Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 22 references

Symmetric Sliding-Mode Control of Grid-Forming Inverters With Precision Region Under AC and DC Sides Varying

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives an explicit voltage precision region for a symmetric sliding-mode controller of grid-forming inverters, under which AC-side power dynamics and DC-link voltage variation decouple from voltage tracking, and identifies the…

desk verdict Interesting but not sound as written: the precision-region proof rests on an unproven bound and the compensation has a sign error, though the asymmetry diagnosis and experiments are genuinely useful. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11504 v3 pith:ZZUF7NFQ submitted 2025-06-13 eess.SY cs.SY

Qianxi Tang , Li Peng , Xuefeng Wang , Xinchen Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords grid-forminginverterssliding-modecontrolvoltageprecisionregiondc-linkvariationAC-sidecurrentasymmetrycompensationtracking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Grid-forming inverters are the power converters that set voltage and frequency in modern grids, and their voltage-tracking accuracy normally worsens when dc-link voltage or ac-side current changes. This paper proposes a symmetric sliding-mode controller (SSMC) for such inverters and derives a closed-form, time-dependent "voltage precision region" that says exactly when the point-of-common-coupling voltage will track its reference within a bounded error even while the dc link and ac side vary. The paper's central claim is that inside this region the AC-side power dynamics and dc-link variation are decoupled from the voltage-regulation task, turning the inverter into a predictable voltage source with known accuracy limits. It also identifies the 50/60 Hz residual error of ordinary sliding-mode control as an asymmetry of the sliding variable caused by digital delay and computational error, and removes that error with a compensator rather than with extra sliding-surface complexity. If right, this gives a quantitative design and prediction tool for inverter-based power systems, and the experiments show faster, more accurate tracking than conventional grid-forming and sliding-mode baselines under simultaneous AC and DC variation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the voltage precision region, the inequality $$\left|\ddot{u}_d+\frac{u_o}{L_f C_f}+\frac{1}{C_f}\frac{di_o}{dt}\right| \le \frac{v_{dc}}{L_f C_f}-(F+2\eta)-2\$\lambda$(|s(t_0)|-\eta(t-t_0)),$$ valid on $t\in[t_0,t_0+|s(t_0)|/\eta]$. It is obtained from the sliding-mode contraction condition by writing the sliding surface as $s=\dot{\tilde{x}}+\lambda\tilde{x}$, bounding $\dot{\tilde{x}}$ with the triangle inequality, inserting a pointwise bound on $\tilde{x}$ from the reaching inequality, and replacing $|s(t)|$ with its worst-case linear decay. The second load-bearing mechanism is the compensator $x_{\mathrm{comp}}$ defined by $\dot{x}_{\mathrm{comp}}+\lambda x_{\mathrm{comp}}=s_{\mathrm{error}}$, where $s_{\mathrm{error}}$ is the asymmetric component of the sliding variable extracted by a second-order band-pass filter centered at the grid frequency; this restores $(\frac{d}{dt}+\lambda)(x-x_d)=s_{\mathrm{symmetric}}$ and removes the low-frequency tracking bias.

