pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0509715 · v1 · submitted 2005-09-30 · 🧮 math.CO

Noncrossing Trees and Noncrossing Graphs

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords noncrossingtreesnumbergraphsconnectededgesgiveninvolution
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We give a parity reversing involution on noncrossing trees that leads to a combinatorial interpretation of a formula on noncrossing trees and symmetric ternary trees in answer to a problem proposed by Hough. We use the representation of Panholzer and Prodinger for noncrossing trees and find a correspondence between a class of noncrossing trees, called proper oncrossing trees, and the set of symmetric ternary trees. The second result of this paper is a parity reversing involution on connected noncrossing graphs which leads to a relation between the number of noncrossing trees with a given number of edges and descents and the number of connected noncrossing graphs with a given number of vertices and edges.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.