Pith Number
pith:HWOQFDDF
pith:2025:HWOQFDDF4GISWHVB5NVEGUJJBO
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Are Any-to-Any Models More Consistent Across Modality Transfers Than Specialists?
arxiv:2505.24211 v1 · 2025-05-30 · cs.CL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{HWOQFDDF4GISWHVB5NVEGUJJBO}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T11:12:44.172813Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
3d9d028c65e1912b1ea1eb6a4351290bbcd913e109ac7b63d87f3b202f08fc18
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/HWOQFDDF4GISWHVB5NVEGUJJBO \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 3d9d028c65e1912b1ea1eb6a4351290bbcd913e109ac7b63d87f3b202f08fc18
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "7d51bd28f82aa4aa3967d04fe82e1c6d0e2215e63fb4be8ce403a96a66771eaa",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2025-05-30T04:51:54Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "d6820cf4caab20574b0c5f9e49b49ebf0bd886ac50877daf7219786b5ce54b47"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2505.24211",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}