Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 88 references

NoRe: Augmenting Journaling Experience with Generative AI for Music Creation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that journal-based AI music generation supports emotional reflection and vivid reminiscence, based on a seven-day in-the-wild study of the NoRe system.

desk verdict A genuinely new artifact and a useful design-study package, but the central benefit claim rests on a single-arm deployment with self-report items that essentially invite participants to credit the system. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01395 v1 pith:ZXK7JNVN submitted 2025-06-02 cs.HC

Joonyoung Park , Hyewon Cho , Hyehyun Chu , Yeeun Lee , Hajin Lim This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords JournalingdiarywritinggenerativeAImusicself-reflectionpersonalizedemotionalregulationreminiscencein-the-wildstudy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that adding AI-generated music to the act of journaling can make the reflective practice more emotionally engaging and more memorable. To test this, the authors built NoRe, a web application that converts a journal entry into a song description, then into two candidate music tracks, and ran a seven-day in-the-wild study with fifteen regular journal writers. Participants reported that the generated music reflected their entries well (average 5.50/7) and that listening to it helped them relive the day, regulate emotions, and understand themselves. The authors argue that journal-based music generation is a viable extension of journaling rather than a replacement, and they derive design implications for balancing AI autonomy with user control. If the findings hold, generative AI could add a multisensory, personalised channel to everyday self-reflection.

What carries the argument

NoRe, a web-based journaling system whose two-stage pipeline turns written entries into personalised music. An LLM first transforms the journal text—together with the user's chosen emotion-regulation strategy (maintain, amplify, or moderate) and lyric preference—into a song description; a generative music model then produces two candidate tracks from that description. The pipeline's design builds on the finding that an 'autonomous' prompt, which lets the LLM freely interpret the entry rather than forcing predefined emotion-to-music rules, yielded the most reflective music in the formative study. The machinery also includes an archive that links each entry to its song, enabling later revisiting.

What would settle it

Run a controlled experiment with three arms—NoRe, journaling alone, and journaling while listening to researcher-selected music—measuring daily emotional reflection and memory vividness over the same seven-day period. If the NoRe arm does not outperform both controls on these measures, the paper's claim that journal-based music generation supports emotional reflection and vivid reminiscence is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that music generated from a person's own journal entry can support emotional reflection and evoke vivid reminiscence of daily experiences. In the seven-day deployment (N=15, 50 entries), participants rated the journal-to-music reflectiveness at 5.50/7 and satisfaction at 5.52/7, and the strongest reported benefit was reminiscence (6.08/7). Interviews echo this: participants described the songs as a 'mirror' of themselves and as a way to 'quickly revisit how I felt on a specific day.' The paper also claims that users valued the AI's creative autonomy—an 'autonomous' prompt that freely interpreted the entry was rated more reflective than rule-based emotion-to-music mappings—but they also wanted lightweight controls such as choosing an emotional direction (maintain, amplify, moderate) and deciding whether to include lyrics. The paper concludes that journal-based AI music is best designed as a scaffolded, guided co-creation experience rather than a fully automated or fully user-controlled one.

