Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Quantitative spectroscopic analysis of and distance to SN1999em

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0510526 v1 pith:VBLH5Z7Y submitted 2005-10-18 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords distancecorrectiondetailedfactorsmethodobservationssn1999emtimes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work presents a detailed quantitative spectroscopic analysis of, and the determination of the distance to, the type II supernovae (SN) SN1999em with CMFGEN (Dessart & Hillier 2005a), based on spectrophotometric observations at eight dates up to 40 days after discovery. We use the same iron-group metal content for the ejecta, the same power-law density distribution (with exponent n~10), and a Hubble-velocity law at all times. We adopt a H/He/C/N/O abundance pattern compatible with CNO-cycle equilibrium values for a RSG/BSG progenitor, with C/O enhanced and N depleted at later times. Based on our synthetic fits to spectrophotometric observations of SN1999em, we obtain a distance of 11.5Mpc, similar to that of Baron et al. (2004) and the Cepheid distance to the galaxy host of 11.7Mpc (Leonard et al. 2003). Similarly, based on such models, the Expanding Photosphere Method (EPM) delivers a distance of 11.6Mpc, with negligible scatter between photometric bandpass sets; there is thus nothing wrong with the EPM as such. Previous determinations using the tabulated correction factors of Eastman et al. (1996) all led to 30-50% underestimates: we find that this is caused by 1) an underestimate of the correction factors compared to the only other study of the kind by Dessart & Hillier (2005b), 2) a neglect of the intrinsic >20% scatter of correction factors, and 3) the use of the EPM at late times when severe line blanketing makes the method inaccurate. The need of detailed model computations for reliable EPM distance estimates thus defeats the appeal and simplicity of the method. However, detailed fits to SN optical spectra, based on tailored models for individual SN observations, offers a promising approach to obtaining distances with 10-20% accuracy, either through the EPM or a la Baron et al. (2004).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST Detects a Dusty AGB-like Source Before the Type Ia-CSM Supernova 2026sqf

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pre-explosion JWST and HST images reveal a dusty, luminous AGB-like point source at the site of SN 2026sqf, the first candidate progenitor system for a Type Ia-CSM supernova.

  2. Surrogate models for type II supernovae: Probing low-energy explosions and interaction-free regimes

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Trained on STELLA grids, two autoencoder-plus-emulator surrogates reconstruct type II SN SEDs at ~1e-4 MSE and recover progenitor masses for SN 2005cs, SN 2012aw, and SN 1999em in minutes.

Pith tools