Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An investigation into the prominence of spiral galaxy bulges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0011256 v1 pith:6PJFMMV5 submitted 2000-11-14 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords galaxiesspiralbulgebulgesdisklate-typeearly-typeelliptical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

From a diameter-limited sample of 86 `face-on' spiral galaxies, the bulge-to-disk size and luminosity ratios, and other quantitative measurements for the prominence of the bulge are derived. The bulge and disk parameters have been estimated using a seeing convolved Sersic r^(1/n) bulge and a seeing convolved exponential disk. In general, early-type spiral galaxy bulges have Sersic values of n>1, and late-type spiral galaxy bulges have values of n<1. In the B-band, only 8 galaxies have a bulge shape parameter n consistent with the exponential value of 1, and only 5 galaxies do in the K-band. Application of the r^(1/n) bulge models results in a larger mean r_e/h ratio for the early-type spiral galaxies than the late-type spiral galaxies. Although, this result is shown not to be statistically significant. The mean B/D luminosity ratio is, however, significantly larger (> 3-sigma) for the early-type spirals than the late-type spirals. This apparent contradiction with the r_e/h values can be explained with an iceberg-like scenario, in which the bulges in late-type spiral galaxies are relatively submerged in their disk. This can be achieved by varying the relative bulge/disk stellar density while maintaining the same effective bulge-to-disk size ratio. The absolute bulge magnitude - log(n) diagram is used as a diagnostic tool for comparative studies with dwarf elliptical and ordinary elliptical galaxies. At least in the B-band, these objects occupy distinctly different regions of this parameter space. While the dwarf ellipticals appear to be the faint extension to the brighter elliptical galaxies, the bulges of spiral galaxies are not.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mass--size evolution and the emerging passive--density relation revealed by JWST/NIRCam in the Spiderweb protocluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the Spiderweb protocluster, passive fraction rises with local density to ~60% while passive mass–size intercepts sit between field and cluster values, indicating advanced quenching but ongoing size growth.

  2. Galaxy morphology dependent (black hole mass)-(velocity dispersion) relations: implications for gravitational wave forecasts and cosmological simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Morphology-dependent M_bh-σ0 relations are reported: shallow (2.5-3.1) for dust-poor S0 galaxies and steep (7.8) for massive ellipticals, using new SCOPE Bayesian regression on 137 galaxies.

Pith tools