pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0408282 · v3 · submitted 2004-08-20 · 🧮 math.LO · math.CO

Proofs Without Syntax

classification 🧮 math.LO math.CO
keywords combinatorialgraphproofslogicproofpropositionalsyntacticabstract
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

"[M]athematicians care no more for logic than logicians for mathematics." Augustus de Morgan, 1868. Proofs are traditionally syntactic, inductively generated objects. This paper presents an abstract mathematical formulation of propositional calculus (propositional logic) in which proofs are combinatorial (graph-theoretic), rather than syntactic. It defines a *combinatorial proof* of a proposition P as a graph homomorphism h : C -> G(P), where G(P) is a graph associated with P and C is a coloured graph. The main theorem is soundness and completeness: P is true iff there exists a combinatorial proof h : C -> G(P).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.