Pith Number
pith:OVDPJFMH
pith:2020:OVDPJFMHKQAT2PRAJEOX7NFVRK
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Does jackknife scale really matter for accurate large-scale structure covariances?
arxiv:2004.13436 v2 · 2020-04-28 · astro-ph.CO
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{OVDPJFMHKQAT2PRAJEOX7NFVRK}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T02:57:07.325923Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
7546f4958754013d3e20491d7fb4b58a849906b86698edaa99f616f5ef2652e8
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/OVDPJFMHKQAT2PRAJEOX7NFVRK \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 7546f4958754013d3e20491d7fb4b58a849906b86698edaa99f616f5ef2652e8
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "d8fd8bec7694c9c0ef84d1bd5fd5010a8877c480efc65299b8efabfa6a1532f4",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "astro-ph.CO",
"submitted_at": "2020-04-28T11:40:56Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "aca393b9c7c4d3c2b9bfbadf23055be5ab153c448daf4f2560d1252ec314e579"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2004.13436",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}