Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CFHT Optical PDCS Survey II: Evolution in the Space Density of Clusters of Galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0004091 v1 pith:I67IRNBQ submitted 2000-04-06 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords clustersgalaxiesfunctionpdcsdensitydispersionsmassspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first dynamical study of the optically selected Palomar Distant Cluster Survey (PDCS). We show that eleven out of twelve PDCS clusters we observed are real over-densities of galaxies. Most clusters have velocity dispersions appropriate for clusters of galaxies. However, we find a fraction (1/3) of objects in the PDCS which have velocity dispersions in the range of groups of galaxies (200 +/- 100 km/s) but have richnesses appropriate for clusters of galaxies. We measure the richness function, X-ray luminosity function (using both the detections and upper limits), and the mass function derived from our velocity dispersions. We confirm that the space density, as a function of richness, of clusters of galaxies in the PDCS is ~5 times that of the Abell catalog. Excluding the above fraction of 1/3 of objects with low velocity dispersions, we measure a space density ~3 times that of the Abell catalog for equivalent mass clusters of galaxies. Our space density estimates are in agreement with other low-redshift, optically-selected cluster surveys such as the EDCC, APM and EDCC2, which raises the possibility that the Abell catalog is incomplete. Our X-ray luminosity function agrees with other measurements based on both X-ray and optically selected samples, so we find that the PDCS does not miss clusters of galaxies that would be found in an X-ray selected survey. Our resulting mass function, centered around 10e14 Msun/h, agrees with the expectations from such surveys as the Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology cluster survey, though errors on our mass measurements are too large to constrain cosmological parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools