Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 80 references

Risk-based framework to determine climate-informed design storms for road drainage infrastructure

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A risk-based framework that combines statistically downscaled CMIP6 precipitation projections with hazard and vulnerability scoring adjusts road-drainage design storms for a changing climate, demonstrated across Ontario.

desk verdict A plausible framework for climate-informed design storms, but the supplied full text is a different paper — the risk-to-storm adjustment is unverifiable from this submission. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10183 v1 pith:ZT6OI7N3 submitted 2025-08-13 physics.geo-ph stat.AP

Mohammad Fereshtehpour , Rashid Bashir , Neil F. Tandon This is my paper
classification physics.geo-phstat.AP
keywords climate-informeddesignstormsroaddrainageinfrastructureCMIP6projectionsstatisticaldownscalingriskassessmentnonstationaryprecipitationOntariostormadjustment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a workflow for replacing stationary, historical-rainfall design storms with climate-informed ones for road drainage. It combines statistically downscaled CMIP6 projections with a risk level defined by hazard, which merges physiographic and meteorological factors, and vulnerability, which covers socioeconomic, transportation, and environmental conditions. Weights for these factors are set through a sensitivity-analysis-based scheme, and the resulting risk level is applied to adjust the projected design storm. The authors demonstrate the workflow at province-wide and site-specific scales across Ontario. If the risk-to-storm mapping is sound, the framework gives engineers a quantitative way to build future climate and local vulnerability into drainage design.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the risk level, a scalar formed from weighted hazard and vulnerability components. Hazard combines physiographic and meteorological factors, while vulnerability encompasses socioeconomic, transportation, and environmental considerations. The paper uses a sensitivity-analysis-based weighting scheme to set relative importance, then applies this risk level as the adjustment to the projected design storm. The legitimacy of that risk-to-storm adjustment is the load-bearing step in the framework.

What would settle it

Compute the risk-adjusted design storm for a set of Ontario drainage sites, then compare those storms against observed flood or damage events, or against a calibrated hydrologic and hydraulic model of the catchments. If the risk-adjusted storms predict historical or simulated drainage failures no better than conventional design storms, the central mapping is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that design storms for road drainage can be made climate-informed by coupling downscaled CMIP6 extreme-precipitation projections to a location-specific risk index. Hazard combines physiographic and meteorological factors; vulnerability captures socioeconomic, transportation, and environmental conditions. A weighting scheme derived from sensitivity analysis assigns relative importance, and the resulting risk level adjusts the projected design storm. The claim is demonstrated at province-wide and site-specific scales in Ontario, supporting a shift from stationarity-based design to dynamic, risk-informed design.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single weighted risk score, built from hazard and vulnerability criteria, translates quantitatively into the correct adjustment of the design storm, even though the paper provides no derivation, calibration, or validation of that translation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, road drainage design storms in Ontario could be updated for mid-century and late-century climate horizons rather than relying on historical rainfall records.
  • The framework would let agencies prioritize drainage upgrades at locations where high hazard coincides with high socioeconomic, transportation, or environmental vulnerability.
  • The same workflow could scale from a province-wide screening tool to site-specific design, so jurisdictions with limited local data could still produce climate-informed storms.
  • Adoption would shift design practice from static intensity-duration-frequency curves toward dynamic, risk-informed standards that respond to projected precipitation change.
  • The sensitivity-analysis-based weighting scheme could be re-run under different stakeholder priorities, making the adjustment tunable across regions or asset classes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The full text supplied with this paper is a different manuscript about fuzzy dark matter and the 21-cm power spectrum, so the drainage-storm framework's methods, equations, and validation are not present in this document; the abstract is the only available evidence for its claims.
  • The central open question the framework leaves unresolved is whether the weighted risk score maps quantitatively onto a valid design-storm adjustment; a calibration against observed drainage failures or a hydrologic model would be needed to support it.
  • Because the weighting scheme is described as flexible, the resulting design storms may be highly sensitive to expert-chosen weights; a systematic sensitivity sweep across weight vectors would show how robust the adjustment is.
  • If the framework is adopted, its practical effect is likely to be larger design storms in high-hazard, high-vulnerability areas, which carries cost implications that decision-makers would need to weigh against added resilience.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract (arXiv:2508.10183) describes a risk-based framework for climate-informed design storms for road drainage infrastructure in Ontario, Canada. It proposes to combine statistically downscaled CMIP6 precipitation projections with a composite risk level defined by hazard (physiographic and meteorological) and vulnerability (socioeconomic, transportation, environmental), use a sensitivity-analysis-based weighting scheme, and then adjust the projected design storm by the estimated risk. The supplied full text, however, is arXiv:2508.10176, "Constraining fuzzy dark matter with the 21-cm power spectrum from Cosmic Dawn and Reionization" — an unrelated cosmology paper. Consequently, the manuscript as provided contains no methods, equations, data, sensitivity analysis, or demonstrations for the drainage framework. The claims in the abstract cannot be checked.