Load-bearing premise

The benefits were measured only by asking participants who all used the full NoRe system, with no comparison condition; therefore the study cannot distinguish the effect of journal-based AI music from the effect of journaling more attentively, the novelty of AI-generated audio, or the desire to report a positive experience.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Journaling systems can add an auditory layer without disrupting existing writing habits: usability was rated 6.32/7 and participants said NoRe felt similar to their usual routine.
  • Designing for emotion-regulation goals matters: users chose 'amplify' mainly for pleasant entries (52.9%) and 'moderate' most often for unpleasant ones (36.4%).
  • Lightweight post-generation control improves outcomes: entries whose song descriptions were tweaked scored higher on reflectiveness and satisfaction than untweaked ones.
  • Archiving journal–music pairs could extend the reflective value of journaling over time, since participants reported that replaying the music vividly brought back the original day.
  • AI autonomy and user agency should be balanced: the highest-rated prompt in the formative study was the fully autonomous one, yet no participant wanted to write a song description from scratch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A longer deployment could test whether the vivid reminiscence effect strengthens or fades with repeated listening; if it strengthens, journal-based AI music might be used in life-review or reminiscence therapy.
  • The pattern of strategy choices (maintain for mixed, moderate for negative, amplify for positive) suggests users implicitly follow a mood-repair logic; a future study could measure actual affect before and after listening to test whether the music changes mood, not just self-perception.
  • The formative study found that music from unpleasant-emotion entries was rated significantly less reflective than music from pleasant ones; this asymmetry may reflect a bias in either the LLM's description, the music model, or the difficulty of sonifying negative affect, and could be probed with a wider range of negative-emotion prompts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper describes the design and evaluation of NoRe, a web application that augments journaling by converting journal entries into AI-generated music. The work is organized in two phases: a formative study with 15 regular journal writers to derive design requirements for journal-based AI music generation, and a seven-day in-the-wild deployment with 15 participants (including six who had taken part in the formative study) to investigate perceived reflectiveness, emotional benefits, and user behavior. The authors report that participants perceived high reflectiveness and satisfaction with the generated music, and that self-reported reminiscence, emotional regulation, and self-understanding were positively rated. The paper also offers design implications for balancing user agency and AI autonomy in journal-based music systems. The manuscript is clearly written and the system description is thorough, but the strength of the empirical claims is limited by the single-arm design and by statistical issues in the quantitative analyses.

Significance. If the results are viewed as descriptive evidence of user perception, the paper makes a useful contribution to the DIS community: it demonstrates a novel integration of journaling with generative music in a real-world setting, and the formative study offers design requirements that may inform future systems. The qualitative interview data are rich and provide plausible accounts of how journal-based music can support reflection, reminiscence, and emotional regulation. However, the paper's central claim that journal-based music generation 'could support emotional reflection and provide vivid reminiscence' is not backed by a design that can identify the music component as the cause of the reported benefits. The quantitative analyses also rely on questionable statistical assumptions, particularly the treatment of non-independent journal-entry pairs as independent observations and the use of chi-square tests with very small expected counts. The paper's value depends on re-framing the claims to match the evidence, or on substantially stronger study designs.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1.2, §7.5, Abstract] The single-arm, no-baseline deployment cannot support the abstract's claim that 'journal-based music generation could support emotional reflection and provide vivid reminiscence.' The daily survey items Q6-Q8 ask whether 'Today's use of the NoRe helped me...' which directly solicits favorable attribution to the system and invites acquiescence and demand characteristics. The limitations section (§7.5) correctly states that the findings are 'descriptive and correlational,' but the abstract and conclusion do not carry that caveat. Please reframe the central claims throughout as evidence of perceived or self-reported benefits rather than as findings about the effects of the music augmentation.
  2. [§6.2.1, Table 4] The Mann-Whitney U tests comparing reflectiveness and satisfaction between tweaked and non-tweaked song descriptions treat the 50 journal-entry pairs as independent observations drawn from 15 participants. Because entries are nested within participants, the observations are not independent, which inflates the test statistics and p-values. A mixed-effects model with a random intercept for participant, or an analysis on participant-level aggregates, is needed to establish whether the association between prompt modification and higher scores is robust. Please also report effect sizes and confidence intervals.
  3. [§6.2.2, §6.2.3, Tables 5 and 6] The chi-square tests for the association between journal sentiment and emotion-regulation strategy (Table 5: χ²=17.8, df=6) and between sentiment and lyrics inclusion (Table 6: χ²=8.42, df=3) are applied to small samples with several expected counts below 5, including zero counts in the neutral-amplify and mixed-amplify cells. In addition, the 50 entries are not independent because they come from only 15 participants. The resulting p-values are unreliable. Please use Fisher's exact test or a permutation-based approach that accounts for participant-level clustering, and disclose expected counts or provide diagnostic checks.
  4. [§5.2] Six of the 15 in-the-wild participants had previously taken part in the formative study (§3) and were therefore familiar with the research hypotheses, the prompting strategies, and the design rationale behind NoRe. This participant overlap is reported in §5.2 but is not acknowledged as a threat to validity in the limitations section (§7.5). These participants may have responded differently than naive users, either because of prior exposure to the underlying concepts or because of motivation to confirm the research goals. Please add a discussion of this overlap and its potential impact on both the quantitative ratings and the interview themes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§6.2] The text refers to 'the usability item (Q8)' and reports a mean of 6.32, but in §5.1.2 the usability question is Q5, while Q8 is the self-understanding item. This inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [§6.2 and §6.2.1] There is a numeric inconsistency: §6.2 states that '46.7% of participants (7 out of 15) modified at least one prompt during the study period,' whereas §6.2.1 states 'A total of 8 out of 15 participants modified the song description at least once.' Please verify the counts.
  3. [§6.2.3] The quote attributed to P1 about 'quiet hope' and 'full of hope' appears twice in the same subsection, once in the sentence beginning 'P1 described how lyrics elevated the tone' and again a few lines later. The duplicate should be removed.
  4. [§3.5 and §6.2.2] Mann-Whitney U tests are used in the formative study (e.g., comparing reflectiveness for pleasant vs. unpleasant entries) on repeated measures within the same participants, but the analysis treats these as independent observations. This concern also applies to the formative study comparisons and should at least be mentioned in the analysis section.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Quantitative benefit ratings are agreement with items that already assert NoRe's benefit, making part of the central claim self-referential; no fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

