Pith Number
pith:AIGDCN3R
pith:2014:AIGDCN3RES3EPHE23EJJQCWFVE
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Is HDF5 a good format to replace UVFITS?
arxiv:1411.0507 v1 · 2014-11-03 · astro-ph.IM
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{AIGDCN3RES3EPHE23EJJQCWFVE}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T02:38:45.288100Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
020c31377124b6479c9ad912980ac5a919e221360c45e13f44d14fe869c19c56
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/AIGDCN3RES3EPHE23EJJQCWFVE \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 020c31377124b6479c9ad912980ac5a919e221360c45e13f44d14fe869c19c56
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "469e24ea983d6f4951b9c875ad10039ee76f0b4f53ee21c5c521b3c39ca5a5f6",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "astro-ph.IM",
"submitted_at": "2014-11-03T14:44:14Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "9395833eefe044d48298848a4192d37a32f88e8dcf35d32b40b40298cd570c2a"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1411.0507",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}