Significance. The applied need is real: conventional design storms assume stationarity, and incorporating CMIP6 projections into drainage design is an active engineering problem. The abstract's idea of combining hazard and vulnerability into a scalar risk level and translating it into a design-storm adjustment is potentially useful, and the province-wide plus site-specific demonstration would be valuable if properly documented. However, because the actual paper is absent, there are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or quantifiable predictions to assess. The significance of the proposed framework cannot be evaluated from the abstract alone.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (all)] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.10176, a fuzzy dark matter cosmology paper, not the drainage-infrastructure paper described in the abstract. There is no method section, no equations for hazard/vulnerability weighting or risk computation, no description of the statistically downscaled CMIP6 data, and no sensitivity analysis. The central claim of the abstract is therefore unsupported in the submitted artifact. This must be corrected before any scientific review can proceed.
  2. [Abstract] The sentence "The estimated risk level is then applied to adjust the projected design storm accordingly" is the load-bearing link between risk assessment and engineering design, but gives no functional form, calibration, or validation. The adjustment could be a multiplicative factor, a return-period shift, or an expert override. No drainage model, historical failure data, or derived physical relationship is cited in the abstract. If the missing full text supplies this, it must be inspected; as submitted, the mapping is arbitrary.
  3. [Abstract] The "weighting scheme based on a sensitivity analysis of the criteria" is described as providing "flexibility in assigning relative importance." Without seeing the sensitivity analysis, equations, and validation, the weights are free parameters. There is no evidence that the weights are physically tied to design-storm magnitudes. This is a load-bearing gap because the risk level—and hence the design-storm adjustment—depends on these weights.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] 'General Circulation Models' is a dated term; CMIP6 models are typically called global climate models or Earth system models. Also, the abbreviation 'GCM' should be defined at first use.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'The findings signify the necessity' is a policy conclusion that cannot be supported by the abstract alone; the manuscript should state a specific quantitative result.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'province-wide and site-specific applications across Ontario's road network' but gives no maps, case-study locations, or result highlights. The full text (when supplied) should make the demonstration traceable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable from available abstract; supplied full text is a different manuscript and prevents deeper verification.

full rationale

The supplied full text (arXiv:2508.10176) is a fuzzy dark matter paper, not the target drainage-infrastructure manuscript (arXiv:2508.10183). The only available target text is the abstract. The abstract describes a risk level defined as a function of hazard and vulnerability, a weighting scheme based on sensitivity analysis, and an estimated risk level that is 'applied to adjust the projected design storm accordingly.' However, it provides no equations or quantitative mapping. Under the hard rules, circularity may be flagged only when a specific reduction can be quoted (e.g., Eq. X equals Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction). The abstract's wording does not demonstrate that the risk-level weighting is equivalent to the design-storm adjustment by definition, nor that the CMIP6 downscaling is fitted to the output design storm, nor that any self-citation supplies the load-bearing premise. The unstated risk-to-storm mapping is a validation/arbitrariness concern, not a demonstrable circular step. Therefore, from the evidence available, the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Everything the adjusted design storm rests on that the abstract does not independently establish: (1) the fidelity of statistically downscaled CMIP6 projections for extreme precipitation, (2) the decomposition of risk into hazard and vulnerability with a combination rule, and (3) the weighting scheme and risk-to-storm mapping, which are free modeling choices. No invented physical entities are needed; the only invented construct is the composite risk score itself.