  1. self definitional [Section 5.1.2 (survey items) and Section 6.3 (Perceived Benefits of NoRe)]
    "Q6 (Reminiscence): “Today’s use of the NoRe helped me remember the day’s events” ... Q7 ... “Today’s use of the NoRe aided in regulating my emotions” ... Q8 ... “While using the NoRe today, I gained a deeper understanding of myself and my emotions” ... participants reported high levels of reminiscence (M = 6.08, SD = 1.07), emotional regulation (M = 5.56, SD = 1.40), and deeper self-understanding (M = 5.36, SD = 1.40)."

    The outcome variables for the paper's central claim are defined as respondents' agreement with sentences that already assert both the benefit and its attribution to NoRe ('NoRe helped me...'). Reporting the mean agreement as evidence that 'journal-based music generation could support emotional reflection and provide vivid reminiscence' restates the item wording rather than independently testing it. Since the deployment had no journaling-only or music-free control condition (conceded in §7.5), these scores conflate the act of journaling, the novelty of the AI system, and demand characteristics with the music augmentation. The qualitative interviews and system logs provide non-circular evidence, which is why the circularity is partial.

full rationale

This is an empirical design study, not a formal derivation, and most of its chain (formative findings -> design requirements -> NoRe implementation -> seven-day evaluation) is a normal design-iteration loop. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the references to MindfulDiary/DiaryMate are external, not self-citations. The one concrete reduction is the Q6-Q8 measurement: the quantitative 'emotional benefits' are endorsements of statements that already contain the conclusion, so those means cannot bear the weight of the abstract's causal-sounding claim. The paper itself flags this in §7.5 ('all statistical findings are descriptive and correlational'). The fact that six evaluation participants also took part in the formative study (§5.2) is a real contamination risk, and the single-arm design is a serious internal-validity limitation, but these are threats to validity rather than definitional circularity; they are weighed here only as context. Because the interviews, behavioral logs, and nine new participants supply information not contained in the survey items, the central claim retains independent content, so the paper is not wholly circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical HCI study, so the ledger contains no mathematical free parameters or invented physical entities. The load-bearing assumptions are measurement validity, the adopted emotion-music mapping, and qualitative analysis conventions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Self-reported Likert ratings validly measure reflectiveness, emotional regulation, reminiscence, and self-understanding.
    All quantitative outcomes are self-reports; no objective or physiological measures are used, and the scales were constructed for this study without validation against external instruments.
  • domain assumption The Meyers mapping from Russell's circumplex emotion model to musical features is a valid basis for translating journal emotions into music.
    Adopted from Meyers (2007); the formative prompt design relies on this mapping (Table 1, Table 2).
  • domain assumption Thematic analysis of interview transcripts yields faithful representations of participant experience.
    Standard qualitative assumption; codes were developed by the research team and not externally audited.
  • domain assumption Participants' journal entries and corresponding Suno-generated music were produced under comparable conditions across days.
    The study assumes the proprietary GPT-4o and Suno pipelines behave consistently; authors acknowledge model dependence (Section 7.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NoRe: Augmenting Journaling Experience with Generative AI for Music Creation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXK7JNVN

