Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Satellites of the largest Kuiper belt objects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0510029 v1 pith:ABQNDMO2 submitted 2005-10-03 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords satellitesbeltkuiperobjectsbrightestobjectel61four
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We have searched the four brightest objects in the Kuiper belt for the presence of satellites using the newly commissioned Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics system. Satellites are seen around three of the four objects: Pluto (whose satellite Charon is well-known), 2003 EL61, and 2003 UB313. The object 2005 FY9, the brightest Kuiper belt object after Pluto, does not have a satellite detectable within 0.4 arcseconds with a brightness of more than 0.5% of the primary. The presence of satellites to 3 of the 4 brightest Kuiper belt objects is inconsistent with the fraction of satellites in the Kuiper belt at large at the 99.1% confidence level, suggesting a different formation mechanism for these largest KBO satellites. The satellites of 2003 EL61 and 2003 UB313, with fractional brightnesses of 5% and 2% of their primaries, respectively, are significantly fainter relative to their primaries than other known Kuiper belt object satellites, again pointing to possible differences in their origin.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Where are the missing Kuiper Belt binaries?

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Kuiper belt binary systems are rare in the 10^19 to 10^20 kg mass range, suggesting a mix of formation effects and observational bias.

Pith tools