REVIEW 1 cited by
Non-Gaussianity: Comparing wavelet and Fourier based methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the context of the present and future Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments, going beyond the information provided by the power spectrum has become necessary in order to tightly constrain the cosmological model. The non-Gaussian signatures in the CMB represent a very promising tool to probe the early universe and the structure formation epoch. We present the results of a comparison between two families of non-Gaussian estimators: The first act on the wavelet space (skewness and excess kurtosis of the wavelet coefficients) and the second group on the Fourier space (bi- and trispectrum). We compare the relative sensitivities of these estimators by applying them to three different data sets meant to reproduce the majority of possible non-Gaussian contributions to the CMB. We find that the skewness in the wavelet space is slightly more sensitive than the bispectrum. For the four point estimators, we find that the excess kurtosis of the wavelet coefficients has very similar capabilities than the diagonal trispectrum while a near-diagonal trispectrum seems to be less sensitive to non-Gaussian signatures.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fr\'echet Vectors as sensitive tools for blind tests of CMB anomalies
Fréchet Vectors, built from Multipole Vectors, are more sensitive to CMB anisotropies, and Planck 2018 temperature maps show small tensions with a Gaussian and statistically isotropic sky.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.