Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 45 references

A Detailed Spectral Study of Intermittent-Accreting Millisecond X-ray Pulsar Aql X-1 during Pulse-on and Pulse-off Stages

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aql X-1's pulse traces a 1.65 km hotspot on the neutron star

desk verdict The hotspot spectral component is plausible but not required: the data fit as well with a free continuum, and the paper never tests the two models statistically. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04542 v2 pith:ZR6FMXC5 submitted 2025-01-08 astro-ph.HE

T. Kocab{i}y{i}k , C. Güngör , M. T. Sağlam , T. Güver , Z. F. Bostanc{i} This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords accretingmillisecondX-raypulsarintermittentAqlX-1spectroscopyphase-resolvedneutronstarhotspotRXTE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the intermittent millisecond X-ray pulsar Aql X-1 during a rare 150-second pulse-on episode and the surrounding pulse-off stages, using archival RXTE data. The authors argue that the pulsation is most prominent in the 3–13 keV band, and that the pulse-on spectrum cannot be fully described by the same absorbed blackbody plus disk-blackbody continuum that fits the pulse-off stages. They attribute the residual to an extra thermal blackbody component, which phase-resolved spectroscopy places on the neutron star surface as a hotspot with temperature about 1.65 keV and radius 1.65 ± 0.74 km. If correct, this would be direct spectral evidence of the magnetic polar cap that produces the recurring pulse, giving a measurable size for the emitting region.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is phase-resolved spectroscopy on the last 128 s of the pulse-on observation, splitting the folded pulse into pulse-high (spin phase 0.75–0.25) and pulse-low (0.25–0.75) spectra. The diagnostic is an additive blackbody component (bbodyrad in XSPEC) appended only to the pulse-high spectrum while the shared continuum parameters are held fixed; the radius is recovered from the normalization through the assumed 5 kpc distance, assuming a circular emitting spot.

What would settle it

Re-fit the pulse-high spectrum of the same 128 s segment with all continuum parameters free and no added blackbody, then compare the improvement from adding the hotspot component; the paper's own Table 3 shows $\chi^2$/dof = 0.74 for the free-continuum fit versus 0.84 for the hotspot fit, so a decisive test needs higher signal-to-noise data where the two models separate. Alternatively, search for the expected sinusoidal modulation of the blackbody temperature or normalization over spin phase in a longer pulse-on episode.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the coherent 550.27 Hz pulsation in Aql X-1 has a spectral signature: a small, hot blackbody component that appears only in the pulse-high phase. When pulse-high and pulse-low spectra are forced to share the same continuum parameters, a residual excess appears between roughly 3 and 13 keV in the pulse-high spectrum, matching the energy range where the pulse is temporally strongest. Modeling that excess with an additional blackbody gives a temperature of 1.65 ± 0.06 keV and, assuming a distance of 5 kpc, a radius of 1.65 ± 0.74 km as reported in the abstract. The authors interpret this as a hotspot, likely at high magnetic latitude, and note that its flux contribution of about 8.6% of the total is broadly consistent with the measured pulse fraction of about 4.5%.

Load-bearing premise

The hotspot's existence depends on the assumption that the non-pulsed continuum shape is identical in the pulse-high and pulse-low phases; if the continuum is allowed to differ, the 3–13 keV residual disappears without needing any extra component.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hotspot radius of about 1.6 km is far smaller than the neutron star radius, consistent with a magnetic polar cap rather than a global surface component.
  • The pulse fraction of about 4.5% and the blackbody flux fraction of about 8.6% of the total flux link the spectral excess to the rotational modulation.
  • The pulse-on residual in the 3–13 keV band independently corroborates the temporal detection in the same band, strengthening the case that the pulse and the spectral excess share a common origin.
  • If the hotspot is real, its temperature and size can be used to estimate the local accretion column geometry and, indirectly, the magnetic field strength at the neutron star surface.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the extra blackbody is only required when the continuum is frozen, the hotspot interpretation is not unique: the paper's own second approach, with free continuum parameters, fits the pulse-high spectrum without any added component ($\chi^2$/dof = 0.74 versus 0.84 with the hotspot). A higher-signal observation should decide between these.
  • If the hotspot is confirmed, the same phase-resolved technique applied to other intermittent AMXPs (HETE J1900.1-2455, SAX J1748.9-2021) could test whether hotspot size scales with pulse strength or duty cycle.
  • The 8.6% flux fraction is computed from a blackbody component spread over the RXTE band, while the pulse fraction is measured only in a limited energy range; a direct comparison would require accounting for gravitational redshift and fast rotation, as the authors themselves note.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes archival RXTE/PCA observations of the intermittent accreting millisecond X-ray pulsar Aql X-1 during its 1998 outburst, focusing on the pulse-on episode. The authors perform a Z^2_1 timing search in three energy bands, confirming the 550.27 Hz signal and showing that it is strongest in the 3.0-13.0 keV band. They then carry out spectral modeling with an absorbed blackbody plus disk blackbody plus Gaussian line, first on the last four 128 s segments and then with phase-resolved spectroscopy of the pulse-on segment. The central claim is that an additional blackbody component, present only in the pulse-high phase, represents a hotspot on the neutron star surface with a temperature of about 1.65 keV and a radius near 1.65 km.

