Pith Number
pith:HKMHKJ6I
pith:2025:HKMHKJ6IQMSFZAHMYNRPRMOKNW
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
When can we get away with using the two-way fixed effects regression?
arxiv:2503.05125 v1 · 2025-03-07 · econ.EM
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{HKMHKJ6IQMSFZAHMYNRPRMOKNW}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Cited by
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T10:26:21.485707Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
3a987527c883245c80ecc362f8b1ca6dbba3fb50b64547a1724919f978d5392e
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/HKMHKJ6IQMSFZAHMYNRPRMOKNW \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 3a987527c883245c80ecc362f8b1ca6dbba3fb50b64547a1724919f978d5392e
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "687a38f3a3d044ea8829c0e5ec9e06e3b457dd8d94e97d63cca66bbc006d96d5",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "econ.EM",
"submitted_at": "2025-03-07T04:02:38Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "27cf70031c89d9df5b618fcc8e57dceaf99490fa3f830825f0d74b4fff8f0cab"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2503.05125",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}