RECORD
The Cosmological Baryon Density from Deuterium in QSO Spectra
Astrophysics · Submitted 18 Jun 1996
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We are confident that we have measured the primordial abundance of D (log D/H $= -4.62 \pm 0.05$), which is the first such measurement because other values in the literature are much larger, and apparently strongly contaminated.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The primordial D/H ratio now provides the best measure of the cosmological density of baryons. We describe in detail how we deduce the D/H ratio from absorption lines in the spectra of quasars, and we present our first two measurements of D/H in different QSOs, which agree to within the random errors. We describe how we correct D/H for blending with Lyman alpha forest H lines. For our two QSOs these corrections are small, because the D lines are narrow, deep and constrained by H and metal lines. The similarity of the two measurements rules out ad hoc astrophysical effects, such as the destruction of D without production of metals, or unusual data problems. We are confident that we have measured the primordial abundance of D (log D/H $= -4.62 \pm 0.05$), which is the first such measurement because other values in the literature are much larger, and apparently strongly contaminated.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The primordial D/H ratio now provides the best measure of the cosmological density of baryons. | background 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.54 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We describe in detail how we deduce the D/H ratio from absorption lines in the spectra of quasars, and we present our first two measurements of D/H in different QSOs, which agree to within the random errors. | contribution 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We describe how we correct D/H for blending with Lyman alpha forest H lines. | method 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.02 | asserted 0.91 |
| s3 | For our two QSOs these corrections are small, because the D lines are narrow, deep and constrained by H and metal lines. | method 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The similarity of the two measurements rules out ad hoc astrophysical effects, such as the destruction of D without production of metals, or unusual data problems. | interpretation 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.07 | asserted 0.99 |
| s5 | We are confident that we have measured the primordial abundance of D (log D/H $= -4.62 \pm 0.05$), which is the first such measurement because other values in the literature are much larger, and apparently strongly contaminated. | result 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.64 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The primordial D/H ratio now provides the best measure of the cosmological density of baryons. We describe in detail how we deduce the D/H ratio from absorption lines in the spectra of quasars, and we present our first two measurements of D/H in different QSOs, which agree to within the random errors. We describe how we correct D/H for blending with Lyman alpha forest H lines. For our two QSOs these corrections are small, because the D lines are narrow, deep and constrained by H and metal lines. The similarity of the two measurements rules out ad hoc astrophysical effects, such as the destruction of D without production of metals, or unusual data problems. We are confident that we have measured the primordial abundance of D (log D/H $= -4.62 \pm 0.05$), which is the first such measurement because other values in the literature are much larger, and apparently strongly contaminated.
Human review
References
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.