REVIEW 2 cited by
Operads and Motives in Deformation Quantization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Moshe Flato, and will appear in Lett. Math. Phys. 48 (1) It became clear during last 5-6 years that the algebraic world of associative algebras (abelian categories, triangulated categories, etc) has many deep connections with the geometric world of two-dimensional surfaces. One of manifestations of this is Deligne's conjecture (1993) which says that on the cohomological Hochschild complex of any associative algebra naturally acts the operad of singular chains in the little discs operad. Recently D. Tamarkin discovered that the operad of chains of the little discs operad is formal, i.e. it is homotopy equivalent to its cohomology. From this fact and from Deligne's conjecture follows almost immediately my formality result in deformation quantization. I review the situation as it looks now. Also I conjecture that the motivic Galois group acts on deformation quantizations, and speculate on possible relations of higher-dimensional algebras and of motives to quantum field theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On coefficients of operator product expansions for quantum field theories with ordinary, holomorphic, and topological spacetime dimensions
For theories with mixed topological, holomorphic, and ordinary spacetime dimensions, OPE coefficients are proposed to be sheaf cohomology classes, with singular derived coefficients appearing under explicit dimension-...
-
Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry
A programmatic review asserting that stability and transversality in Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formulas correspond to abelian versus nonabelian gauging in Rozansky-Witten theory, without providing a derivation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.