Significance. If the hotspot detection were statistically robust, it would provide a useful measurement of the pulsed emission region in an intermittent AMXP and would strengthen the connection between timing and spectral behavior. The temporal analysis is a strength: the pulse detection, trial correction, and energy-dependent significance are presented carefully, and the estimated pulse fraction is consistent with earlier work. However, the main spectral claim is not supported by the paper's own fits: the pulse-high spectrum is adequately fitted without the extra blackbody when the continuum parameters are free, so the proposed hotspot is degenerate with continuum variation. This undercuts the abstract's primary conclusion and the discussion section.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2.3, Table 3] Approach (b), which lets the continuum parameters of the pulse-high spectrum vary independently, yields chi^2/dof = 0.74 without any additional blackbody component, while approach (c), which adds the proposed hotspot blackbody, yields chi^2/dof = 0.84. The reduced chi-square is therefore lower when the continuum is allowed to vary than when the extra component is included, so the data do not require the additional blackbody. The paper does not report raw chi-square and degrees-of-freedom values or an F-test, likelihood-ratio test, or AIC/BIC comparison between approaches (b) and (c), and without such a test the abstract's statement that the residual 'indicates a hotspot' is not justified.
  2. [§2.2.3, Table 3] The hotspot interpretation is built on the assumption that kT_bb, Norm_bb, kT_dbb, and Norm_dbb are identical between the pulse-low and pulse-high phases. This assumption is imposed rather than derived, and approach (b) demonstrates that a modest change in the continuum produces an acceptable fit without any extra component. Consequently, the extra blackbody is degenerate with continuum variation, and its fitted temperature and normalization are not independent measurements of a hotspot unless the continuum-linkage assumption is physically defended.
  3. [Abstract and §2.2.3] The reported hotspot radius is internally inconsistent: the abstract states 1.65 +/- 0.74 km, while Section 2.2.3 states 1.65 +/- 0.54 km. Since this radius is one of the two headline results, the discrepancy must be resolved and the correct uncertainty reported consistently.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.2.2, Table 2] In the first approach of Table 2, four separate chi^2/dof values are listed for the simultaneous fit; please clarify whether these are per-segment contributions to a joint chi-square or independent fits, as this affects how the reader interprets the quoted statistics.
  2. [§2.2.2] The sentence 'the parameters were improved physically and statistically' is vague; please specify which parameters changed and which statistic improved when the extra blackbody was added.
  3. [Throughout] The notation alternates between '12_low/12_high' and 'pulse-low/pulse-high', and the phase definitions in the text ('0.75 - 0.25' and '0.25 - 0.75') are stated twice with the same words in different order; a consistent definition with a single phase convention would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The hotspot 'indication' is a fitted extra blackbody component, and Table 3 shows a free-continuum fit removes the need for it, so the central result is partially a fitted construct rather than an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.2.3 (Step 3) and Table 3; Abstract]
    "We finally refitted only the pulse-high segment by adding an extra blackbody component assuming that the extra radiation comes from the hotspot which is the cause of the observed coherent pulsation. The temperature of the extra blackbody component is obtained to be about 1.65±0.06 keV whose radius of 1.65±0.54 km indicated by its normalization."

