Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A nonperturbative determination of the O(a) improvement coefficient c_A and the scaling of f_pi and m^{MSbar}

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-lat/0110159 v1 pith:XA2ZOEMD submitted 2001-10-18 hep-lat

classification hep-lat
keywords coefficientbetaalphacollaborationerrorsfindfixedimprovement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report on an investigation of the LANL method for determining the O(a) improvement coefficient c_A nonperturbatively. We find we are able to extract reliable estimates for the coefficient using this method. However, our study of systematic errors shows that for very accurate determinations of c_A, the smearing function must be tuned and the volume fixed to keep the O(a) ambiguity in c_A fixed as beta varies. Consistency was found with previous results from the LANL group and (within fairly large errors) 1-loop perturbation theory; c_A does not change significantly over the range beta=5.93-6.2. The big difference between our results and those of the ALPHA collaboration, around beta=6.0, show that the O(a) differences in c_A between the different methods can be large. We find that the lattice spacing dependence of f_pi and the renormalised quark mass is much smaller using our values of the coefficient compared to those of the ALPHA collaboration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools