Pith Number
pith:OME4WBM2
pith:2020:OME4WBM2HSRPD4DBWWLV2G4SD6
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Can RNNs trained on harder subject-verb agreement instances still perform well on easier ones?
arxiv:2010.04976 v2 · 2020-10-10 · cs.CL · cs.LG
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{OME4WBM2HSRPD4DBWWLV2G4SD6}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T02:30:29.723951Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
7309cb059a3ca2f1f061b5975d1b921fbc0c12284ca626f7da6f433a57298f68
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/OME4WBM2HSRPD4DBWWLV2G4SD6 \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 7309cb059a3ca2f1f061b5975d1b921fbc0c12284ca626f7da6f433a57298f68
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "9471374eea37bc3a72ce083d04b81c4bf9913d4a66a1a55281bea59156150ab6",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"cs.LG"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2020-10-10T11:30:58Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "b68c268ef39b6c01f5adb8b1c1b85c1e6d46e7146e03360728fdb4eeb6898f01"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2010.04976",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}