Pith Number
pith:2AML24IV
pith:2021:2AML24IV4P6LHLRNSL2E3XEF3K
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Does referent predictability affect the choice of referential form? A computational approach using masked coreference resolution
arxiv:2109.13105 v1 · 2021-09-27 · cs.CL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{2AML24IV4P6LHLRNSL2E3XEF3K}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T03:17:41.395949Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
d018bd7115e3fcb3ae2d92f44ddc85da9f972495842a75dad14802f7ca5fb0a6
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/2AML24IV4P6LHLRNSL2E3XEF3K \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: d018bd7115e3fcb3ae2d92f44ddc85da9f972495842a75dad14802f7ca5fb0a6
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "f47fa851f0ab3f8e6c575c8fabee81c47d2a2dfed32c27562de70a750eda415e",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2021-09-27T14:54:46Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "907ce25e72280309429b55df6ad7e5a090196bb70dfd816e890aab97dca950ec"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2109.13105",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}