REVIEW 1 cited by
On packing spheres into containers (about Kepler's finite sphere packing problem)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In an Euclidean $d$-space, the container problem asks to pack $n$ equally sized spheres into a minimal dilate of a fixed container. If the container is a smooth convex body and $d\geq 2$ we show that solutions to the container problem can not have a ``simple structure'' for large $n$. By this we in particular find that there exist arbitrary small $r>0$, such that packings in a smooth, 3-dimensional convex body, with a maximum number of spheres of radius $r$, are necessarily not hexagonal close packings. This contradicts Kepler's famous statement that the cubic or hexagonal close packing ``will be the tightest possible, so that in no other arrangement more spheres could be packed into the same container''.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The maximum number of points in the cross-polytope that form a packing set of a scaled cross-polytope
For the l1 unit cross-polytope, the maximum number of points with pairwise l1-distance at least 2r is exactly 2n for r in (1-1/n, 1], and in three dimensions is exactly 10 for r in (3/5, 2/3] and 12 for r in (4/7, 3/5...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.