What would settle it

Run the paper's single-phase plant with the Table I parameters from a nonzero initial tracking error, record $|s(t)|$ and $|\tilde{x}(t)|$ throughout the reaching phase, and test whether $|\tilde{x}(t)| \le |s(t)|/\lambda + \eta/\lambda^2$ at every sampled instant. If the tracking error ever exceeds that bound while $s$ is already near zero, the elimination of $\dot{\tilde{x}}$ in Eq. (16) is invalid and the stated precision region is not guaranteed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the voltage tracking capability of a grid-forming inverter under sliding-mode control is characterized by inequality (16): the magnitude of the reference-acceleration plus LC/current terms must stay below $v_{dc}/(L_f C_f) - (F+2\eta) - 2\lambda(|s(t_0)|-\eta(t-t_0))$ during the interval in which the sliding variable decays. This "voltage precision region" is a function of dc-link level, ac-current changing rate, model uncertainty $F$, and the chosen convergence speed $\eta$, so it both predicts the boundary beyond which voltage regulation distorts and quantifies how much dc-voltage variation can be tolerated. The second claim is that the persistent power-line-frequency voltage error seen in conventional sliding-mode inverters is not an unavoidable LC-filter or switching-delay effect but an asymmetry of the sliding variable $s$ produced by the digital decision interval and computational inaccuracy. Decomposing $s$ into a symmetric part and an error term, and compensating the error with a band-pass-filtered feedback path, restores the symmetric sliding motion and eliminates that low-frequency error without changing the sliding surface or reaching law.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is an unproven pointwise bound asserting that the tracking error never exceeds a fixed combination of the sliding variable and the convergence rate; the voltage precision region is derived from that bound, so if the bound is false the region is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Operators can compute a dc-link voltage floor and a maximum ac-current slew rate for a desired voltage accuracy before a disturbance, rather than discovering after the fact that tracking has failed.
  • Within the precision region, synchronization and voltage-inner-loop models no longer need to be coupled, so large-scale grid studies can treat each inverter as a controllable voltage source with a known bounded error.
  • The asymmetry compensation removes the need for repetitive controllers or higher-order sliding surfaces to kill the 50/60 Hz residual, lowering control complexity while keeping microsecond-scale convergence.
  • The explicit dependence of the region on $\lambda$, $\eta$, and $F$ gives a quantitative parameter-tuning rule: each controller gain has a stated effect on precision and convergence speed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the precision region as a condition to test rather than a constraint to enforce; a natural extension is an adaptive controller that grows $\eta$ or shifts the operating point when (16) is about to be violated, actively keeping the inverter inside the region.
  • The same asymmetry idea should transfer to other variable-structure power converters with digital update delays, such as single-phase UPS inverters or active filters, where the same low-frequency bias should appear in the sliding variable.
  • Because the precision region is stated in terms of measured states and known parameters, it could be inverted into a sizing rule: given a required voltage accuracy during worst-case AC and DC transients, choose filter inductance, capacitance, and minimum dc-link voltage accordingly.
  • A skeptical reader would first probe the asserted pointwise bound in Step 3: if it fails, the closed-form region could be conservative or optimistic in unknown directions, so an independent proof or numerical check of that bound is the quickest way to consolidate the claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a symmetric sliding-mode control (SSMC) for grid-forming inverters, derives a so-called voltage precision region intended to bound the PCC voltage tracking error under dc-link voltage and ac-side current variations, and introduces an asymmetry compensator to suppress power-line-frequency tracking error. The claims are supported by simulations and experiments on a laboratory-scale prototype, and the paper advocates the precision region as a quantitative tool for decoupling the inner voltage loop from the outer synchronization loop.

Significance. If the theoretical results were correct, the paper would offer a valuable quantitative design tool for grid-forming inverter voltage control and a low-complexity compensation structure. The experimental results show improved tracking under dc-link and ac-side variations relative to the compared methods, and the practical motivation is well articulated. However, the two central analytical contributions—the precision-region derivation and the asymmetry-compensation identity—are not established as written, so the significance of the paper is not realized in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [II-A, Step 3, Eq. (12)] The bound |tilde x(t)| <= |s(t)|/lambda + eta/lambda^2 is asserted without proof and is not generally valid. The reaching inequality only bounds the decay of s; it does not relate the tracking error to the instantaneous value of s. For example, take lambda=1, eta=1, tilde x(t0)=100, and s(t0)=1. The reaching law permits s(t)=1-(t-t0) for t in [t0,t0+1]; the solution of d(tilde x)/dt = s - lambda*tilde x is then tilde x(t0+1) approximately 37.05 while s(t0+1)=0, violating the bound 0+1=1. The transients studied in the paper (phase jump, voltage drop, dc-link variation) start from nonzero tracking error and do not guarantee the initial condition that a valid bound of this type would require. Since Eqs. (13), (15), and (16) all rely on Eq. (12), the voltage precision region is not established.
  2. [II-B, Eq. (21)] The compensation identity has a sign error. Substituting d(xcomp)/dt + lambda*xcomp = serror into (d/dt+lambda)(x - xd + xcomp) gives ssymmetric + 2*serror, not ssymmetric. Cancellation requires d(xcomp)/dt + lambda*xcomp = -serror. As written, the compensator doubles the asymmetry error rather than removing it, so the proposed asymmetry compensation does not achieve its stated objective.
  3. [II-B, after Eq. (16)] The claimed numerical verification of the precision region is not derived. The text states that 'by (16)' the dc-link voltage must exceed (110+20)*1.414 = 181 V, but no term in (16) is identified with the 20 V margin, and the arithmetic is inconsistent: (110+20)*1.414 is approximately 183.8 V. Without a quantitative link between the threshold and the parameters F, eta, lambda, and s(t0), the statement that the precision region is 'explicitly verified' is unsupported.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Header] The manuscript contains the line 'Post Conference Paper [DELETE THIS LINE FROM YOUR ACCEPTED FINAL SUBMISSION]', which should be removed before submission.
  2. [Author list] Author names contain stray spaces, e.g., 'Qianxi T ang' and 'Xinchen Y ao', which should be corrected.
  3. [Equation (17)] The word 'hysterisis' is misspelled; it should be 'hysteresis'.
  4. [III, Case 1] The text says the dc-link voltages 150 V and 180 V 'don't satisfy the condition (8)'; this should likely refer to the precision-region inequality (16) or (9), not the switching condition (8).
  5. [References] Reference [14] is listed after reference [15] in the bibliography, so the numbering is out of order.
  6. [II-A, end of Step 5] The sentence 'The simulation is given in this section B to check its effectiveness after the control law is provided' is awkward and should be reworded.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the precision-region derivation is carried out from stated SMC assumptions, and the self-citations are not load-bearing for the central claim.

