pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0505086 · v1 · submitted 2005-05-05 · 🧮 math.CO

The Threshold for Ackermannian Ramsey numbers

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords ramseynumbersregressiveprimitiverecursivefunctionackermannianemph
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For a function $g:\N\to \N$, the \emph{$g$-regressive Ramsey number} of $k$ is the least $N$ so that \[N\stackrel \min \longrightarrow (k)_g\] . This symbol means: for every $c:[N]^2\to \N$ that satisfies $c(m,n)\le g(\min\{m,n\})$ there is a \emph{min-homogeneous} $H\su N$ of size $k$, that is, the color $c(m,n)$ of a pair $\{m,n\}\su H$ depends only on $\min\{m,n\}$. It is known (\cite{km,ks}) that $\id$-regressive Ramsey numbers grow in $k$ as fast as $\Ack(k)$, Ackermann's function in $k$. On the other hand, for constant $g$, the $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers grow exponentially in $k$, and are therefore primitive recursive in $k$. We compute below the threshold in which $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers cease to be primitive recursive and become Ackermannian, by proving: Suppose $g:\N\to \N$ is weakly increasing. Then the $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers are primitive recursive if an only if for every $t>0$ there is some $M_t$ so that for all $n\ge M_t$ it holds that $g(m)<n^{1/t}$ and $M_t$ is bounded by a primitive recursive function in $t$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.