free parameters (2)
  • Hazard and vulnerability criterion weights = not reported in abstract
    The abstract states a weighting scheme based on sensitivity analysis with 'flexibility in assigning relative importance to each factor'; the specific weights are free parameters that determine the risk level and hence the storm adjustment.
  • Risk-to-design-storm adjustment mapping = not reported in abstract
    The risk level is 'applied to adjust the projected design storm', but the functional form and coefficients of this mapping are unspecified; any such mapping is a free parameter unless derived externally.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Statistically downscaled CMIP6 GCM projections are reliable predictors of future extreme precipitation for Ontario
    The entire adjustment pipeline feeds on these projections; the abstract offers no bias assessment or uncertainty quantification.
  • domain assumption Nonstationarity of extremes requires scenario-based adjustment rather than purely historical design storm estimation
    Abstract premise motivating the framework; reasonable but unproven within the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Risk can be decomposed into a scalar function of hazard (physiographic plus meteorological) and vulnerability (socioeconomic, transportation, environmental)
    This decomposition and its combination rule are introduced by the paper; no evidence in the abstract that it has independent validation.
invented entities (1)
  • Composite risk level combining hazard and vulnerability scores
    purpose: Single scalar used to scale the projected design storm
    The abstract defines a scalar 'risk level' as a function of hazard and vulnerability and applies it to scale the design storm. This composite score is introduced by the paper as a decision variable; the abstract provides no validation against observed drainage performance, historical failures, or independent benchmarks, so the entity carries no independent evidentiary handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Risk-based framework to determine climate-informed design storms for road drainage infrastructure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZT6OI7N3

@misc{pith2026250810183,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Risk-based framework to determine climate-informed design storms for road drainage infrastructure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZT6OI7N3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10183}
}
read the original abstract

Climate change is amplifying extreme precipitation events in many regions and imposes substantial challenges for the resilience of road drainage infrastructure. Conventional design storm methodologies, which rely on historical trends of rainfall data under a stationarity assumption, may not adequately account for future climate variability. This study introduces a risk-based framework for determining climate-informed design storms tailored to road drainage systems. The proposed framework integrates climate model projections with risk assessment to quantify the potential impacts of future extreme rainfall on drainage performance and adjust the future design storm, with a focus on the province of Ontario, Canada. Projected precipitation changes for mid- and late-century time horizons are quantified using statistically downscaled CMIP6 General Circulation Models. The risk level is defined as a function of hazard and vulnerability, where hazard combines both physiographic and meteorological factors. Vulnerability is comprised of socioeconomic, transportation, and environmental considerations. To systematically integrate these components, a weighting scheme is developed based on a sensitivity analysis of the criteria, which provides flexibility in assigning relative importance to each factor. The estimated risk level is then applied to adjust the projected design storm accordingly. The proposed workflow is demonstrated through both province-wide and site-specific applications across Ontario's road network to better highlight its scalability and adaptability. The findings signify the necessity of shifting from static, stationarity-based design methodologies to dynamic, risk-informed approaches that enhance the long-term resilience of transportation networks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Small-Scale Chal- lenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- trophys. 55, 343 (2017), arXiv:1707.04256 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    D. H. Weinberg, J. S. Bullock, F. Governato, R. Kuzio de Naray, and A. H. G. Peter, Cold dark matter: Con- troversies on small scales, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 112, 12249 (2015), arXiv:1306.0913 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Fluid Dark Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 534, L127 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0002495 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    Goodman, Repulsive dark matter, New Astron

    J. Goodman, Repulsive dark matter, New Astron. 5, 103 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003018 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Par- ticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0003365 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    L. A. Boyle, R. R. Caldwell, and M. Kamionkowski, Spintessence! New models for dark matter and dark energy, Physics Letters B 545, 17 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0105318 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    B. Li, T. Rindler-Daller, and P. R. Shapiro, Cosmological constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89, 083536 (2014), arXiv:1310.6061 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Phys. Rep. 643, 1 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ul- tralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043541 (2017), arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Schive, T