full rationale

The paper derives the voltage precision region from the standard reaching condition and the definition of the sliding variable: Equations (8)-(9) encode the reachability condition, and Equations (10)-(16) manipulate it algebraically to eliminate the dot-tilde-x term. This is a derivation rather than a restatement of an input; the load-bearing inequality (16) is obtained by substituting a claimed bound on dot-tilde-x, and any problem with that bound is a mathematical-validity issue rather than a circular dependency. The self-citations to [13] and [19] are real but not load-bearing: [13] only supplies the equivalent single-phase model, and [19] is invoked as an equivalence statement after the standard Slotine bound in Equation (4) already supports translating s-bounds into tracking-error bounds; neither citation is what makes Equation (16) true. The 181 V threshold used to illustrate Equation (16) is a numerical evaluation of the derived inequality with the stated parameters and an explicit margin, not a fit of a parameter to the simulation outcome. The main weakness is that Equation (12) is asserted without proof and is not obviously valid, but that affects correctness, not circularity. No step has been found in which an output is identical by construction to an input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard sliding-mode lemmas and on several plant-specific assumptions. The most fragile item is the asserted bound in Step 3 used to eliminate tilde{x}dot; it is neither proved nor cited. The compensator also assumes that a band-pass filter can extract and cancel the asymmetry component without destabilizing the closed loop.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda (sliding surface bandwidth) = 4480 /s
    Chosen via the switching-frequency heuristic and used in the precision region (16) and the sliding-surface filter; the value strongly affects the claimed error bound.
  • eta (convergence speed in reaching law)
    Appears in the precision region and in bound (12), but is not reported in Table I; the paper only states it must be positive.
  • h_s (hysteresis band) = 20000 V/s
    Chosen for the switching stage; it sets the sliding-variable oscillation amplitude and therefore the precision bound.
  • zeta (band-pass filter damping ratio) = 2
    Hand-selected for the asymmetry compensator; the paper notes a larger zeta is better but does not derive the value.
  • 20 V margin in the dc-link threshold = 20 V
    The threshold (110+20)*1.414 = 181 V is used to claim agreement with (16), but the origin of the 20 V margin is not derived from the stated precision-region inequality.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard SMC lemmas: |s(t)| <= Phi implies |tilde{x}| <= Phi/lambda, and finite-time convergence follows from (1/2) d(s^2)/dt <= -eta |s|.
    Invoked in Section II from Slotine and Li [15]; the precision-region derivation assumes these textbook results without restating their hypotheses.
  • domain assumption The three-phase balanced inverter reduces to an equivalent single-phase model, and the other two phases follow the same analysis.
    Stated at the start of Section II; the entire derivation and experiments are built on this equivalent single-phase representation.
  • ad hoc to paper The bound |tilde{x}| <= |s|/lambda + eta/lambda^2 in Step 3 is true.
    Section II-A, Step 3 introduces this inequality with the phrase 'one show' and no proof. The precision region (16) is invalid without it, and the bound is not generally valid for the second-order plant.
  • domain assumption Modeling uncertainty F is zero and the output-current derivative is known or measured in the asymmetry analysis.
    Section II-B states 'the modeling is thought to be accurate, so F = 0' and treats io as measured; the asymmetry argument and Eq. (19) rely on this simplification.
  • domain assumption The asymmetry error serror is a narrowband signal at the grid frequency that can be extracted by a second-order band-pass filter without destabilizing the sliding motion.
    Section II-B builds the compensator on Eq. (22), assuming the band-pass filter isolates the low-frequency asymmetry and that the added compensation does not break reachability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetric Sliding-Mode Control of Grid-Forming Inverters With Precision Region Under AC and DC Sides Varying." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZZUF7NFQ

