pith. sign in

USPTO: us-12660804 · published 2026-06-23 · patents · A01K 97/18· A01K 91/03· A01K 95/02· A01K 97/00

Fish release assembly

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification patents A01K 97/18A01K 91/03A01K 95/02A01K 97/00
keywords fish release assemblysinker releasefishing equipmentspring-loaded plungercylindrical bodylanyardswivelsfishing rig
0
0 comments X

The pith

A fish release assembly uses a hollow cylindrical sinker release with internal spring-loaded plunger to detach weights via lanyard and swivels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a fish release assembly that connects a lanyard to a sinker through a specialized release mechanism. The assembly includes a lanyard with two loops and a pliable structure, a hollow cylindrical body containing a spring-loaded plunger along with a slot and two eyelets, and two swivels linking the cylinder to the rest of the rig. This structure is presented as a way to attach and release a sinker during fishing. A reader would care about the claim if the mechanism allows the sinker to detach reliably without additional tools or loss of equipment. The patent focuses on the operational connection of these parts to achieve the release function.

Core claim

The fish release assembly comprises a lanyard with a first loop, a second loop, and a pliable structure operatively connected to the second loop of the lanyard; a sinker release that is a cylindrical body comprising a spring-loaded plunger, a slot, a first eyelet, and a second eyelet; a first swivel; and a second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is operatively connected to the first swivel and the second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is a hollow body and the spring-loaded plunger resides in the hollow body.

What carries the argument

Hollow cylindrical sinker release containing a spring-loaded plunger that interacts with the slot and eyelets to control sinker attachment and release.

If this is right

  • The swivels permit free rotation to reduce line twist during use.
  • The pliable structure on the lanyard allows flexible positioning of the release point.
  • The hollow body design houses the plunger to protect it while enabling slot-based engagement.
  • The eyelets provide attachment points for connecting to standard fishing line and sinker.
  • The overall assembly integrates into existing fishing rigs without requiring custom tools.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The design could extend to other weighted release scenarios in marine environments where detachment under load is needed.
  • Repeated exposure to saltwater might affect the plunger's spring function, suggesting a need for material durability checks.
  • The slot and eyelet configuration implies the release can be triggered by pulling on the lanyard loop.

Load-bearing premise

The specific arrangement of the spring-loaded plunger within the hollow cylindrical body, slot, and eyelets will reliably engage and disengage the sinker under normal fishing conditions without jamming or structural failure.

What would settle it

A test in which the assembled device is placed under tension simulating a hooked fish and the plunger fails to release the sinker through the slot and eyelets, or jams after repeated cycles.

read the original abstract

1 . A fish release assembly comprising: a lanyard comprising a first loop, a second loop, and a pliable structure operatively connected to the second loop of the lanyard; a sinker release, wherein the sinker release is a cylindrical body comprising: a spring-loaded plunger, a slot, a first eyelet, and a second eyelet; a first swivel; and a second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is operatively connected to the first swivel and the second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is a hollow body and the spring-loaded plunger resides in the hollow body.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a utility patent (US12660804) whose sole claim describes a fish release assembly. It consists of a lanyard having a first loop, a second loop, and a pliable structure connected to the second loop; a cylindrical sinker release formed as a hollow body containing a spring-loaded plunger, a slot, a first eyelet, and a second eyelet; and first and second swivels to which the cylindrical body is operatively connected.

Significance. The document supplies only a structural component listing with no performance data, comparative analysis, operational validation, or theoretical derivation. If the described geometry were shown to function reliably, the assembly might represent a minor incremental design for sinker release in fishing tackle, but the absence of any supporting evidence or novelty demonstration limits significance to the level of an untested mechanical description.

minor comments (2)
  1. The single claim paragraph repeats the same component list without clarifying the intended sequence of assembly, the material specifications, or the kinematic relationship between the plunger, slot, and eyelets during release.
  2. No figures, exploded views, or reference numerals are supplied to accompany the textual description, which is standard for utility patents but leaves the geometry ambiguous.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the referee's report. As this is a utility patent claim describing a fish release assembly, we address the points raised regarding the absence of performance data and novelty demonstration.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The document supplies only a structural component listing with no performance data, comparative analysis, operational validation, or theoretical derivation.

    Authors: The manuscript is a utility patent claim, which by design provides a structural description of the invention rather than empirical data. Patent claims are not required to include performance testing, comparative analysis, or theoretical derivations; they must enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention through the description of components and their operative connections. The claim details the lanyard with first and second loops and pliable structure, the hollow cylindrical sinker release containing the spring-loaded plunger with slot and eyelets, and the swivels, which together define the assembly. revision: no

  2. Referee: If the described geometry were shown to function reliably, the assembly might represent a minor incremental design for sinker release in fishing tackle, but the absence of any supporting evidence or novelty demonstration limits significance to the level of an untested mechanical description.

    Authors: We disagree that the claim lacks a demonstration of novelty. The specific configuration—a lanyard with loops and pliable structure connected via swivels to a hollow cylindrical body housing a spring-loaded plunger—represents a novel combination for a sinker release mechanism in fishing tackle. As a granted US patent (US12660804), the claim has undergone examination for novelty and non-obviousness. The structural elements and their interconnections provide the inventive concept without needing additional validation data in the claim itself. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; patent is pure structural description

full rationale

The document is a utility patent (US12660804) whose sole content is a component-level mechanical claim describing a lanyard, hollow cylindrical sinker release with spring-loaded plunger, slot, eyelets, and swivels. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, hypotheses, datasets, or self-citations appear anywhere in the provided abstract or claim language. All enumerated circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, self-citation load-bearing, etc.) require at least one of those elements and therefore have no target. The reader's assessment of score 0.0 is confirmed by direct inspection of the text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No scientific content; the document is a patent description of a mechanical assembly using standard components. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5641 in / 1086 out tokens · 37684 ms · 2026-06-25T20:30:48.288259+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    A fish release assembly comprising: a lanyard comprising a first loop, a second loop, and a pliable structure operatively connected to the second loop of the lanyard; a sinker release, wherein the sinker release is a cylindrical body comprising: a spring-loaded plunger, a slot, a first eyelet, and a second eyelet; a first swivel; and a second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is operatively connected to the first swivel and the second swivel; wherein the cylindrical body is a hollow body and the spring-loaded plunger resides in the hollow body.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.