pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/9609113 · v1 · submitted 1996-09-17 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

The SBF Survey of Galaxy Distances. I. Sample Selection, Photometric Calibration, and the Hubble Constant

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords distanceszerocalibrationcepheidsgalaxyhubblepointsnia
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We describe a program of surface brightness fluctuation (SBF) measurements for determining galaxy distances. This paper presents the photometric calibration of our sample and of SBF in general. Basing our zero point on observations of Cepheid variable stars, we find that the absolute SBF magnitude in the Kron-Cousins I band correlates well with the mean (V-I)o color of a galaxy according to M_Ibar = (-1.74 +/- 0.07) + (4.5 +/- 0.25) [ (V-I)o - 1.15 ] for 1.0 < (V-I) < 1.3. This agrees well with theoretical estimates from stellar population models. Comparisons between SBF distances and a variety of other estimators, including Cepheid variable stars, the Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function (PNLF), Tully-Fisher (TF), Dn-sigma, SNII, and SNIa, demonstrate that the calibration of SBF is universally valid and that SBF error estimates are accurate. The zero point given by Cepheids, PNLF, TF (both calibrated using Cepheids), and SNII is in units of Mpc; the zero point given by TF (referenced to a distant frame), Dn-sigma and SNIa is in terms of a Hubble expansion velocity expressed in km/s. Tying together these two zero points yields a Hubble constant of H_0 = 81 +/- 6 km/s/Mpc. As part of this analysis, we present SBF distances to 12 nearby groups of galaxies where Cepheids, SNII, and SNIa have been observed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Challenges for $\Lambda$CDM: An update

    astro-ph.CO 2021-05 accept novelty 3.0

    The review updates the status of multiple cosmological and astrophysical signals that appear inconsistent with LambdaCDM as defined by the Cosmological Principle, General Relativity, and Planck18 parameters.