@misc{pith2026250601395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NoRe: Augmenting Journaling Experience with Generative AI for Music Creation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXK7JNVN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01395}
}
read the original abstract

Journaling has long been recognized for fostering emotional awareness and self-reflection, and recent advancements in generative AI offer new opportunities to create personalized music that can enhance these practices. In this study, we explore how AI-generated music can augment the journaling experience. Through a formative study, we examined journal writers' writing patterns, purposes, emotional regulation strategies, and the design requirements for the system that augments journaling experience by journal-based AI-generated music. Based on these insights, we developed NoRe, a system that transforms journal entries into personalized music using generative AI. In a seven-day in-the-wild study (N=15), we investigated user engagement and perceived emotional effectiveness through system logs, surveys, and interviews. Our findings suggest that journal-based music generation could support emotional reflection and provide vivid reminiscence of daily experiences. Drawing from these findings, we discuss design implications for tailoring music to journal writers' emotional states and preferences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01395 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Research overview. This figure outlines the overall research procedure taken in this study. As a formative study, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two-stage pipeline of creating journal-based AI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of song descriptions generated by four different prompts (right) applied to the same journal entry written [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean reflectiveness scores (1–7 Likert) for music [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NoRe interface. (A) The main text input area for journal writing. (B) Option toggle for lyrics inclusion. (C) Emotional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NoRe archiving interface. (a) Calendar interface showing archived dates with dots. Clicking on it navigates to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahmet Akin and Murat Iskender. 2011. Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress. International online journal of educational sciences 3, 1 (2011), 138–148

    2011

  2. [2]

    Alan, Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D

    Alper T. Alan, Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Joel Fischer, Tom Rodden, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2016. Tariff Agent: Interacting with a Future Smart Energy System at Home. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 23, 4, Article 25 (Aug. 2016), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2943770

    work page doi:10.1145/2943770 2016

  3. [3]

    June Alexander, Margaret McAllister, and Donna Lee Brien. 2016. Exploring the diary as a recovery-oriented therapeutic tool. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 25, 1 (2016), 19–26

    2016

  4. [4]

    Charles Ames and Michael Domino. 1992. Cybernetic composer: an overview. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 186–205

    1992

  5. [5]

    Anithamol Babu and Akhil P. Joseph. 2025. Digital wellness or digital depen- dency? a critical examination of mental health apps and their implications. Fron- tiers in Psychiatry 16 (April 2025), 1581779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025. 1581779

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025 2025

  6. [6]

    Anna N Baglione, Michael Paul Clemens, Juan F Maestre, Aehong Min, Luke Dahl, and Patrick C Shih. 2021. Understanding the technological practices and needs of music therapists. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–25

    2021

  7. [7]

    Adriel Boals. 2012. The use of meaning making in expressive writing: When meaning is beneficial. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 31, 4 (2012), 393–409

    2012

  8. [8]

    Robyn Brandenburg. 2017. Reflective theory and practice in teacher education . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY

    2017

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Michele Brunges and Gail Avigne. 2003. Music therapy for reducing surgical anxiety. AORN journal 78, 5 (2003), 816–819

    2003

  2. [10]

    Francesco Burrai, Wohaib Hasan, Daisy Fancourt, Marco Luppi, and Salvatore Di Somma. 2016. A randomized controlled trial of listening to recorded music for heart failure patients: Study protocol. Holistic nursing practice 30, 2 (2016), 102–115

    2016

  3. [11]

