pith. sign in

USPTO: us-12622387 · published 2026-05-12 · patents · A01H 6/4684· A01H 5/10

Plants and seeds of corn variety CV960136

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification patents A01H 6/4684A01H 5/10
keywords corn varietyCV960136seed depositplant patentNCMA accessionmaize genetics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A corn plant of variety CV960136 is defined by seeds deposited under NCMA accession 202306049.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The document claims a new corn variety designated CV960136. Representative seeds of this variety have been placed in a public depository under a specific accession number. The patent centers on the plant grown from those seeds and any progeny that retain the defining characteristics. A reader would care because the deposit serves as the legal and biological reference that allows others to reproduce and study the exact line.

Core claim

The central claim is a plant of corn variety CV960136, where the variety is identified by the deposit of representative seeds under NCMA Accession No. 202306049.

What carries the argument

The seed deposit under NCMA Accession No. 202306049, which fixes the genetic identity of the variety and allows its faithful reproduction.

If this is right

  • Breeders can obtain the seeds from the depository to use the variety in crossing programs.
  • The variety can be propagated and sold under the protection of the patent.
  • Any hybrid or progeny derived directly from the deposited line falls within the claim scope.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The deposit provides a concrete starting point for independent verification or trait testing by third parties.
  • Commercial seed companies could incorporate this line into new hybrids if licensing terms allow.
  • If the variety carries undisclosed agronomic advantages, the patent creates an exclusive window for their exploitation.

Load-bearing premise

The seeds in the deposit produce plants that are sufficiently distinct, uniform, and stable to qualify as a protectable variety.

What would settle it

Growing plants from the deposited seeds and showing that they do not exhibit consistent, unique traits that set them apart from existing varieties.

read the original abstract

1 . A plant of corn variety CV960136, wherein representative seeds of corn variety CV960136 have been deposited under NCMA Accession No. 202306049.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript consists of a single claim asserting a plant of corn variety CV960136 whose representative seeds have been deposited under NCMA Accession No. 202306049.

Significance. The result, if legally upheld, would secure plant-variety protection for the named corn line. No phenotypic, genotypic, or agronomic data are supplied, so the work contributes no new scientific knowledge or reproducible description of the variety.

major comments (1)
  1. [Claim 1] Claim 1: the sole claim rests exclusively on a seed-deposit statement and supplies no morphological, molecular, or performance descriptors. Without such data the statutory requirements of distinctness, uniformity, and stability cannot be evaluated from the manuscript itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the review. The document is a patent claim for plant-variety protection under U.S. law, not a scientific manuscript intended to convey new agronomic or molecular data. The single claim is drafted to meet statutory enablement requirements through an accessioned seed deposit, which is the accepted legal mechanism for defining the variety.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Claim 1: the sole claim rests exclusively on a seed-deposit statement and supplies no morphological, molecular, or performance descriptors. Without such data the statutory requirements of distinctness, uniformity, and stability cannot be evaluated from the manuscript itself.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the claim text contains no phenotypic or genotypic descriptors. Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and USPTO practice for plant patents and plant-variety protection, enablement is satisfied by a deposit made in a recognized depository (here NCMA Accession No. 202306049). Distinctness, uniformity, and stability are evaluated by the examining authority with reference to the deposited material and any supporting data submitted during prosecution; they are not required to appear in the claim language itself. The present document is limited to the claim; any comparative data reside in the confidential prosecution file or in separate PVP application materials. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; patent claim rests on seed deposit

full rationale

The document is a plant-variety patent whose sole load-bearing claim is the factual existence of corn variety CV960136 defined by a public seed deposit (NCMA Accession No. 202306049). No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or derivations appear; the text contains only a legal claim whose validity is determined by external DUS examination rather than any internal chain that could reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The filing contains no mathematical model, fitted parameters, or theoretical axioms; it is a legal deposit statement whose validity rests on unshown agronomic evidence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5380 in / 911 out tokens · 31894 ms · 2026-05-16T19:00:57.605833+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.