pith. sign in

USPTO: us-12660799 · published 2026-06-23 · patents · A01K 15/025

Electric pet toy

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification patents A01K 15/025
keywords electric pet toymotorized rollerclamping armstorsion springsvertical reciprocating movementpet entertainment devicedetachable fixing device
0
0 comments X

The pith

An electric pet toy uses a motor-driven roller to move a rope and ornament vertically while clamped to objects by torsion-spring arms that keep the axis horizontal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The patent presents a design for an electric pet toy that automates vertical play motion for pets. A motor inside a shell rotates a roller to wind and unwind a rope, causing an attached ornament to move up and down repeatedly. The unit connects to a target object through a fixing device made of two clamping arms linked by torsion springs, which provide the force to hold the toy in place. This arrangement ensures the roller's center shaft stays horizontal during operation. The overall mechanism is meant to allow detachable mounting on furniture or similar surfaces for ongoing pet entertainment without constant human involvement.

Core claim

The electric pet toy comprises a main unit with a shell, driving motor fixed to the shell, and a roller with center shaft connected to the motor output; the motor rotates the roller to wind a rope connected to an ornament for vertical reciprocating movement; a fixing device with two oppositely arranged clamping arms, each with a fixing end in shaft connection to the shell and torsion springs at those ends to generate elastic clamping force, with clamping ends extending outside the shell to detachably attach to a target object while maintaining the center shaft in a horizontal direction.

What carries the argument

The fixing device of two torsion-spring clamping arms that rotate around their fixing ends on the shell to generate elastic clamping force and hold the main unit so the roller center shaft remains horizontal.

If this is right

  • The toy can be attached and removed from different target objects using only the spring force of the arms.
  • Clockwise or counterclockwise rotation of the roller produces consistent vertical reciprocating motion of the ornament.
  • The horizontal shaft orientation is maintained by the clamping arms during attachment to the target object.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The design might extend to other hanging toys or interactive elements beyond the described ornament if the rope attachment point is adapted.
  • Users could test different rope lengths or ornament weights to adjust motion range while keeping the clamping mechanism unchanged.
  • The torsion spring clamping could allow temporary mounting on varied surfaces like chair backs or table edges without permanent fixtures.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanical components will operate reliably and safely around pets even without added specifications for power supply, speed control, rope strength, or injury prevention.

What would settle it

Mount the assembled toy on a typical household object using the clamping arms, power the motor, and observe whether the ornament performs repeated vertical motion while the unit stays attached and the roller axis remains level without tilting or release.

read the original abstract

1 . An electric pet toy, comprising: a main unit, comprising a shell, a driving motor, and a roller, wherein the driving motor is fixed on the shell; the roller comprises a center shaft and side walls that are oppositely arranged on two sides of the center shaft; the center shaft is connected to an output shaft of the driving motor; when working, the driving motor drives the roller to rotate clockwise or counterclockwise; a rope, wherein one end of the rope is connected to the roller, and another end is connected with an ornament; the rope is wound on the center shaft under the rotation of the roller, to drive the ornament to do reciprocating movement in a vertical direction; and a fixing device, wherein one end of the fixing device is connected to the shell, and another end is detachably connected to a target object, so that when the main unit is connected to the target object, the center shaft of the roller is in a horizontal direction; wherein the fixing device comprises two oppositely arranged clamping arms; each of the two clamping arms comprises a fixing end and a clamping end; the two fixing ends are in shaft connection to the shell, to cause the two clamping arms to rotate around the fixing ends; torsion springs are further arranged at the two fixing ends, to generate an elastic clamping force between the two clamping arms; and the clamping ends extend to an outside of the shell to clamp the target object.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a utility patent specification describing an electric pet toy. The central claim details a main unit consisting of a shell, driving motor, and roller (with center shaft and side walls) that winds a rope connected to an ornament, producing vertical reciprocating motion when the motor rotates clockwise or counterclockwise. A fixing device with two oppositely arranged clamping arms (each with fixing and clamping ends, shaft-connected to the shell, and equipped with torsion springs) detachably attaches the unit to a target object while ensuring the roller center shaft remains horizontal.

Significance. The described mechanical assembly provides a compact, clamp-on mechanism for generating vertical pet toy motion via motor-driven winding. The kinematic description is self-contained and internally consistent with no equations, parameters, or derivations to evaluate. As a purely structural specification without testing data, performance metrics, or comparisons, its significance is limited to the inventive arrangement itself rather than validated outcomes or broader engineering insights.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The single-paragraph claim format in the abstract makes the component relationships difficult to parse; standard patent practice uses numbered sub-elements or references to figures for clarity.
  2. No figures, diagrams, or exploded views are referenced or described, which are essential for conveying the spatial arrangement of the roller, rope, and clamping arms.
  3. The description omits any mention of power supply, speed regulation, rope durability, or safety features, which are standard elements in utility patent specifications for consumer devices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing our utility patent specification. As this is a patent document rather than an academic research paper, the requirements differ substantially: patentability rests on the novelty and non-obviousness of the described mechanical arrangement, not on experimental validation or performance metrics.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The described mechanical assembly provides a compact, clamp-on mechanism for generating vertical pet toy motion via motor-driven winding. The kinematic description is self-contained and internally consistent with no equations, parameters, or derivations to evaluate. As a purely structural specification without testing data, performance metrics, or comparisons, its significance is limited to the inventive arrangement itself rather than validated outcomes or broader engineering insights.

    Authors: We agree the significance centers on the inventive structural arrangement. For a utility patent specification this is the appropriate and required focus. Patent law evaluates the claims on the basis of the disclosed structure and function (here, the motor-driven roller with torsion-spring clamping arms ensuring horizontal shaft orientation), without mandating empirical test data or comparative metrics. The self-contained kinematic description is intentional and sufficient for enablement under patent standards. revision: no

  2. Referee: REFEREE RECOMMENDATION: reject

    Authors: We respectfully disagree with the recommendation to reject. The manuscript is a complete utility patent specification whose claims define a novel combination of elements (motor-driven reciprocating ornament via roller, torsion-spring clamp ensuring horizontal orientation). No revisions to add experimental data are appropriate or necessary, as such data are not a prerequisite for patent grant. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is a utility patent specification for a mechanical assembly (motor, roller, rope, ornament, and torsion-spring clamp). It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, performance predictions, or self-citations of theorems. All content is a self-contained structural and kinematic description whose functional claims follow directly from the enumerated components with no reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, scientific axioms, or invented physical entities are present; the document is a mechanical design specification without fitted values or unproven assumptions beyond standard engineering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5783 in / 950 out tokens · 32040 ms · 2026-06-25T18:01:52.608668+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.