    Auth0 by Okta. 2025. JSON Web Tokens. https://jwt.io/

    2025

  4. [12]

    Moon Fai Chan, Yuet Foon Loretta Chung, Siu Wai Anne Chung, and On Kei An- gela Lee. 2009. Investigating the physiological responses of patients listening to music in the intensive care unit.Journal of clinical nursing 18, 9 (2009), 1250–1257

    2009

  5. [13]

    Miguel Civit, Véronique Drai-Zerbib, David Lizcano, and María José Escalona

  6. [14]

    Terence Cook, Ashlin RK Roy, and Keith M Welker. 2019. Music as an emotion regulation strategy: An examination of genres of music and their roles in emotion regulation. Psychology of Music 47, 1 (2019), 144–154

    2019

  7. [15]

    Adyasha Dash and Kathleen Agres. 2024. Ai-based affective music generation systems: A review of methods and challenges. Comput. Surveys 56, 11 (2024), 1–34

    2024

  8. [16]

    Julian De Freitas, Ahmet Kaan Uğuralp, Zeliha Oğuz-Uğuralp, and Stefano Puntoni. 2024. Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of gen- erative AI. Journal of Consumer Psychology 34, 3 (2024), 481–491. https: //doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1393 DIS ’25, July 5–9, 2025, Fun...

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Rebecca NH De Leeuw, Sophie H Janicke-Bowles, and Qihao Ji. 2022. How music awakens the heart: An experimental study on music, emotions, and connected- ness. Mass Communication and Society 25, 5 (2022), 626–648

    2022

  10. [18]

    SeungHeon Doh, Keunwoo Choi, Jongpil Lee, and Juhan Nam. 2023. LP- MusicCaps: LLM-Based Pseudo Music Captioning. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2307.16372 arXiv:2307.16372 [cs]

    2023 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Renee Donohoe. 1999. The Effect of Student Music Choice on Writing Productiv- ity. (May 1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Eric Drott. 2021. Copyright, compensation, and commons in the music AI industry. Creative Industries Journal 14, 2 (May 2021), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17510694.2020.1839702

    2021

  13. [21]

    Kaja Elise Aaslid Enge and Brynjulf Stige. 2022. Musical pathways to the peer community: A collective case study of refugee children’s use of music therapy. Nordic journal of music therapy 31, 1 (2022), 7–24

    2022

  14. [22]

    Terry Ervin II. 2002. The Effect of Music on Journal Writing Productivity. (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Veronica T Fallon, Samantha Rubenstein, Rebecca Warfield, Hannah Ennerfelt, Brenna Hearn, and Echo Leaver. 2020. Stress reduction from a musical interven- tion. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 30, 1 (2020), 20

    2020

  16. [24]

    Tony Ghaye. 2010. Teaching and Learning through Reflective Practice (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833322

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    Karez Abdulwahhab Hamad and Mehmet Kaya. 2016. A Detailed Analysis of Optical Character Recognition Technology.International Journal of Applied Math- ematics, Electronics and Computers 4 (2016), 244–249. https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:63844557

    2016

  18. [26]

    Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Un- derstanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.03300 arXiv:2009.03300 [cs] version: 3

    2021 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Lejaren Arthur Hiller and Leonard M Isaacson. 1979. Experimental Music; Com- position with an electronic computer . Greenwood Publishing Group Inc

    1979

  20. [28]

    Yurui Hou. 2022. AI Music Therapist: A Study on Generating Specific Therapeutic Music based on Deep Generative Adversarial Network Approach. In2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI). IEEE, 1277–1281

    2022

  21. [29]

    Ke Nicole Hu. 2021. The Effects of Mood, Language, and Order of Songs on Writing Productivity. IJPS 13, 1 (Jan. 2021), 12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps. v13n1p12

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    MongoDB Inc. 2024. MongoDB: The Developer Data Platform. https://www. mongodb.com/ko-kr

    2024

  23. [31]

    Vercel Inc. 2025. Next.js by Vercel - The React Framework. https://nextjs.org/

    2025

  24. [32]

    Vercel Inc. 2025. Vercel: Build and deploy the best web experiences with the Frontend Cloud. https://vercel.com/home

    2025

  25. [33]

    Kori Inkpen, Stevie Chancellor, Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Veale, and Eric P. S. Baumer. 2019. Where is the Human? Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19) ...