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst, Cosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave, Nature Physics 10, 496 (2014), arXiv:1406.6586 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Schive, M.-H

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chi- ueh, T. Broadhurst, and W. Y. P. Hwang, Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Mat- ter from 3D Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261302 (2014), arXiv:1407.7762 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Annu

    L. Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys. 59, 247 (2021), arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D. J. E. Marsh, and P. G. Ferreira, A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data, Phys. Rev. D 91, 103512 (2015), arXiv:2412.15192 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Q. Yang, B. Li, and P. R. Shapiro, Hydrodynam- ics of ultralight complex scalar field dark matter and its impact on the growth of structure, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 68, 280409 (2025), arXiv:2503.16773 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    M. I. Khlopov, B. A. Malomed, and I. B. Zeldovich, Grav- itational instability of scalar fields and formation of pri- mordial black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 215, 575 (1985)

    1985

  9. [17]

    Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self- gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions

    P.-H. Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self- gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions. I. Analytical results, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043531 (2011), arXiv:1103.2050 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Rindler-Daller and P

    T. Rindler-Daller and P. R. Shapiro, Angular momen- tum and vortex formation in Bose-Einstein-condensed cold dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 135 (2012), arXiv:1106.1256 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Schive, T

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, and K.- W. Huang, Contrasting Galaxy Formation from Quan- tum Wave Dark Matter, ψDM, with ΛCDM, using Planck and Hubble Data, Astrophys. J. 818, 89 (2016), arXiv:1508.04621 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    May and V

    S. May and V. Springel, Structure formation in large- volume cosmological simulations of fuzzy dark matter: impact of the non-linear dynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, 2603 (2021), arXiv:2101.01828 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    May and V

    S. May and V. Springel, The halo mass function and fila- ments in full cosmological simulations with fuzzy dark matter, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 4256 (2023), arXiv:2209.14886 [astro-ph.CO]. 13

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lidz and L

    A. Lidz and L. Hui, Implications of a prereionization 21- cm absorption signal for fuzzy dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023011 (2018), arXiv:1805.01253 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Boylan-Kolchin, Stress testing ΛCDM with high- redshift galaxy candidates, Nature Astronomy 7, 731 (2023), arXiv:2208.01611 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, Stress testing ΛCDM with high- redshift galaxy candidates, Nature Astronomy 7, 731 (2023), arXiv:2208.01611 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. R. Furlanetto, S. P. Oh, and F. H. Briggs, Cos- mology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe, Phys. Rep. 433, 181 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608032 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Y. Mao, M. Tegmark, M. McQuinn, M. Zaldarriaga, and O. Zahn, How accurately can 21cm tomography constrain cosmology?, Phys. Rev. D 78, 023529 (2008), arXiv:0802.1710 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. R. Pritchard and A. Loeb, 21 cm cosmology in the 21st century, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 086901 (2012), arXiv:1109.6012 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Barkana, The rise of the first stars: Supersonic stream- ing, radiative feedback, and 21-cm cosmology, Phys

    R. Barkana, The rise of the first stars: Supersonic stream- ing, radiative feedback, and 21-cm cosmology, Phys. Rep. 645, 1 (2016), arXiv:1605.04357 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Nebrin, R

    O. Nebrin, R. Ghara, and G. Mellema, Fuzzy dark matter at cosmic dawn: new 21-cm constraints, J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys. 2019, 051 (2019), arXiv:1812.09760 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jones, S

    D. Jones, S. Palatnick, R. Chen, A. Beane, and A. Lidz, Fuzzy Dark Matter and the 21 cm Power Spectrum, Astrophys. J. 913, 7 (2021), arXiv:2101.07177 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sarkar, J

    D. Sarkar, J. Flitter, and E. D. Kovetz, Exploring de- laying and heating effects on the 21-cm signature of fuzzy dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103529 (2022), arXiv:2201.03355 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Flitter and E

    J. Flitter and E. D. Kovetz, Closing the window on fuzzy dark matter with the 21-cm signal, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063504 (2022), arXiv:2207.05083 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. R. DeBoer, A. R. Parsons, J. E. Aguirre, P. Alexan- der, Z. S. Ali, A. P. Beardsley, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bow- man, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, C. Cheng, E. de Lera Acedo, J. S. Dillon, A. Ewall-Wice, G. Fadana, N. Fagnoni, R. Fritz, S. R. Furlanetto, B. Glenden- ning, B. G...