@misc{pith2026250611504,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetric Sliding-Mode Control of Grid-Forming Inverters With Precision Region Under AC and DC Sides Varying},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZZUF7NFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11504}
}
read the original abstract

Voltage regulation under conventional grid-forming controllers is tightly coupled to power sharing and dc-link dynamics. Consequently, its tracking accuracy deteriorates during grid faults, sudden power sharing changes, or dc-bus voltage varying. To address this issue, a symmetric sliding-mode control (SSMC) method is developed and its voltage precision region is derived. It illustrates how much ac-side power dynamics and dc-link voltage varying can be decoupled from the voltage regulation task, which helps predict when an abnormal entangling appears. While conventional sliding-mode controls address voltage-tracking error through complex sliding surface designs, repetitive correction techniques or special reaching laws, this work identifies that the error at power-line frequency primarily stem from the asymmetry property of inverters with the delay effect and the computational inaccuracy. Guided by this insight, an asymmetry compensation structure is proposed, which avoids added design complexity and directly mitigates voltage tracking error. Furthermore, the control design is supported by a physical and quantitative explanation, aiding in parameter tuning. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves faster tracking responses while maintaining robust and more accurate tracking under both dc-link voltage and ac-side current variations. Conventional grid-forming and classical sliding-mode controllers, which handle these variations separately, cannot match this combined speed and robustness. Furthermore, the voltage precision region is explicitly verified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11504 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The diagram and control architecture of the GFMI system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. illustrates an inverter system with a dc-link, an LC filter and a transmission line. In its dynamic equation (1), the variables are capacitor voltage uo, output current io, switching variable T, dc-link vdc. When switch T1 is on, T = 1. When [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulation to examine voltage precision region varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The simulation result of asymmetry when tdi = 10 µs, with a reference magnitude that steps from 100% to 50% at 0.2s with dc-voltage jump from 400V to 250V for examining the vdc varying resilience and then back to 100% at 0.3s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The simulation result of asymmetry when tdi = 2 µs, with a reference magnitude that steps from 100% to 50% at 0.2s with dc-voltage jump from 400V to 250V for examining vdc varying resilience and then back to 100% at 0.3s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ideal s dynamics, which seems a hysteresis dynamics with a bound. is decomposed in (20) into a symmetric dynamic component ssymmetric(t) which stands for the ideal symmetric sliding surface component shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The simulation result of the proposed symmetric sliding-mode control when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Three cases are examined and results are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The simulation result of the proposed symmetric sliding-mode control when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Experimental setup. The voltage and current waveform are better in SSMC than direct modulation (DM) in [4]. Also, the powers are obviously coupled by DM in [4]. In contrast, the proposed SSMC achieves accurate tracking within ±8 V instantaneous error even under current…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparative experimental validation of the symmetric sliding-mode controller (SSMC).(a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Theoretical grid-forming extreme of inverters,

    Q. Tang and L. Peng, “Theoretical grid-forming extreme of inverters,”

    work page

  2. [1]

    Ac-voltage controller for grid-forming converters,

    D. R ´ıos-Castro, D. P ´erez-Est´evez, and J. Doval-Gandoy, “Ac-voltage controller for grid-forming converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4529–4543, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Control of a grid- forming inverter based on sliding-mode and mixed H2/H∞ control,

    Z. Li, C. Zang, P. Zeng, H. Yu, S. Li, and J. Bian, “Control of a grid- forming inverter based on sliding-mode and mixed H2/H∞ control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 3862– 3872, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    H ∞-based control design for grid-forming inverters with enhanced damping and virtual inertia,

    D. B. Rathnayake, S. P. Me, R. Razzaghi, and B. Bahrani, “H ∞-based control design for grid-forming inverters with enhanced damping and virtual inertia,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2311–2325, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Impact of dc volt- age reference on subsynchronous dynamics in grid-forming inverters,

    Z. Zeng, P. M. Gajare, D. Divan, and M. Saeedifard, “Impact of dc volt- age reference on subsynchronous dynamics in grid-forming inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 8934–8938, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [5]

    Effect of control damping on small-signal stability of grid-forming vscs considering interaction between inner and outer loops,

    J. Liu, Y . Xia, W. Wei, Q. Feng, and P. Yang, “Effect of control damping on small-signal stability of grid-forming vscs considering interaction between inner and outer loops,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 7685–7695, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    Physical insight into hybrid-synchronization- controlled grid-forming inverters under large disturbances,

