Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Formal Modeling and SMT-Based Parameterized Verification of Data-Aware BPMN (Extended Version)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.07811 v3 pith:ZRUVLHV2 submitted 2019-06-01 cs.LO

classification cs.LO
keywords safetyverificationcatalogarray-basedbpmncalledcheckingdata-aware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose DAB -- a data-aware extension of BPMN where the process operates over case and persistent data (partitioned into a read-only database called catalog and a read-write database called repository). The model trades off between expressiveness and the possibility of supporting parameterized verification of safety properties on top of it. Specifically, taking inspiration from the literature on verification of artifact systems, we study verification problems where safety properties are checked irrespectively of the content of the read-only catalog, and accepting the potential presence of unboundedly many tuples in the catalog and repository. We tackle such problems using an array-based backward reachability procedure fully implemented in MCMT -- a state-of-the-art array-based SMT model checker. Notably, we prove that the procedure is sound and complete for checking safety of DABs, and single out additional conditions that guarantee its termination and, in turn, show decidability of checking safety.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LLM-based Vulnerability Discovery in Business Process Documentation

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Large language models can flag contradictions and errors in business documentation and extract process structures, but the reported evidence is thin, partly synthetic, and lacks ground-truth metrics for the hardest task.

Pith tools