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. S. Dillon and A. R. Parsons, Redundant Array Con- figurations for 21 cm Cosmology, Astrophys. J. 826, 181 (2016), arXiv:1602.06259 [astro-ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    D. J. E. Marsh and J. Silk, A model for halo formation with axion mixed dark matter, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 2652 (2014), arXiv:1307.1705 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Mesinger, S

    A. Mesinger, S. Furlanetto, and R. Cen, 21CMF AST: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21- cm signal, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 955 (2011), arXiv:1003.3878 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Greig and A

    B. Greig and A. Mesinger, Simultaneously constraining the astrophysics of reionization and the epoch of heating with 21CMMC, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, 2651 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    J. Park, A. Mesinger, B. Greig, and N. Gillet, Inferring the astrophysics of reionization and cosmic dawn from galaxy luminosity functions and the 21-cm signal, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 933 (2019), arXiv:1809.08995 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Qin, A. Mesinger, S. G. Murray, B. Greig, and C. Mason, The impact of the first galaxies on cosmic dawn and reionization, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 3657 (2022), arXiv:2110.13919 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Mellema, L

    G. Mellema, L. V. E. Koopmans, F. A. Abdalla, G. Bernardi, B. Ciardi, S. Daiboo, A. G. de Bruyn, K. K. Datta, H. Falcke, A. Ferrara, I. T. Iliev, F. Iocco, V. Jeli´ c, H. Jensen, R. Joseph, P. Labroupoulos, A. Meiksin, A. Mesinger, A. R. Offringa, V. N. Pandey, J. R. Pritchard...

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. N. Taylor, and A. F. Heavens, Karhunen- Lo` eve Eigenvalue Problems in Cosmology: How Should We Tackle Large Data Sets?, Astrophys. J. 480, 22 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9603021 [astro-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Madau, A

    P. Madau, A. Meiksin, and M. J. Rees, 21 Centimeter To- mography of the Intergalactic Medium at High Redshift, Astrophys. J. 475, 429 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9608010 [astro-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Y. Mao, P. R. Shapiro, G. Mellema, I. T. Iliev, J. Koda, and K. Ahn, Redshift-space distortion of the 21-cm back- ground from the epoch of reionization - I. Methodology re-examined, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 926 (2012), arXiv:1104.2094 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    B. Li, J. Tan, and Y. Mao, Linear Polarization of the 21 cm Line from the Epoch of Reionization, Astrophys. J. 918, 14 (2021), arXiv:2101.11543 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Murray, B

    S. Murray, B. Greig, A. Mesinger, J. Mu˜ noz, Y. Qin, J. Park, and C. Watkinson, 21cmF AST v3: A Python- integrated C code for generating 3D realizations of the cosmic 21cm signal., The Journal of Open Source Soft- ware 5, 2582 (2020), arXiv:2010.15121 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Con- densation, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 (1974)

    1974

  38. [46]

    J. R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou, and N. Kaiser, Excur- sion Set Mass Functions for Hierarchical Gaussian Fluc- tuations, Astrophys. J. 379, 440 (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Large-scale bias and the peak background split, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 119 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R. K. Sheth, H. J. Mo, and G. Tormen, Ellipsoidal col- lapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/9907024 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Jenkins, C

    A. Jenkins, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White, J. M. Col- berg, S. Cole, A. E. Evrard, H. M. P. Couchman, and N. Yoshida, The mass function of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 321, 372 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0005260 [astro-ph]

    2001

  42. [50]

    H. J. Mo and S. D. M. White, An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 347 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9512127 [astro-ph]. 14

    1996 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cooray and R

    A. Cooray and R. Sheth, Halo models of large scale struc- ture, Phys. Rep. 372, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0206508 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb, In the beginning: the first sources of light and the reionization of the universe, Phys. Rep. 349, 125 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010468 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Bou...

