Reply to ``Comment on `Inverse exciton series in the optical decay of an excitonic molecule' "

As a reply to the Comment by I.S. Gorban {\it et al.} (Phys. Rev. B, preceding paper) we summarize our criticism on their claim of the first observation of the $M$ series in $\beta$-ZnP$_2$. We support our analysis by reporting the first observation of inverse {\it polariton} series from the excitonic molecules selectively generated at ${\bf K}_m \simeq {\bf 0}$ in a CuCl single crystal. This observation and its explanation within the bipolariton model complete our proof of the biexcitonic origin of the inverse series.