, Contemp. Math. 710 (2018), 145–162

    2018

  10. [18]

    Horst,On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation

    E. Horst,On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation. I. General theory, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 3 (1981), 229–248

    1981

  11. [19]

    Horst,On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation

    E. Horst,On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation. II. Special cases, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 4 (1982), 19–32

    1982

  12. [20]

    Huang, Q.-H

    L. Huang, Q.-H. Nguyen, and Y. Xu,Sharp estimates for screened Vlasov–Poisson system around Penrose-stable equilibria inRd, d≥ 3, Kinet. Relat. Models 18 (2025), no. 2, 186–251 (published online 2024), doi:10.3934/krm.2024015

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Huang, Q.-H

    L. Huang, Q.-H. Nguyen, and Y. Xu,Nonlinear Landau damping for the 2D Vlasov–Poisson system with massless electrons around Penrose-stable equilibrium, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 57 (2025), no. 2, 1939–1963, doi:10.1137/23M1595382

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    Iacobelli,A new perspective on Wasserstein distances for kinetic problems, Arch

    M. Iacobelli,A new perspective on Wasserstein distances for kinetic problems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 244 (2022), 27–50, doi:10.1007/s00205-021-01705-9

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Iacobelli and J

    M. Iacobelli and J. Junné,Stability estimates for the Vlasov–Poisson system inp-kinetic Wasserstein distances, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 56 (2024), 2250–2267, doi:10.1112/blms.13053. 20

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Jeong and S

    I.-J. Jeong and S. Tae,Low regularity Sobolev well-posedness for Vlasov–Poisson, arXiv:2510.02112

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lions and B

    P.-L. Lions and B. Perthame,Propagation of moments and regularity for the 3-dimensional Vlasov–Poisson system, Invent. Math. 105 (1991), 415–430

    1991

  18. [26]

    Loeper,Uniqueness of the solution to the Vlasov–Poisson system with bounded density, J

    G. Loeper,Uniqueness of the solution to the Vlasov–Poisson system with bounded density, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 86 (2006), 68–79

    2006

  19. [27]

    Miot,A uniqueness criterion for unbounded solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system, Comm

    E. Miot,A uniqueness criterion for unbounded solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system, Comm. Math. Phys. 346 (2016), 469–482

    2016

  20. [28]

    Nguyen,Potential estimates and quasilinear parabolic equations with measure data, Mem

    Q.-H. Nguyen,Potential estimates and quasilinear parabolic equations with measure data, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 291 (2023), no. 1449, doi:10.1090/memo/1449

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Pallard,Moment propagation of weak solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system, Comm

    C. Pallard,Moment propagation of weak solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 37 (2012), 1273–1285

    2012

  22. [30]

    Pfaffelmoser,Global classical solutions of the Vlasov–Poisson system in three dimensions for general initial data, J

    K. Pfaffelmoser,Global classical solutions of the Vlasov–Poisson system in three dimensions for general initial data, J. Differential Equations 95 (1992), 281–303

    1992

  23. [31]

    Rein,Collisionless kinetic equations from astrophysics—the Vlasov–Poisson system, inHandbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, vol

    G. Rein,Collisionless kinetic equations from astrophysics—the Vlasov–Poisson system, inHandbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, vol. III, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007, 383–476

    2007

  24. [32]

    Schaeffer,Global existence of smooth solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system in three dimensions, Comm

    J. Schaeffer,Global existence of smooth solutions to the Vlasov–Poisson system in three dimensions, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 16 (1991), 1313–1335

    1991

  25. [33]

    Simon,Compact sets in the spaceLp(0, T;B), Ann

    J. Simon,Compact sets in the spaceLp(0, T;B), Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 146 (1987), 65–96

    1987

  26. [34]

    Tae,Well-posedness for Vlasov–Poisson on low regularityHs,p spaces in all dimensions, arXiv:2606.15281

    S. Tae,Well-posedness for Vlasov–Poisson on low regularityHs,p spaces in all dimensions, arXiv:2606.15281

  27. [35]

    Ukai and T

    S. Ukai and T. Okabe,On classical solutions in the large in time of two-dimensional Vlasov’s equation, Osaka J. Math. 15 (1978), no. 2, 245–261, doi:10.18910/6063. 21

    1978 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.