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Gravitational instability: An approxi- mate theory for large density perturbations., Astron. As- trophys. 5, 84 (1970)

    1970

  47. [55]

    I. D. McGreer, A. Mesinger, and V. D’Odorico, Model- independent evidence in favour of an end to reionization by z ≈ 6, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 499 (2015), arXiv:1411.5375 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    X. Jin, J. Yang, X. Fan, F. Wang, E. Ba˜ nados, F. Bian, F. B. Davies, A.-C. Eilers, E. P. Farina, J. F. Hennawi, F. Pacucci, B. Venemans, and F. Walter, (Nearly) Model- independent Constraints on the Neutral Hydrogen Frac- tion in the Intergalactic Medium at z 5-7 Using Dark ...

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Ouchi, K

    M. Ouchi, K. Shimasaku, H. Furusawa, T. Saito, M. Yoshida, M. Akiyama, Y. Ono, T. Yamada, K. Ota, N. Kashikawa, M. Iye, T. Kodama, S. Okamura, C. Simp- son, and M. Yoshida, Statistics of 207 Ly α Emitters at a Redshift Near 7: Constraints on Reionization and Galaxy Formation M...

    2010 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A. M. Morales, C. A. Mason, S. Bruton, M. Gronke, F. Haardt, and C. Scarlata, The Evolution of the Lyman- alpha Luminosity Function during Reionization, As- trophys. J. 919, 120 (2021), arXiv:2101.01205 [astro- ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    C. A. Mason, T. Treu, M. Dijkstra, A. Mesinger, M. Trenti, L. Pentericci, S. de Barros, and E. Vanzella, The Universe Is Reionizing at z ∼ 7: Bayesian Inference of the IGM Neutral Fraction Using Ly α Emission from Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 856, 2 (2018), arXiv:1709.05356 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A. Hoag, M. Bradaˇ c, K. Huang, C. Mason, T. Treu, K. B. Schmidt, M. Trenti, V. Strait, B. C. Lemaux, E. Q. Finney, and M. Paddock, Constraining the Neutral Frac- tion of Hydrogen in the IGM at Redshift 7.5, Astrophys. J. 878, 12 (2019), arXiv:1901.09001 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    C. A. Mason, A. Fontana, T. Treu, K. B. Schmidt, A. Hoag, L. Abramson, R. Amorin, M. Bradaˇ c, L. Guaita, T. Jones, A. Henry, M. A. Malkan, L. Pen- tericci, M. Trenti, and E. Vanzella, Inferences on the timeline of reionization at z ∼ 8 from the KMOS Lens- Amplified Spectrosco...

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Greig, A

    B. Greig, A. Mesinger, F. B. Davies, F. Wang, J. Yang, and J. F. Hennawi, IGM damping wing constraints on reionization from covariance reconstruction of two z & 7 QSOs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 512, 5390 (2022), arXiv:2112.04091 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Greig, A

    B. Greig, A. Mesinger, E. Ba˜ nados, G. D. Becker, S. E. I. Bosman, H. Chen, F. B. Davies, V. D’Odorico, A. C. Eilers, S. Gallerani, M. G. Haehnelt, L. Keating, S. Lai, Y. Qin, E. Ryan-Weber, S. Satyavolu, F. Wang, J. Yang, and Y. Zhu, IGM damping wing constraints on the tail ...