    The hotspot is not independently predicted: it is introduced as the assumed source of an extra blackbody that is added specifically to absorb the pulse-high residual. Its temperature and radius are therefore direct outputs of the very component that defines the hotspot, so they cannot confirm the hotspot interpretation. Table 3 makes the reduction explicit: approach (b) fits the pulse-high spectrum with the continuum parameters free and no extra component at chi2/dof=0.74, while approach (c) freezes the continuum to pulse-low values and adds the extra blackbody at chi2/dof=0.84; no F-test, likelihood-ratio test, or AIC/BIC is reported. The claimed hotspot radius/temperature consequently reduce to a fit choice rather than a derived prediction.

full rationale

The temporal analysis (Z^2_n detection of the 550.27 Hz pulse, strongest in 3-13 keV) is self-contained and provides independent support in the same energy range as the soft residual, which is why this is not a fully forced circularity. The spectral continuum modeling is also tested against several common models rather than being imposed by self-citation. However, the central phase-resolved claim that the extra blackbody 'indicates a hotspot' with a specific radius and temperature is partially circular: those numbers are parameters of the component added to fit the residual, and the alternative free-continuum model in Table 3 (approach b) fits at least as well without any hotspot component. The abstract reports the hotspot radius as 1.65±0.74 km while Section 2.2.3 gives 1.65±0.54 km, an inconsistency that does not change the circularity assessment but reinforces the fragility of the reported value.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result rests on one fitted thermal component plus several fixed inputs from the literature. The extra blackbody temperature and normalization are genuine free parameters of the claimed hotspot, and the hotspot radius depends on the assumed distance and geometry. The tied-continuum assumption in the phase-resolved analysis is the key modeling choice that makes the additive component seem necessary.

free parameters (2)
  • Additional blackbody temperature (kT2bb) = 1.65 +/- 0.06 keV (phase-resolved); 1.75 +/- 0.20 keV (segmented)
    The temperature of the extra blackbody added to model the pulse-on residual is a free fit parameter, not independently predicted.
  • Additional blackbody normalization (Norm2bb) = 10.88 +/- 2.18 (phase-resolved); 2.24 +/- 0.96 (segmented)
    The normalization is fitted and, together with the assumed 5 kpc distance and circular geometry, yields the reported hotspot radius of 1.65 +/- 0.54 km.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The spectrum of Aql X-1 in the soft state is described by phabs * (bbodyrad + diskbb + gau).
    The model choice is selected by chi2 among three candidate models and adopted from the literature, not derived. The choice determines what counts as a residual.
  • domain assumption The neutral hydrogen column density N_H = 3.4e21 cm^-2 is fixed from Maccarone & Coppi (2003).
    The absorption is not fit; it is taken from prior literature. An incorrect N_H would shift the soft excess and affect the derived hotspot parameters.
  • domain assumption The distance to the source is 5 kpc, taken from Jonker & Nelemans (2004).
    The hotspot radius is computed from the bbodyrad normalization assuming this distance. A different distance changes the radius directly.
  • ad hoc to paper The continuum parameters are assumed to be identical between the pulse-low and pulse-high phases.
    This assumption forces any phase difference to appear as an additive component. It is the load-bearing assumption of the hotspot interpretation, and the paper does not test it against the alternative of freely varying continuum parameters.
invented entities (1)
  • Extra blackbody component / hotspot on the neutron star surface
    purpose: To model the soft X-ray residual seen in the pulse-on segment and the pulse-high phase.
    The hotspot is introduced after the residual is seen, and its temperature and normalization are fitted to the same data. The timing pulse provides indirect motivation but no spectral confirmation independent of the fit. An alternative fit without this component, in which the continuum parameters vary, is statistically at least as good (Table 3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Detailed Spectral Study of Intermittent-Accreting Millisecond X-ray Pulsar Aql X-1 during Pulse-on and Pulse-off Stages." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZR6FMXC5

@misc{pith2026250104542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Detailed Spectral Study of Intermittent-Accreting Millisecond X-ray Pulsar Aql X-1 during Pulse-on and Pulse-off Stages},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZR6FMXC5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04542}
}
abstract

