Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The minimum mass for star formation, and the origin of binary brown dwarfs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0610039 v1 pith:DCJAIFSK submitted 2006-10-02 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords fragmentationprimarymassminimumbrownsecondaryclosediscs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our first aim is to calculate the minimum mass for Primary Fragmentation in a variety of potential star-formation scenarios, i.e. (i) hierarchical fragmentation of a 3-D medium; (ii) one-shot, 2-D fragmentation of a shock-compressed layer; (iii) fragmentation of a circumstellar disc. Our second aim is to evaluate the role of H2 dissociation in facilitating Secondary Fragmentation and thereby producing close, low-mass binaries. Results: (i)For contemporary, local star formation, the minimum mass for Primary Fragmentation is in the range 0.001-0.004Msun, irrespective of the scenario considered. (ii)Circumstellar discs are only able to radiate fast enough to undergo Primary Fragmentation in their cool outer parts (R>100AU). Therefore brown dwarfs (BDs) should have difficulty forming by Primary Fragmentation at R<30AU, explaining the Brown Dwarf Desert.Conversely, Primary Fragmentation at R>100AU could be the source of brown dwarfs in wide orbits, and could explain why massive discs with Rd>100AU are rarely seen.(iii)H2 dissociation can lead to collapse and Secondary Fragmentation, thereby converting primary fragments into close, low-mass binaries, with semi-major axes a~5AU(Msystem/0.1Msun), in good agreement with observation; in this case, the minimum mass for Primary Fragmentation becomes a minimum system mass, rather than a minimum stellar mass.(iv)Any primary fragment can undergo Secondary Fragmentation, producing a close low-mass binary, provided only that the fragment is spinning. Secondary Fragmentation is therefore most likely in fragments formed in the outer parts of discs, and this could explain why a BD in a wide orbit about a Sun-like star has a greater likelihood of having a BD companion than a BD in the field -as seems to be observed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Wide Jupiter-Mass Binary-Objects Cannot Form

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The star-planet-planet stripping mechanism can maintain at most about one Jupiter-mass binary object in the Trapezium cluster at any time, far fewer than the roughly 40 observed.

  2. The Companions to B and A Stars Snapshot (C-BASS) Survey: I. Discovery of a Young Brown Dwarf Companion to HIP 17453

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Discovery of an L2 brown dwarf companion (mass 53 M_Jup, age ~280 Myr) to HIP 17453 A via proper-motion confirmed imaging and spectroscopy.

Pith tools