Recursive upper bounds for the vertex online Ramsey game with applications to hypergraph Ramsey numbers
Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:01 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Hypergraph vertex online Ramsey numbers satisfy a recurrence with a (1+o(1)) factor in the exponent.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The natural hypergraph generalization tilde r_k(s,t) of the vertex online Ramsey numbers satisfies tilde r_k(s,t) ≤ 2^{(1+o(1)) tilde r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)} for 2 ≤ k < s ≤ t. The bound is obtained by exhibiting a recursive strategy in the vertex online Ramsey game on hypergraphs whose analysis incurs only a (1+o(1)) factor in the exponent, extending the earlier graph-case argument of Conlon, Fox, and Sudakov without extra losses from higher uniformity.
What carries the argument
The recursive strategy in the vertex online Ramsey game played on k-uniform hypergraphs, which controls the growth of the Ramsey number level by level and produces the linear factor in the exponent.
Load-bearing premise
That the vertex online Ramsey game on hypergraphs admits a recursive strategy whose analysis produces only a (1+o(1)) factor in the exponent, extending the graph-case argument without additional losses.
What would settle it
An explicit computation or tighter upper bound for tilde r_3(s,t) with small s and t that forces the ratio of log base two of the number to tilde r_2(s-1,t-1) to exceed any fixed constant greater than one.
read the original abstract
The classical recursive upper bound on hypergraph Ramsey numbers due to Erd\H{o}s and Rado states that for $2 \leq k < s \leq t$, \[ r_k(s,t) \leq 2^{\binom{r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)}{k-1}}. \] In 2010, Conlon, Fox, and Sudakov introduced the so-called vertex online Ramsey numbers $\tilde{r}(s,t)$ for graphs to obtain a quantitative improvement over this bound when $k=3$. In this note, we show that the natural hypergraph generalization $\tilde{r}_k(s,t)$ of the vertex online Ramsey numbers satisfy an improved recurrence \[ \tilde{r}_k(s,t) \leq 2^{(1+o(1))\tilde{r}_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)}. \] We obtain several corollaries from this, including a lower-order improvement to the best known quantitative upper bounds for hypergraph Ramsey numbers and an improvement to the above recursive bound of Erd\H{o}s and Rado.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript defines the hypergraph vertex online Ramsey numbers tilde r_k(s,t) and proves the improved recurrence tilde r_k(s,t) ≤ 2^{(1+o(1)) tilde r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)} for 2 ≤ k < s ≤ t. This is obtained by adapting the Conlon-Fox-Sudakov vertex-online strategy to hypergraphs: a potential is maintained over the (k-1)-uniform links of each newly presented vertex, and a probabilistic deletion argument is used to show that the exponent incurs only a (1+o(1)) factor with no additional multiplicative loss. Corollaries include a modest quantitative improvement to the best known upper bounds on hypergraph Ramsey numbers r_k(s,t) and a refinement of the classical Erdős-Rado recursive bound.
Significance. If the result holds, the paper supplies a concrete quantitative improvement to the recursive structure of hypergraph Ramsey numbers by reducing the exponent from a binomial coefficient to a linear term times (1+o(1)). The explicit tracking of the o(1) term through the induction and the use of probabilistic deletion to control losses constitute a technical strength that directly extends the graph-case precedent without introducing extra factors. This yields lower-order gains when the recurrence is iterated and strengthens the toolkit for bounding hypergraph Ramsey numbers.
minor comments (2)
- [§2] §2, Definition of tilde r_k(s,t): the precise rules of the vertex online game on k-uniform hypergraphs (in particular, how the adversary presents vertices and the colorer responds) should be stated with an explicit small example for k=3 to make the generalization from the graph case fully transparent.
- [Corollary 1.4] Corollary 1.4: the claimed improvement to the Erdős-Rado bound is stated asymptotically; a short remark on the precise range of s,t for which the (1+o(1)) factor yields a visible numerical gain would help readers assess the practical scope.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive report, accurate summary of our results, and recommendation of minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the technical contribution in adapting the Conlon-Fox-Sudakov vertex-online strategy to hypergraphs via potential functions and probabilistic deletion, yielding the (1+o(1)) factor in the exponent without extra multiplicative losses.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The derivation proceeds directly from the definition of the vertex online Ramsey game on hypergraphs by maintaining a potential over the (k-1)-uniform links of each new vertex and applying a probabilistic deletion argument to control the exponent. This yields the claimed recurrence with only a (1+o(1)) factor without any fitted parameters, self-referential quantities, or load-bearing self-citations; the argument is an explicit inductive extension of the external Conlon-Fox-Sudakov strategy and remains self-contained against the combinatorial inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard inductive argument on uniformity k using the definition of the vertex online game
invented entities (1)
-
Hypergraph vertex online Ramsey number tilde r_k(s,t)
no independent evidence
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Theorem 1. … ˜r_k(s,t) ≤ ˜r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1) · 2^{˜r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)} = 2^{(1+o(1)) ˜r_{k-1}(s-1,t-1)}
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
P. Balister, B. Bollob´ as, M. Campos, S. Griffiths, E. Hurley, R. Morris, J. Sahasrabudhe, and M. Tiba, Upper bounds for multicolour Ramsey numbers, J. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear. 4
-
[2]
J. Beck,Achievement games and the probabilistic method, in Combinatorics, Paul Erd˝ os is Eighty, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud.1(1993), 51–78. 2
work page 1993
- [3]
-
[4]
Conlon,On-line Ramsey numbers, SIAM J
D. Conlon,On-line Ramsey numbers, SIAM J. Discrete Math.23(2009), 1954–1963. 2, 9
work page 2009
- [5]
- [6]
-
[7]
P. Erd˝ os and R. Rado,Combinatorial theorems on classifications of subsets of a given set, Proc. London Math. Soc.3(1952), 417–439. 1
work page 1952
-
[8]
J. Fox, J. Pach, B. Sudakov, and A. Suk,Erd˝ os–Szekeres-type theorems for monotone paths and convex bodies, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)105(2012), 953–982. 2, 3
work page 2012
-
[9]
Three Proofs of the Hypergraph Ramsey Theorem (An exposition)
W. Gasarch, A. Parrish, and S. Sinai,Three proofs of the hypergraph Ramsey theorem (An exposition), preprint available athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4257. 2, 3
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[10]
R. L. Graham, B. L. Rothschild, and J. H. Spencer,Ramsey theory, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons (1980)
work page 1980
-
[11]
A. Kurek and A. Ruci´ nski,Two variants of the size Ramsey number, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory25 (2005), 141–149 2
work page 2005
-
[12]
D. Mubayi and A. Suk,The Erd˝ os–Hajnal hypergraph Ramsey problem, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)22 (2020), 1247–1259. 2
work page 2020
-
[13]
F. P. Ramsey,On a problem of formal logic, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2)30(1929), 264–286. 1 Department of Mathematics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA Email address:daniel.dobak@emory.edu Department of Mathematics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA Email address:eion.mulrenin@emory.edu 10
work page 1929
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.