Pith Number
pith:MPJCUN4F
pith:2017:MPJCUN4FG5HWS74S5CD3FFNWDG
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Why does the sign problem occur in evaluating the overlap of HFB wave functions?
arxiv:1711.00369 v2 · 2017-11-01 · nucl-th
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{MPJCUN4FG5HWS74S5CD3FFNWDG}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T00:22:18.642542Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
63d22a3785374f697f92e887b295b619a00429f96461df5e3f7d30583b095396
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/MPJCUN4FG5HWS74S5CD3FFNWDG \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 63d22a3785374f697f92e887b295b619a00429f96461df5e3f7d30583b095396
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "582ba628298b4f8a4443209895a00e228433bf1a74161389915e8d7b45a1fae2",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "nucl-th",
"submitted_at": "2017-11-01T14:39:31Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "d36695803594de459de3b00442b95a88cd61118176ab76fab4c065bb2df6b034"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1711.00369",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}