REVIEW 2 cited by
Chaotic Loss Cones, Black Hole Fueling and the M-Sigma Relation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In classical loss cone theory, stars are supplied to a central black hole via gravitational scattering onto low angular momentum orbits. Higher feeding rates are possible if the gravitational potential near the black hole is non-axisymmetric and the orbits are chaotic. Motivated by recently published, self-consistent models, we evaluate rates of stellar capture and disruption in triaxial nuclei. Rates are found to substantially exceed those in collisionally-resupplied loss cones, as long as an appreciable fraction of the orbits are centrophilic. The mass captured by a black hole after a given time in a steep nucleus scales as the fifth power of the velocity dispersion, and the accumulated mass in 10^10 yr is of the correct order to reproduce the M-sigma relation. Triaxiality can solve the "final parsec problem" of decaying black hole binaries by increasing the flux of stars into the binary's loss cone.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The evolution of a supermassive binary black hole in an non-spherical nuclear star cluster
The m=2 quadrupole tidal field of a non-spherical nuclear star cluster, with Einstein precession, can drive a supermassive black hole binary to near-unity eccentricity and trigger gravitational-wave circularization wi...
-
Gravitational wave inference of star cluster properties from intermediate-mass black hole mergers
Single intermediate-mass black hole mergers detected by next-generation observatories cannot pin down progenitor cluster mass or radius because of model degeneracy, but formation redshift posteriors are narrow enough ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.