Pith Number
pith:KBCX7SV6
pith:2016:KBCX7SV6TYQ3BF7AWY53NT7EBG
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?
arxiv:1611.06390 v1 · 2016-11-19 · hep-lat
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{KBCX7SV6TYQ3BF7AWY53NT7EBG}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Cited by
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T00:54:26.392229Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
50457fcabe9e21b097e0b63bb6cfe4098ef784d2dd28438ac3362ef86a489ba6
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/KBCX7SV6TYQ3BF7AWY53NT7EBG \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 50457fcabe9e21b097e0b63bb6cfe4098ef784d2dd28438ac3362ef86a489ba6
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "cbd1eb3e7e82d651b098c3b894687d851671cf1f38b70e51b05a6e661318b2d1",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "hep-lat",
"submitted_at": "2016-11-19T16:05:33Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "13abe62f2daf1b44e2e43f35d2c639323ad59893b75d83bfd923252cc07ae36b"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1611.06390",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}