REVIEW 1 cited by
Detecting Nonlinearity in Data with Long Coherence Times
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider the limitations of two techniques for detecting nonlinearity in time series. The first technique compares the original time series to an ensemble of surrogate time series that are constructed to mimic the linear properties of the original. The second technique compares the forecasting error of linear and nonlinear predictors. Both techniques are found to be problematic when the data has a long coherence time; they tend to indicate nonlinearity even for linear time series. We investigate the causes of these difficulties both analytically and with numerical experiments on ``real'' and computer-generated data. In particular, although we do see some initial evidence for nonlinear structure in the SFI dataset E, we are inclined to dismiss this evidence as an artifact of the long coherence time.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Active galactic nucleus time-variability analysis and its caveats
Flare-biased interpolation biases periodogram fits in AGN variability studies, and the EMP13 simulation algorithm is often misused so that phase information and red-noise-leak correction are lost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.