We present a detailed spectral study of an intermittent-AMXP Aql X-1 during the pulse-on and pulse-off stages by using the archival RXTE data. We first perform temporal analysis by using Z$_n^2$ technique in three different energy bands, 3.0 -- 13.0 keV, 13.0 -- 23.0 keV and 23.0 -- 33.0 keV, for the last 128 s time segment of the RXTE data including pulse-on region. We show that the pulse is the most significant in the softest band. We, then, show that the spectrum is represented the best via combination of absorbed blackbody, disk blackbody and a gaussian line. We modeled the last four segments of the data 30188-03-05-00 to better compare pulse-on and pulse-off stages. We found a vague residual in the spectral fit of the pulse-on segment between $\sim$3.0 -- 13.0 keV which agrees with the result of temporal analysis. We show that the residual may be represented with an extra blackbody component with the temperature of 1.75 keV and the radius of 0.75$\pm$0.49 km. For deeper analysis, we performed phase-resolved spectroscopy to the last 128 s, pulse-on, segment. We obtain two separate spectra for the spin phase range of 0.75 -- 0.25, pulse-high and 0.25 -- 0.75, pulse-low and followed the same procedure. We display that the residual becomes more clear for pulse-high compared to the pulse-low. We report that the additional blackbody component, which models the residual, indicates a hotspot from the surface of the neutron star with the radius of 1.65$\pm$0.74 km whose temperature is 1.65 keV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The light curve of the outburst of Aql X-1 in 1998 via ASM data (upper panel, black points) with the time evolution of the hardness ratio estimated by using the ratio of count rates in the energy ranges of 5.0 – 12.0 keV and 1.5 – 5.0 keV (bottom panel, black points). The times of the pointing RXTE observations and the detected pulsation are shown via vertical grey lines and the blue dashed line, respectively. These… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The dynamic power spectrum of ObsID 30188-03-05-00 of Aql X-1 with a zoomed-in view to the last 150 s (pulse-on) in the inset (The left panel) in the energy range of 3.0 – 13.0 keV. Pulse profile for the last 150 s with normalized count rates is presented in the upper right panel while the defined pulse-low and pulse-high are shown as shaded pink and green areas. The time evolutions of Z2 1 power values at 550.27 Hz… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The unfolded X-ray spectrum of Aql X-1 for last four segments, 9 (black), 10 (red), 11 (green), 12 (blue), with the components from the best model (upper panel) and residuals for three approaches; (a) The four segments are modelled as linked to each other (the second panel), (b) The pulse-on segment is fit independently from the previous three segments (the third panel), (c) The last segment is linked to previous th… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S., Nasser M

    Abdelfatah A. S., Nasser M. A., Abdelbar A. M., Beheary M. M., 2021, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2021.05.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JHEAp..31...12A 31, 12

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2021.05.001 2021

  2. [2]

    A., Cheng A

    Alpar M. A., Cheng A. F., Ruderman M. A., Shaham J., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1038/300728a0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982Natur.300..728A 300, 728

    doi:10.1038/300728a0 1982

  3. [3]

    Asai K., Dotani T., Nagase F., Mitsuda K., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJS..131..571A 131, 571

    doi:10.1086/317374 2000

  4. [4]

    arXiv:2206.10053

    Bahramian A., Degenaar N., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220610053B p. arXiv:2206.10053

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Bhattacharya D., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-S , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PhR...203....1B 203, 1

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-s 1991

  6. [6]

    V., Rothschild R

    Bradt H. V., Rothschild R. E., Swank J. H., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS...97..355B 97, 355

    1993

  7. [7]

    Buccheri R., et al., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983A&A...128..245B 128, 245

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Bult P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac87f9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935L..32B 935, L32

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac87f9 2022

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    I., Rea N., Vida \ n a I., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol

    Campana S., Di Salvo T., 2018, in Rezzolla L., Pizzochero P., Jones D. I., Rea N., Vida \ n a I., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 457, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 149 ( @eprint arXiv 1804.03422 ), @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7_4

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Campana S., Coti Zelati F., D'Avanzo P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt604 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1695C 432, 1695

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Casella P., Altamirano D., Patruno A., Wijnands R., van der Klis M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/528982 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674L..41C 674, L41

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    A., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...251L..11C 251, L11

    Chevalier C., Ilovaisky S. A., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...251L..11C 251, L11

    1991

  5. [13]

    arXiv:2010.09005

    Di Salvo T., Sanna A., 2020, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv201009005D p. arXiv:2010.09005

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    K., Swank J

    Dib R., Ransom S., Ray P., Kaspi V., 2004, in Kaaret P., Lamb F. K., Swank J. H., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 714, X-ray Timing 2003: Rossi and Beyond. pp 232--238 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0401134 ), @doi 10.1063/1.1781033

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gierli \'n ski M., Poutanen J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09004.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.359.1261G 359, 1261

