Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparisons of an Evolutionary Chemical Model with Other Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0506086 v1 pith:PAF24RCX submitted 2005-06-03 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords modelschemicalprofilesabundanceempiricalevolutionarystaticinfall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We compare an evolutionary chemical model with simple empirical models of the abundance and with static chemical models. We focus on the prediction of molecular line profiles that are commonly observed in low mass star forming cores. We show that empirical models can be used to constrain evaporation radii and infall radii using lines of some species. Species with more complex abundance profiles are not well represented by the empirical models. Static chemical models produce abundance profiles different from those obtained from an evolutionary calculation because static models do not account for the flow of matter inward from the outer regions. The resulting profiles of lines used to probe infall may differ substantially.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools