Pith Number
pith:MCIKMJQU
pith:2025:MCIKMJQUMGY64GQXM5P6HM6WGR
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Is linguistically-motivated data augmentation worth it?
arxiv:2506.03593 v1 · 2025-06-04 · cs.CL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{MCIKMJQUMGY64GQXM5P6HM6WGR}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T11:15:48.492675Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
6090a6261461b1ee1a17675fe3b3d6347f0a7669209e8b46c30439180b134f43
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/MCIKMJQUMGY64GQXM5P6HM6WGR \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 6090a6261461b1ee1a17675fe3b3d6347f0a7669209e8b46c30439180b134f43
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "f3e8604602a64e59ab095816886f9df161c53ae854a9a475dec85621b4bb163a",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2025-06-04T05:48:20Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "f4deace009c30c7a55d902c7a622e969ac564415d98e696830c1a3d5e5465676"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2506.03593",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}