    2005

  8. [16]

    Gierli \'n ski M., Done C., Barret D., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05174.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.331..141G 331, 141

    2002

  9. [17]

    A., Gilfanov M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512028 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659..580G 659, 580

    G \"o g \"u s E., Alpar M. A., Gilfanov M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512028 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659..580G 659, 580

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    u ng \"o r C., Ek s i K. Y., G \

    G \"u ng \"o r C., Ek s i K. Y., G \"o g \"u s E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2017.04.005 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NewA...56....1G 56, 1

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    G \"u ng \"o r C., et al., 2020, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2019.12.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JHEAp..25...10G 25, 10

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    B., Radeva Y., Rots A

    Jahoda K., Markwardt C. B., Radeva Y., Rots A. H., Stark M. J., Swank J. H., Strohmayer T. E., Zhang W., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..163..401J 163, 401

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    G., Nelemans G., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08193.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.354..355J 354, 355

    Jonker P. G., Nelemans G., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08193.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.354..355J 354, 355

    2004

  14. [22]

    Koyama K., et al., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/183582 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...247L..27K 247, L27

    1981 doi

  15. [23]

    K., Boutloukos S., Van Wassenhove S., Chamberlain R

    Lamb F. K., Boutloukos S., Van Wassenhove S., Chamberlain R. T., Lo K. H., Miller M. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/L36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...705L..36L 705, L36

    2009 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Homan J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521181 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667.1073L 667, 1073

    Lin D., Remillard R. A., Homan J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521181 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667.1073L 667, 1073

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    C., Remillard R

    Lochner J. C., Remillard R. A., 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 91.05

    1995

  18. [26]

    J., Coppi P

    Maccarone T. J., Coppi P. S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021881 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A

    2003 doi

  19. [27]

    Mata S \'a nchez D., Mu \ n oz-Darias T., Casares J., Jim \'e nez-Ibarra F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw172 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464L..41M 464, L41

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Messenger C., Patruno A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..261M 806, 261

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Mitsuda K., Inoue H., Nakamura N., Tanaka Y., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989PASJ...41...97M 41, 97

    1989

  22. [30]

    L., 2021, in Belloni T

    Patruno A., Watts A. L., 2021, in Belloni T. M., M \'e ndez M., Zhang C., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 461, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. pp 143--208 ( @eprint arXiv 1206.2727 ), @doi 10.1007/978-3-662-62110-3_4

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Poutanen J., 2006, @doi [Advances in Space Research] 10.1016/j.asr.2006.04.025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AdSpR..38.2697P 38, 2697

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    E., Rees M

    Pringle J. E., Rees M. J., 1972, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972A

    1972

  25. [33]

    Raichur H., Misra R., Dewangan G., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19075.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416..637R 416, 637

    2011

  26. [34]

    Sakurai S., Yamada S., Torii S., Noda H., Nakazawa K., Makishima K., Takahashi H., 2012, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASJ...64...72S 64, 72

    2012

  27. [35]

    Sanna A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slac093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516L..76S 516, L76

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    E., Keek L., 2017, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division \#16

    Strohmayer T. E., Keek L., 2017, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division \#16. p. 108.25

    2017

  29. [37]

    Titarchuk L., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174760 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...434..570T 434, 570

    1994 doi

  30. [38]

    Titarchuk L., Lyubarskij Y., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176191 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450..876T 450, 876

    1995 doi

  31. [39]

    A., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174818 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...435..362V 435, 362

    Vaughan B. A., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174818 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...435..362V 435, 362

    1994 doi

  32. [40]

    M., van der Klis M., Lewin W

    Verbunt F., Belloni T., Johnston H. M., van der Klis M., Lewin W. H. G., 1994, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A

    1994

  33. [41]

    A., Ferland G

    Verner D. A., Ferland G. J., Korista K. T., Yakovlev D. G., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...465..487V 465, 487

    1996 doi

  34. [42]

    Wilms J., Allen A., McCray R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..914W 542, 914

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Johnson W

    Zdziarski A. A., Johnson W. N., Magdziarz P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/283.1.193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.283..193Z 283, 193

    1996 doi

  36. [44]

    T., Done C., Smith D

    \.Z ycki P. T., Done C., Smith D. A., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02885.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.309..561Z 309, 561

    1999

  37. [45]

    S imon V., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011470 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.