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Sabine Jacques and Mathew Flynn. 2024. Protecting Human Creativity in AI- Generated Music with the Introduction of an AI-Royalty Fund.GRUR International 73, 12 (Oct. 2024), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae134

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Jin-Wan Park Jung-Bin Lee, Min-Jin Kim. 2024. Implementation of a Personalized Music Content Creation Platform Utilizing Emotion Recognition Technology and Generative AI. Journal of The Korean Society for Computer Game 37 (2024), 27–37. Issue 3. https://db.koreascholar.com/Art...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Patrik N Juslin and Daniel Västfjäll. 2008. Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 31, 5 (2008), 559–575

    2008

  29. [37]

    Emily A Kerner and Marilyn R Fitzpatrick. 2007. Integrating writing into psy- chotherapy practice: A matrix of change processes and structural dimensions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 44, 3 (2007), 333

    2007

  30. [38]

    Taewan Kim, Seolyeong Bae, Hyun Ah Kim, Su-woo Lee, Hwajung Hong, Chanmo Yang, and Young-Ho Kim. 2024. MindfulDiary: Harnessing Large Language Model to Support Psychiatric Patients’ Journaling. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–20. ...

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Taewan Kim, Donghoon Shin, Young-Ho Kim, and Hwajung Hong. 2024. Di- aryMate: Understanding User Perceptions and Experience in Human-AI Col- laboration for Personal Journaling. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1...

    2024

  32. [40]

    David Allen Kolb and Ronald Eugene Fry. 1974. Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. MIT Alfred P. Sloan School of Management

    1974

  33. [41]

    Fred Korthagen and Angelo Vasalos. 2005. Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching 11, 1 (Feb. 2005), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093

    2005 doi

  34. [42]

    Silke Kruse-Weber, Andrea Schiavio, Erik M Kirchgäßner, and Elizabeth Bucura

  35. [43]

    Tinea Larsson, Jose Font, and Alberto Alvarez. 2022. Towards AI as a creative colleague in game level design. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment , Vol. 18. 137–145

    2022

  36. [44]

    Reineke Lengelle, Tom Luken, and Frans Meijers. 2016. Is self-reflection dan- gerous? Preventing rumination in career learning. Australian Journal of Career Development 25, 3 (2016), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416216670675

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    Matthew D Lieberman, Naomi I Eisenberger, Molly J Crockett, Sabrina M Tom, Jennifer H Pfeifer, and Baldwin M Way. 2007. Putting feelings into words. Psy- chological science 18, 5 (2007), 421–428

    2007

  38. [46]

    PRAGYA SINGH LODHI, DEEPAK SINGH, and GUNJAN SHARMA. 2018. Impact of Diary Writing Practice on Mental Health of Adolescent Girls. Dev Sanskriti Interdisciplinary International Journal 12 (2018), 56–62

    2018

  39. [47]

    Mehrdad Rahsepar Meadi, Tomas Sillekens, Suzanne Metselaar, Anton van Balkom, Justin Bernstein, and Neeltje Batelaan. 2025. Exploring the Ethical Challenges of Conversational AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Mental Health 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.2196/60432

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Owen Craigie Meyers. 2007. A mood-based music classification and exploration system. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/ handle/1721.1/39337 Accepted: 2007-10-22T17:38:20Z

    2007

  41. [49]

    Kateryna Militsyna. 2023. Human Creative Contribution to AI-Based Output – One Just Can(’t) Get Enough. GRUR International 72, 10 (Aug. 2023), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad075

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Caterina Moruzzi and Solange Margarido. 2024. A User-centered Framework for Human-AI Co-creativity. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’24) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Arti...