    T. Liu and X. Wang, “Physical insight into hybrid-synchronization- controlled grid-forming inverters under large disturbances,” IEEE Trans- actions on Power Electronics , vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 11 475–11 480, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Small-signal synchronization stability of grid-forming converters with regulated dc-link dynamics,

    L. Zhao, Z. Jin, and X. Wang, “Small-signal synchronization stability of grid-forming converters with regulated dc-link dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 12 399– 12 409, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 22 references
  1. [8]

    Adaptive-output-voltage- regulation-based solution for the dc-link undervoltage of grid- forming inverters,

    C. Luo, X. Ma, T. Liu, and X. Wang, “Adaptive-output-voltage- regulation-based solution for the dc-link undervoltage of grid- forming inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12 559–12 569, 2023

    2023

  2. [9]

    Grid-forming hybrid angle control and almost global stability of the dc-ac power converter,

    A. Tayyebi, A. Anta, and F. D ¨orfler, “Grid-forming hybrid angle control and almost global stability of the dc-ac power converter,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 3842–3857, 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    A novel complex power sharing based on sliding mode control for islanded ac microgrids,

    C. Alfaro, R. Guzman, A. Camacho, ´A. Borrell, and L. G. de Vicu ˜na, “A novel complex power sharing based on sliding mode control for islanded ac microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , vol. 72, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2024.3488330, no. 6, pp. 5507–5517, 2025

  4. [11]

    Disturbance observer based fuzzy sliding mode control of pv grid connected inverter,

    J. Fei, Y . Zhu, and M. Hua, “Disturbance observer based fuzzy sliding mode control of pv grid connected inverter,” in 2018 5th International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICEEE) , DOI 10.1109/ICEEE2.2018.8391293, pp. 18–22, 2018

    2018

  5. [12]

    A discrete-time repetitive sliding mode control for voltage source inverters,

    L. Zheng, F. Jiang, J. Song, Y . Gao, and M. Tian, “A discrete-time repetitive sliding mode control for voltage source inverters,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics , vol. 6, DOI 10.1109/JESTPE.2017.2781701, no. 3, pp. 1553–1566, 2018

  6. [13]

    A slack bus grid-forming inverter based on symmetric sliding mode control against power sharing imbalances among microgenerators,

    Q. Tang and L. Peng, “A slack bus grid-forming inverter based on symmetric sliding mode control against power sharing imbalances among microgenerators,” in IECON 2024 - 50th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society , pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  7. [14]

    Harmonic disturbance suppression based on precise shaping of output impedance at selected frequencies for standalone voltage source inverter,

    B. Lin, L. Peng, K. Yu, and H. Xu, “Harmonic disturbance suppression based on precise shaping of output impedance at selected frequencies for standalone voltage source inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 6963–6975, 2023

    2023

  8. [15]

    Applied nonlinear control,

    J.-J. E. Slotine and W. Li, “Applied nonlinear control,” 1991. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:106519536

    1991

  9. [16]

    Enhanced grid-forming inverter control through integral control in a cascaded framework,

    K. Rayane, A. Rabhi, B. K. Oubbati, and M. Benzoubir, “Enhanced grid-forming inverter control through integral control in a cascaded framework,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE) , DOI 10.1109/SGRE59715.2024.10429007, pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Chattering-free fixed-time robust sliding mode controller for grid-connected inverters under parameter variations,

    P. Alinaghi Hosseinabadi, S. Mekhilef, H. R. Pota, and M. Ker- madi, “Chattering-free fixed-time robust sliding mode controller for grid-connected inverters under parameter variations,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics , vol. 12, DOI 10.1109/JE...

  11. [18]

    The design and implementation of a three-phase active power filter based on control,

    S. Saetieo, R. Devaraj, and D. Torrey, “The design and implementation of a three-phase active power filter based on control,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , vol. 31, DOI 10.1109/28.464511, no. 5, pp. 993–1000, 1995

    doi

  12. [20]

    A three-level hysteresis function approach to the sliding-mode control of single-phase ups inverters,

    O. Kukrer, H. Komurcugil, and A. Doganalp, “A three-level hysteresis function approach to the sliding-mode control of single-phase ups inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 3477–3486, 2009

    2009

  13. [21]

    Constant switching frequency band controller for dynamic voltage restorer,

    S. Sasitharan and M. Mishra, “Constant switching frequency band controller for dynamic voltage restorer,” IET Power Electronics , vol. 3, pp. 657–667, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://digital-library.theiet.org/ doi/abs/10.1049/iet-pel.2008.0267 Qianxi Tang (Student Member, ...

    2010

  14. [2025]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20367

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20367

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.