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Spina, S

    B. Spina, S. E. I. Bosman, F. B. Davies, P. Gaikwad, and Y. Zhu, Damping wings in the Lyman- α forest: A model-independent measurement of the neutral fraction at 5 .4 < z <6.1, Astron. Astrophys. 688, L26 (2024), arXiv:2405.12273 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    S. A. Wouthuysen, On the excitation mechanism of the 21-cm (radio-frequency) interstellar hydrogen emission line., Astron. J. 57, 31 (1952)

    1952

  58. [66]

    G. B. Field, Excitation of the Hydrogen 21-CM Line, Proceedings of the IRE 46, 240 (1958)

    1958

  59. [67]

    A. Lidz, O. Zahn, M. McQuinn, M. Zaldarriaga, and L. Hernquist, Detecting the Rise and Fall of 21 cm Fluc- tuations with the Murchison Widefield Array, Astrophys. J. 680, 962 (2008), arXiv:0711.4373 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Mesinger, A

    A. Mesinger, A. Ferrara, and D. S. Spiegel, Signatures of X-rays in the early Universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 15 431, 621 (2013), arXiv:1210.7319 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    We do not consider molecular cooling in this work

  62. [70]

    Sokolowski, S

    M. Sokolowski, S. J. Tingay, D. B. Davidson, R. B. Wayth, D. Ung, J. Broderick, B. Juswardy, M. Kovaleva, G. Macario, G. Pupillo, and A. Sutinjo, What is the SKA- Low sensitivity for your favourite radio source?, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 39, e015 (2022), arXiv:2204.05873 [a...

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Square Kilometre Array Cosmology Science Working Group, D. J. Bacon, R. A. Battye, P. Bull, S. Camera, P. G. Ferreira, I. Harrison, D. Parkinson, A. Pourtsi- dou, M. G. Santos, L. Wolz, F. Abdalla, Y. Akrami, D. Alonso, S. Andrianomena, M. Ballardini, J. L. Bernal, D. Bertacca...

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    J. C. Pober, A. R. Parsons, D. R. DeBoer, P. McDon- ald, M. McQuinn, J. E. Aguirre, Z. Ali, R. F. Bradley, T.-C. Chang, and M. F. Morales, The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Broadband and Broad-beam Array: Design Overview and Sensitivity Forecasts, Astron. J. 145, 65 (2013), arXi...

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    J. C. Pober, A. Liu, J. S. Dillon, J. E. Aguirre, J. D. Bowman, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. R. DeBoer, J. N. Hewitt, D. C. Jacobs, M. McQuinn, M. F. Morales, A. R. Parsons, M. Tegmark, and D. J. Werthimer, What Next-generation 21 cm Power Spectrum Measurements can Teach u...

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Ewall-Wice, J

    A. Ewall-Wice, J. Hewitt, A. Mesinger, J. S. Dillon, A. Liu, and J. Pober, Constraining high-redshift X-ray sources with next generation 21-cm power spectrum mea- surements, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 2710 (2016), arXiv:1511.04101 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Liu and J

    A. Liu and J. R. Shaw, Data Analysis for Precision 21 cm Cosmology, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 132, 062001 (2020), arXiv:1907.08211 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Parsons, J

    A. Parsons, J. Pober, M. McQuinn, D. Jacobs, and J. Aguirre, A Sensitivity and Array-configuration Study for Measuring the Power Spectrum of 21 cm Emis- sion from Reionization, Astrophys. J. 753, 81 (2012), arXiv:1103.2135 [astro-ph.IM]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    A. R. Parsons, A. Liu, J. E. Aguirre, Z. S. Ali, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, D. R. DeBoer, M. R. Dexter, N. E. Gugliucci, D. C. Jacobs, P. Klima, D. H. E. MacMahon, J. R. Manley, D. F. Moore, J. C. Pober, I. I. Stefan, and W. P. Walbrugh, New Limits on 21 cm Epoch of Reioniz...

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    M. F. Morales, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan, and A. Beardsley, Four Fundamental Foreground Power Spectrum Shapes for 21 cm Cosmology Observations, Astrophys. J. 752, 137 (2012), arXiv:1202.3830 [astro-ph.IM]

    2012 arXiv

  71. [79]

    J. R. Pritchard and A. Loeb, Constraining the unex- plored period between the dark ages and reionization with observations of the global 21 cm signal, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023006 (2010), arXiv:1005.4057 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Liu and A

    A. Liu and A. R. Parsons, Constraining cosmology and ionization history with combined 21 cm power spectrum and global signal measurements, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 1864 (2016), arXiv:1510.08815 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.