    2024

  43. [51]

    Raffaella Negretti. 2012. Metacognition in student academic writing: A longi- tudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication 29, 2 (2012), 142–179

    2012

  44. [52]

    Heinz, Ashmita Kunwar, Eunsol Soul Choi, Xuhai Xu, Joanna Kuc, Jeremy F

    Subigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi, Michael V. Heinz, Ashmita Kunwar, Eunsol Soul Choi, Xuhai Xu, Joanna Kuc, Jeremy F. Huckins, Ja- son Holden, Sarah M. Preum, Colin Depp, Nicholas Jacobson, Mary P. Czerwinski, Eric Granholm, and Andrew T. Campbell...

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Yogi Tegar Nugroho and P

    Y. Yogi Tegar Nugroho and P. Paulus Metta Dwi Manggala. 2024. The Use of AI in Creating Music Compositions: A Case Study on Suno Application. In Proceedings of the 7th Celt International Conference (CIC 2024) , Ekawati Marhaenny Dukut, Antonius Suratno, Heny Hartono, Radhika G...

    2024

  46. [54]

    Changhoon Oh, Jungwoo Song, Jinhan Choi, Seonghyeon Kim, Sungwoo Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details: Understand- ing User Experience of Co-Creation with Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors i...

    2018

  47. [55]

    OpenAI. 2024. GPT-4o. https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/

    2024

  48. [56]

    Papinczak, Genevieve A

    Zoe E. Papinczak, Genevieve A. Dingle, Stoyan R. Stoyanov, Leanne Hides, and Oksana Zelenko. 2015. Young people’s uses of music for well-being. Journal of Youth Studies 18, 9 (Oct. 2015), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261. 2015.1020935

    2015

  49. [57]

    Kathleen Patterson. 2011. Handbook of Emotions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS 17, 3 (2011), 566

    2011

  50. [58]

    James W Pennebaker and Sandra K Beall. 1986. Confronting a traumatic event: to- ward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of abnormal psychology 95, 3 (1986), 274

    1986

  51. [59]

    Perron, Hui Luan, Bryan G

    Brian E. Perron, Hui Luan, Bryan G. Victor, Oliver Hiltz-Perron, and Joseph Ryan. 2024. Moving Beyond ChatGPT: Local Large Language Models (LLMs) and the Secure Analysis of Confidential Unstructured Text Data in Social Work Research. Research on Social Work Practice (Sept. 202...

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Mark Reybrouck, Piotr Podlipniak, and David Welch. 2021. Music listening and homeostatic regulation: Surviving and flourishing in a sonic world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 1 (2021), 278

    2021

  53. [61]

    Tara Riddell, Jane Nassif, Ana Hategan, and Joanna Jarecki. 2020. Healthy Habits: Positive Psychology, Journaling, Meditation, and Nature Therapy. In Humanism and Resilience in Residency Training: A Guide to Physician Wellness , Ana Hategan, Karen Saperson, Sheila Harms, and H...

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    Curtis Roads. 1985. Research in music and artificial intelligence. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 17, 2 (1985), 163–190. NoRe: Augmenting Journaling Experience with Generative AI for Music Creation DIS ’25, July 5–9, 2025, Funchal, Portugal

    1985

  55. [63]

    James A. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6 (1980), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association

    1980 doi

  56. [64]

    Suvi Saarikallio and Jaakko Erkkilä. 2007. The role of music in adolescents’ mood regulation. Psychology of music 35, 1 (2007), 88–109

    2007

  57. [65]

    Johnny Saldana. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers . SAGE Publications Ltd

    2021

  58. [66]

    Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1992. Learning complex, extended sequences using the principle of history compression. Neural computation 4, 2 (1992), 234–242

    1992

  59. [67]

    Donald A. Schön. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    1983

  60. [68]

    Peter Shaw, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Ashish Vaswani. 2018. Self-Attention with Relative Position Representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Pape...

