Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Bundle gerbes

dg-ga · Submitted 25 Jul 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Every bundle gerbe gives rise to a gerbe and most of the well-known examples examples of gerbes are bundle gerbes.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDdg-ga/9407015 (version 1)
Pith IDO22WSEIB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMichael K. Murray. "Bundle gerbes." arXiv:dg-ga/9407015 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/O22WSEIB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,609 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.80 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Just as $\Cstar$ principal bundles provide a geometric realisation of two-dimensional integral cohomology; gerbes or sheaves of groupoids, provide a geometric realisation of three dimensional integral cohomology through their Dixmier-Douady class. I consider an alternative, related, geometric realisation of three dimensional cohomology called a bundle gerbe. Every bundle gerbe gives rise to a gerbe and most of the well-known examples examples of gerbes are bundle gerbes. I discuss the properties of bundle gerbes, in particular bundle gerbe connections and curvature and their associated Dixmier-Douady class.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Just as $\Cstar$ principal bundles provide a geometric realisation of two-dimensional integral cohomology; gerbes or sheaves of groupoids, provide a geometric realisation of three dimensional integral cohomology through their Dixmier-Douady class. background 1.00 0.06 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 I consider an alternative, related, geometric realisation of three dimensional cohomology called a bundle gerbe. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.24 asserted 0.98
s2 Every bundle gerbe gives rise to a gerbe and most of the well-known examples examples of gerbes are bundle gerbes. result 0.75 0.32 0.19 asserted 1.00
s3 I discuss the properties of bundle gerbes, in particular bundle gerbe connections and curvature and their associated Dixmier-Douady class. contribution 0.99 0.77 0.13 asserted 0.85

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.59 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.72.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Just as $\Cstar$ principal bundles provide a geometric realisation of two-dimensional integral cohomology; gerbes or sheaves of groupoids, provide a geometric realisation of three dimensional integral cohomology through their Dixmier-Douady class. I consider an alternative, related, geometric realisation of three dimensional cohomology called a bundle gerbe. Every bundle gerbe gives rise to a gerbe and most of the well-known examples examples of gerbes are bundle gerbes. I discuss the properties of bundle gerbes, in particular bundle gerbe connections and curvature and their associated Dixmier-Douady class.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

61 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 60 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 10 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 28 of the 138 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Builds on it 2 of 5 papers with this label
Uses its method or tool 3 of 5 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

61 arXiv papers cite this in 138 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 75 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 5 papers
Uses its method or tool 5 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 40 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.