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    Joshua M Smyth. 1998. Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 66, 1 (1998), 174

    1998

  62. [70]

    Monika Sohal, Pavneet Singh, Bhupinder Singh Dhillon, and Harbir Singh Gill

  63. [71]

    Eric Stice, Emily Burton, Sarah Kate Bearman, and Paul Rohde. 2007. Random- ized trial of a brief depression prevention program: An elusive search for a psychosocial placebo control condition. Behaviour research and therapy 45, 5 (2007), 863–876

    2007

  64. [72]

    M Suhr, AK Risch, and G Wilz. 2017. Maintaining mental health through positive writing: Effects of a resource diary on depression and emotion regulation.Journal of clinical psychology 73, 12 (2017), 1586–1598

    2017

  65. [73]

    Jingjing Sun, Jingyi Yang, Guyue Zhou, Yucheng Jin, and Jiangtao Gong. 2024. Un- derstanding Human-AI Collaboration in Music Therapy Through Co-Design with Therapists. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21

    2024

  66. [74]

    Suno Inc. 2025. Suno. https://suno.com/. Accessed: 2025-01-19

    2025

  67. [75]

    Thoma, Stefan Ryf, Changiz Mohiyeddini, Ulrike Ehlert, and Urs M

    Myriam V. Thoma, Stefan Ryf, Changiz Mohiyeddini, Ulrike Ehlert, and Urs M. Nater. 2012. Emotion regulation through listening to music in everyday situations. Cognition & Emotion 26, 3 (2012), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931. 2011.595390

    2012

  68. [76]

    Cheryl Travers. 2011. Unveiling a reflective diary methodology for exploring the lived experiences of stress and coping. Journal of Vocational Behavior 79, 1 (2011), 204–216

    2011

  69. [77]

    Philip M Ullrich and Susan K Lutgendorf. 2002. Journaling about stressful events: Effects of cognitive processing and emotional expression. Annals of behavioral medicine 24, 3 (2002), 244–250

    2002

  70. [78]

    Mahima Anna Varghese, Poonam Sharma, and Maitreyee Patwardhan. 2024. Public Perception on Artificial Intelligence–Driven Mental Health Interventions: Survey Research. JMIR Formative Research 8 (2024), e64380

    2024

  71. [79]

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Ł ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. ...

    2017

  72. [80]

    Kathryn Waddington. 2012. Using qualitative diary research to understand emotion at work. In A Day in the Life of a Happy Worker . Psychology Press, 132–149

    2012

  73. [81]

    Da Wang, Shuai Liu, and Xi Wang. 2018. Study on the Impact of Different Music Education on Emotional Regulation of Adolescents Based on EEG Signals. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 18, 5 (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    Meyer, Radhika Juglan, Zunamys I

    Isabella Catharina Wiest, Dyke Ferber, Jiefu Zhu, Marko van Treeck, Sonja K. Meyer, Radhika Juglan, Zunamys I. Carrero, Daniel Paech, Jens Kleesiek, Matthias P. Ebert, Daniel Truhn, and Jakob Nikolas Kather. 2024. Privacy- preserving large language models for structured medica...

    2024 doi

  75. [83]

    Marianne van Woerkom. 2010. Critical Reflection as a Rationalistic Ideal.Adult Ed- ucation Quarterly 60, 4 (2010), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609358446

    2010 doi

  76. [84]

    It’s a Fair Game

    Zhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Bingsheng Yao, Sauvik Das, Ada Lerner, Dakuo Wang, and Tianshi Li. 2024. “It’s a Fair Game”, or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the...

    2024

  77. [189]

    https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-348-1_13 Series Title: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

    doi

  78. [2022]

    10, 1 (2022), e001154

    Efficacy of journaling in the management of mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 10, 1 (2022), e001154. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch- 2021-001154

    2022 doi

  79. [2023]

    Research Studies in Music Education 45, 3 (Oct

    Reflective writing in a community music project with students in higher music education. Research Studies in Music Education 45, 3 (Oct. 2023), 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221107513

    2023 doi

  80. [2024]

    Data in Brief 55 (2024), 110743

    SunoCaps: A novel dataset of text-prompt based AI-generated music with emotion annotations. Data in Brief 55 (2024), 110743

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.